scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Sung Bae Kim

Bio: Sung Bae Kim is an academic researcher from University of Ulsan. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer & Population. The author has an hindex of 35, co-authored 163 publications receiving 6909 citations. Previous affiliations of Sung Bae Kim include Asan Medical Center & Gyeongsang National University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Lenvatinib, as compared with placebo, was associated with significant improvements in progression-free survival and the response rate among patients with iodine-131-refractory thyroid cancer.
Abstract: Background Lenvatinib, an oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, fibroblast growth factor receptors 1 through 4, platelet-derived growth factor receptor α, RET, and KIT, showed clinical activity in a phase 2 study involving patients with differentiated thyroid cancer that was refractory to radioiodine (iodine-131). Methods In our phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study involving patients with progressive thyroid cancer that was refractory to iodine-131, we randomly assigned 261 patients to receive lenvatinib (at a daily dose of 24 mg per day in 28-day cycles) and 131 patients to receive placebo. At the time of disease progression, patients in the placebo group could receive open-label lenvatinib. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included the response rate, overall survival, and safety. Results The median progression-free survival was 18.3 months in the lenvatinib group and 3.6 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.21; 99% confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.31; P<0.001). A progression-free survival benefit associated with lenvatinib was observed in all prespecified subgroups. The response rate was 64.8% in the lenvatinib group (4 complete responses and 165 partial responses) and 1.5% in the placebo group (P<0.001). The median overall survival was not reached in either group. Treatment-related adverse effects of any grade, which occurred in more than 40% of patients in the lenvatinib group, were hypertension (in 67.8% of the patients), diarrhea (in 59.4%), fatigue or asthenia (in 59.0%), decreased appetite (in 50.2%), decreased weight (in 46.4%), and nausea (in 41.0%). Discontinuations of the study drug because of adverse effects occurred in 37 patients who received lenvatinib (14.2%) and 3 patients who received placebo (2.3%). In the lenvatinib group, 6 of 20 deaths that occurred during the treatment period were considered to be drug-related. Conclusions Lenvatinib, as compared with placebo, was associated with significant improvements in progression-free survival and the response rate among patients with iodine-131– refractory thyroid cancer. Patients who received lenvatinib had more adverse effects. (Funded by Eisai; SELECT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01321554.)

1,354 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Ezra E.W. Cohen1, Denis Soulières2, Christophe Le Tourneau3, Christophe Le Tourneau4, Christophe Le Tourneau5, José Dinis6, Lisa Licitra7, Myung-Ju Ahn8, Ainara Soria, Jean-Pascal Machiels9, Jean-Pascal Machiels10, Nicolas Mach, Ranee Mehra11, Barbara Burtness12, Pingye Zhang13, Jonathan D. Cheng13, Ramona F. Swaby13, Kevin J. Harrington14, Kevin J. Harrington15, Mirelis Acosta-Rivera, Douglas Adkins, Morteza Aghmesheh, Mario Airoldi, Eduardas Aleknavicius, Yousuf Al-Farhat, Alain Algazi, Salah Almokadem, Anna Alyasova, Jessica Bauman, Marco Benasso, Alfonso Berrocal, Victoria Bray, Barbara Ann Burtness12, F. Caponigro, Ana Castro, Terrence P. Cescon, Kelvin K. W. Chan, Arvind Chaudhry, Bruno Chauffert, Ezra W. Cohen1, Tibor Csoszi, J. de Boer, Jean-Pierre Delord, Andreas Dietz, Charlotte Dupuis, Laurence Digue, Jozsef Erfan, Yolanda Alvarez, Mererid Evans, Mary J. Fidler, Martin David Forster, Signe Friesland, Apar Kishor Ganti, Lionnel Geoffrois, Cliona Grant, Viktor Gruenwald, Kevin J. Harrington15, Thomas K. Hoffmann, Geza Horvai, Arturas Inciura, Raymond Woo-Jun Jang, Petra Jankowska, Antonio Jimeno, Mano Joseph, Alejandro Juarez Ramiro, Boguslawa Karaszewska, Andrzej Kawecki, Ulrich Keilholz, Ulrich Keller, Sung Bae Kim, Judit Kocsis, Nuria Kotecki, Mark F. Kozloff, Julio Lambea, Laszlo Landherr, Yuri Lantsukhay, Sergey Alexandrovich Lazarev, Lip Way Lee, Igor Dmitrievich Lifirenko, Danko Martincic, Oleg Vladmirovhich Matorin, Margaret McGrath, Krzysztof Misiukiewicz, John C. Morris, Fagim Fanisovich Mufazalov, Jiaxin Niu, Devraj Pamoorthy Srinivasan, Pedro Perez Segura, Daniel Rauch, Maria Leonor Ribeiro, Cristina P. Rodriguez, Frederic Rolland, Antonio Russo, Agnes Ruzsa, Frederico Sanches, Sang-Won Shin, Mikhail Shtiveland, Pol Specenier, Eva Szekanecz, Judit Szota, Carla M.L. van Herpen, Hector A. Velez-Cortes, William V. Walsh, Stefan Wilop, Ralph Winterhalder, Marek Z. Wojtukiewicz, Deborah Wong, Dan P. Zandberg 
TL;DR: The clinically meaningful prolongation of overall survival and favourable safety profile of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma support the further evaluation of p embrolizUMab as a monotherapy and as part of combination therapy in earlier stages of disease.

