scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Sudeb Bhattacharya

Other affiliations: Homi Bhabha National Institute
Bio: Sudeb Bhattacharya is an academic researcher from Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics. The author has contributed to research in topics: MicroMegas detector & Detector. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 75 publications receiving 1061 citations. Previous affiliations of Sudeb Bhattacharya include Homi Bhabha National Institute.


Papers
More filters
ReportDOI
01 Feb 2010
TL;DR: The International Large Detector (ILD) is a concept for a detector at the International Linear Collider, ILC as discussed by the authors, which will collide electrons and positrons at energies of initially 500 GeV, upgradeable to 1 TeV.
Abstract: The International Large Detector (ILD) is a concept for a detector at the International Linear Collider, ILC. The ILC will collide electrons and positrons at energies of initially 500 GeV, upgradeable to 1 TeV. The ILC has an ambitious physics program, which will extend and complement that of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). A hallmark of physics at the ILC is precision. The clean initial state and the comparatively benign environment of a lepton collider are ideally suited to high precision measurements. To take full advantage of the physics potential of ILC places great demands on the detector performance. The design of ILD is driven by these requirements. Excellent calorimetry and tracking are combined to obtain the best possible overall event reconstruction, including the capability to reconstruct individual particles within jets for particle ow calorimetry. This requires excellent spatial resolution for all detector systems. A highly granular calorimeter system is combined with a central tracker which stresses redundancy and efficiency. In addition, efficient reconstruction of secondary vertices and excellent momentum resolution for charged particles are essential for an ILC detector. The interaction region of the ILC is designed to host two detectors, which can be moved into the beam position with a push-pull scheme. The mechanical design of ILD and the overall integration of subdetectors takes these operational conditions into account.

202 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented the physics potential of the ICAL detector as obtained from realistic detector simulations and gave the expected physics reach of the detector with 10 years of runtime.
Abstract: The upcoming 50 kt magnetized iron calorimeter (ICAL) detector at the India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) is designed to study the atmospheric neutrinos and antineutrinos separately over a wide range of energies and path lengths. The primary focus of this experiment is to explore the Earth matter effects by observing the energy and zenith angle dependence of the atmospheric neutrinos in the multi-GeV range. This study will be crucial to address some of the outstanding issues in neutrino oscillation physics, including the fundamental issue of neutrino mass hierarchy. In this document, we present the physics potential of the detector as obtained from realistic detector simulations. We describe the simulation framework, the neutrino interactions in the detector, and the expected response of the detector to particles traversing it. The ICAL detector can determine the energy and direction of the muons to a high precision, and in addition, its sensitivity to multi-GeV hadrons increases its physics reach substantially. Its charge identification capability, and hence its ability to distinguish neutrinos from antineutrinos, makes it an efficient detector for determining the neutrino mass hierarchy. In this report, we outline the analyses carried out for the determination of neutrino mass hierarchy and precision measurements of atmospheric neutrino mixing parameters at ICAL, and give the expected physics reach of the detector with 10 years of runtime. We also explore the potential of ICAL for probing new physics scenarios like CPT violation and the presence of magnetic monopoles.

