Author
Stefaan Cottenier
Other affiliations: Catholic University of Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, RWTH Aachen University
Bio: Stefaan Cottenier is an academic researcher from Ghent University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Hyperfine structure & Density functional theory. The author has an hindex of 26, co-authored 111 publications receiving 3424 citations. Previous affiliations of Stefaan Cottenier include Catholic University of Leuven & Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Ghent University1, Forschungszentrum Jülich2, Aalto University3, Åbo Akademi University4, Vienna University of Technology5, Duke University6, University of Grenoble7, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne8, Durham University9, International School for Advanced Studies10, Max Planck Society11, Uppsala University12, Humboldt University of Berlin13, Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society14, Technical University of Denmark15, National Institute of Standards and Technology16, University of Udine17, Université catholique de Louvain18, University of Basel19, Harvard University20, University of California, Davis21, Rutgers University22, University of York23, Wake Forest University24, Science and Technology Facilities Council25, University of Oxford26, University of Vienna27, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology28, Dresden University of Technology29, Radboud University Nijmegen30, University of Tokyo31, Centre national de la recherche scientifique32, University of Cambridge33, Royal Holloway, University of London34, University of California, Santa Barbara35, University of Luxembourg36, Los Alamos National Laboratory37, Harbin Institute of Technology38
TL;DR: A procedure to assess the precision of DFT methods was devised and used to demonstrate reproducibility among many of the most widely used DFT codes, demonstrating that the precisionof DFT implementations can be determined, even in the absence of one absolute reference code.
Abstract: The widespread popularity of density functional theory has given rise to an extensive range of dedicated codes for predicting molecular and crystalline properties. However, each code implements the formalism in a different way, raising questions about the reproducibility of such predictions. We report the results of a community-wide effort that compared 15 solid-state codes, using 40 different potentials or basis set types, to assess the quality of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof equations of state for 71 elemental crystals. We conclude that predictions from recent codes and pseudopotentials agree very well, with pairwise differences that are comparable to those between different high-precision experiments. Older methods, however, have less precise agreement. Our benchmark provides a framework for users and developers to document the precision of new applications and methodological improvements.
1,141 citations
TL;DR: A practical protocol is proposed that allows any scientist—experimental or theoretical—to determine justifiable error estimates for many basic property predictions, without having to perform additional DFT calculations.
Abstract: Predictions of observable properties by density-functional theory calculations (DFT) are used increasingly often by experimental condensed-matter physicists and materials engineers as data. These predictions are used to analyze recent measurements, or to plan future experiments in a rational way. Increasingly more experimental scientists in these fields therefore face the natural question: what is the expected error for such a first-principles prediction? Information and experience about this question is implicitly available in the computational community, scattered over two decades of literature. The present review aims to summarize and quantify this implicit knowledge. This eventually leads to a practical protocol that allows any scientist—experimental or theoretical—to determine justifiable error estimates for many basic property predictions, without having to perform additional DFT calculations. A central role is played by a large and diverse test set of crystalline solids, containing all ground-state...
409 citations
Université catholique de Louvain1, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières2, University of Paris3, Université Paris-Saclay4, University of Liège5, Université de Montréal6, Ghent University7, Rutgers University8, Wake Forest University9, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg10, University of California, Berkeley11, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory12, University of Cantabria13, West Virginia University14, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven15, Dalhousie University16
TL;DR: An analysis of the impact that Abinit has had, through for example the bibliometric indicators of the 2009 publication, and the new capabilities of abinit that have been implemented during the last three years are covered, complementing a recent update of the2009 article published in 2016.
347 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a comprehensive review of density-functional theory calculations (DFT) error analysis for a large set of crystalline solids, containing all ground-state elemental crystals (except most lanthanides).
