scispace - formally typeset
T

Thomas Hildebrandt

Researcher at University of Copenhagen

Publications -  145
Citations -  2378

Thomas Hildebrandt is an academic researcher from University of Copenhagen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Concurrency & Bisimulation. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 138 publications receiving 1926 citations. Previous affiliations of Thomas Hildebrandt include Aarhus University & IT University of Copenhagen.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Lower or Higher Oxygenation Targets for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

TL;DR: In this paper, the benefits and harms of different oxygenation levels for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU) were discussed. But, the benefits of different levels of oxygenation were not evaluated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Declarative Event-Based Workflow as Distributed Dynamic Condition Response Graphs

TL;DR: In this article, a dynamic condition response graph (DCRG) is presented as a declarative, event-based process model inspired by the workflow language employed by an industrial partner and conservatively generalizing prime event structures.
Book ChapterDOI

Bigraphical models of context-aware systems

TL;DR: This work investigates bigraphical models of context-aware systems, a facet of ubiquitous computing, and proposes a more sophisticated modeling technique, introducing Plato-graphical models, alleviating awkwardness in naively encoding such systems in bigraphs.
Book ChapterDOI

Nested dynamic condition response graphs

TL;DR: An extension of the recently introduced declarative process model Dynamic Condition Response Graphs to allow nested sub-graphs and a new milestone relation between events and formalize the semantics by giving first a map from Nested to (flat) DCR Graphs with milestones, and then extending the previously given mapping to Buchi-automata to include the milestone relation.
Book ChapterDOI

On purpose and by necessity: Compliance under the GDPR

TL;DR: The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) gives primacy to purpose, which begs the question: how do the authors audit a computer system’s adherence to a purpose?