scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Susanne Schmehl

Bio: Susanne Schmehl is an academic researcher from University of Vienna. The author has contributed to research in topics: Interpersonal communication & Mate choice. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 9 publications receiving 2104 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Daniel Conroy-Beam1, David M. Buss2, Kelly Asao2, Agnieszka Sorokowska3, Agnieszka Sorokowska4, Piotr Sorokowski3, Toivo Aavik5, Grace Akello6, Mohammad Madallh Alhabahba7, Charlotte Alm8, Naumana Amjad9, Afifa Anjum9, Chiemezie S. Atama10, Derya Atamtürk Duyar11, Richard Ayebare, Carlota Batres12, Mons Bendixen13, Aicha Bensafia14, Boris Bizumic15, Mahmoud Boussena14, Marina Butovskaya16, Marina Butovskaya17, Seda Can18, Katarzyna Cantarero19, Antonin Carrier20, Hakan Cetinkaya21, Ilona Croy4, Rosa María Cueto22, Marcin Czub3, Daria Dronova16, Seda Dural18, İzzet Duyar11, Berna Ertuğrul23, Agustín Espinosa22, Ignacio Estevan24, Carla Sofia Esteves25, Luxi Fang26, Tomasz Frackowiak3, Jorge Contreras Garduño27, Karina Ugalde González, Farida Guemaz, Petra Gyuris28, Mária Halamová29, Iskra Herak20, Marina Horvat30, Ivana Hromatko31, Chin Ming Hui26, Jas Laile Suzana Binti Jaafar32, Feng Jiang33, Konstantinos Kafetsios34, Tina Kavčič35, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair13, Nicolas Kervyn20, Truong Thi Khanh Ha19, Imran Ahmed Khilji36, Nils C. Köbis37, Hoang Moc Lan19, András Láng28, Georgina R. Lennard15, Ernesto León22, Torun Lindholm8, Trinh Thi Linh19, Giulia Lopez38, Nguyen Van Luot19, Alvaro Mailhos24, Zoi Manesi39, Rocio Martinez40, Sarah L. McKerchar15, Norbert Meskó28, Girishwar Misra41, Conal Monaghan15, Emanuel C. Mora42, Alba Moya-Garófano40, Bojan Musil30, Jean Carlos Natividade43, Agnieszka Niemczyk3, George Nizharadze, Elisabeth Oberzaucher44, Anna Oleszkiewicz3, Anna Oleszkiewicz4, Mohd Sofian Omar-Fauzee45, Ike E. Onyishi10, Barış Özener11, Ariela Francesca Pagani38, Vilmante Pakalniskiene46, Miriam Parise38, Farid Pazhoohi47, Annette Pisanski42, Katarzyna Pisanski3, Katarzyna Pisanski48, Edna Lúcia Tinoco Ponciano, Camelia Popa49, Pavol Prokop50, Pavol Prokop51, Muhammad Rizwan, Mario Sainz52, Svjetlana Salkičević31, Ruta Sargautyte46, Ivan Sarmány-Schuller53, Susanne Schmehl44, Shivantika Sharad41, Razi Sultan Siddiqui54, Franco Simonetti55, Stanislava Stoyanova56, Meri Tadinac31, Marco Antonio Correa Varella57, Christin-Melanie Vauclair25, Luis Diego Vega, Dwi Ajeng Widarini, Gyesook Yoo58, Marta Zaťková29, Maja Zupančič59 
University of California, Santa Barbara1, University of Texas at Austin2, University of Wrocław3, Dresden University of Technology4, University of Tartu5, Gulu University6, Middle East University7, Stockholm University8, University of the Punjab9, University of Nigeria, Nsukka10, Istanbul University11, Franklin & Marshall College12, Norwegian University of Science and Technology13, University of Algiers14, Australian National University15, Russian Academy of Sciences16, Russian State University for the Humanities17, İzmir University of Economics18, University of Social Sciences and Humanities19, Université catholique de Louvain20, Ankara University21, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru22, Cumhuriyet University23, University of the Republic24, ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon25, The Chinese University of Hong Kong26, National Autonomous University of Mexico27, University of Pécs28, University of Constantine the Philosopher29, University of Maribor30, University of Zagreb31, University of Malaya32, Central University of Finance and Economics33, University of Crete34, University of Primorska35, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology36, University of Amsterdam37, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart38, VU University Amsterdam39, University of Granada40, University of Delhi41, University of Havana42, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro43, University of Vienna44, Universiti Utara Malaysia45, Vilnius University46, University of British Columbia47, University of Sussex48, Romanian Academy49, Slovak Academy of Sciences50, Comenius University in Bratislava51, University of Monterrey52, SAS Institute53, DHA Suffa University54, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile55, South-West University "Neofit Rilski"56, University of São Paulo57, Kyung Hee University58, University of Ljubljana59
TL;DR: This work combines this large cross-cultural sample with agent-based models to compare eight hypothesized models of human mating markets and finds that this cross-culturally universal pattern of mate choice is most consistent with a Euclidean model of mate preference integration.
