scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Thomas J. Masaryk

Bio: Thomas J. Masaryk is an academic researcher from Cleveland Clinic. The author has contributed to research in topics: Magnetic resonance imaging & Aneurysm. The author has an hindex of 54, co-authored 173 publications receiving 10976 citations. Previous affiliations of Thomas J. Masaryk include Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine & Case Western Reserve University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Signal intensity changes appear to reflect a spectrum of vertebral body marrow changes associated with degenerative disk disease in patients referred for lumbar spine MR imaging.
Abstract: The authors reviewed magnetic resonance (MR) images of 474 consecutive patients referred for lumbar spine MR imaging. Type 1 changes (decreased signal intensity on T1-weighted spin-echo images and increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images) were identified in 20 patients (4%) and type 2 (increased signal intensity on T1-weighted images and isointense or slightly increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images) in 77 patients (16%). In all cases there was evidence of associated degenerative disk disease at the level of involvement. Histopathologic sections in three cases of type 1 change demonstrated disruption and fissuring of the end plates and vascularized fibrous tissue, while in three cases of type 2 change they demonstrated yellow marrow replacement. In addition, 16 patients with end-plate changes documented with MR were studied longitudinally. Type 1 changes in five of six patients converted to a type 2 pattern in 14 months to 3 years. Type 2 changes in ten patients remained stable over a 2-3...

1,611 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is generally accepted that blood–brain barrier (BBB) failure occurs as a result of CNS diseases, including epilepsy, but evidences also suggest that BBB failure may be an etiological factor contributing to the development of seizures.
Abstract: Summary: Purpose: It is generally accepted that blood‐brain barrier (BBB) failure occurs as a result of CNS diseases, including epilepsy. However, evidences also suggest that BBB failure may be an etiological factor contributing to the development of seizures. Methods: We monitored the onset of seizures in patients undergoing osmotic disruption of BBB (BBBD) followed by intraarterial chemotherapy (IAC) to treat primary brain lymphomas. Procedures were performed under barbiturate anesthesia. The effect of osmotic BBBD was also evaluated in naive pigs. Results: Focal motor seizures occurred immediately after BBBD in 25% of procedures and originated contralateral to the hemisphere of BBBD. No seizures were observed when BBB was not breached and only IAC was administered. The only predictors of seizures were positive indices of BBBD, namely elevation of serum S100β levels and computed tomography (CT) scans. In a porcine model of BBBD, identical procedures generated an identical result, and sudden behavioral and electrographic (EEG) seizures correlated with successful BBB disruption. The contribution of tumor or chemotherapy to acute seizures was therefore excluded. Conclusion: This is the first study to correlate extent of acute BBB openings and development of seizures in humans and in a large animal model of BBB opening. Acute vascular failure is sufficient to cause seizures in the absence of CNS pathologies or chemotherapy. Key Words: Epileptogenesis—Endothelial cells—Cerebrovascular disease—Tight junctions.

441 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 2007-Stroke
TL;DR: Angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial atheromatous disease can be performed with the Gateway balloon–Wingspan stent system with a high rate of technical success and acceptable periprocedural morbidity.
Abstract: Background and Purpose— The current report details our initial periprocedural experience with Wingspan (Boston Scientific/Target), the first self-expanding stent system designed for the treatment of intracranial atheromatous disease. Methods— All patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting with the Gateway balloon–Wingspan stent system were prospectively tracked. Results— During a 9-month period, treatment with the stent system was attempted in 78 patients (average age, 63.6 years; 33 women) with 82 intracranial atheromatous lesions, of which 54 were ≥70% stenotic. Eighty-one of 82 lesions were successfully stented (98.8%) during the first treatment session. In 1 case, the stent could not be delivered across the lesion; the patient was treated solely with angioplasty and stented at a later date. Lesions treated involved the internal carotid (n=32; 8 petrous, 10 cavernous, 11 supraclinoid segment, 3 terminus), vertebral (n=14; V4 segment), basilar (n=14), and middle cerebral (n=22) arteries. Mean±SD pretr...

