Author
Sverre E. Kjeldsen
Other affiliations: University of Michigan, Cornell University, University Hospital of North Norway ...read more
Bio: Sverre E. Kjeldsen is an academic researcher from University of Oslo. The author has contributed to research in topics: Blood pressure & Left ventricular hypertrophy. The author has an hindex of 94, co-authored 735 publications receiving 89059 citations. Previous affiliations of Sverre E. Kjeldsen include University of Michigan & Cornell University.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The diagnosis of heart failure with normal ejection fraction presupposes clinical findings consistent with heart failure and objective signs of diastolic dysfunction, and Ventricular hypertrophy and increased natriuretic peptides support the diagnosis.
Abstract: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex clinical condition. Initially called diastolic heart failure, it soon became clear that this condition is more than the opposite side of systolic heart failure. It is increasingly prevalent and lethal. Currently, HFpEF represents more than 50% of heart failure cases and shares a 90-day mortality and readmission rate similar to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is best considered to be a systemic disease. From a cardiovascular standpoint, it is not just a stiff ventricle. A stiff ventricle combined with a stiff arterial and venous system account for the clinical manifestations of flash pulmonary edema and the marked changes in renal function or systemic blood pressure with minor changes in fluid volume status. No effective pharmacologic treatments are avail able for patients with HFpEF, but an approach to the musculoskeletal system has merit: the functional limitations and exercise intolerance that patients experience are largely due to abnormalities of peripheral vascular function and skeletal muscle dysfunction. Regular exercise training has strong objective evidence to support its use to improve quality of life and functional capacity for patients with HFpEF. This clinical review summarizes the current evidence on the pathophysiologic aspects, diagnosis, and management of HFpEF.
••
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors present a review of the work of Luis Alcocer (Mexico), Christina Antza (Greece), Mustafa Arici (Turkey), Eduardo Barbosa (Brazil), Adel Berbari (Lebanon), Luís Bronze (Portugal), John Chalmers (Australia), Tine De Backer (Belgium), Alejandro de la Sierra (Spain), Kyriakos Dimitriadis (GREEce), Dorota Drozdz (Poland), Béatrice Duly-Bouhanick (France), Brent M. Egan (USA), Claudio Ferri (Italy), Anthony Heagerty (UK), M.
Abstract: DOCUMENT REVIEWERS
Luis Alcocer (Mexico), Christina Antza (Greece), Mustafa Arici (Turkey), Eduardo Barbosa (Brazil), Adel Berbari (Lebanon), Luís Bronze (Portugal), John Chalmers (Australia), Tine De Backer (Belgium), Alejandro de la Sierra (Spain), Kyriakos Dimitriadis (Greece), Dorota Drozdz (Poland), Béatrice Duly-Bouhanick (France), Brent M. Egan (USA), Serap Erdine (Turkey), Claudio Ferri (Italy), Anthony Heagerty (UK), Slavomira Filipova (Slovak Republic), Michael Hecht Olsen (Denmark), Dagmara Hering (Poland), Uday Jadhav (India), Manolis Kallistratos (Greece), Kazuomi Kario (Japan), Vasilios Kotsis (Greece), Adi Leiba (Israel), Patricio López-Jaramillo (Colombia), Hans-Peter Marti (Norway), Terry McCormack (UK), Paolo Mulatero (Italy), Dike B. Ojji (Nigeria), Sungha Park (South Korea), Priit Pauklin (Estonia), Sabine Perl (Austria), Arman Postadzhian (Bulgaria), Aleksander Prejbisz (Poland), Venkata Ram (India), Ramiro Sanchez (Argentina), Markus Schlaich (Australia), Alta Schutte (Australia), Cristina Sierra (Spain), Sekib Sokolovic (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Jonas Spaak (Sweden), Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios (Greece), Bruno Trimarco (Italy), Thomas Unger (The Netherlands), Bert-Jan van den Born (The Netherlands), Anna Vachulova (Slovak Republic), Agostino Virdis (Italy), Jiguang Wang (China), Ulrich Wenzel (Germany), Paul Whelton (USA), Jiri Widimsky (Czech Republic), Jacek Wolf (Poland), Grégoire Wuerzner (Switzerland), Eugene Yang (USA), Yuqing Zhang (China).
••
TL;DR: In this paper , a national multicenter study was conducted to determine common CYP gene variations in patients with treated but uncontrolled hypertension and to compare the distribution with the prevalence in the overall Caucasian population.
