scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Swaroop Darbha published in 2018"


Posted Content
TL;DR: For any given target, it is proved that every target is visited at least once and the maximum revisit time over all the targets, $\mathcal R(\mathcal W(k)), is minimized, which suggests significant computational savings.
Abstract: We consider the problem of planning a closed walk $\mathcal W$ for a UAV to persistently monitor a finite number of stationary targets with equal priorities and dynamically changing properties. A UAV must physically visit the targets in order to monitor them and collect information therein. The frequency of monitoring any given target is specified by a target revisit time, $i.e.$, the maximum allowable time between any two successive visits to the target. The problem considered in this paper is the following: Given $n$ targets and $k \geq n$ allowed visits to them, find an optimal closed walk $\mathcal W^*(k)$ so that every target is visited at least once and the maximum revisit time over all the targets, $\mathcal R(\mathcal W(k))$, is minimized. We prove the following: If $k \geq n^2-n$, $\mathcal R(\mathcal W^*(k))$ (or simply, $\mathcal R^*(k)$) takes only two values: $\mathcal R^*(n)$ when $k$ is an integral multiple of $n$, and $\mathcal R^*(n+1)$ otherwise. This result suggests significant computational savings - one only needs to determine $\mathcal W^*(n)$ and $\mathcal W^*(n+1)$ to construct an optimal solution $\mathcal W^*(k)$. We provide MILP formulations for computing $\mathcal W^*(n)$ and $\mathcal W^*(n+1)$. Furthermore, for {\it any} given $k$, we prove that $\mathcal R^*(k) \geq \mathcal R^*(k+n)$.

12 citations


Proceedings ArticleDOI
27 Jun 2018
TL;DR: In this paper, a controller that can achieve traffic shaping over the multiple dimensions of target time-gap and velocity over a region of space is designed, and it can stabilize the string of vehicles in attaining the target profiles.
Abstract: Connected automated vehicles (CAVs) could potentially be coordinated to safely attain the maximum traffic flow on roadways under dynamic traffic patterns, such as those engendered by the merger of two strings of vehicles due a lane drop. Strings of vehicles have to be shaped correctly in terms of the inter-vehicular time-gap and velocity to ensure that such operation is feasible. However, controllers that can achieve such traffic shaping over the multiple dimensions of target time-gap and velocity over a region of space are unknown. The objective of this work is to design such a controller, and to show that we can design candidate time-gap and velocity profiles such that it can stabilize the string of vehicles in attaining the target profiles. Our analysis is based on studying the system in the spacial rather than the time domain, which enables us to study stability as in terms of minimizing errors from the target profile and across vehicles as a function of location. Finally, we conduct numeral simulations in the context of shaping two platoons for merger, which we use to illustrate how to select time-gap and velocity profiles for maximizing flow and maintaining safety.

8 citations


Posted Content
TL;DR: The benefits of using V2V communication for autonomous vehicles are quantified in terms of a reduction in the employable time headway.
Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the benefits of Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication for autonomous vehicles and provide results on how V2V information helps reduce employable time headway in the presence of parasitic lags. For a string of vehicles adopting a Constant Time Headway Policy (CTHP) and availing the on-board information of predecessor's vehicle position and velocity, the minimum employable time headway ($h_{\min}$) must be lower bounded by $2\tau_0$ for string stability, where $\tau_0$ is the maximum parasitic actuation lag. In this paper, we quantify the benefits of using V2V communication in terms of a reduction in the employable time headway: (1) If the position and velocity information of $r$ immediately preceding vehicles is used, then $h_{\min}$ can be reduced to ${4\tau_0}/{(1+r)}$; (2) furthermore, if the acceleration of `$r$' immediately preceding vehicles is used, then $h_{\min}$ can be reduced to ${2\tau_0}/{(1+r)}$; and (3) if the position, velocity and acceleration of the immediate and the $r$-th predecessors are used, then $h_{\min} \ge {2\tau_0}/{(1+r)}$. Note that cases (2) and (3) provide the same lower bound on the minimum employable time headway; however, case (3) requires much less communicated information.

Posted Content
TL;DR: OWTT measurements available to a vehicle from the communication of its multiple on-board receivers with acoustic beacons, more specifically, long baseline (LBL) beacons are used by this paper to focus on localization.
Abstract: Localization is an important required task for enabling vehicle autonomy for underwater vehicles. Localization entails the determination of position of the center of mass and orientation of a vehicle from the available measurements. In this paper, we focus on localization by using One-Way Travel Time (OWTT) measurements available to a vehicle from the communication of its multiple on-board receivers with acoustic beacons, more specifically, long baseline (LBL) beacons. Range can be inferred by multiplying the OWTT with speed of sound; however, water conditions can change spatially and temporally resulting in uncertainty in range measurement. The farther a beacon is from a receiver, the larger is the uncertainty. The proposed method for localization accounts captures this uncertainty by bounding the true distance with an increasing (calibrating) function of the range measurement. Determination of this calibration function is formulated as polynomial optimization problem and is a crucial step for localization. The proposed two-step procedure for localization is as follows: based on the range measurements specific to a receiver from the beacons, a convex optimization problem is proposed to estimate the location of the receiver. The estimate is essentially a center of the set of possible locations of the receiver. In the second step, the location estimates of the vehicle are corrected using rigid body motion constraints and the orientation of the rigid body is thus determined. Numerical examples and experimental results provided at the end corroborate the procedures developed in this paper.