Abstract: Humans express a wide array of ideal mate preferences. Around the world, people desire romantic partners who are intelligent, healthy, kind, physically attractive, wealthy, and more. In order for these ideal preferences to guide the choice of actual romantic partners, human mating psychology must possess a means to integrate information across these many preference dimensions into summaries of the overall mate value of their potential mates. Here we explore the computational design of this mate preference integration process using a large sample of n = 14,487 people from 45 countries around the world. We combine this large cross-cultural sample with agent-based models to compare eight hypothesized models of human mating markets. Across cultures, people higher in mate value appear to experience greater power of choice on the mating market in that they set higher ideal standards, better fulfill their preferences in choice, and pair with higher mate value partners. Furthermore, we find that this cross-culturally universal pattern of mate choice is most consistent with a Euclidean model of mate preference integration.

1,827 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Agnieszka Sorokowska1, Piotr Sorokowski1, Peter Hilpert2, Katarzyna Cantarero3, Tomasz Frackowiak1, Khodabakhsh Ahmadi4, Ahmad M. Alghraibeh5, Richmond Aryeetey6, Anna Marta Maria Bertoni7, Karim Bettache8, Sheyla Blumen9, Marta Błażejewska1, Tiago Bortolini10, Marina Butovskaya11, Marina Butovskaya12, Felipe Nalon Castro13, Hakan Cetinkaya14, Diana Cunha15, Daniel David16, Oana A. David16, Fahd A. Dileym5, Alejandra del Carmen Domínguez Espinosa17, Silvio Donato7, Daria Dronova, Seda Dural18, Jitka Fialová19, Maryanne L. Fisher20, Evrim Gülbetekin21, Aslıhan Hamamcıoğlu Akkaya22, Ivana Hromatko23, Raffaella Iafrate7, Mariana Iesyp24, Bawo O. James25, Jelena Jaranovic26, Feng Jiang27, Charles O. Kimamo28, Grete Kjelvik29, Fırat Koç22, Amos Laar6, Fívia de Araújo Lopes13, Guillermo Macbeth30, Nicole M. Marcano31, Rocio Martinez32, Norbert Meskó33, Natalya Molodovskaya1, Khadijeh Moradi34, Zahrasadat Motahari35, Alexandra Mühlhauser36, Jean Carlos Natividade37, Joseph Mpeera Ntayi38, Elisabeth Oberzaucher36, Oluyinka Ojedokun39, Mohd Sofian Omar-Fauzee40, Ike E. Onyishi41, Anna Paluszak1, Alda Portugal15, Eugenia Razumiejczyk30, Anu Realo42, Anu Realo43, Ana Paula Relvas15, Maria Rivas44, Muhammad Rizwan45, Svjetlana Salkičević23, Ivan Sarmány-Schuller46, Susanne Schmehl36, Oksana Senyk24, Charlotte Sinding47, Eftychia Stamkou48, Stanislava Stoyanova49, Denisa Šukolová50, Nina Sutresna51, Meri Tadinac23, Andero Teras, Edna Lúcia Tinoco Ponciano52, Ritu Tripathi53, Nachiketa Tripathi54, Mamta Tripathi54, Olja Uhryn, Maria Emília Yamamoto13, Gyesook Yoo55, John D. Pierce31 
University of Wrocław1, University of Washington2, University of Social Sciences and Humanities3, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences4, King Saud University5, University of Ghana6, University of Milan7, The Chinese University of Hong Kong8, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru9, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro10, Moscow State University11, Russian State University for the Humanities12, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte13, Ankara University14, University of Coimbra15, Babeș-Bolyai University16, Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México17, İzmir University of Economics18, Charles University in Prague19, Saint Mary's University20, Akdeniz University21, Cumhuriyet University22, University of Zagreb23, Lviv University24, Federal Neuro Psychiatric Hospital25, University of Belgrade26, Central University of Finance and Economics27, University of Nairobi28, Norwegian University of Science and Technology29, National University of Entre Ríos30, Philadelphia University31, University of