151 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
A. Kumar1, A M Vinod Kumar2, Abhik Jash3, Abhik Jash4, Ajit Kumar Mohanty5, Ajit Kumar Mohanty3, Aleena Chacko6, Ali Ajmi3, Ali Ajmi7, Ambar Ghosal3, Ambar Ghosal4, Amina Khatun3, Amitava Raychaudhuri8, Amol Dighe9, Animesh Chatterjee10, Animesh Chatterjee3, Ankit Gaur11, Anushree Ghosh3, Anushree Ghosh10, Ashok Kumar11, A. Redij9, B. Satyanarayana9, B. S. Acharya9, Brajesh C Choudhary11, C. Ranganathaiah12, C. D. Ravikumar2, Chandan Gupta13, Chandan Gupta3, D. Indumathi3, Daljeet Kaur11, Debasish Majumdar3, Debasish Majumdar4, D. Samuel9, Deepak Tiwari3, Deepak Tiwari10, G Rajasekaran3, Gautam Gangopadhyay8, Gobinda Majumder9, H. B. Ravikumar12, Jasvinder A. Singh1, J. Shahi1, J. Libby6, Jyotsna Singh14, K. Raveendrababu6, K. Raveendrababu3, K K Meghna3, K. R. Rebin6, Kamalesh Kar3, Kamalesh Kar4, K. Bhattacharya9, Lalit Mohan Pant5, Lalit Mohan Pant3, M. Sajjad Athar15, M. V. N. Murthy3, Manzoor A. Malik16, Naimuddin11, Mohammad Salim15, Monojit Ghosh13, Moon Moon Devi3, Moon Moon Devi9, N.K. Mondal9, Nayana Majumdar3, Nayana Majumdar4, N Sinha3, N. Dash3, N. Dash5, Pomita Ghoshal13, Poonam Mehta17, Prafulla Kumar Behera6, R. Kanishka1, R. Gandhi3, R. Gandhi10, Rajesh Ganai3, Rajesh Ganai18, Rashid Hasan15, S. Krishnaveni12, S. M. Lakshmi3, S. K. Singh15, S.S.R. Inbanathan19, S. Uma Sankar7, Sadiq Jafer6, Saikat Biswas18, Saikat Biswas3, Sanjeev Kumar11, Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla3, Sandhya Choubey3, Sandhya Choubey10, Satyajit Saha4, Satyajit Saha3, Shakeel Ahmed15, S. P. Behera5, S. P. Behera3, Srubabati Goswami13, Subhasis Chattopadhyay18, Subhasis Chattopadhyay3, Sudeb Bhattacharya3, Sudeb Bhattacharya4, Sw. Banerjee9, Sudeshna Dasgupta9, Sumanta Pal3, Supratik Mukhopadhyay3, Supratik Mukhopadhyay4, Sushant K. Raut13, S. Bose3, S. Bose4, Swapna Mahapatra20, T.K. Ghosh18, T.K. Ghosh3, Tarak Thakore9, V K S Kashyap5, V K S Kashyap3, V. S. Subrahmanyam21, V. Singh21, V.B. Chandratre3, V.B. Chandratre5, Vipin Bhatnagar1, V. M. Datar9, V. M. Datar5, W. Bari16, Y. P. Viyogi18, Y. P. Viyogi3 
26 Apr 2017-Pramana
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented the physics potential of the ICAL detector as obtained from realistic detector simulations and gave the expected physics reach of the detector with 10 years of runtime.
Abstract: The upcoming 50 kt magnetized iron calorimeter (ICAL) detector at the India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) is designed to study the atmospheric neutrinos and antineutrinos separately over a wide range of energies and path lengths. The primary focus of this experiment is to explore the Earth matter effects by observing the energy and zenith angle dependence of the atmospheric neutrinos in the multi-GeV range. This study will be crucial to address some of the outstanding issues in neutrino oscillation physics, including the fundamental issue of neutrino mass hierarchy. In this document, we present the physics potential of the detector as obtained from realistic detector simulations. We describe the simulation framework, the neutrino interactions in the detector, and the expected response of the detector to particles traversing it. The ICAL detector can determine the energy and direction of the muons to a high precision, and in addition, its sensitivity to multi-GeV hadrons increases its physics reach substantially. Its charge identification capability, and hence its ability to distinguish neutrinos from antineutrinos, makes it an efficient detector for determining the neutrino mass hierarchy. In this report, we outline the analyses carried out for the determination of neutrino mass hierarchy and precision measurements of atmospheric neutrino mixing parameters at ICAL, and give the expected physics reach of the detector with 10 years of runtime. We also explore the potential of ICAL for probing new physics scenarios like CPT violation and the presence of magnetic monopoles.