Abstract: Objective: Altered drug metabolism may be a contributing factor to uncontrolled hypertension. Beta-blockers, alpha-blockers, calcium antagonists and angiotensin receptor blockers undergo hepatic metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. Genetic variation can contribute to interindividual variation, lack of treatment response or side effects with discontinuation of treatment. We aimed to determine common CYP gene variations in patients with treated but uncontrolled hypertension and to compare the distribution with the prevalence in the overall Caucasian population. Design and method: In this national multicenter study we mapped CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms in 552 patients prescribed > = 2 antihypertensive agents and with systolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABPM) > = 135 mmHg. On the (MALDI-TOF) MassARRAY analyzer, single nucleotide variants and small insertions/deletions (indels) were investigated with the VeriDose Core Panel and CYP2D6 copy-number variation with the VeriDose CYP2D6 CNV Panel (Agena Biosciences). Each allele is associated with either normal, decreased, absent, increased or unknown enzyme function based on activity scores defined by the The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) and describe function and phenotypes for genes (IM = Intermediate metabolizer, PM = poor metabolizer, RM = rapid metabolizer and UM = ultra-rapid metabolizer). Results: 94% of patients were Caucasian. Mean daytime ABPM was 146/84 mmHg (135-190/55-106 mmHg), median age 63 (26-86) years and 35% were female. The distributions of the predicted phenotypes (illustrated in colors in Figure) for each enzyme did not differ from that reported in Caucasian population by The Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (PharmGK) (gray). 11% had normal phenotype in all five enzymes whereas 49% had > = 2 enzymes affected by gene variants. Conclusions: The phenotype distribution of five relevant CYP genes in patients with uncontrolled hypertension did not differ from the general Caucasian population. Dosing guidelines based on CYP2D6 genotype currently exist for metoprolol, but for other antihypertensive drugs further investigation is needed. The low proportion of patients with five normal enzymes and the high proportion with > = 2 enzymes affected suggest that pharmacogenetic CYP-testing may be useful for individualizing drug treatment in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
••
TL;DR: The editors of Blood Pressure, although accepting the paper by Reed et al. (1) for publication inasmuch as it is nicely reviewing many studies showing high cardiovascular risk associated with pre-hypertension and high normal blood pressure, would like to extend the reservation expressed by Gordon T. McInnes in his letter response to the editors.
Abstract: The editors of Blood Pressure , although accepting the paper by Reed et al. (1) for publication inasmuch as it is nicely reviewing many studies showing high cardiovascular risk associated with pre-hypertension and high normal blood pressure, would like to extend the reservation expressed by Gordon T. McInnes in his letter response to the editors. We herewith in the paragraph below repeat the abstract written by Gordon T. McInnes in 2009 (3).
••
TL;DR: The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation trial failed to show its primary goal, and was not able to demonstrate superiority of valartan compared to amlodipine, but was able to prevent new-onset diabetes better and tended to prevent development of heart failure.
Abstract: The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial, which was started in 1997 by including the first patient by September 10 and closed-out by December 5, 2003, is one of the major outcome trials investigating angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism in hypertension [1–3]. The study compared treatment with valsartan with that of the calcium antagonist amlodipine, and the Executive Committee has now published the main outcome data from the 15313 randomized patients from 31 countries as well as their interpretations of the results [4, 5]. The main hypothesis in VALUE was that there would be a 12.5% incidence of cardiac morbidity and mortality in the amlodipine group and a 10.6% incidence in the valsartan group, i.e. a reduction by 15%, during the course of the follow-up of the hypertensive cohort with increased risks [4]. The study was event driven and the initial anticipation was that at least 1450 valid endpoints should occur in the cohort. At study closure, the primary composite cardiac mortality and morbidity endpoint had occurred in 1599 patients [4]. Secondary endpoints in VALUE were cardiac morbidity, cardiac mortality, total mortality, stroke morbidity or mortality, fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or worsening of heart failure, or new-onset diabetes mellitus [4]. The final results of VALUE showed that the primary composite cardiac outcome (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.94–1.15, p = 0.49 valsartan vs amlodipine), did not differ between the treatment groups [4]. Thus, VALUE demonstrated no difference in its primary endpoint (i.e. time to first cardiac event), and was not able to demonstrate superiority of valsartan compared to amlodipine. As for pre-specified secondary outcomes, there were 19% more myocardial infarctions overall, more strokes in the valsartan group initially but not overall at study end [4] and a trend for less heart failure on valsartan. Interestingly, new-onset diabetes was reduced by 33% in the valsartan group [4]. What is clear