Granada32, University of Pécs33, Razi University34, University of Science and Culture35, University of Vienna36, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro37, Makerere University Business School38, Adekunle Ajasin University39, Universiti Utara Malaysia40, University of Nigeria, Nsukka41, University of Warwick42, University of Tartu43, University of Magdalena44, University of Karachi45, University of Constantine the Philosopher46, Dresden University of Technology47, University of Amsterdam48, South-West University "Neofit Rilski"49, Matej Bel University50, Indonesia University of Education51, Rio de Janeiro State University52, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore53, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati54, Kyung Hee University55
TL;DR: In this paper, an extensive analysis of interpersonal distances over a large data set (N = 8,943 participants from 42 countries) was presented, which attempted to relate the preferred social, personal, and intimate distances observed in each country to a set of individual characteristics of the participants, and some attributes of their cultures.
Abstract: Human spatial behavior has been the focus of hundreds of previous research studies. However, the conclusions and generalizability of previous studies on interpersonal distance preferences were limited by some important methodological and sampling issues. The objective of the present study was to compare preferred interpersonal distances across the world and to overcome the problems observed in previous studies. We present an extensive analysis of interpersonal distances over a large data set (N = 8,943 participants from 42 countries). We attempted to relate the preferred social, personal, and intimate distances observed in each country to a set of individual characteristics of the participants, and some attributes of their cultures. Our study indicates that individual characteristics (age and gender) influence interpersonal space preferences and that some variation in results can be explained by temperature in a given region. We also present objective values of preferred interpersonal distances in different regions, which might be used as a reference data point in future studies.

260 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Kathryn V. Walter1, Daniel Conroy-Beam1, David M. Buss2, Kelly Asao2, Agnieszka Sorokowska3, Agnieszka Sorokowska4, Piotr Sorokowski5, Toivo Aavik6, Grace Akello7, Mohammad Madallh Alhabahba8, Charlotte Alm9, Naumana Amjad10, Afifa Anjum10, Chiemezie S. Atama11, Derya Atamtürk Duyar12, Richard Ayebare, Carlota Batres13, Mons Bendixen14, Aicha Bensafia15, Boris Bizumic16, Mahmoud Boussena15, Marina Butovskaya17, Marina Butovskaya18, Seda Can19, Katarzyna Cantarero20, Antonin Carrier21, Hakan Cetinkaya22, Ilona Croy3, Rosa María Cueto23, Marcin Czub4, Daria Dronova17, Seda Dural19, İzzet Duyar12, Berna Ertuğrul24, Agustín Espinosa23, Ignacio Estevan25, Carla Sofia Esteves26, Luxi Fang27, Tomasz Frackowiak4, Jorge Contreras Garduño28, Karina Ugalde González, Farida Guemaz, Petra Gyuris29, Mária Halamová, Iskra Herak21, Marina Horvat30, Ivana Hromatko31, Chin Ming Hui27, Jas Laile Suzana Binti Jaafar32, Feng Jiang33, Konstantinos Kafetsios34, Tina Kavčič35, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair14, Nicolas Kervyn21, Truong Thi Khanh Ha20, Imran Ahmed Khilji, Nils C. Köbis36, Hoang Moc Lan20, András Láng29, Georgina R. Lennard16, Ernesto León23, Torun Lindholm9, Trinh Thi Linh20, Giulia Lopez37, Nguyen Van Luot20, Alvaro Mailhos25, Zoi Manesi38, Rocio Martinez39, Sarah L. McKerchar16, Norbert Meskó29, Girishwar Misra40, Conal Monaghan16, Emanuel C. Mora41, Alba Moya-Garófano39, Bojan Musil30, Jean Carlos Natividade42, Agnieszka Niemczyk4, George Nizharadze, Elisabeth Oberzaucher43, Anna Oleszkiewicz4, Anna Oleszkiewicz3, Mohd Sofian