116 citations

ReportDOI
Robert Abrams, Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla, A. Alekou, C. Andreopoulos, Charles M. Ankenbrandt, Stefan Antusch, M. Apollonio, Morteza Aslaninejad, J. J. Back, P. Ballett, Gareth J. Barker, K. B. Beard, E. Benedetto, J.R.J. Bennett, J. S. Berg, Sudeb Bhattacharya, V. Blackmore, Mattias Blennow1, A. Blondel, A. Bogacz, M. Bonesini, C. Bontoiu, C. Booth, C. Bromberg, Stephen Brooks, A. D. Bross, O. Caretta, A. Cervera-Villanueva, Sandhya Choubey, D. Cline, J.H. Cobb, P. Coloma, L. Coney, Mary Anne Cummings, T. Davenne, A. de Gouvea, C. Densham, X. Ding, Andrea Donini, P. J. Dornan, Marcos Dracos, F. Dufour, R. Eccleston, Rob Edgecock, Ilias Efthymiopoulos, Malcolm Ellis, Enrique Fernandez-Martinez, Richard C. Fernow, G. Flanagan, Juan C. Gallardo, R. Gandhi, R. Garoby, Belen Gavela, S. Geer, Simone Gilardoni, J.J. Gómez-Cadenas, Srubabati Goswami, V.B. Graves, Rajat Gupta, Gordon H. Hanson, Paul Fraser Harrison, T. L. Hart, Porfidio Hernández, Patrick Huber, D. Indumathi, R. A. Johnson, Carol Johnstone, Y. Karadzhov, David Kelliher, H.G. Kirk, Joachim Kopp1, Yu. G. Kudenko, Y. Kuno, A. Kurup, P. Kyberd, A. Laing, Ting Li, Manfred Lindner1, Kenneth Long, J. Lopez Pavon, P. Loveridge, S. Machida, Debasish Majumdar, Michele Maltoni, J. Martín-Albo, Marco Martini, R. Matev, Kirk T. McDonald, A.J. McFarland, Davide Meloni, M. Mezzetto, P. Migliozzi, S. R. Mishra, N.V. Mokhov, N. K. Mondal, Jorge G. Morfin, Y. Mori, Vasiliy Morozov, David Neuffer, T. Ota1, V. Palladino, Stephen J. Parke, Silvia Pascoli, J. Pasternak, J.T. Peltoniemi, R. Petti, T. Planche, Milorad Popovic, J. Pozimski, G. Prior, C.R.Prior, G.H. Rees, Stefano Rigolin, T. J. Roberts, Yves Roblin, C. Rogers, Roman Samulyak, Thomas Schwetz-Mangold1, N. Simos, N Sinha, G.P. Skoro, P. Snopok, F. J. P. Soler, N. Souchlas, J. Strait, Diktys Stratakis, S. Striganov, J. Tang, J. W. G. Thomason, L. Tortora, R. Tsenov, Walter Winter, Holger Witte, Osamu Yasuda, Cary Yoshikawa, Michael S. Zisman 
TL;DR: The International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory (the IDS-NF) was established by the community at the 9th International Workshop on Neutron Factories, super-beams, and beta- beams.
Abstract: The International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory (the IDS-NF) was established by the community at the ninth "International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, super-beams, and beta- beams" which was held in Okayama in August 2007. The IDS-NF mandate is to deliver the Reference Design Report (RDR) for the facility on the timescale of 2012/13. In addition, the mandate for the study [3] requires an Interim Design Report to be delivered midway through the project as a step on the way to the RDR. This document, the IDR, has two functions: it marks the point in the IDS-NF at which the emphasis turns to the engineering studies required to deliver the RDR and it documents baseline concepts for the accelerator complex, the neutrino detectors, and the instrumentation systems. The IDS-NF is, in essence, a site-independent study. Example sites, CERN, FNAL, and RAL, have been identified to allow site-specific issues to be addressed in the cost analysis that will be presented in the RDR. The choice of example sites should not be interpreted as implying a preferred choice of site for the facility.

75 citations

M. Sajjad Athar, Bhatia, S.C. Ojha, H. S. Mani, S. K. Pal, Anjan S. Joshipura, D. P. Mahapatra, B.K. Nagesh, Ajit Kumar Mohanty, R.K. Bhandari, Rashid Hasan, Purbasha Ghosh, J. B. Singh, Tapan Nayak, S. Uma Sankar, C.P. Singh, A. Bhadra, N. Krishnan, P. Nagaraj, Premomay Ghosh, Shobha K. Rao, Poonam Mehta, Sandhya Choubey, Subhendu Rakshit, Sandip Pakvasa, Sw. Banerjee, V. M. Datar, S. C. Phatak, Sukanta Dutta, A. Mukherjee, G. C. Mishra, M.G. Ghodgaonkar, Sudeb Bhattacharya, Monika Gupta, R. N. Singaraju, V. Singh, R.K. Choudhury, S.D. Rindani, Abhijit Samanta, G.S.N. Murthy, Pankaj Agrawal, Abhijit Sanyal, Subir Sarkar, Y. P. Viyogi, P.K. Mukhopadhyay, Palash B. Pal, A.W. Matkar, S.D. Kalmani, S. Upadhya, B. S. Acharya, Raghav Varma, Anindya Datta, S.R. Dugad, K. Srinivas, K.S. Gothe, Ambar Ghosal, Piyush Verma, Sandip Sarkar, V. Arumugam, Asimananda Goswami, Satish Sharma, S. K. Singh, Shiv K. Gupta, G. Rajasekaran, Sarika Bhide, B. Satyanarayana, Kamales Kar, Raj Gandhi, Srubabati Goswami, B.K. Singh, Amitava Raychaudhuri, S. Bose, V.B. Chandratre, M. V. N. Murthy, N.K. Mondal, D. Indumathi, A.K. Ray, Vipin Bhatnagar, L.V. Reddy, Lalit Mohan Pant, C.S. Sundar, Ashok Goyal, Bijaya Ghosh, Pomita Ghoshal, Swapan Sen, Satyajit Saha, Bedangadas Mohanty, Kirti Ranjan, M.P. Diwakar, Sukanta Panda, Brajesh C Choudhary, Manoj Sharan, Debasish Majumdar, Anita Behere, Subhasish Chattopadhyay, Subhendra Mohanty, P.R. Sarma, Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla, Sukalyan Chattopadhyay, Debajyoti Choudhury, Amol Dighe, Biswajit Paul, Basanta Nandi, N Sinha, J. Jayapandian, D.V. Ramakrishna 
01 May 2006

