scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Thomas Hagglof

Bio: Thomas Hagglof is an academic researcher from Rockefeller University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Antibody & Epitope. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 8 publications receiving 2368 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
18 Jun 2020-Nature
TL;DR: Most convalescent plasma samples obtained from individuals who recover from COVID-19 do not contain high levels of neutralizing activity, and rare but recurring RBD-specific antibodies with potent antiviral activity were found in all individuals tested, suggesting that a vaccine designed to elicit such antibodies could be broadly effective.
Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 infected millions of people and claimed hundreds of thousands of lives Virus entry into cells depends on the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) Although there is no vaccine, it is likely that antibodies will be essential for protection However, little is known about the human antibody response to SARS-CoV-21-5 Here we report on 149 COVID-19 convalescent individuals Plasmas collected an average of 39 days after the onset of symptoms had variable half-maximal pseudovirus neutralizing titres: less than 1:50 in 33% and below 1:1,000 in 79%, while only 1% showed titres above 1:5,000 Antibody sequencing revealed expanded clones of RBD-specific memory B cells expressing closely related antibodies in different individuals Despite low plasma titres, antibodies to three distinct epitopes on RBD neutralized at half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50 values) as low as single digit nanograms per millitre Thus, most convalescent plasmas obtained from individuals who recover from COVID-19 do not contain high levels of neutralizing activity Nevertheless, rare but recurring RBD-specific antibodies with potent antiviral activity were found in all individuals tested, suggesting that a vaccine designed to elicit such antibodies could be broadly effective

1,675 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
18 Jan 2021-Nature
TL;DR: In this article, the authors report on the humoral memory response in a cohort of 87 individuals assessed at 1.3 and 6.2 months after infection with SARS-CoV-2.
Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected 78 million individuals and is responsible for over 1.7 million deaths to date. Infection is associated with the development of variable levels of antibodies with neutralizing activity, which can protect against infection in animal models1,2. Antibody levels decrease with time, but, to our knowledge, the nature and quality of the memory B cells that would be required to produce antibodies upon reinfection has not been examined. Here we report on the humoral memory response in a cohort of 87 individuals assessed at 1.3 and 6.2 months after infection with SARS-CoV-2. We find that titres of IgM and IgG antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 decrease significantly over this time period, with IgA being less affected. Concurrently, neutralizing activity in plasma decreases by fivefold in pseudotype virus assays. By contrast, the number of RBD-specific memory B cells remains unchanged at 6.2 months after infection. Memory B cells display clonal turnover after 6.2 months, and the antibodies that they express have greater somatic hypermutation, resistance to RBD mutations and increased potency, indicative of continued evolution of the humoral response. Immunofluorescence and PCR analyses of intestinal biopsies obtained from asymptomatic individuals at 4 months after the onset of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) revealed the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids and immunoreactivity in the small bowel of 7 out of 14 individuals. We conclude that the memory B cell response to SARS-CoV-2 evolves between 1.3 and 6.2 months after infection in a manner that is consistent with antigen persistence.

1,163 citations

Posted ContentDOI
04 Jan 2021-bioRxiv
TL;DR: The memory B cell response to SARS-CoV-2 evolves between 1.3 and 6.2 months after infection in a manner that is consistent with antigen persistence, and the antibodies they express have greater somatic hypermutation, increased potency and resistance to RBD mutations, indicative of continued evolution of the humoral response.
Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected 78 million individuals and is responsible for over 1.7 million deaths to date. Infection is associated with development of variable levels of antibodies with neutralizing activity that can protect against infection in animal models. Antibody levels decrease with time, but the nature and quality of the memory B cells that would be called upon to produce antibodies upon re-infection has not been examined. Here we report on the humoral memory response in a cohort of 87 individuals assessed at 1.3 and 6.2 months after infection. We find that IgM, and IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody titers decrease significantly with IgA being less affected. Concurrently, neutralizing activity in plasma decreases by five-fold in pseudotype virus assays. In contrast, the number of RBD-specific memory B cells is unchanged. Memory B cells display clonal turnover after 6.2 months, and the antibodies they express have greater somatic hypermutation, increased potency and resistance to RBD mutations, indicative of continued evolution of the humoral response. Analysis of intestinal biopsies obtained from asymptomatic individuals 4 months after coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) onset, using immunofluorescence, or polymerase chain reaction, revealed persistence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids and immunoreactivity in the small bowel of 7 out of 14 volunteers. We conclude that the memory B cell response to SARS-CoV-2 evolves between 1.3 and 6.2 months after infection in a manner that is consistent with antigen persistence.

