scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Stephen T. Armenti

Bio: Stephen T. Armenti is an academic researcher from University of Michigan. The author has contributed to research in topics: Viral shedding & Viral load. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 11 publications receiving 88 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that PPS-associated maculopathy is a vision-threatening condition that can manifest in the setting of long-term exposure to the drug.
Abstract: Importance A unique pigmentary maculopathy was recently described in 6 patients with long-term exposure to pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS), a long-standing oral therapy for interstitial cystitis. Objective To characterize the exposure characteristics and clinical manifestations of PPS–associated maculopathy. Design, Setting, and Participants In this multi-institutional case series, medical records of patients who exhibited the characteristic maculopathy in the setting of prior PPS exposure were retrospectively reviewed. Data were collected from August 1, 2012, to October 1, 2018, and data were analyzed from October 2018 to January 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Drug exposure, visual acuity, and retinal imaging characteristics. Results Of the 35 included patients (70 eyes), 34 (97%) were female, and the median (range) age was 60 (37-79) years. The median (range) duration of PPS intake was 15 (3-22) years, and the median (range) cumulative exposure was 1.61 (0.44-4.31) kg. The leading visual symptoms were metamorphopsia, blurred vision, and prolonged dark adaptation. Median (range) logMAR visual acuity of all eyes was 0.10 (−0.12 to 1.18). Fundus examination often revealed hyperpigmented macular spots (34 of 64 eyes [53%]) with interspersed pale-yellow deposits, although less commonly in eyes that exhibited retinal pigment epithelial atrophy (6 of 26 eyes [23%];P Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that PPS–associated maculopathy is a vision-threatening condition that can manifest in the setting of long-term exposure to the drug. Multimodal imaging posits a distinctive clinical phenotype, characterized in this cohort by dynamic alterations within the retinal pigment epithelium and at the retinal pigment epithelium–photoreceptor interface. Ongoing work might explore causality and direct screening guidelines.

72 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Uveal effusion should be considered in patients taking anti-PD-1 and/or PD-L1 monoclonal antibody therapy because of the role of the PD-1 pathway in the inhibition of self-reactive T cells, which might lead to inflammation because of immune-related adverse effects.
Abstract: Importance Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) and antiprogrammed cell death ligand-1 (anti-PD-L1) monoclonal antibodies, have recently been introduced as a promising new immunotherapy for solid cancers. The adverse effects typically include inflammation of the skin, endocrine, and gastrointestinal systems. Objective To describe 3 patients who developed uveal effusion after initiating anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This case series was conducted in a university-based ocular oncology practice. The participants were a 68-year-old African American man with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung and 2 white men, aged 52 years and 85 years, with metastatic cutaneous melanoma; all were taking anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Ocular findings of 3 patients. Results We identified 3 patients who developed uveal effusion within 1 to 2 months after initiating anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody therapy. Uveal effusion resolved completely in 6 to 12 weeks after discontinuation of systemic therapy in 2 patients and persisted in 1 patient who continued the therapy. Conclusions and Relevance Uveal effusion should be considered in patients taking anti-PD-1 and/or PD-L1 monoclonal antibody therapy. Because of the role of the PD-1 pathway in the inhibition of self-reactive T cells, PD-1 inhibition might lead to inflammation because of immune-related adverse effects.

39 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the ocular manifestations of hospitalized COVID-19 patients at a tertiary care medical center in the United States and found that 9 5% of these patients exhibited ocular signs and symptoms.
Abstract: Purpose: Studies have identified a wide range of ocular signs and symptoms in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients;however, these studies were often conducted outside of the United States We aim to investigate the ocular manifestations of hospitalized COVID-19 patients at a tertiary care medical center in the United States Patients and Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on individuals aged 18 and over who were hospitalized for COVID-19 between March 10, 2020 and April 13, 2020 The electronic health record was reviewed for all patients, and a follow-up phone survey was conducted on patients who were discharged home Data on patient history, physical exam, laboratory results, and hospital disposition were collected and analyzed Results: A total of 400 patients were included The mean patient age was 61 7 years (SD 15 5) and 233 (58 3%) were males Ocular signs and symptoms were noted in 38 (9 5%) patients The most common ocular abnormality was conjunctival injection, followed by vision changes and ocular irritation Among the 38 patients, 30 (79 0%) developed ocular involvement prior to day 30 of onset of their COVID symptoms Univariate analysis showed that age, gender, ocular history, fever, mechanical ventilation, and increasing inflammatory markers were not significantly associated with the presence or development of ocular symptoms Conclusion: In this study, 9 5% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients exhibited ocular signs and symptoms Factors associated with severe systemic COVID-19 disease were not associated with developing ocular abnormalities The rate of ocular manifestations of COVID-19 should not be ignored, and thus physicians should routinely evaluate for ocular involvement in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