54 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 1988-Nature
TL;DR: In this paper, a sedimentological core and petrographic characterisation of samples from eleven boreholes from the Lower Carboniferous of Bowland Basin (Northwest England) is presented.
Abstract: Deposits of clastic carbonate-dominated (calciclastic) sedimentary slope systems in the rock record have been identified mostly as linearly-consistent carbonate apron deposits, even though most ancient clastic carbonate slope deposits fit the submarine fan systems better. Calciclastic submarine fans are consequently rarely described and are poorly understood. Subsequently, very little is known especially in mud-dominated calciclastic submarine fan systems. Presented in this study are a sedimentological core and petrographic characterisation of samples from eleven boreholes from the Lower Carboniferous of Bowland Basin (Northwest England) that reveals a >250 m thick calciturbidite complex deposited in a calciclastic submarine fan setting. Seven facies are recognised from core and thin section characterisation and are grouped into three carbonate turbidite sequences. They include: 1) Calciturbidites, comprising mostly of highto low-density, wavy-laminated bioclast-rich facies; 2) low-density densite mudstones which are characterised by planar laminated and unlaminated muddominated facies; and 3) Calcidebrites which are muddy or hyper-concentrated debrisflow deposits occurring as poorly-sorted, chaotic, mud-supported floatstones. These

9,929 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors review the present status of global analyses of neutrino oscillations and discuss the robustness of the oscillation interpretation against departures from the Standard Solar Model and the possible existence of non-standard neutrinos physics.
Abstract: We review the present status of global analyses of neutrino oscillations, taking into account the most recent neutrino data including the latest KamLAND and K2K updates presented at Neutrino2004, as well as state-of-the-art solar and atmospheric neutrino flux calculations. We give the two-neutrino solar + KamLAND results, as well as two-neutrino atmospheric + K2K oscillation regions, discussing in each case the robustness of the oscillation interpretation against departures from the Standard Solar Model and the possible existence of non-standard neutrino physics. Furthermore, we give the best fit values and allowed ranges of the three-flavour oscillation parameters from the current worlds' global neutrino data sample and discuss in detail the status of the small parameters $\alpha \equiv \Dms/\Dma$ as well as $\sin^2\theta_{13}$, which characterize the strength of CP violating effects in neutrino oscillations. We also update the degree of rejection of four-neutrino interpretations of the LSND anomaly in view of the most recent developments.

592 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The theoretical status of coexistence in nuclei is summarized in this article, where microscopic shell-model descriptions and mean-field descriptions are emphasized, and a systematic data for both even and odd-mass nuclei, selected to illustrate the various ways in which coexistence is observed in nucleis.
Abstract: Shape coexistence in nuclei appears to be unique in the realm of finite many-body quantum systems It differs from the various geometrical arrangements that sometimes occur in a molecule in that in a molecule the various arrangements are of the widely separated atomic nuclei In nuclei the various ''arrangements'' of nucleons involve (sets of) energy eigenstates with different electric quadrupole properties such as moments and transition rates, and different distributions of proton pairs and neutron pairs with respect to their Fermi energies Sometimes two such structures will ''invert'' as a function of the nucleon number, resulting in a sudden and dramatic change in ground-state properties in neighboring isotopes and isotones In the first part of this review the theoretical status of coexistence in nuclei is summarized Two approaches, namely, microscopic shell-model descriptions and mean-field descriptions, are emphasized The second part of this review presents systematic data, for both even- and odd-mass nuclei, selected to illustrate the various ways in which coexistence is observed in nuclei The last part of this review looks to future developments and the issue of the universality of coexistence in nuclei Surprises continue to be discovered With the major advances in reaching to extremes of proton-neutronmore » number, and the anticipated new ''rare isotope beam'' facilities, guidelines for search and discovery are discussed« less

570 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a review of the literature on heavy-ion fusion at low energies is presented, with special emphasis given to the fusion of loosely bound stable and unstable projectiles, and the experimental challenges encountered in the measurement of the fusion cross section of these systems are pointed out.