362 citations

Posted ContentDOI
29 May 2020-bioRxiv
TL;DR: These studies structurally define a recurrent anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody class derived from VH3-53/Vh3-66 and similarity to a SARS- coV VH 3-30 antibody, providing criteria for evaluating vaccine-elicited antibodies.
Abstract: Neutralizing antibody responses to coronaviruses focus on the trimeric spike, with most against the receptor-binding domain (RBD). Here we characterized polyclonal IgGs and Fabs from COVID-19 convalescent individuals for recognition of coronavirus spikes. Plasma IgGs differed in their degree of focus on RBD epitopes, recognition of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and mild coronaviruses, and how avidity effects contributed to increased binding/neutralization of IgGs over Fabs. Electron microscopy reconstructions of polyclonal plasma Fab-spike complexes showed recognition of both S1A and RBD epitopes. A 3.4A cryo-EM structure of a neutralizing monoclonal Fab-S complex revealed an epitope that blocks ACE2 receptor-binding on "up" RBDs. Modeling suggested that IgGs targeting these sites have different potentials for inter-spike crosslinking on viruses and would not be greatly affected by identified SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations. These studies structurally define a recurrent anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody class derived from VH3-53/VH3-66 and similarity to a SARS-CoV VH3-30 antibody, providing criteria for evaluating vaccine-elicited antibodies.

181 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that neutralization level is highly predictive of immune protection, and an evidence-based model of SARS-CoV-2 immune protection that will assist in developing vaccine strategies to control the future trajectory of the pandemic is provided.
Abstract: Predictive models of immune protection from COVID-19 are urgently needed to identify correlates of protection to assist in the future deployment of vaccines. To address this, we analyzed the relationship between in vitro neutralization levels and the observed protection from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection using data from seven current vaccines and from convalescent cohorts. We estimated the neutralization level for 50% protection against detectable SARS-CoV-2 infection to be 20.2% of the mean convalescent level (95% confidence interval (CI) = 14.4–28.4%). The estimated neutralization level required for 50% protection from severe infection was significantly lower (3% of the mean convalescent level; 95% CI = 0.7–13%, P = 0.0004). Modeling of the decay of the neutralization titer over the first 250 d after immunization predicts that a significant loss in protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection will occur, although protection from severe disease should be largely retained. Neutralization titers against some SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern are reduced compared with the vaccine strain, and our model predicts the relationship between neutralization and efficacy against viral variants. Here, we show that neutralization level is highly predictive of immune protection, and provide an evidence-based model of SARS-CoV-2 immune protection that will assist in developing vaccine strategies to control the future trajectory of the pandemic. Estimates of the levels of neutralizing antibodies necessary for protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 or severe COVID-19 are a fraction of the mean level in convalescent serum and will be useful in guiding vaccine rollouts.

2,705 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
05 Feb 2021-Science
TL;DR: This article analyzed multiple compartments of circulating immune memory to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 254 samples from 188 COVID-19 cases, including 43 samples at ≥ 6 months after infection.
Abstract: Understanding immune memory to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is critical for improving diagnostics and vaccines and for assessing the likely future course of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed multiple compartments of circulating immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 in 254 samples from 188 COVID-19 cases, including 43 samples at ≥6 months after infection. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the spike protein was relatively stable over 6+ months. Spike-specific memory B cells were more abundant at 6 months than at 1 month after symptom onset. SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells declined with a half-life of 3 to 5 months. By studying antibody, memory B cell, CD4+ T cell, and CD8+ T cell memory to SARS-CoV-2 in an integrated manner, we observed that each component of SARS-CoV-2 immune memory exhibited distinct kinetics.