from the published results of VALUE is that inferior blood pressure control was achieved in the valsartan group as compared with its comparator. This was achieved in spite of the ambition to reach below the 140/90 mmHg target by either valsartan (80–160 mg) or amlodipine (5 or 10 mg), which could be combined with HCTZ as well as other allowed drug combinations [1–4]. During the course of the trial, gradually larger proportions of the treated patient cohort achieved blood pressure targets, and after 30 months of treatment, 62% of all patients had reached the systolic target of 140 mmHg and 90% of patients had reached the diastolic target of below 90 mmHg [2, 3]. However, in the final analysis, it became clear that in patients randomized to starting treatment with amlodipine, there was a more rapid initial fall as well as more extensive reduction in systolic as well as diastolic blood pressures. Although this was not reflected in differences in the primary composite cardiac endpoint at study end, the discrepancy in blood pressure reduction between treatments was reflected in subcomponents of the primary endpoint, i.e. there were more myocardial infarctions overall. Furthermore, the blood pressure difference also influenced the most important of the secondary outcomes of the study in terms of more strokes initially but not overall at study end [4]. Despite lower blood pressures on amlodipine, valsartan prevented new-onset diabetes better and tended to prevent development of heart failure. So, what important messages can we extract from VALUE? Firstly, the trial failed to show its primary goal, i.e. a superiority of valsartan in lowering the composite cardiac endpoint in relation to its comparator amlodipine. On the contrary, the inferior initial blood pressure control by valsartan was reflected by more myocardial infarctions as well as strokes. From the results of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor cardiovascular outcome trials in hypertensives performed so far, we know from the LIFE study [6] that losartan lowers stroke morbidity and mortality compared with atenolol, and from the SCOPE trial that candesartan lowers the incidence of non-fatal strokes [7]. Certainly, so far, a mixed result for the group. As regards the calcium antagonist as comparator in VALUE, the amlodipine benefit on myocardial infarction was partially related to more effective lowering of blood pressure. It may also be speculated whether anti-ischaemic and antiangina properties may have played a role, particularly in light of no difference in fatal myocardial infarction. The trend in favour of valsartan over amlodipine regarding heart failure, and the benefit in preventing new-onset diabetes adds to previous data with inhibitors of RAS. What will be the immediate aftermath of VALUE? Certainly a discussion on which are optimal doses for valsartan in the treatment of hypertension, as well as a debate on whether or not there are true differences between the agents within the group of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers, or whether differences between agents in outcome trials so far merely reflect the design of the studies as well as the way they were in fact carried out.
Cited by
More filters
••
Boston University1, Rush University Medical Center2, University of Tennessee Health Science Center3, University of Michigan4, University at Buffalo5, University of Mississippi6, University of Miami7, University of Alabama at Birmingham8, Case Western Reserve University9, National Institutes of Health10
TL;DR: The most effective therapy prescribed by the most careful clinician will control hypertension only if patients are motivated, and empathy builds trust and is a potent motivator.
Abstract: "The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure" provides a new guideline
for hypertension prevention and management. The following are the key messages(1) In persons older than 50 years, systolic blood pressure (BP) of
more than 140 mm Hg is a much more important cardiovascular disease
(CVD) risk factor than diastolic BP; (2) The risk of CVD, beginning at 115/75
mm Hg, doubles with each increment of 20/10 mm Hg; individuals who are normotensive
at 55 years of age have a 90% lifetime risk for developing hypertension; (3)
Individuals with a systolic BP of 120 to 139 mm Hg or a diastolic BP of 80
to 89 mm Hg should be considered as prehypertensive and require health-promoting
lifestyle modifications to prevent CVD; (4) Thiazide-type diuretics should
be used in drug treatment for most patients with uncomplicated hypertension,
either alone or combined with drugs from other classes. Certain high-risk
conditions are compelling indications for the initial use of other antihypertensive
drug classes (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor
blockers, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers); (5) Most patients with
hypertension will require 2 or more antihypertensive medications to achieve
goal BP (<140/90 mm Hg, or <130/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes
or chronic kidney disease); (6) If BP is more than 20/10 mm Hg above goal
BP, consideration should be given to initiating therapy with 2 agents, 1 of
which usually should be a thiazide-type diuretic; and (7) The most effective
therapy prescribed by the most careful clinician will control hypertension
only if patients are motivated. Motivation improves when patients have positive
experiences with and trust in the clinician. Empathy builds trust and is a
potent motivator. Finally, in presenting these guidelines, the committee recognizes
that the responsible physician's judgment remains paramount.
