scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Stéphane Peineau

Bio: Stéphane Peineau is an academic researcher from University of Picardie Jules Verne. The author has contributed to research in topics: Synaptic plasticity & Somatostatin. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 30 publications receiving 2785 citations. Previous affiliations of Stéphane Peineau include Paris Diderot University & University of Bristol.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Converging evidence supports a crucial role of LTD in some types of learning and memory and in situations in which cognitive demands require a flexible response.
Abstract: Long-term depression (LTD) in the CNS has been the subject of intense investigation as a process that may be involved in learning and memory and in various pathological conditions. Several mechanistically distinct forms of this type of synaptic plasticity have been identified and their molecular mechanisms are starting to be unravelled. Most studies have focused on forms of LTD that are triggered by synaptic activation of either NMDARs (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors) or metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Converging evidence supports a crucial role of LTD in some types of learning and memory and in situations in which cognitive demands require a flexible response. In addition, LTD may underlie the cognitive effects of acute stress, the addictive potential of some drugs of abuse and the elimination of synapses in neurodegenerative diseases.

821 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 2007-Neuron
TL;DR: It is concluded that the regulation of GSK3beta activity provides a powerful mechanism to preserve information encoded during LTP from erasure by subsequent LTD, perhaps thereby permitting the initial consolidation of learnt information.

655 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2013
TL;DR: Dysregulation of the JAK-STAT pathway in inflammation, cancer and neurodegenerative diseases positions it at the heart of most brain disorders, highlighting the importance to understand how it can influence the fate and functions of brain cells.
Abstract: JAK-STAT is an efficient and highly regulated system mainly dedicated to the regulation of gene expression. Primarily identified as functioning in hematopoietic cells, its role has been found critical in all cell types, including neurons. This review will focus on JAK-STAT functions in the mature central nervous system. Our recent research suggests the intriguing possibility of a non-nuclear role of STAT3 during synaptic plasticity. Dysregulation of the JAK-STAT pathway in inflammation, cancer and neurodegenerative diseases positions it at the heart of most brain disorders, highlighting the importance to understand how it can influence the fate and functions of brain cells.

250 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Recent work has shown that GSK‐3 is involved in the regulation of, and cross‐talk between, two major forms of synaptic plasticity, N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor (NMDAR)‐dependent long‐term potentiation (LTP) and NMDAR‐dependentlong‐term depression (LTD).
Abstract: Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3), an important component of the glycogen metabolism pathway, is highly expressed in the CNS. It has been implicated in major neurological disorders including Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. Despite its central role in these conditions it was not known until recently whether GSK-3 has neuronal-specific functions under normal conditions. However recent work has shown that GSK-3 is involved in the regulation of, and cross-talk between, two major forms of synaptic plasticity, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR)-dependent long-term potentiation (LTP) and NMDAR-dependent long-term depression (LTD). The present article summarizes this recent work and discusses its potential relevance to the treatment of neurological disorders.

245 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
26 Jan 2012-Neuron
TL;DR: It is shown that the JAK/STAT pathway plays an essential role in the induction of NMDA-receptor dependent long-term depression (NMDAR-LTD) in the hippocampus, which means that in addition to established roles in cytokine signaling, the Jak/ STAT pathway is involved in synaptic plasticity in the brain.

197 citations


Cited by
More filters
28 Jul 2005
TL;DR: PfPMP1)与感染红细胞、树突状组胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用,在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作�ly.
Abstract: 抗原变异可使得多种致病微生物易于逃避宿主免疫应答。表达在感染红细胞表面的恶性疟原虫红细胞表面蛋白1(PfPMP1)与感染红细胞、内皮细胞、树突状细胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用,在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作用。每个单倍体基因组var基因家族编码约60种成员,通过启动转录不同的var基因变异体为抗原变异提供了分子基础。