984 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Tastuzumab deruxtecan showed durable antitumor activity in a pretreated patient population with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and requires attention to pulmonary symptoms and careful monitoring.
Abstract: Background Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linke...

961 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Overall survival was significantly improved in the nivolumab group compared with the chemotherapy group, and a favourable safety profile compared with chemotherapy in previously treated advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.
Abstract: Summary Background Chemotherapy for patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma offers poor long-term survival prospects. We report the final analysis from our study of the immune checkpoint PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (ATTRACTION-3) at 90 hospitals and cancer centres in Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA. We enrolled patients aged 20 years and older with unresectable advanced or recurrent oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (regardless of PD-L1 expression), at least one measurable or non-measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, and who were refractory or intolerant to one previous fluoropyrimidine-based and platinum-based chemotherapy and had a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either nivolumab (240 mg for 30 min every 2 weeks) or investigator's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 for at least 60 min once per week for 6 weeks then 1 week off; or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 for at least 60 min every 3 weeks), all given intravenously. Treatment continued until disease progression assessed by the investigator per RECIST version 1.1 or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was done using an interactive web response system with a block size of four and stratified according to geographical region (Japan vs rest of the world), number of organs with metastases, and PD-L1 expression. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as the time from randomisation until death from any cause, in the intention-to-treat population that included all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02569242 , and follow-up for long-term outcomes is ongoing. Findings Between Jan 7, 2016, and May 25, 2017, we assigned 419 patients to treatment: 210 to nivolumab and 209 to chemotherapy. At the time of data cutoff on Nov 12, 2018, median follow-up for overall survival was 10·5 months (IQR 4·5–19·0) in the nivolumab group and 8·0 months (4·6–15·2) in the chemotherapy group. At a minimum follow-up time (ie, time from random assignment of the last patient to data cutoff) of 17·6 months, overall survival was significantly improved in the nivolumab group compared with the chemotherapy group (median 10·9 months, 95% CI 9·2–13·3 vs 8·4 months, 7·2–9·9; hazard ratio for death 0·77, 95% CI 0·62–0·96; p=0·019). 38 (18%) of 209 patients in the nivolumab group had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events compared with 131 (63%) of 208 patients in the chemotherapy group. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were anaemia (four [2%]) in the nivolumab group and decreased neutrophil count (59 [28%]) in the chemotherapy group. Five deaths were deemed treatment-related: two in the nivolumab group (one each of interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis) and three in the chemotherapy group (one each of pneumonia, spinal cord abscess, and interstitial lung disease). Interpretation Nivolumab was associated with a significant improvement in overall survivaland a favourable safety profile compared with chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and might represent a new standard second-line treatment option for these patients. Funding ONO Pharmaceutical and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

527 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Pembrolizumab prolonged OS versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer in patients with programmed death ligand-1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10, with fewer treatment-related adverse events.
Abstract: PURPOSEPatients with advanced esophageal cancer have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options after first-line chemotherapy.PATIENTS AND METHODSIn this open-label, phase III study, we randoml...

