The very etymology of Ecology, from the greek 'Qikos', 'the household', implies that ecologists should devote some attention to the 'house' or habitat of the population or community they are studying. However, as Charles Elton (1966) has so forcibly pointed out, 'definition of habitats, or rather lack of it, is one of the chief blind spots in Zoology'. Elton himself has provided us with a qualitative classification of habitats, while another past President, Alex Watt (1947) highlighted the dynamic nature of habitats by his phrase, 'pattern and process'. Elton referred to the need to quantify habitat characteristics. In this Address I will attempt some quantification;however, you will all be aware that in doing this I will not be able to emulate those former Presidents who have been able to provide a definitative synthesis of a field or of their own studies, my offering can be but a small beginning, an indication of the type of characteristics we should quantify. In considering ecosystem patterns and environment R. M. May (1974) writes 'it is to be emphasized that although patterns may underlie the rich and varied tapestry of the natural world, there is no single simple pattern. Theories must be pluralistic'. Indeed, the complexity of the subject is daunting and in any attempt to formulate some type of general framework, one is continually beset with exceptions. In stressing the need for a framework I am echoing a plea of my predecessor Amyan Macfadyen (1975) who cited K. E. F. Watt's (1971) vivid image 'if we do not develop a strong theoretical core that will bring all parts of ecology back together we shall all be washed out to sea in an immense tide of unrelated information'. In some ways I think we may see ourselves at a similar point to the inorganic chemist before the development of the periodic table; then he could not predict, for example, how soluble a particular sulphate would be, or what was the likelihood of a particular reaction occurring. Each fact had to be discovered for itself and each must be remembered in isolation. It is noteworthy that from Dobereiner's early efforts in 1816 it took more than fifty years before Mendeleeff ormulated his Periodic Law (1869) and even after this there were various attempts at rearrangement. Another parallel may be drawn with astronomy before the development of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram that relates the evolution and the properties of stars. Again in our own subject biology, the situation is somewhat analagous to that before the formulation of the Linnean system of classification; but now from this system of classification, we are able to organize our knowledge of, for example, the functional morphology of organisms and we can even make assumptions, with a high probability

Habitat, the template for ecological strategies?

Simple mathematical models show that adaptations for achieving dispersal retain great importance even in uniform and predictable environments. A parent organism is expected to try to enter a high fraction of its propagules into competition for sites away from its own immediate locality even when mortality to such dispersing propagules is extremely high. The models incidentally provide a case where the evolutionarily stable dispersal strategy for individuals is suboptimal for the population as a whole.

Dispersal in stable habitats

Gene dispersal (flow, or migration) within and between plant populations has been of continuous interest to plant breeders and seed producers for many decades. Economic considerations have stimulated studies of gene flow as a function of distance, breeding system, pollinating agent, and planting design in numerous domestic plants. Only during the past two decades have a large body of plant evolutionists become interested in information accruing from these studies, and in the rates of gene flow in wild populations. Their efforts have concentrated primarily on related problems such as adaptations for and mechanics of pollen and seed (or fruit) dispersal, plant-pollinator coevolution, adaptive radiation in pollination and seed dispersal mechanisms, and colonization and the alteration of species boundaries. Early in this century, anecdoctal evidence on the movement of pollen and seed vectors, dispersal of pollen by wind, and the range extensions of weed species led to the casual assumption that gene flow must be extensive, and that it must play a major role in the cohesion of populations and population systems. This view eroded as more information became available and was more critically interpreted (e.g., Grant, 1958, 1971; Ehrlich and Raven, 1969; Stebbins, 1970a; Bradshaw, 1972).

Gene Flow in Seed Plants

discon­ tinuities on many scales in time and space. The patterns of these discontinuities produce an environmental patchwork which exerts powerful influences on the distri­ butions of organisms, their interactions, and their adaptations. Consideration of this environmental patch structure is critical to both the theory and management of populations. Despite the obvious heterogeneity of natural sys­ te.ms, most of the models that form the theoretical fabric of population biology and ecology (and that are increasingly conditioning our perception of reality) tell mathe­ matical stories of populations

http://max2.ese.u-psud.fr/epc/conservation/PDFs/HIPE/Wiens1976.pdf

Population Responses to Patchy Environments

▪ Abstract Studies of dispersal polymorphism in insects have played a pivotal role in advancing our understanding of population dynamics, life history evolution, and the physiological basis of adaptation. Comparative data on wing-dimorphic insects provide the most definitive evidence to date that habitat persistence selects for reduced dispersal capability. The increased fecundity of flightless females documents that a fitness trade-off exists between flight capability and reproduction. However, only recently have studies of nutrient consumption and allocation provided unequivocal evidence that this fitness trade-off results from a trade-off of internal resources. Recent studies involving wing-dimorphic insects document that flight capability imposes reproductive penalties in males as well as females. Direct information on hormone titers and their regulation implicates juvenile hormone and ecdysone in the control of wing-morph determination. However, detailed information is available for only one species,...

/pdf/physiology-and-ecology-of-dispersal-polymorphism-in-insects-1g97xoek12.pdf

T. R. E. Southwood

Papers

Migration of terrestrial arthropods in relation to habitat