415 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
A. Bandyopadhyay1, Sandhya Choubey1, Raj Gandhi1, Srubabati Goswami1, B.L. Roberts2, J. Bouchez, I. Antoniadis3, John Ellis3, Gian F. Giudice3, T. Schwetz3, S. Umasankar, G. Karagiorgi4, Alexis A. Aguilar-Arevalo4, Janet Conrad4, M. H. Shaevitz4, Silvia Pascoli5, S. Geer6, J.E. Campagne7, Mark Rolinec8, A. Blondel9, Manuela Campanelli9, Joachim Kopp10, Manfred Lindner10, J.T. Peltoniemi, P. J. Dornan11, Kenneth Long11, Takashi Matsushita11, C. Rogers11, Y. Uchida11, Marcos Dracos, K. Whisnant12, David William Casper13, Mingshui Chen13, B. A. Popov14, Juha Äystö15, Danny Marfatia16, Y. Okada17, H. Sugiyama17, Klaus-Peter Jungmann18, Julien Lesgourgues, Michael S. Zisman19, Mariam Tórtola20, Alexander Friedland21, Sacha Davidson22, Stefan Antusch23, C. Biggio23, Andrea Donini23, Enrique Fernandez-Martinez23, Belen Gavela23, Michele Maltoni23, Jacobo Lopez-Pavon23, Stefano Rigolin23, N. K. Mondal24, V. Palladino, Frank Filthaut, Carl H. Albright25, A. de Gouvea26, Yoshitaka Kuno27, Y. Nagashima27, M. Mezzetto, S. Lola28, Paul Langacker29, A. Baldini, Hiroshi Nunokawa30, Davide Meloni31, Michel Diaz32, Stephen F. King33, Kai Zuber34, A.G. Akeroyd35, Y. Grossman36, Yasaman Farzan, Kazuhiro Tobe37, Mayumi Aoki38, Hitoshi Murayama19, Hitoshi Murayama39, Hitoshi Murayama40, N. Kitazawa41, Osamu Yasuda41, S.T. Petcov42, Andrea Romanino42, P. Chimenti43, Andrea Vacchi43, A. Yu. Smirnov44, Elena Couce45, J.J. Gómez-Cadenas45, Pilar Hernández45, M. Sorel45, José W. F. Valle45, Paul Fraser Harrison46, Cecilia Lunardini47, J.K. Nelson48, Vernon Barger49, Lisa L. Everett49, Patrick Huber49, Walter Winter50, W. Fetscher51, A. van der Schaaf52 
Harish-Chandra Research Institute1, Boston University2, CERN3, Columbia University4, Durham University5, Fermilab6, University of Paris-Sud7, Technische Universität München8, University of Geneva9, Max Planck Society10, Imperial College London11, Iowa State University12, University of California, Irvine13, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research14, University of Jyväskylä15, University of Kansas16, KEK17, University of Groningen18, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory19, Instituto Superior Técnico20, Los Alamos National Laboratory21, Lyon College22, Autonomous University of Madrid23, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research24, Northern Illinois University25, Northwestern University26, Osaka University27, University of Patras28, University of Pennsylvania29, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro30, Sapienza University of Rome31, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile32, University of Southampton33, University of Sussex34, National Cheng Kung University35, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology36, Tohoku University37, University of Tokyo38, University of California, Berkeley39, Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe40, Tokyo Metropolitan University41, International School for Advanced Studies42, University of Trieste43, International Centre for Theoretical Physics44, Spanish National Research Council45, University of Warwick46, University of Washington47, College of William & Mary48, University of Wisconsin-Madison49, University of Würzburg50, ETH Zurich51, University of Zurich52
TL;DR: The conclusions of the Physics Working Group of the International Scoping Study of a future Neutrino Factory and super-beam facility (the ISS) are presented in this article.
Abstract: The conclusions of the Physics Working Group of the International Scoping Study of a future Neutrino Factory and super-beam facility (the ISS) are presented. The ISS was carried out by the international community between NuFact05, (the 7th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories and Super-beams, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Rome, 21–26 June 2005) and NuFact06 (Ivine, CA, 24–30 August 2006). The physics case for an extensive experimental programme to understand the properties of the neutrino is presented and the role of high-precision measurements of neutrino oscillations within this programme is discussed in detail. The performance of second-generation super-beam experiments, beta-beam facilities and the Neutrino Factory are evaluated and a quantitative comparison of the discovery potential of the three classes of facility is presented. High-precision studies of the properties of the muon are complementary to the study of neutrino oscillations. The Neutrino Factory has the potential to provide extremely intense muon beams and the physics potential of such beams is discussed in the final section of the report.

290 citations