Omar-Fauzee44, Ike E. Onyishi11, Barış Özener12, Ariela Francesca Pagani37, Vilmante Pakalniskiene45, Miriam Parise37, Farid Pazhoohi46, Annette Pisanski41, Katarzyna Pisanski47, Katarzyna Pisanski4, Edna Lúcia Tinoco Ponciano, Camelia Popa48, Pavol Prokop49, Pavol Prokop50, Muhammad Rizwan, Mario Sainz51, Svjetlana Salkičević31, Ruta Sargautyte45, Ivan Sarmány-Schuller50, Susanne Schmehl43, Shivantika Sharad40, Razi Sultan Siddiqui52, Franco Simonetti53, Stanislava Stoyanova54, Meri Tadinac31, Marco Antonio Correa Varella55, Christin-Melanie Vauclair26, Luis Diego Vega, Dwi Ajeng Widarini, Gyesook Yoo56, Marta Zat’ková, Maja Zupančič57 
University of California, Santa Barbara1, University of Texas at Austin2, Dresden University of Technology3, University of Wrocław4, Opole University5, University of Tartu6, Gulu University7, Middle East University8, Stockholm University9, University of the Punjab10, University of Nigeria, Nsukka11, Istanbul University12, Franklin & Marshall College13, Norwegian University of Science and Technology14, University of Algiers15, Australian National University16, Russian Academy of Sciences17, Russian State University for the Humanities18, İzmir University of Economics19, University of Social Sciences and Humanities20, Université catholique de Louvain21, Ankara University22, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru23, Cumhuriyet University24, University of the Republic25, ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon26, The Chinese University of Hong Kong27, National Autonomous University of Mexico28, University of Pécs29, University of Maribor30, University of Zagreb31, University of Malaya32, Central University of Finance and Economics33, University of Crete34, University of Primorska35, University of Amsterdam36, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart37, VU University Amsterdam38, University of Granada39, University of Delhi40, University of Havana41, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro42, University of Vienna43, Universiti Utara Malaysia44, Vilnius University45, University of British Columbia46, Centre national de la recherche scientifique47, Romanian Academy48, Comenius University in Bratislava49, Slovak Academy of Sciences50, University of Monterrey51, DHA Suffa University52, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile53, South-West University "Neofit Rilski"54, University of São Paulo55, Kyung Hee University56, University of Ljubljana57
TL;DR: Using a new 45-country sample (N = 14,399), this work attempted to replicate classic studies and test both the evolutionary and biosocial role perspectives, finding neither pathogen prevalence nor gender equality robustly predicted sex differences or preferences across countries.
Abstract: Considerable research has examined human mate preferences across cultures, finding universal sex differences in preferences for attractiveness and resources as well as sources of systematic cultural variation. Two competing perspectives-an evolutionary psychological perspective and a biosocial role perspective-offer alternative explanations for these findings. However, the original data on which each perspective relies are decades old, and the literature is fraught with conflicting methods, analyses, results, and conclusions. Using a new 45-country sample (N = 14,399), we attempted to replicate classic studies and test both the evolutionary and biosocial role perspectives. Support for universal sex differences in preferences remains robust: Men, more than women, prefer attractive, young mates, and women, more than men, prefer older mates with financial prospects. Cross-culturally, both sexes have mates closer to their own ages as gender equality increases. Beyond age of partner, neither pathogen prevalence nor gender equality robustly predicted sex differences or preferences across countries.

