scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Stan Z. Li

Bio: Stan Z. Li is an academic researcher from Westlake University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Facial recognition system & Face detection. The author has an hindex of 97, co-authored 532 publications receiving 41793 citations. Previous affiliations of Stan Z. Li include Microsoft & Macau University of Science and Technology.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A texture-constrained active shape model (TC-ASM) to localize a face in an image that performs stable to initialization, accurate in shape localization and robust to illumination variation, with low computational cost.

77 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
Li Zhao1, Wei Qi2, Stan Z. Li2, Shiqiang Yang1, Hong-Jiang Zhang2 
04 Nov 2000
TL;DR: This paper proposes to use the “breakpoints” of feature trajectory of a video shot as the key frames and use the lines passing through these points to represent the shot to achieve a better performance.
Abstract: Query by key frame or video example is a convenient and often effective way to search in video database. This paper proposes a new approach to support such searches. The main contribution of the proposed approach is the consideration of both feature extraction and distance computation as a whole process. With a video shot represented by key-frames corresponding to feature points in a feature space, a new metric is defined to measure the distance between a query image and a shot based on the concept of Nearest Feature Line (NFL). We propose to use the “breakpoints” of feature trajectory of a video shot as the key frames and use the lines passing through these points to represent the shot. When combined with the NFL method, it helps to achieve a better performance, as evidenced by experiments.

76 citations

Proceedings Article
01 Jan 2002
TL;DR: FloatBoost uses a backtrack mechanism after each iteration of AdaBoost to remove weak classifiers which cause higher error rates, and proposes a statistical model for learning weak classifier, based on a stagewise approximation of the posterior using an overcomplete set of scalar features.
Abstract: AdaBoost [3] minimizes an upper error bound which is an exponential function of the margin on the training set [14]. However, the ultimate goal in applications of pattern classification is always minimum error rate. On the other hand, AdaBoost needs an effective procedure for learning weak classifiers, which by itself is difficult especially for high dimensional data. In this paper, we present a novel procedure, called FloatBoost, for learning a better boosted classifier. FloatBoost uses a backtrack mechanism after each iteration of AdaBoost to remove weak classifiers which cause higher error rates. The resulting float-boosted classifier consists of fewer weak classifiers yet achieves lower error rates than AdaBoost in both training and test. We also propose a statistical model for learning weak classifiers, based on a stagewise approximation of the posterior using an overcomplete set of scalar features. Experimental comparisons of FloatBoost and AdaBoost are provided through a difficult classification problem, face detection, where the goal is to learn from training examples a highly nonlinear classifier to differentiate between face and nonface patterns in a high dimensional space. The results clearly demonstrate the promises made by FloatBoost over AdaBoost.

75 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
Weilong Yang1, Dong Yi1, Zhen Lei1, Jitao Sang1, Stan Z. Li1 
01 Sep 2008
TL;DR: This paper proposes a learning based 2D-3D face matching method using the CCA to learn the mapping between 2D face image and 3D face data, and a patch based strategy is proposed to boost the accuracy of matching.
Abstract: In recent years, 3D face recognition has obtained much attention. Using 2D face image as probe and 3D face data as gallery is an alternative method to deal with computation complexity, expensive equipment and fussy pretreatment in 3D face recognition systems. In this paper we propose a learning based 2D-3D face matching method using the CCA to learn the mapping between 2D face image and 3D face data. This method makes it possible to match the on-site 2D face image with enrolled 3D face data. Our 2D-3D face matching method decreased the computation complexity drastically compared to the conventional 3D-3D face matching while keeping relative high recognition rate. Furthermore, to simplify the mapping between 2D face image and 3D face data, a patch based strategy is proposed to boost the accuracy of matching. And the kernel method is also evaluated to reveal the non-linear relationship. The experiment results show that CCA based method has good performance and patch based method has significant improvement compared to the holistic method.

74 citations

Book ChapterDOI
16 Oct 2005
TL;DR: This paper proposes to use Local Binary Pattern features to represent 3D faces and presents a statistical learning procedure for feature selection and classifier learning, which leads to a matching engine for 3D face recognition.
Abstract: 2D intensity images and 3D shape models are both useful for face recognition, but in different ways. While algorithms have long been developed using 2D or 3D data, recently has seen work on combining both into multi-modal face biometrics to achieve higher performance. However, the fusion of the two modalities has mostly been at the decision level, based on scores obtained from independent 2D and 3D matchers. In this paper, we propose a systematic framework for fusing 2D and 3D face recognition at both feature and decision levels, by exploring synergies of the two modalities at these levels. The novelties are the following. First, we propose to use Local Binary Pattern (LBP) features to represent 3D faces and present a statistical learning procedure for feature selection and classifier learning. This leads to a matching engine for 3D face recognition. Second, we propose a statistical learning approach for fusing 2D and 3D based face recognition at both feature and decision levels. Experiments show that the fusion at both levels yields significantly better performance than fusion at the decision level.