511 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
01 Nov 2009-Thyroid
TL;DR: Evidence-based recommendations are developed to inform clinical decision-making in the management of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer and represent, in the authors' opinion, contemporary optimal care for patients with these disorders.
Abstract: Background: Thyroid nodules are a common clinical problem, and differentiated thyroid cancer is becoming increasingly prevalent. Since the American Thyroid Association's (ATA's) guidelines for the management of these disorders were revised in 2009, significant scientific advances have occurred in the field. The aim of these guidelines is to inform clinicians, patients, researchers, and health policy makers on published evidence relating to the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Methods: The specific clinical questions addressed in these guidelines were based on prior versions of the guidelines, stakeholder input, and input of task force members. Task force panel members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database searching, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Published English language articles on adults were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians Guideline Gr...

10,501 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
21 Jul 1979-BMJ
TL;DR: It is suggested that if assessment of overdoses were left to house doctors there would be an increase in admissions to psychiatric units, outpatients, and referrals to social services, but for house doctors to assess overdoses would provide no economy for the psychiatric or social services.
Abstract: admission. This proportion could already be greater in some parts of the country and may increase if referrals of cases of self-poisoning increase faster than the facilities for their assessment and management. The provision of social work and psychiatric expertise in casualty departments may be one means of preventing unnecessary medical admissions without risk to the patients. Dr Blake's and Dr Bramble's figures do not demonstrate, however, that any advantage would attach to medical teams taking over assessment from psychiatrists except that, by implication, assessments would be completed sooner by staff working on the ward full time. What the figures actually suggest is that if assessment of overdoses were left to house doctors there would be an increase in admissions to psychiatric units (by 19°U), outpatients (by 5O°'), and referrals to social services (by 140o). So for house doctors to assess overdoses would provide no economy for the psychiatric or social services. The study does not tell us what the consequences would have been for the six patients who the psychiatrists would have admitted but to whom the house doctors would have offered outpatient appointments. E J SALTER

4,497 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
22 Jan 2019-JAMA
TL;DR: This review focuses on current approaches and evolving strategies for local and systemic therapy of breast cancer as well as distinct risk profiles and treatment strategies.
Abstract: Importance Breast cancer will be diagnosed in 12% of women in the United States over the course of their lifetimes and more than 250 000 new cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in the United States in 2017. This review focuses on current approaches and evolving strategies for local and systemic therapy of breast cancer. Observations Breast cancer is categorized into 3 major subtypes based on the presence or absence of molecular markers for estrogen or progesterone receptors and human epidermal growth factor 2 (ERBB2; formerlyHER2): hormone receptor positive/ERBB2 negative (70% of patients),ERBB2positive (15%-20%), and triple-negative (tumors lacking all 3 standard molecular markers; 15%). More than 90% of breast cancers are not metastatic at the time of diagnosis. For people presenting without metastatic disease, therapeutic goals are tumor eradication and preventing recurrence. Triple-negative breast cancer is more likely to recur than the other 2 subtypes, with 85% 5-year breast cancer–specific survival for stage I triple-negative tumors vs 94% to 99% for hormone receptor positive andERBB2positive. Systemic therapy for nonmetastatic breast cancer is determined by subtype: patients with hormone receptor–positive tumors receive endocrine therapy, and a minority receive chemotherapy as well; patients withERBB2-positive tumors receiveERBB2-targeted antibody or small-molecule inhibitor therapy combined with chemotherapy; and patients with triple-negative tumors receive chemotherapy alone. Local therapy for all patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer consists of surgical resection, with consideration of postoperative radiation if lumpectomy is performed. Increasingly, some systemic therapy is delivered before surgery. Tailoring postoperative treatment based on preoperative treatment response is under investigation. Metastatic breast cancer is treated according to subtype, with goals of prolonging life and palliating symptoms. Median overall survival for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is approximately 1 year vs approximately 5 years for the other 2 subtypes. Conclusions and Relevance Breast cancer consists of 3 major tumor subtypes categorized according to estrogen or progesterone receptor expression andERBB2gene amplification. The 3 subtypes have distinct risk profiles and treatment strategies. Optimal therapy for each patient depends on tumor subtype, anatomic cancer stage, and patient preferences.

2,310 citations