129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Agnieszka Sorokowska1, Supreet Saluja2, Piotr Sorokowski1, Tomasz Frąckowiak1, Maciej Karwowski1, Toivo Aavik3, Grace Akello4, Charlotte Alm5, Naumana Amjad6, Afifa Anjum7, Kelly Asao8, Chiemezie S. Atama9, Derya Atamtürk Duyar10, Richard Ayebare, Carlota Batres11, Mons Bendixen12, Aicha Bensafia13, Boris Bizumic14, Mahmoud Boussena13, David M. Buss8, Marina Butovskaya, Seda Can15, Katarzyna Cantarero16, Antonin Carrier17, Hakan Cetinkaya18, Dominika Chabin1, Daniel Conroy-Beam19, Jorge Contreras-Graduño, Marco Antonio Correa Varella20, Rosa María Cueto21, Marcin Czub1, Daria Dronova, Seda Dural15, İzzet Duyar10, Berna Ertuğrul10, Agustín Espinosa21, Carla Sofia Esteves22, Farida Guemaz, Mária Haľamová23, Iskra Herak17, Ivana Hromatko24, Chin Ming Hui25, Jas Laile Suzana Binti Jaafar26, Feng Jiang27, Konstantinos Kafetsios28, Tina Kavčič29, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair12, Nicolas Kervyn17, Imran Ahmed Khilji, Nils C. Köbis30, Aleksandra Kostic31, András Láng32, Georgina R. Lennard14, Ernesto León21, Torun Lindholm5, Giulia Lopez33, Zoi Manesi34, Rocio Martinez35, Sarah L. McKerchar14, Norbert Meskó32, Girishwar Misra36, Conal Monaghan14, Emanuel C. Mora37, Alba Moya-Garófano35, Bojan Musil38, Jean Carlos Natividade39, George Nizharadze, Elisabeth Oberzaucher40, Anna Oleszkiewicz41, Anna Oleszkiewicz1, Ike E. Onyishi9, Barış Özener10, Ariela Francesca Pagani33, Vilmante Pakalniskiene42, Miriam Parise33, Farid Pazhoohi43, Marija Pejičić31, Annette Pisanski37, Katarzyna Pisanski1, Nejc Plohl38, Camelia Popa, Pavol Prokop44, Pavol Prokop45, Muhammad Rizwan46, Mario Sainz47, Svjetlana Salkičević24, Ruta Sargautyte42, Ivan Sarmány-Schuller44, Susanne Schmehl40, Anam Shahid7, Rizwana Shaikh48, Shivantika Sharad36, Razi Sultan Siddiqui49, Franco Simonetti50, Meri Tadinac24, Karina Ugalde González, Olga Uhryn, Christin-Melanie Vauclair22, Luis Diego Vega Araya, Dwi Ajeng Widarini, Gyesook Yoo51, Zainab F. Zadeh52, Marta Zaťková23, Maja Zupančič29, Ilona Croy41 
University of Wrocław1, Macquarie University2, University of Tartu3, Gulu University4, Stockholm University5, International University, Cambodia6, University of the Punjab7, University of Texas at Austin8, University of Nigeria, Nsukka9, Istanbul University10, Franklin & Marshall College11, Norwegian University of Science and Technology12, University of Algiers13, Australian National University14, İzmir University of Economics15, University of Social Sciences and Humanities16, Université catholique de Louvain17, Ankara University18, University of California, Santa Barbara19, University of São Paulo20, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru21, ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon22, University of Constantine the Philosopher23, University of Zagreb24, The Chinese University of Hong Kong25, University of Malaya26, Central University of Finance and Economics27, Palacký University, Olomouc28, University of Ljubljana29, Max Planck Society30, University of Niš31, University of Pécs32, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart33, VU University Amsterdam34, University of Granada35, University of Delhi36, University of Havana37, University of Maribor38, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro39, University of Vienna40, Dresden University of Technology41, Vilnius University42, University of British Columbia43, Slovak Academy of Sciences44, Comenius University in Bratislava45, University of Karachi46, University of Monterrey47, Aga Khan University Hospital48, DHA Suffa University49, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile50, Kyung Hee University51, Bahria University52
TL;DR: For instance, this article found that affective touch was most prevalent in relationships with partners and children, and its diversity was relatively higher in warmer, less conservative, and religious countries, and among younger, female, and liberal people.
Abstract: Interpersonal touch behavior differs across cultures, yet no study to date has systematically tested for cultural variation in affective touch, nor examined the factors that might account for this variability. Here, over 14,000 individuals from 45 countries were asked whether they embraced, stroked, kissed, or hugged their partner, friends, and youngest child during the week preceding the study. We then examined a range of hypothesized individual-level factors (sex, age, parasitic history, conservatism, religiosity, and preferred interpersonal distance) and cultural-level factors (regional temperature, parasite stress, regional conservatism, collectivism, and religiosity) in predicting these affective-touching behaviors. Our results indicate that affective touch was most prevalent in relationships with partners and children, and its diversity was relatively higher in warmer, less conservative, and religious countries, and among younger, female, and liberal people. This research allows for a broad and integrated view of the bases of cross-cultural variability in affective touch.