24,988 citations
••
TL;DR: In those older than age 50, systolic blood pressure of greater than 140 mm Hg is a more important cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor than diastolic BP, and hypertension will be controlled only if patients are motivated to stay on their treatment plan.
Abstract: The National High Blood Pressure Education Program presents the complete Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Like its predecessors, the purpose is to provide an evidence-based approach to the prevention and management of hypertension. The key messages of this report are these: in those older than age 50, systolic blood pressure (BP) of greater than 140 mm Hg is a more important cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor than diastolic BP; beginning at 115/75 mm Hg, CVD risk doubles for each increment of 20/10 mm Hg; those who are normotensive at 55 years of age will have a 90% lifetime risk of developing hypertension; prehypertensive individuals (systolic BP 120-139 mm Hg or diastolic BP 80-89 mm Hg) require health-promoting lifestyle modifications to prevent the progressive rise in blood pressure and CVD; for uncomplicated hypertension, thiazide diuretic should be used in drug treatment for most, either alone or combined with drugs from other classes; this report delineates specific high-risk conditions that are compelling indications for the use of other antihypertensive drug classes (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers); two or more antihypertensive medications will be required to achieve goal BP (<140/90 mm Hg, or <130/80 mm Hg) for patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease; for patients whose BP is more than 20 mm Hg above the systolic BP goal or more than 10 mm Hg above the diastolic BP goal, initiation of therapy using two agents, one of which usually will be a thiazide diuretic, should be considered; regardless of therapy or care, hypertension will be controlled only if patients are motivated to stay on their treatment plan. Positive experiences, trust in the clinician, and empathy improve patient motivation and satisfaction. This report serves as a guide, and the committee continues to recognize that the responsible physician's judgment remains paramount.
14,975 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, a randomized controlled trial of Aliskiren in the Prevention of Major Cardiovascular Events in Elderly people was presented. But the authors did not discuss the effect of the combination therapy in patients living with systolic hypertension.
Abstract: ABCD
: Appropriate Blood pressure Control in Diabetes
ABI
: ankle–brachial index
ABPM
: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
ACCESS
: Acute Candesartan Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke Survival
ACCOMPLISH
: Avoiding Cardiovascular Events in Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension
ACCORD
: Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes
ACE
: angiotensin-converting enzyme
ACTIVE I
: Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events
ADVANCE
: Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-MR Controlled Evaluation
AHEAD
: Action for HEAlth in Diabetes
ALLHAT
: Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart ATtack
ALTITUDE
: ALiskiren Trial In Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-renal Endpoints
ANTIPAF
: ANgioTensin II Antagonist In Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
APOLLO
: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Aliskiren in the Prevention of Major Cardiovascular Events in Elderly People
ARB
: angiotensin receptor blocker
ARIC
: Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities
ARR
: aldosterone renin ratio
ASCOT
: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
ASCOT-LLA
: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Lipid Lowering Arm
ASTRAL
: Angioplasty and STenting for Renal Artery Lesions
A-V
: atrioventricular
BB
: beta-blocker
BMI
: body mass index
BP
: blood pressure
BSA
: body surface area
CA
: calcium antagonist
CABG
: coronary artery bypass graft
CAPPP
: CAPtopril Prevention Project
CAPRAF
: CAndesartan in the Prevention of Relapsing Atrial Fibrillation
CHD
: coronary heart disease
CHHIPS
: Controlling Hypertension and Hypertension Immediately Post-Stroke
CKD
: chronic kidney disease
CKD-EPI
: Chronic Kidney Disease—EPIdemiology collaboration
CONVINCE
: Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of CV Endpoints
CT
: computed tomography
CV
: cardiovascular
CVD
: cardiovascular disease
D
: diuretic
DASH
: Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension
DBP
: diastolic blood pressure
DCCT
: Diabetes Control and Complications Study
DIRECT
: DIabetic REtinopathy Candesartan Trials
DM
: diabetes mellitus
DPP-4
: dipeptidyl peptidase 4
EAS
: European Atherosclerosis Society
EASD
: European Association for the Study of Diabetes
ECG
: electrocardiogram
EF
: ejection fraction
eGFR
: estimated glomerular filtration rate
