Doing Replication Research in Applied LinguisticsInference and Generalizability in Applied LinguisticsResearch Methods in Applied LinguisticsStimulated Recall Methodology in Applied Linguistics and L2 ResearchDoing Applied LinguisticsAn A–Z of Applied Linguistics Research MethodsQualitative Research in Applied LinguisticsCase Study Research in Applied LinguisticsWriting about Quantitative Research in Applied LinguisticsResearch Methods for Language TeachingData Collection Research Methods in Applied LinguisticsContinuum Companion to Research Methods in Applied LinguisticsApplied Communication Research MethodsResearch Methods in LinguisticsResearch Methods in Applied SettingsGrounded Theory in Applied Linguistics ResearchSecond Language Research MethodsResearch Methods for Applied Language StudiesExperimental Research Methods in Language LearningThe Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied LinguisticsDoing Research in Applied LinguisticsA Dictionary of Research Methodology and Statistics in Applied LinguisticsResearch Methods for English Language TeachersResearching Second Language ClassroomsCritical Sociolinguistic Research MethodsResearch Methods in Second Language PsycholinguisticsSecond Language Research Methods Oxford Applied Linguistics:Quantitative Methods for Second Language ResearchResearch Methods in Second Language AcquisitionResearch Methods in Applied LinguisticsResearch Methods in Applied LinguisticsLanguage, Literacy, and Learning in STEM EducationQuantitative Research in LinguisticsEthics in Applied Linguistics ResearchResearch Methods in LinguisticsThe Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research MethodologyResearch Methods for Complexity Theory in Applied LinguisticsResearch in Applied LinguisticsThe Psychology of Second Language Acquisition Oxford Applied LinguisticsThe Routledge Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics

Research methods in applied linguistics

Cross-Cultural Pragmatics

Bylaws of the international association for the scientific study of mental deficiency.

Like predatory journals, predatory conferences are a growing part of the academic landscape, but unlike their journal counterparts, to date predatory conferences have not been extensively investigated, and many unanswered questions about their workings exist. From a positive ethics perspective, a more complete understanding of predatory conferences is desirable, as it can support researchers in making ethically appropriate choices about conference attendance. Ten predatory conference organisations were the focus of this study. The investigation first set out to identify and document the attributes of such conferences. They were then analysed to understand which attributes can most easily and reliably be used to distinguish them from legitimate conferences. A tool to assist prospective participants is introduced. The implications for positive ethics, in terms of making decisions about conference attendance, are discussed.

Predatory Conferences: What Are the Signs?

According to van Eemeren, argumentation theory is a hybrid discipline, because it requires a multidisciplinary, if not interdisciplinary approach, combining descriptive and normative insights. He points out that modern argumentation theorists give substance to the discipline by relying either on a dialectical perspective, concentrating on the reasonableness of argumentation, or on a rhetorical perspective, concentrating on its effectiveness. Both the dialectical and the rhetorical perspective are interpreted in ways related to how they were viewed by Aristotle, but in modern argumentation theory the relationship between the two, captured in Aristotle’s term antistrophos, is lost. According to van Eemeren, this relationship, which he considers crucial to a full-fledged argumentation theory, has been recovered in extended pragma-dialectics with the help of the theoretical notion of ‘strategic manoeuvring.’

In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.

In the academic community, predatory publishers are exploiting academic integrity and the open access publishing model. Academicians receive numerous spam e-mail messages inviting article submissions each day which deceive authors by promising fast review and publication. The content of these emails present arguments in a way to appear as legitimate and valid to grab the attention of authors. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to advance insights into the arguments deployed by fake journals in their attempt to convey specific indexicalities of identity and truthfulness. As a result of thematic analysis of 50 email messages from such journals, this research drew on two main themes-explicit and implicit arguments and their most frequent subcategories which were formal lexicon/grammar and fast peer- reviewed process. These arguments were, further, mapped on to Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation to find out more about the strength of the information used to support their claim. Utilizing Toulmin’s model, the findings highlighted the fact that there were instances of discursive deviations or “hidden rebuttals” that revealed the predatory journals’ ingenuity.

Exploring Arguments Presented in Predatory Journals Using Toulmin's Model of Argumentation.

Investigating supervision comments, as a form of interaction between the teacher and the learner, is an area of research that has received little attention so far in spite of being crucial in creat...

A Comparative Study of the Use of Affective Markers in Supervision Comments: Case of Native versus Non-native Supervision Comments

Grounded in Vygotsky's sociocultural theory of mind, dynamic assessment (DA) procedures integrate assessment and instruction into one unified activity. Mediation as the core concept of DA is defined as the assistance and the feedback offered by the mediator to the learners while engaging in the process of assessment. This study aimed at addressing the effect of DA training on the meditational moves of student mediators regarding a writing accuracy task in small groups in an EFL classroom. A multiple case study design was used in this study. Five students underwent DA training during which they were exposed to a large classroom DA by a teacher mediator followed by basic theoretical underpinnings of DA as well as mock DA practice and discussion. Data were collected though video records of DA training workshops and Group Dynamic Assessment sessions. Additionally, stimulated recall was used to help student mediators reflect on the interactions. Language-related episodes were used for data analysis. The findings showed that DA training resulted in qualitative and quantitative changes in the meditational moves of student mediators, which calls for incorporating of small group DA as an essential complementary to large classroom DA and learner-centered approaches to teaching and assessment in the EFL classrooms.

https://www.teljournal.org/article_140223_0852001f59f70bd2a1ffe6b43ce41412.pdf

Dynamic Assessment Training and Mediational Strategies of EFL Student Mediators

This study aimed to investigate the application of Group Dynamic Assessment (GDA) to writing accuracy of EFL learners and explore whether secondary interactants could benefit from interactions between mediator and primary interactants. The idea of implementing DA (Dynamic Assessment) in dyads seems unworkable since teachers are required to teach the whole class (Guk & Kellog, 2007). Moreover, Lantolf and Poehner (2004) suggest a new approach to DA that is GDA, which involves applying DA with a large number of learners rather than individuals. Following a multiple case study design and interactionist DA, the development of ten students in a class of twenty five was tracked during the eight sessions of DA program. Data were collected though written artifacts, video-recording of interactions, interview, and observation. The results indicated that GDA was an effective way of helping learners overcome their linguistic problems and there were signs of microgenetic as well as macrogenetic development within the same DA session and across sessions. The present findings provide further insight into understanding how secondary interactants benefit from the interactions between mediator and primary interactants.

Soroor Ashtarian

Papers

Exploring Arguments Presented in Predatory Journals Using Toulmin's Model of Argumentation.

A Comparative Study of the Use of Affective Markers in Supervision Comments: Case of Native versus Non-native Supervision Comments

Dynamic Assessment Training and Mediational Strategies of EFL Student Mediators

Group Dynamic Assessment in an EFL Classroom: Do Secondary Interactants Benefit?