This paper provides an overview of the Internet of Things (IoT) with emphasis on enabling technologies, protocols, and application issues. The IoT is enabled by the latest developments in RFID, smart sensors, communication technologies, and Internet protocols. The basic premise is to have smart sensors collaborate directly without human involvement to deliver a new class of applications. The current revolution in Internet, mobile, and machine-to-machine (M2M) technologies can be seen as the first phase of the IoT. In the coming years, the IoT is expected to bridge diverse technologies to enable new applications by connecting physical objects together in support of intelligent decision making. This paper starts by providing a horizontal overview of the IoT. Then, we give an overview of some technical details that pertain to the IoT enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. Compared to other survey papers in the field, our objective is to provide a more thorough summary of the most relevant protocols and application issues to enable researchers and application developers to get up to speed quickly on how the different protocols fit together to deliver desired functionalities without having to go through RFCs and the standards specifications. We also provide an overview of some of the key IoT challenges presented in the recent literature and provide a summary of related research work. Moreover, we explore the relation between the IoT and other emerging technologies including big data analytics and cloud and fog computing. We also present the need for better horizontal integration among IoT services. Finally, we present detailed service use-cases to illustrate how the different protocols presented in the paper fit together to deliver desired IoT services.

Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications

Networked sensors-those that coordinate amongst themselves to achieve a larger sensing task-will revolutionize information gathering and processing both in urban environments and in inhospitable terrain. The sheer numbers of these sensors and the expected dynamics in these environments present unique challenges in the design of unattended autonomous sensor networks. These challenges lead us to hypothesize that sensor network coordination applications may need to be structured differently from traditional network applications. In particular, we believe that localized algorithms (in which simple local node behavior achieves a desired global objective) may be necessary for sensor network coordination. In this paper, we describe localized algorithms, and then discuss directed diffusion, a simple communication model for describing localized algorithms.

https://www.cs.jhu.edu/~cs647/class-papers/Sensor%20Nets/estrin.pdf

Next century challenges: scalable coordination in sensor networks

Underwater sensor nodes will find applications in oceanographic data collection, pollution monitoring, offshore exploration, disaster prevention, assisted navigation and tactical surveillance applications. Moreover, unmanned or autonomous underwater vehicles (UUVs, AUVs), equipped with sensors, will enable the exploration of natural undersea resources and gathering of scientific data in collaborative monitoring missions. Underwater acoustic networking is the enabling technology for these applications. Underwater networks consist of a variable number of sensors and vehicles that are deployed to perform collaborative monitoring tasks over a given area. In this paper, several fundamental key aspects of underwater acoustic communications are investigated. Different architectures for two-dimensional and three-dimensional underwater sensor networks are discussed, and the characteristics of the underwater channel are detailed. The main challenges for the development of efficient networking solutions posed by the underwater environment are detailed and a cross-layer approach to the integration of all communication functionalities is suggested. Furthermore, open research issues are discussed and possible solution approaches are outlined. � 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V.

/pdf/underwater-acoustic-sensor-networks-research-challenges-15fjl1gvhc.pdf

Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges

National Institute of Standards and Technology における超伝導研究及び生活

Ad hoc networks are a new wireless networking paradigm for mobile hosts. Unlike traditional mobile wireless networks, ad hoc networks do not rely on any fixed infrastructure. Instead, hosts rely on each other to keep the network connected. Military tactical and other security-sensitive operations are still the main applications of ad hoc networks, although there is a trend to adopt ad hoc networks for commercial uses due to their unique properties. One main challenge in the design of these networks is their vulnerability to security attacks. In this article, we study the threats on ad hoc network faces and the security goals to be achieved. We identify the new challenges and opportunities posed by this new networking environment and explore new approaches to secure its communication. In particular, we take advantage of the inherent redundancy in ad hoc networks-multiple routes between nodes-to defend routing against denial-of-service attacks. We also use replication and new cryptographic schemes, such as threshold cryptography, to build a highly secure and highly available key management service, which terms the core of our security framework.

/pdf/securing-ad-hoc-networks-3hudjv4io2.pdf

Securing ad hoc networks

In this paper, we describe the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) [1] for Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks (MANETs) and the evaluation of this protocol through experiments and simulations. In particular, we emphasize the practical tests and intensive simulations, which have been used in guiding and evaluating the design of the protocol, and which have been a key to identifying both problems and solutions. OLSR is a proactive link-state routing protocol, employing periodic message exchange for updating topological information in each node in the network. I.e. topological information is flooded to all nodes in the network. Conceptually, OLSR contains three elements: Mechanisms for neighbor sensing based on periodic exchange of HELLO messages within a node’s neighborhood. Generic mechanisms for efficient flooding of control traffic into the network employing the concept of multipoint relays (MPRs) [5] for a significant reduction of duplicate retransmissions during the flooding process. And a specification of a set of control-messages providing each node with sufficient topological information to be able to compute an optimal route to each destination in the network using any shortest-path algorithm. Experimental work, running a test-network of laptops with IEEE 802.11 wireless cards, revealed interesting properties. While the protocol, as originally specified, works quite well, it was found, that enforcing “jitter” on the interval between the periodic exchange of control messages in OLSR and piggybacking said control messages into a single packet, significantly reduced the number of messages lost due to collisions. It was also observed, that under certain conditions a “naive” neighbor sensing mechanism was insufficient: a bad link between two nodes (e.g. when two nodes are on the edge of radio range) might on occasion transmit a HELLO message in both directions (hence enabling the link for routing), while not being able to sustain continuous traffic. This would result in “route-flapping” and temporary loss of connectivity. With the experimental results as basis, we have been deploying simulations to reveal the impact of the various algorithmic improvements, described above.

/pdf/the-optimized-link-state-routing-protocol-evaluation-through-3320s5g0o1.pdf

The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol: Evaluation through Experiments and Simulation

This specification describes version 2 of the Optimized Link State
Routing Protocol (OLSRv2) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs).

The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2

With RPL - the “IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-power Lossy Networks” - emerging as a Proposed Standard “Request For Comment” (RFC) in the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) after a ∼2-year development cycle, this paper presents a critical evaluation of the resulting protocol and its applicability and limits. The paper presents a selection of observations of the protocol characteristics, exposes experiences acquired when producing a prototype implementation of RPL, and presents results obtained from testing this protocol - both in a network simulator, and in real-world experiments on a wireless sensor network testbed. The paper aims at providing a better understanding of possible weaknesses and limits of RPL, notably the possible directions that further protocol developments should explore, in order to address these.

/pdf/a-critical-evaluation-of-the-ipv6-routing-protocol-for-low-3e0dugixg3.pdf

A critical evaluation of the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL)

In this paper, we describe the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR), a proactive routing protocol for Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks (MANETs). We evaluate its performance through exhaustive simulations using the Network Simulator 2 (ns2), and compare with other ad-hoc protocols, specifically the Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocol and the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocol. We study the protocols under varying conditions (node mobility, network density) and with varying traffic (TCP, UDP, different number of connections/streams) to provide a qualitative assessment of the applicability of the protocols in different scenarios.

/pdf/comparative-study-of-routing-protocols-for-mobile-ad-hoc-378mzpixda.pdf

Comparative Study of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks

This document describes a 1-hop and symmetric 2-hop neighborhood
discovery protocol (NHDP) for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs).
[STANDARDS-TRACK]

/pdf/mobile-ad-hoc-network-manet-neighborhood-discovery-protocol-19rkxp3ddc.pdf

Thomas Clausen

Papers

The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol: Evaluation through Experiments and Simulation

The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2

A critical evaluation of the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL)

Comparative Study of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks

Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)