ELSA
: European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis
ESC
: European Society of Cardiology
ESH
: European Society of Hypertension
ESRD
: end-stage renal disease
EXPLOR
: Amlodipine–Valsartan Combination Decreases Central Systolic Blood Pressure more Effectively than the Amlodipine–Atenolol Combination
FDA
: U.S. Food and Drug Administration
FEVER
: Felodipine EVent Reduction study
GISSI-AF
: Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico-Atrial Fibrillation
HbA1c
: glycated haemoglobin
HBPM
: home blood pressure monitoring
HOPE
: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation
HOT
: Hypertension Optimal Treatment
HRT
: hormone replacement therapy
HT
: hypertension
HYVET
: HYpertension in the Very Elderly Trial
IMT
: intima-media thickness
I-PRESERVE
: Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Systolic Function
INTERHEART
: Effect of Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors associated with Myocardial Infarction in 52 Countries
INVEST
: INternational VErapamil SR/T Trandolapril
ISH
: Isolated systolic hypertension
JNC
: Joint National Committee
JUPITER
: Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin
LAVi
: left atrial volume index
LIFE
: Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertensives
LV
: left ventricle/left ventricular
LVH
: left ventricular hypertrophy
LVM
: left ventricular mass
MDRD
: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease
MRFIT
: Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial
MRI
: magnetic resonance imaging
NORDIL
: The Nordic Diltiazem Intervention study
OC
: oral contraceptive
OD
: organ damage
ONTARGET
: ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial
PAD
: peripheral artery disease
PATHS
: Prevention And Treatment of Hypertension Study
PCI
: percutaneous coronary intervention
PPAR
: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
PREVEND
: Prevention of REnal and Vascular ENdstage Disease
PROFESS
: Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Secondary Strokes
PROGRESS
: Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study
PWV
: pulse wave velocity
QALY
: Quality adjusted life years
RAA
: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
RAS
: renin-angiotensin system
RCT
: randomized controlled trials
RF
: risk factor
ROADMAP
: Randomized Olmesartan And Diabetes MicroAlbuminuria Prevention
SBP
: systolic blood pressure
SCAST
: Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker Candesartan for Treatment of Acute STroke
SCOPE
: Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly
SCORE
: Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation
SHEP
: Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program
STOP
: Swedish Trials in Old Patients with Hypertension
STOP-2
: The second Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension
SYSTCHINA
: SYSTolic Hypertension in the Elderly: Chinese trial
SYSTEUR
: SYSTolic Hypertension in Europe
TIA
: transient ischaemic attack
TOHP
: Trials Of Hypertension Prevention
TRANSCEND
: Telmisartan Randomised AssessmeNt Study in ACE iNtolerant subjects with cardiovascular Disease
UKPDS
: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study
VADT
: Veterans' Affairs Diabetes Trial
VALUE
: Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation
WHO
: World Health Organization
### 1.1 Principles
The 2013 guidelines on hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology …
14,173 citations
••
TL;DR: Authors/Task Force Members: Piotr Ponikowski* (Chairperson) (Poland), Adriaan A. Voors* (Co-Chair person) (The Netherlands), Stefan D. Anker (Germany), Héctor Bueno (Spain), John G. F. Cleland (UK), Andrew J. S. Coats (UK)
13,400 citations
•
TL;DR: This book by a teacher of statistics (as well as a consultant for "experimenters") is a comprehensive study of the philosophical background for the statistical design of experiment.
Abstract: THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS. By Oscar Kempthorne. New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1952. 631 pp. $8.50. This book by a teacher of statistics (as well as a consultant for \"experimenters\") is a comprehensive study of the philosophical background for the statistical design of experiment. It is necessary to have some facility with algebraic notation and manipulation to be able to use the volume intelligently. The problems are presented from the theoretical point of view, without such practical examples as would be helpful for those not acquainted with mathematics. The mathematical justification for the techniques is given. As a somewhat advanced treatment of the design and analysis of experiments, this volume will be interesting and helpful for many who approach statistics theoretically as well as practically. With emphasis on the \"why,\" and with description given broadly, the author relates the subject matter to the general theory of statistics and to the general problem of experimental inference. MARGARET J. ROBERTSON
13,333 citations