73 citations


Cited by
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
27 Jun 2016
TL;DR: Compared to state-of-the-art detection systems, YOLO makes more localization errors but is less likely to predict false positives on background, and outperforms other detection methods, including DPM and R-CNN, when generalizing from natural images to other domains like artwork.
Abstract: We present YOLO, a new approach to object detection. Prior work on object detection repurposes classifiers to perform detection. Instead, we frame object detection as a regression problem to spatially separated bounding boxes and associated class probabilities. A single neural network predicts bounding boxes and class probabilities directly from full images in one evaluation. Since the whole detection pipeline is a single network, it can be optimized end-to-end directly on detection performance. Our unified architecture is extremely fast. Our base YOLO model processes images in real-time at 45 frames per second. A smaller version of the network, Fast YOLO, processes an astounding 155 frames per second while still achieving double the mAP of other real-time detectors. Compared to state-of-the-art detection systems, YOLO makes more localization errors but is less likely to predict false positives on background. Finally, YOLO learns very general representations of objects. It outperforms other detection methods, including DPM and R-CNN, when generalizing from natural images to other domains like artwork.

27,256 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis.
Abstract: Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

13,246 citations

Christopher M. Bishop1
01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Probability distributions of linear models for regression and classification are given in this article, along with a discussion of combining models and combining models in the context of machine learning and classification.
Abstract: Probability Distributions.- Linear Models for Regression.- Linear Models for Classification.- Neural Networks.- Kernel Methods.- Sparse Kernel Machines.- Graphical Models.- Mixture Models and EM.- Approximate Inference.- Sampling Methods.- Continuous Latent Variables.- Sequential Data.- Combining Models.

10,141 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work considers the problem of automatically recognizing human faces from frontal views with varying expression and illumination, as well as occlusion and disguise, and proposes a general classification algorithm for (image-based) object recognition based on a sparse representation computed by C1-minimization.
Abstract: We consider the problem of automatically recognizing human faces from frontal views with varying expression and illumination, as well as occlusion and disguise. We cast the recognition problem as one of classifying among multiple linear regression models and argue that new theory from sparse signal representation offers the key to addressing this problem. Based on a sparse representation computed by C1-minimization, we propose a general classification algorithm for (image-based) object recognition. This new framework provides new insights into two crucial issues in face recognition: feature extraction and robustness to occlusion. For feature extraction, we show that if sparsity in the recognition problem is properly harnessed, the choice of features is no longer critical. What is critical, however, is whether the number of features is sufficiently large and whether the sparse representation is correctly computed. Unconventional features such as downsampled images and random projections perform just as well as conventional features such as eigenfaces and Laplacianfaces, as long as the dimension of the feature space surpasses certain threshold, predicted by the theory of sparse representation. This framework can handle errors due to occlusion and corruption uniformly by exploiting the fact that these errors are often sparse with respect to the standard (pixel) basis. The theory of sparse representation helps predict how much occlusion the recognition algorithm can handle and how to choose the training images to maximize robustness to occlusion. We conduct extensive experiments on publicly available databases to verify the efficacy of the proposed algorithm and corroborate the above claims.

9,658 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An analytical strategy for integrating scRNA-seq data sets based on common sources of variation is introduced, enabling the identification of shared populations across data sets and downstream comparative analysis.
Abstract: Computational single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) methods have been successfully applied to experiments representing a single condition, technology, or species to discover and define cellular phenotypes. However, identifying subpopulations of cells that are present across multiple data sets remains challenging. Here, we introduce an analytical strategy for integrating scRNA-seq data sets based on common sources of variation, enabling the identification of shared populations across data sets and downstream comparative analysis. We apply this approach, implemented in our R toolkit Seurat (http://satijalab.org/seurat/), to align scRNA-seq data sets of peripheral blood mononuclear cells under resting and stimulated conditions, hematopoietic progenitors sequenced using two profiling technologies, and pancreatic cell 'atlases' generated from human and mouse islets. In each case, we learn distinct or transitional cell states jointly across data sets, while boosting statistical power through integrated analysis. Our approach facilitates general comparisons of scRNA-seq data sets, potentially deepening our understanding of how distinct cell states respond to perturbation, disease, and evolution.

7,741 citations