18,940 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Current studies indicate that even in the normal brain, microglia have highly motile processes by which they scan their territorial domains, and microglial cells are considered the most susceptible sensors of brain pathology.
Abstract: Microglial cells are the resident macrophages in the central nervous system. These cells of mesodermal/mesenchymal origin migrate into all regions of the central nervous system, disseminate through the brain parenchyma, and acquire a specific ramified morphological phenotype termed "resting microglia." Recent studies indicate that even in the normal brain, microglia have highly motile processes by which they scan their territorial domains. By a large number of signaling pathways they can communicate with macroglial cells and neurons and with cells of the immune system. Likewise, microglial cells express receptors classically described for brain-specific communication such as neurotransmitter receptors and those first discovered as immune cell-specific such as for cytokines. Microglial cells are considered the most susceptible sensors of brain pathology. Upon any detection of signs for brain lesions or nervous system dysfunction, microglial cells undergo a complex, multistage activation process that converts them into the "activated microglial cell." This cell form has the capacity to release a large number of substances that can act detrimental or beneficial for the surrounding cells. Activated microglial cells can migrate to the site of injury, proliferate, and phagocytose cells and cellular compartments.

2,998 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: D dopamine receptor classification, their basic structural and genetic organization, their distribution and functions in the brain and the periphery, and their regulation and signal transduction mechanisms are discussed.
Abstract: G protein-coupled dopamine receptors (D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5) mediate all of the physiological functions of the catecholaminergic neurotransmitter dopamine, ranging from voluntary movement and reward to hormonal regulation and hypertension. Pharmacological agents targeting dopaminergic neurotransmission have been clinically used in the management of several neurological and psychiatric disorders, including Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, Huntington's disease, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD(1)), and Tourette's syndrome. Numerous advances have occurred in understanding the general structural, biochemical, and functional properties of dopamine receptors that have led to the development of multiple pharmacologically active compounds that directly target dopamine receptors, such as antiparkinson drugs and antipsychotics. Recent progress in understanding the complex biology of dopamine receptor-related signal transduction mechanisms has revealed that, in addition to their primary action on cAMP-mediated signaling, dopamine receptors can act through diverse signaling mechanisms that involve alternative G protein coupling or through G protein-independent mechanisms via interactions with ion channels or proteins that are characteristically implicated in receptor desensitization, such as β-arrestins. One of the future directions in managing dopamine-related pathologic conditions may involve a transition from the approaches that directly affect receptor function to a precise targeting of postreceptor intracellular signaling modalities either directly or through ligand-biased signaling pharmacology. In this comprehensive review, we discuss dopamine receptor classification, their basic structural and genetic organization, their distribution and functions in the brain and the periphery, and their regulation and signal transduction mechanisms. In addition, we discuss the abnormalities of dopamine receptor expression, function, and signaling that are documented in human disorders and the current pharmacology and emerging trends in the development of novel therapeutic agents that act at dopamine receptors and/or on related signaling events.

2,259 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review aims to comprehensively cover the field of "sleep and memory" research by providing a historical perspective on concepts and a discussion of more recent key findings.
Abstract: Over more than a century of research has established the fact that sleep benefits the retention of memory. In this review we aim to comprehensively cover the field of "sleep and memory" research by providing a historical perspective on concepts and a discussion of more recent key findings. Whereas initial theories posed a passive role for sleep enhancing memories by protecting them from interfering stimuli, current theories highlight an active role for sleep in which memories undergo a process of system consolidation during sleep. Whereas older research concentrated on the role of rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep, recent work has revealed the importance of slow-wave sleep (SWS) for memory consolidation and also enlightened some of the underlying electrophysiological, neurochemical, and genetic mechanisms, as well as developmental aspects in these processes. Specifically, newer findings characterize sleep as a brain state optimizing memory consolidation, in opposition to the waking brain being optimized for encoding of memories. Consolidation originates from reactivation of recently encoded neuronal memory representations, which occur during SWS and transform respective representations for integration into long-term memory. Ensuing REM sleep may stabilize transformed memories. While elaborated with respect to hippocampus-dependent memories, the concept of an active redistribution of memory representations from networks serving as temporary store into long-term stores might hold also for non-hippocampus-dependent memory, and even for nonneuronal, i.e., immunological memories, giving rise to the idea that the offline consolidation of memory during sleep represents a principle of long-term memory formation established in quite different physiological systems.

