scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Stan Z. Li

Bio: Stan Z. Li is an academic researcher from Westlake University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Facial recognition system & Face detection. The author has an hindex of 97, co-authored 532 publications receiving 41793 citations. Previous affiliations of Stan Z. Li include Microsoft & Macau University of Science and Technology.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Wu et al. as discussed by the authors proposed a relation-based frequency adaptive GNN (RFA-GNN) to handle both heterophily and heterogeneity in a unified framework.
Abstract: Graph neural networks (GNNs) have been playing important roles in various graph-related tasks. However, most existing GNNs are based on the assumption of homophily, so they cannot be directly generalized to heterophily settings where connected nodes may have different features and class labels. Moreover, real-world graphs often arise from highly entangled latent factors, but the existing GNNs tend to ignore this and simply denote the heterogeneous relations between nodes as binary-valued homogeneous edges. In this article, we propose a novel relation-based frequency adaptive GNN (RFA-GNN) to handle both heterophily and heterogeneity in a unified framework. RFA-GNN first decomposes an input graph into multiple relation graphs, each representing a latent relation. More importantly, we provide detailed theoretical analysis from the perspective of spectral signal processing. Based on this, we propose a relation-based frequency adaptive mechanism that adaptively picks up signals of different frequencies in each corresponding relation space in the message-passing process. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show qualitatively and quantitatively that RFA-GNN yields truly encouraging results for both the heterophily and heterogeneity settings. Codes are publicly available at: https://github.com/LirongWu/RFA-GNN.

4 citations

Journal Article
Jie Yang, Y. Ma, Xu Zhang, Stan Z. Li, Y. Zhang 
TL;DR: An algorithm for selecting initial cluster centers on the basis of minimum spanning tree (MST) is presented and a MST-based initialization method for the k-means algorithm is presented, and the corresponding time complexity is analyzed.
Abstract: Abstract—The traditional k-means algorithm has been widely used as a simple and efficient clustering method. However, the algorithm often converges to local minima for the reason that it is sensitive to the initial cluster centers. In this paper, an algorithm for selecting initial cluster centers on the basis of minimum spanning tree (MST) is presented. The set of vertices in MST with same degree are regarded as a whole which is used to find the skeleton data points. Furthermore, a distance measure between the skeleton data points with consideration of degree and Euclidean distance is presented. Finally, MST-based initialization method for the k-means algorithm is presented, and the corresponding time complexity is analyzed as well. The presented algorithm is tested on five data sets from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. The experimental results illustrate the effectiveness of the presented algorithm compared to three existing initialization methods.

4 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2015
TL;DR: An introduction to face recognition from a computational model view and a description of four main computational modules in the process, namely face detection, face normalization, face feature extraction, and feature matching are presented.
Abstract: Face recognition by machine is a technique that automatically recognizes human beings from images. It is a cross topic involving techniques from pattern recognition, computer vision, image processing, and so on. This article presents an introduction to face recognition from a computational model view. The concept of face recognition is briefly introduced. This is followed by a description of four main computational modules in the process, namely face detection, face normalization, face feature extraction, and feature matching. Finally, existing challenges and future research directions in real world face recognition are discussed.

4 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , a contrastive visual-textual transformation for SLR is proposed to fully explore the pretrained knowledge of both the visual and language modalities, and the VAE implicitly aligns visual and textual modalities while benefiting from pretrained contextual knowledge as the traditional contextual module.
Abstract: Sign language recognition (SLR) is a weakly supervised task that annotates sign videos as textual glosses. Recent studies show that insufficient training caused by the lack of large-scale available sign datasets becomes the main bottleneck for SLR. Most SLR works thereby adopt pretrained visual modules and develop two mainstream solutions. The multi-stream architectures extend multi-cue visual features, yielding the current SOTA performances but requiring complex designs and might introduce potential noise. Alternatively, the advanced single-cue SLR frameworks using explicit cross-modal alignment between visual and textual modalities are simple and effective, potentially competitive with the multi-cue framework. In this work, we propose a novel contrastive visual-textual transformation for SLR, CVT-SLR, to fully explore the pretrained knowledge of both the visual and language modalities. Based on the single-cue cross-modal alignment framework, we propose a variational autoencoder (VAE) for pretrained contextual knowledge while introducing the complete pretrained language module. The VAE implicitly aligns visual and textual modalities while benefiting from pretrained contextual knowledge as the traditional contextual module. Meanwhile, a contrastive cross-modal alignment algorithm is designed to explicitly enhance the consistency constraints. Extensive experiments on public datasets (PHOENIX-2014 and PHOENIX-2014T) demonstrate that our proposed CVT-SLR consistently outperforms existing single-cue methods and even outperforms SOTA multi-cue methods.