Abstract: Predictions of observable properties by density-functional theory calculations (DFT) are used increasingly often in experimental condensed-matter physics and materials engineering as data. These predictions are used to analyze recent measurements, or to plan future experiments. Increasingly more experimental scientists in these fields therefore face the natural question: what is the expected error for such an ab initio prediction? Information and experience about this question is scattered over two decades of literature. The present review aims to summarize and quantify this implicit knowledge. This leads to a practical protocol that allows any scientist - experimental or theoretical - to determine justifiable error estimates for many basic property predictions, without having to perform additional DFT calculations. A central role is played by a large and diverse test set of crystalline solids, containing all ground-state elemental crystals (except most lanthanides). For several properties of each crystal, the difference between DFT results and experimental values is assessed. We discuss trends in these deviations and review explanations suggested in the literature. A prerequisite for such an error analysis is that different implementations of the same first-principles formalism provide the same predictions. Therefore, the reproducibility of predictions across several mainstream methods and codes is discussed too. A quality factor Delta expresses the spread in predictions from two distinct DFT implementations by a single number. To compare the PAW method to the highly accurate APW+lo approach, a code assessment of VASP and GPAW with respect to WIEN2k yields Delta values of 1.9 and 3.3 meV/atom, respectively. These differences are an order of magnitude smaller than the typical difference with experiment, and therefore predictions by APW+lo and PAW are for practical purposes identical.
341 citations
01 Jan 2004
197 citations
Cited by
More filters
[...]
TL;DR: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one, which seems an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.
Abstract: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.
Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …
33,785 citations
Journal Article•
28,685 citations
[...]
TL;DR: In this paper, a sedimentological core and petrographic characterisation of samples from eleven boreholes from the Lower Carboniferous of Bowland Basin (Northwest England) is presented.
Abstract: Deposits of clastic carbonate-dominated (calciclastic) sedimentary slope systems in the rock record have been identified mostly as linearly-consistent carbonate apron deposits, even though most ancient clastic carbonate slope deposits fit the submarine fan systems better. Calciclastic submarine fans are consequently rarely described and are poorly understood. Subsequently, very little is known especially in mud-dominated calciclastic submarine fan systems. Presented in this study are a sedimentological core and petrographic characterisation of samples from eleven boreholes from the Lower Carboniferous of Bowland Basin (Northwest England) that reveals a >250 m thick calciturbidite complex deposited in a calciclastic submarine fan setting. Seven facies are recognised from core and thin section characterisation and are grouped into three carbonate turbidite sequences. They include: 1) Calciturbidites, comprising mostly of highto low-density, wavy-laminated bioclast-rich facies; 2) low-density densite mudstones which are characterised by planar laminated and unlaminated muddominated facies; and 3) Calcidebrites which are muddy or hyper-concentrated debrisflow deposits occurring as poorly-sorted, chaotic, mud-supported floatstones. These
9,929 citations
University of Udine1, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne2, University of Lugano3, Leipzig University4, University of Paris5, University of North Texas6, Princeton University7, National Research Council8, International School for Advanced Studies9, Cornell University10, University of Lincoln11, University of Milan12, École Polytechnique13, International Centre for Theoretical Physics14, University of Paderborn15, University of Oxford16, Jožef Stefan Institute17, University of Padua18, Sapienza University of Rome19, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology20, University of British Columbia21, University of Lorraine22, Centre national de la recherche scientifique23, École Normale Supérieure24, University of Zurich25, Université Paris-Saclay26, Wake Forest University27, Temple University28
TL;DR: Recent extensions and improvements are described, covering new methodologies and property calculators, improved parallelization, code modularization, and extended interoperability both within the distribution and with external software.
Abstract: Quantum ESPRESSO is an integrated suite of open-source computer codes for quantum simulations of materials using state-of-the-art electronic-structure techniques, based on density-functional theory, density-functional perturbation theory, and many-body perturbation theory, within the plane-wave pseudopotential and projector-augmented-wave approaches Quantum ESPRESSO owes its popularity to the wide variety of properties and processes it allows to simulate, to its performance on an increasingly broad array of hardware architectures, and to a community of researchers that rely on its capabilities as a core open-source development platform to implement their ideas In this paper we describe recent extensions and improvements, covering new methodologies and property calculators, improved parallelization, code modularization, and extended interoperability both within the distribution and with external software
3,638 citations