T. W. Anderson

Bio: T. W. Anderson is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Estimator & Autoregressive model. The author has an hindex of 52, co-authored 179 publications receiving 42299 citations. Previous affiliations of T. W. Anderson include Columbia University & Carnegie Mellon University.

Asymptotic distribution of the reduced rank regression estimator under general conditions

Abstract: In the regression model $\mathbf{Y} = \eta + \mathbf{BX} + \mathbf{Z}$ with $\mathbf{Z}$ unobserved, $\mathscr{E}\mathbf{Z} = \mathbf{0}$ and $\mathscr{E}\mathbf{ZZ}' = \mathbf{\Sigma}_{ZZ}$, the least squares estimator of $\mathbf{B}$ is $\hat{\mathbf{B}} = \mathbf{S}_{YX}\mathbf{S}_{XX}^{-1}$. If the rank of $\mathbf{B}$ is known to be $k$ less than the dimensions of $\mathbf{Y}$ and $\mathbf{X}$, the reduced rank regression estimator of $\mathbf{B}$, say $\mathbf{B}_k$, depends on the first $k$ canonical variates of $\mathbf{Y}$ and $\mathbf{X}$. The asymptotic distribution of $\hat{\mathbf{B}}_k$ is obtained and compared with the asymptotic distribution of $\hat{\mathbf{B}}$. The advantage of $\hat{\mathbf{B}}_k$ is characterized.

Repeated Measurements on Autoregressive Processes

Abstract: Estimation of parameters and tests of hypotheses are studied in first-order autoregressive processes where the process is observed several times over a given time interval. The process may be homogeneous (i.e., the parameters may be constant over time) or inhomogeneous (time-varying parameters). Sufficient statistics under normality are obtained for various cases and several tests of hypotheses are given.

Monotonicity of the Power Functions of Some Tests of the Multivariate Linear Hypothesis

Abstract: The test procedures, invariant under certain groups of transformations [4], for testing a set of multivariate linear hypotheses in the linear normal model depend on the characteristic roots of a random matrix. The power function of such a test depends on the characteristic roots of a corresponding population matrix as parameters; these roots may be regarded as measures of deviation from the hypothesis tested. In this paper sufficient conditions on the procedure for the power function to be a monotonically increasing function of each of the parameters are obtained. The likelihood-ratio test [1], Lawley-Hotelling trace test [1], and Roy's maximum root test [6] satisfy these conditions. The monotonicity of the power function of Roy's test has been shown by Roy and Mikhail [5] using a geometrical method.

Maximum Likelihood Estimators and Likelihood Ratio Criteria in Multivariate Components of Variance

Abstract: Maximum likelihood estimators are obtained for multivariate components of variance models under the condition that the effect covariance matrix is positive semidefinite with a maximum rank. The rank of the estimator is random. The estimation procedure leads to a likelihood ratio test that the rank of the effect matrix is not greater than a given number against the alternative that the rank is not greater than a larger specified number. Linear structural relationship models and some factor analytic models can be put into this framework.

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

Abstract: This article examines the adequacy of the “rules of thumb” conventional cutoff criteria and several new alternatives for various fit indexes used to evaluate model fit in practice. Using a 2‐index presentation strategy, which includes using the maximum likelihood (ML)‐based standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) and supplementing it with either Tucker‐Lewis Index (TLI), Bollen's (1989) Fit Index (BL89), Relative Noncentrality Index (RNI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Gamma Hat, McDonald's Centrality Index (Mc), or root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), various combinations of cutoff values from selected ranges of cutoff criteria for the ML‐based SRMR and a given supplemental fit index were used to calculate rejection rates for various types of true‐population and misspecified models; that is, models with misspecified factor covariance(s) and models with misspecified factor loading(s). The results suggest that, for the ML method, a cutoff value close to .95 for TLI, BL89, CFI, RNI, and G...

A new look at the statistical model identification

Abstract: The history of the development of statistical hypothesis testing in time series analysis is reviewed briefly and it is pointed out that the hypothesis testing procedure is not adequately defined as the procedure for statistical model identification. The classical maximum likelihood estimation procedure is reviewed and a new estimate minimum information theoretical criterion (AIC) estimate (MAICE) which is designed for the purpose of statistical identification is introduced. When there are several competing models the MAICE is defined by the model and the maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters which give the minimum of AIC defined by AIC = (-2)log-(maximum likelihood) + 2(number of independently adjusted parameters within the model). MAICE provides a versatile procedure for statistical model identification which is free from the ambiguities inherent in the application of conventional hypothesis testing procedure. The practical utility of MAICE in time series analysis is demonstrated with some numerical examples.

Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data

Abstract: The second edition of this acclaimed graduate text provides a unified treatment of two methods used in contemporary econometric research, cross section and data panel methods. By focusing on assumptions that can be given behavioral content, the book maintains an appropriate level of rigor while emphasizing intuitive thinking. The analysis covers both linear and nonlinear models, including models with dynamics and/or individual heterogeneity. In addition to general estimation frameworks (particular methods of moments and maximum likelihood), specific linear and nonlinear methods are covered in detail, including probit and logit models and their multivariate, Tobit models, models for count data, censored and missing data schemes, causal (or treatment) effects, and duration analysis. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data was the first graduate econometrics text to focus on microeconomic data structures, allowing assumptions to be separated into population and sampling assumptions. This second edition has been substantially updated and revised. Improvements include a broader class of models for missing data problems; more detailed treatment of cluster problems, an important topic for empirical researchers; expanded discussion of "generalized instrumental variables" (GIV) estimation; new coverage (based on the author's own recent research) of inverse probability weighting; a more complete framework for estimating treatment effects with panel data, and a firmly established link between econometric approaches to nonlinear panel data and the "generalized estimating equation" literature popular in statistics and other fields. New attention is given to explaining when particular econometric methods can be applied; the goal is not only to tell readers what does work, but why certain "obvious" procedures do not. The numerous included exercises, both theoretical and computer-based, allow the reader to extend methods covered in the text and discover new insights.

Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.

Abstract: This paper presents specification tests that are applicable after estimating a dynamic model from panel data by the generalized method of moments (GMM), and studies the practical performance of these procedures using both generated and real data. Our GMM estimator optimally exploits all the linear moment restrictions that follow from the assumption of no serial correlation in the errors, in an equation which contains individual effects, lagged dependent variables and no strictly exogenous variables. We propose a test of serial correlation based on the GMM residuals and compare this with Sargan tests of over-identifying restrictions and Hausman specification tests.

Statistical Principles in Experimental Design

Abstract: CHAPTER 1: Introduction to Design CHAPTER 2: Principles of Estimation and Inference: Means and Variance CHAPTER 3: Design and Analysis of Single-Factor Experiments: Completely Randomized Design CHAPTER 4: Single-Factor Experiments Having Repeated Measures on the Same Element CHAPTER 5: Design and Analysis of Factorial Experiments: Completely-Randomized Design CHAPTER 6: Factorial Experiments: Computational Procedures and Numerical Example CHAPTER 7: Multifactor Experiments Having Repeated Measures on the Same Element CHAPTER 8: Factorial Experiments in which Some of the Interactions are Confounded CHAPTER 9: Latin Squares and Related Designs CHAPTER 10: Analysis of Covariance