1,980 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Paul Bastard1, Paul Bastard2, Paul Bastard3, Lindsey B. Rosen4, Qian Zhang1, Eleftherios Michailidis1, Hans-Heinrich Hoffmann1, Yu Zhang4, Karim Dorgham3, Quentin Philippot2, Quentin Philippot3, Jérémie Rosain3, Jérémie Rosain2, Vivien Béziat3, Vivien Béziat1, Vivien Béziat2, Jeremy Manry2, Jeremy Manry3, Elana Shaw4, Liis Haljasmägi5, Pärt Peterson5, Lazaro Lorenzo3, Lazaro Lorenzo2, Lucy Bizien3, Lucy Bizien2, Sophie Trouillet-Assant6, Kerry Dobbs4, Adriana Almeida de Jesus4, Alexandre Belot6, Anne Kallaste7, Emilie Catherinot, Yacine Tandjaoui-Lambiotte2, Jérémie Le Pen1, Gaspard Kerner2, Gaspard Kerner3, Benedetta Bigio1, Yoann Seeleuthner3, Yoann Seeleuthner2, Rui Yang1, Alexandre Bolze, András N Spaan8, András N Spaan1, Ottavia M. Delmonte4, Michael S. Abers4, Alessandro Aiuti9, Giorgio Casari9, Vito Lampasona9, Lorenzo Piemonti9, Fabio Ciceri9, Kaya Bilguvar10, Richard P. Lifton1, Richard P. Lifton10, Marc Vasse, David M. Smadja3, Mélanie Migaud2, Mélanie Migaud3, Jérôme Hadjadj3, Benjamin Terrier3, Darragh Duffy11, Lluis Quintana-Murci12, Lluis Quintana-Murci11, Diederik van de Beek13, Lucie Roussel14, Donald C. Vinh14, Stuart G. Tangye15, Stuart G. Tangye16, Filomeen Haerynck17, David Dalmau18, Javier Martinez-Picado19, Javier Martinez-Picado20, Petter Brodin21, Petter Brodin22, Michel C. Nussenzweig23, Michel C. Nussenzweig1, Stéphanie Boisson-Dupuis3, Stéphanie Boisson-Dupuis2, Stéphanie Boisson-Dupuis1, Carlos Rodríguez-Gallego, Guillaume Vogt3, Trine H. Mogensen24, Trine H. Mogensen25, Andrew J. Oler4, Jingwen Gu4, Peter D. Burbelo4, Jeffrey I. Cohen4, Andrea Biondi26, Laura Rachele Bettini26, Mariella D'Angiò26, Paolo Bonfanti26, Patrick Rossignol27, Julien Mayaux3, Frédéric Rieux-Laucat3, Eystein S. Husebye28, Eystein S. Husebye29, Eystein S. Husebye30, Francesca Fusco, Matilde Valeria Ursini, Luisa Imberti31, Alessandra Sottini31, Simone Paghera31, Eugenia Quiros-Roldan32, Camillo Rossi, Riccardo Castagnoli33, Daniela Montagna33, Amelia Licari33, Gian Luigi Marseglia33, Xavier Duval, Jade Ghosn3, Hgid Lab4, Covid Clinicians5, Covid-Storm Clinicians§4, CoV-Contact Cohort§3, Amsterdam Umc Covid Biobank2, Amsterdam Umc Covid Biobank3, Amsterdam Umc Covid Biobank1, Covid Human Genetic Effort1, John S. Tsang4, Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky4, Kai Kisand5, Michail S. Lionakis4, Anne Puel1, Anne Puel2, Anne Puel3, Shen-Ying Zhang2, Shen-Ying Zhang1, Shen-Ying Zhang3, Steven M. Holland4, Guy Gorochov3, Emmanuelle Jouanguy2, Emmanuelle Jouanguy1, Emmanuelle Jouanguy3, Charles M. Rice1, Aurélie Cobat3, Aurélie Cobat2, Aurélie Cobat1, Luigi D. Notarangelo4, Laurent Abel2, Laurent Abel3, Laurent Abel1, Helen C. Su4, Jean-Laurent Casanova 
23 Oct 2020-Science
TL;DR: A means by which individuals at highest risk of life-threatening COVID-19 can be identified is identified, and the hypothesis that neutralizing auto-Abs against type I IFNs may underlie critical CO VID-19 is tested.
Abstract: Interindividual clinical variability in the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection is immense. We report that at least 101 of 987 patients with life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia had neutralizing IgG auto-Abs against IFN-ω (13 patients), the 13 types of IFN-α (36), or both (52), at the onset of critical disease; a few also had auto-Abs against the other three type I IFNs. The auto-Abs neutralize the ability of the corresponding type I IFNs to block SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. These auto-Abs were not found in 663 individuals with asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and were present in only 4 of 1,227 healthy individuals. Patients with auto-Abs were aged 25 to 87 years and 95 were men. A B cell auto-immune phenocopy of inborn errors of type I IFN immunity underlies life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia in at least 2.6% of women and 12.5% of men.

1,913 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
18 Jun 2020-Nature
TL;DR: Most convalescent plasma samples obtained from individuals who recover from COVID-19 do not contain high levels of neutralizing activity, and rare but recurring RBD-specific antibodies with potent antiviral activity were found in all individuals tested, suggesting that a vaccine designed to elicit such antibodies could be broadly effective.
Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 infected millions of people and claimed hundreds of thousands of lives Virus entry into cells depends on the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) Although there is no vaccine, it is likely that antibodies will be essential for protection However, little is known about the human antibody response to SARS-CoV-21-5 Here we report on 149 COVID-19 convalescent individuals Plasmas collected an average of 39 days after the onset of symptoms had variable half-maximal pseudovirus neutralizing titres: less than 1:50 in 33% and below 1:1,000 in 79%, while only 1% showed titres above 1:5,000 Antibody sequencing revealed expanded clones of RBD-specific memory B cells expressing closely related antibodies in different individuals Despite low plasma titres, antibodies to three distinct epitopes on RBD neutralized at half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50 values) as low as single digit nanograms per millitre Thus, most convalescent plasmas obtained from individuals who recover from COVID-19 do not contain high levels of neutralizing activity Nevertheless, rare but recurring RBD-specific antibodies with potent antiviral activity were found in all individuals tested, suggesting that a vaccine designed to elicit such antibodies could be broadly effective

1,675 citations