19 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A comprehensive review of the eye as a means of disease transmission, how best to minimize exposure in clinical settings, and both the direct and indirect ocular manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is presented.
Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is known to predominantly cause disease of the respiratory tract. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that the virus manifests with multi-organ damage. Specifically, the eye has been identified as a potential route of entry and site of disease manifestation. Thus, ocular protection has been recommended and implemented in various health care settings. Here, we present a comprehensive review of the eye as a means of disease transmission, how best to minimize exposure in clinical settings, and both the direct and indirect ocular manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

10 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Many ophthalmologists who favored ranibizumab switched to bevacizumabs after CATT publication while most who favored bevaccizumAB prior to CATT Publication continued favoring it afterwards.

10 citations


Cited by
More filters
DOI
01 Jan 2020

1,967 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There was increased risk of an array of incident neurologic sequelae including ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, cognition and memory disorders, peripheral nervous system disorders, episodic disorders, extrapyramidal and movement disorders, mental health disorders, musculoskeletal disorders, sensory disorders, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and encephalitis or encephalopathy in people who had COVID-19.

87 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Common symptoms and diagnostic strategies for organ-specific side effects of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy agents are described.
Abstract: Immunotherapy has an increasing role in the management of cancer, both in metastatic disease and as an adjuvant therapy. However, sensitization of the immune system with checkpoint inhibitors comes with a unique side effect profile. Full appreciation of this can take some time to emerge as some adverse events are rare, or can be subtle and potentially overlooked. Clinician awareness of these side effects can be particularly important in patients with pre-existing autoimmune conditions. Here we describe common symptoms and diagnostic strategies for organ-specific side effects of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy agents.

79 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A comprehensive review of the preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic data that were obtained in different studies with intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumAB, and aflibercept has been conducted.
Abstract: Intravitreal administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies has become the standard treatment for Age-Related Macular Degeneration; however, the knowledge of their pharmacokinetics is limited. A comprehensive review of the preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic data that were obtained in different studies with intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept has been conducted. Moreover, the factors that can influence the vitreous pharmacokinetics of these drugs, as well as the methods that were used in the studies for analytical determination, have been exposed. These anti-VEGF drugs present different charge and molecular weights, which play an important role in vitreous distribution and elimination. The pharmacokinetic parameters that were collected differ depending on the species that were involved in the studies and on physiological and pathological conditions, such as vitrectomy and lensectomy. Knowledge of the intravitreal pharmacokinetics of the anti-VEGF drugs that were used in clinical practice is of vital importance.

71 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review focuses on the mechanisms of toxicity of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, and its diagnosis and management.
Abstract: Immunotherapy has emerged in recent years and has revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) agents, are the first of this new generation of treatments. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents target immune cells by blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. This blockade leads to enhancement of the immune system and therefore restores the tumour-induced immune deficiency selectively in the tumour microenvironment. However, this shift in the balance of the immune system can also produce adverse effects that involve multiple organs. The pattern of toxicity is different from traditional chemotherapy agents or targeted therapy, and there is still little experience in recognizing and managing it. Thus, toxicity constitutes a real clinical management challenge and any new alteration should be suspected of being treatment-related. The most common toxicities occur in the skin, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and endocrine, musculoskeletal, renal, nervous, haematologic, cardiovascular and ocular systems. Immune-mediated toxic effects are usually manageable, but toxicities may sometimes lead to treatment withdrawal, and even fulminant and fatal events can occur. Oncologists need to collaborate with internists, clinical immunologists and other specialists to understand, manage and prevent toxicity derived from immunotherapy. This review focuses on the mechanisms of toxicity of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, and its diagnosis and management.

61 citations