4 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2009
TL;DR: In this article, a probabilistic distribution function has two essential elements: the form of the function and the involved parameters, which are the essential elements for estimating the in-volved parameters.
Abstract: A probabilistic distribution function has two essential elements: the form of the function and the involved parameters For example, the joint distribu­tion of an MRF is characterized by a Gibbs function with a set of clique potential parameters; and the noise by a zero-mean Gaussian distribution parameterized by a variance A probability model is incomplete if the in­volved parameters are not all specified even if the functional form of the distribution is known While formulating the forms of objective functions such as the posterior distribution has long been a subject of research for in vision, estimating the involved parameters has a much shorter history Generally, it is performed by optimizing a statistical criterion, eg using existing techniques such as maximum likelihood, coding, pseudo-likelihood, expectation-maximization, Bayes

4 citations


Cited by
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
27 Jun 2016
TL;DR: Compared to state-of-the-art detection systems, YOLO makes more localization errors but is less likely to predict false positives on background, and outperforms other detection methods, including DPM and R-CNN, when generalizing from natural images to other domains like artwork.
Abstract: We present YOLO, a new approach to object detection. Prior work on object detection repurposes classifiers to perform detection. Instead, we frame object detection as a regression problem to spatially separated bounding boxes and associated class probabilities. A single neural network predicts bounding boxes and class probabilities directly from full images in one evaluation. Since the whole detection pipeline is a single network, it can be optimized end-to-end directly on detection performance. Our unified architecture is extremely fast. Our base YOLO model processes images in real-time at 45 frames per second. A smaller version of the network, Fast YOLO, processes an astounding 155 frames per second while still achieving double the mAP of other real-time detectors. Compared to state-of-the-art detection systems, YOLO makes more localization errors but is less likely to predict false positives on background. Finally, YOLO learns very general representations of objects. It outperforms other detection methods, including DPM and R-CNN, when generalizing from natural images to other domains like artwork.

27,256 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis.
Abstract: Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

13,246 citations

Christopher M. Bishop1
01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Probability distributions of linear models for regression and classification are given in this article, along with a discussion of combining models and combining models in the context of machine learning and classification.
Abstract: Probability Distributions.- Linear Models for Regression.- Linear Models for Classification.- Neural Networks.- Kernel Methods.- Sparse Kernel Machines.- Graphical Models.- Mixture Models and EM.- Approximate Inference.- Sampling Methods.- Continuous Latent Variables.- Sequential Data.- Combining Models.

10,141 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work considers the problem of automatically recognizing human faces from frontal views with varying expression and illumination, as well as occlusion and disguise, and proposes a general classification algorithm for (image-based) object recognition based on a sparse representation computed by C1-minimization.
Abstract: We consider the problem of automatically recognizing human faces from frontal views with varying expression and illumination, as well as occlusion and disguise. We cast the recognition problem as one of classifying among multiple linear regression models and argue that new theory from sparse signal representation offers the key to addressing this problem. Based on a sparse representation computed by C1-minimization, we propose a general classification algorithm for (image-based) object recognition. This new framework provides new insights into two crucial issues in face recognition: feature extraction and robustness to occlusion. For feature extraction, we show that if sparsity in the recognition problem is properly harnessed, the choice of features is no longer critical. What is critical, however, is whether the number of features is sufficiently large and whether the sparse representation is correctly computed. Unconventional features such as downsampled images and random projections perform just as well as conventional features such as eigenfaces and Laplacianfaces, as long as the dimension of the feature space surpasses certain threshold, predicted by the theory of sparse representation. This framework can handle errors due to occlusion and corruption uniformly by exploiting the fact that these errors are often sparse with respect to the standard (pixel) basis. The theory of sparse representation helps predict how much occlusion the recognition algorithm can handle and how to choose the training images to maximize robustness to occlusion. We conduct extensive experiments on publicly available databases to verify the efficacy of the proposed algorithm and corroborate the above claims.

9,658 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An analytical strategy for integrating scRNA-seq data sets based on common sources of variation is introduced, enabling the identification of shared populations across data sets and downstream comparative analysis.
Abstract: Computational single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) methods have been successfully applied to experiments representing a single condition, technology, or species to discover and define cellular phenotypes. However, identifying subpopulations of cells that are present across multiple data sets remains challenging. Here, we introduce an analytical strategy for integrating scRNA-seq data sets based on common sources of variation, enabling the identification of shared populations across data sets and downstream comparative analysis. We apply this approach, implemented in our R toolkit Seurat (http://satijalab.org/seurat/), to align scRNA-seq data sets of peripheral blood mononuclear cells under resting and stimulated conditions, hematopoietic progenitors sequenced using two profiling technologies, and pancreatic cell 'atlases' generated from human and mouse islets. In each case, we learn distinct or transitional cell states jointly across data sets, while boosting statistical power through integrated analysis. Our approach facilitates general comparisons of scRNA-seq data sets, potentially deepening our understanding of how distinct cell states respond to perturbation, disease, and evolution.

7,741 citations