1,964 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
James J. Lee1, Robbee Wedow2, Aysu Okbay3, Edward Kong4, Omeed Maghzian4, Meghan Zacher4, Tuan Anh Nguyen-Viet5, Peter Bowers4, Julia Sidorenko6, Julia Sidorenko7, Richard Karlsson Linnér3, Richard Karlsson Linnér8, Mark Alan Fontana9, Mark Alan Fontana5, Tushar Kundu5, Chanwook Lee4, Hui Li4, Ruoxi Li5, Rebecca Royer5, Pascal Timshel10, Pascal Timshel11, Raymond K. Walters12, Raymond K. Walters4, Emily A. Willoughby1, Loic Yengo7, Maris Alver6, Yanchun Bao13, David W. Clark14, Felix R. Day15, Nicholas A. Furlotte, Peter K. Joshi14, Peter K. Joshi16, Kathryn E. Kemper7, Aaron Kleinman, Claudia Langenberg15, Reedik Mägi6, Joey W. Trampush5, Shefali S. Verma17, Yang Wu7, Max Lam, Jing Hua Zhao15, Zhili Zheng7, Zhili Zheng18, Jason D. Boardman2, Harry Campbell14, Jeremy Freese19, Kathleen Mullan Harris20, Caroline Hayward14, Pamela Herd13, Pamela Herd21, Meena Kumari13, Todd Lencz22, Todd Lencz23, Jian'an Luan15, Anil K. Malhotra23, Anil K. Malhotra22, Andres Metspalu6, Lili Milani6, Ken K. Ong15, John R. B. Perry15, David J. Porteous14, Marylyn D. Ritchie17, Melissa C. Smart14, Blair H. Smith24, Joyce Y. Tung, Nicholas J. Wareham15, James F. Wilson14, Jonathan P. Beauchamp25, Dalton Conley26, Tõnu Esko6, Steven F. Lehrer27, Steven F. Lehrer28, Steven F. Lehrer29, Patrik K. E. Magnusson30, Sven Oskarsson31, Tune H. Pers10, Tune H. Pers11, Matthew R. Robinson7, Matthew R. Robinson32, Kevin Thom33, Chelsea Watson5, Christopher F. Chabris17, Michelle N. Meyer17, David Laibson4, Jian Yang7, Magnus Johannesson34, Philipp Koellinger8, Philipp Koellinger3, Patrick Turley12, Patrick Turley4, Peter M. Visscher7, Daniel J. Benjamin27, Daniel J. Benjamin5, David Cesarini27, David Cesarini33 
TL;DR: A joint (multi-phenotype) analysis of educational attainment and three related cognitive phenotypes generates polygenic scores that explain 11–13% of the variance ineducational attainment and 7–10% ofthe variance in cognitive performance, which substantially increases the utility ofpolygenic scores as tools in research.
Abstract: Here we conducted a large-scale genetic association analysis of educational attainment in a sample of approximately 1.1 million individuals and identify 1,271 independent genome-wide-significant SNPs. For the SNPs taken together, we found evidence of heterogeneous effects across environments. The SNPs implicate genes involved in brain-development processes and neuron-to-neuron communication. In a separate analysis of the X chromosome, we identify 10 independent genome-wide-significant SNPs and estimate a SNP heritability of around 0.3% in both men and women, consistent with partial dosage compensation. A joint (multi-phenotype) analysis of educational attainment and three related cognitive phenotypes generates polygenic scores that explain 11-13% of the variance in educational attainment and 7-10% of the variance in cognitive performance. This prediction accuracy substantially increases the utility of polygenic scores as tools in research.

1,658 citations