scispace - formally typeset
S

Subramanyam Swaminathan

Researcher at Brookhaven National Laboratory

Publications -  99
Citations -  3771

Subramanyam Swaminathan is an academic researcher from Brookhaven National Laboratory. The author has contributed to research in topics: Clostridium botulinum & Active site. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 99 publications receiving 3561 citations. Previous affiliations of Subramanyam Swaminathan include Stony Brook University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Structural analysis of the catalytic and binding sites of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin B.

TL;DR: The structures of BoNT/B and its complex with sialyllactose provide a detailed description of the active site and a model for interactions between the toxin and its cell surface receptor, and the latter may provide valuable information for recombinant vaccine development.
Journal ArticleDOI

Structural genomics: beyond the human genome project.

TL;DR: A program of high-throughput X-ray crystallography aimed at developing a comprehensive mechanistic understanding of normal and abnormal human and microbial physiology at the molecular level is about to embark on.
Journal ArticleDOI

Catalytic centers in the thiamin diphosphate dependent enzyme pyruvate decarboxylase at 2.4-A resolution.

TL;DR: The crystal structure of brewers' yeast pyruvate decarboxylase, a thiamin diphosphate dependent alpha-keto acid decarboxesyase, has been determined to 2.4-A resolution and Amino acids important in cofactor binding and likely to participate in catalysis and substrate activation are identified.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mechanism of action of a flavin-containing monooxygenase

TL;DR: It is proposed that FMOs exist in the cell as a complex with a reduced form of the prosthetic group and NADPH cofactor, readying them to act on substrates to eliminate nonnutritional and insoluble compounds.
Journal ArticleDOI

Domain organization in Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin type E is unique: its implication in faster translocation.

TL;DR: It is suggested that the translocation domain in other BoNTs follows a two-step process to attain translocation-competent conformation as in BoNT E, and this is a probable reason for its faster toxic rate compared to BoNT A.