50 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article found evidence for textural changes, as well as shape changes that might account for the peak attractiveness of female faces at the point of ovulation, and they supported the hypothesis that attractive signals might be rooted in signals of fertility.
Abstract: In recent years, evidence has been gathered indicating increased attractiveness of fe- male faces at the point of ovulation. In this paper, we asked what changes in facial appearance oc- cur during menstrual cycle that lead to this shift in attractiveness. We analysed facial photographs of 20 young women with a normal cycle. We found evidence for textural changes, as well as shape changes that might account for the ovulatory peak in attractiveness. Generally, facial shape at ovulation is perceived as more attractive - and ovulating women are perceived as more attrac- tive the closer their face shape is to the "ovulation shape". These findings support the hypothesis that attractive signals might be rooted in signals of fertility.

48 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This compendium is for established researchers, newcomers, and students alike, highlighting interesting and rewarding problems for the coming years in single-cell data science.
Abstract: The recent boom in microfluidics and combinatorial indexing strategies, combined with low sequencing costs, has empowered single-cell sequencing technology. Thousands-or even millions-of cells analyzed in a single experiment amount to a data revolution in single-cell biology and pose unique data science problems. Here, we outline eleven challenges that will be central to bringing this emerging field of single-cell data science forward. For each challenge, we highlight motivating research questions, review prior work, and formulate open problems. This compendium is for established researchers, newcomers, and students alike, highlighting interesting and rewarding problems for the coming years.

677 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the current status of knowledge on atmospheric microplastics, the methods for sample collection, analysis and detection, and the recommendations for atmospheric micro-plastic sampling and measurement are reviewed.

539 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The empirical review focuses especially on color in achievement and affiliation/attraction contexts, but it also covers work on consumer behavior as well as food and beverage evaluation and consumption and conduct a review of emerging empirical findings.
Abstract: Color is a ubiquitous perceptual stimulus that is often considered in terms of aesthetics. Here we review theoretical and empirical work that looks beyond color aesthetics to the link between color and psychological functioning in humans. We begin by setting a historical context for research in this area, particularly highlighting methodological issues that hampered earlier empirical work. We proceed to overview theoretical and methodological advances during the past decade and conduct a review of emerging empirical findings. Our empirical review focuses especially on color in achievement and affiliation/attraction contexts, but it also covers work on consumer behavior as well as food and beverage evaluation and consumption. The review clearly shows that color can carry important meaning and can have an important impact on people's affect, cognition, and behavior. The literature remains at a nascent stage of development, however, and we note that considerable work on boundary conditions, moderators, and r...

493 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors comprehensively discuss what is known about the different processes that govern the transport of floating marine plastic debris in both the open ocean and the coastal zones, based on the published literature and referring to insights from neighbouring fields such as oil spill dispersion, marine safety recovery, plankton connectivity, and others.
Abstract: Marine plastic debris floating on the ocean surface is a major environmental problem. However, its distribution in the ocean is poorly mapped, and most of the plastic waste estimated to have entered the ocean from land is unaccounted for. Better understanding of how plastic debris is transported from coastal and marine sources is crucial to quantify and close the global inventory of marine plastics, which in turn represents critical information for mitigation or policy strategies. At the same time, plastic is a unique tracer that provides an opportunity to learn more about the physics and dynamics of our ocean across multiple scales, from the Ekman convergence in basin-scale gyres to individual waves in the surfzone. In this review, we comprehensively discuss what is known about the different processes that govern the transport of floating marine plastic debris in both the open ocean and the coastal zones, based on the published literature and referring to insights from neighbouring fields such as oil spill dispersion, marine safety recovery, plankton connectivity, and others. We discuss how measurements of marine plastics (both in situ and in the laboratory), remote sensing, and numerical simulations can elucidate these processes and their interactions across spatio-temporal scales.

408 citations