311 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jun 2003-Cancer
TL;DR: It remains unclear whether elevation of serum levels of S100β reflect BBB dysfunction, parenchymal damage, or both, after head trauma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and stroke.
Abstract: Background S100beta protein is expressed constitutively by brain astrocytes. Elevated S100beta levels in cerebrospinal fluid and serum reported after head trauma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and stroke were correlated with the extent of brain damage. Because elevated serum S100beta also was shown to indicate blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction in the absence of apparent brain injury, it remains unclear whether elevation of serum levels of S100beta reflect BBB dysfunction, parenchymal damage, or both. Methods The authors conducted a prospective study of serum S100beta levels in six patients who underwent hyperosmotic BBB disruption (BBBD) with intraarterial chemotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma. In addition, 53 serum S100beta samples were measured in 51 patients who had a variety of primary or metastatic brain lesions at the time of neuroimaging. Results S100beta was correlated directly with the degree of clinical and radiologic signs of BBBD in patients who were enrolled in the hyperosmotic study. In patients with neoplastic brain lesions, gadolinium enhancement on a magnetic resonance image was correlated with elevated S100beta levels (n = 45 patients; 0.16 +/- 0.1 microg/L; mean +/- standard error of the mean) versus nonenhancing scans (n = 8 patients; 0.069 +/- 0.04 microg/L). Primary brain tumors (n = 8 patients; 0.12 +/- 0.08) or central nervous system metastases also presented with elevated serum S100beta levels (n = 27 patients; 0.14 +/- 0.34). Tumor volume was correlated with serum S100beta levels only in patients with vestibular schwannoma (n = 6 patients; 0.13 +/- 0.10 microg/L) but not in patients with other brain lesions. Conclusions S100beta was correlated directly with the extent and temporal sequence of hyperosmotic BBBD, further suggesting that S100beta is a marker of BBB function. Elevated S100beta levels may indicate the presence of radiologically detectable BBB leakage. Larger prospective studies may better determine the true specificity of S100beta as a marker for BBB function and as an early detection or follow-up marker of brain tumors.

274 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 2013-Stroke
TL;DR: These guidelines supersede the prior 2007 guidelines and 2009 updates and support the overarching concept of stroke systems of care and detail aspects of stroke care from patient recognition; emergency medical services activation, transport, and triage; through the initial hours in the emergency department and stroke unit.
Abstract: Background and Purpose—The authors present an overview of the current evidence and management recommendations for evaluation and treatment of adults with acute ischemic stroke. The intended audienc...

7,214 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2011-Stroke
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provided evidence-based recommendations for the prevention of future stroke among survivors of ischemic stroke or transient ischemi-chemic attack, including the control of risk factors, intervention for vascular obstruction, antithrombotic therapy for cardioembolism, and antiplatelet therapy for noncardioembolic stroke.
Abstract: The aim of this updated guideline is to provide comprehensive and timely evidence-based recommendations on the prevention of future stroke among survivors of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The guideline is addressed to all clinicians who manage secondary prevention for these patients. Evidence-based recommendations are provided for control of risk factors, intervention for vascular obstruction, antithrombotic therapy for cardioembolism, and antiplatelet therapy for noncardioembolic stroke. Recommendations are also provided for the prevention of recurrent stroke in a variety of specific circumstances, including aortic arch atherosclerosis, arterial dissection, patent foramen ovale, hyperhomocysteinemia, hypercoagulable states, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, sickle cell disease, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and pregnancy. Special sections address use of antithrombotic and anticoagulation therapy after an intracranial hemorrhage and implementation of guidelines.

4,545 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2019-Stroke
TL;DR: These guidelines detail prehospital care, urgent and emergency evaluation and treatment with intravenous and intra-arterial therapies, and in-hospital management, including secondary prevention measures that are appropriately instituted within the first 2 weeks.
Abstract: Background and Purpose- The purpose of these guidelines is to provide an up-to-date comprehensive set of recommendations in a single document for clinicians caring for adult patients with acute arterial ischemic stroke. The intended audiences are prehospital care providers, physicians, allied health professionals, and hospital administrators. These guidelines supersede the 2013 Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) Guidelines and are an update of the 2018 AIS Guidelines. Methods- Members of the writing group were appointed by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council's Scientific Statements Oversight Committee, representing various areas of medical expertise. Members were not allowed to participate in discussions or to vote on topics relevant to their relations with industry. An update of the 2013 AIS Guidelines was originally published in January 2018. This guideline was approved by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee and the AHA Executive Committee. In April 2018, a revision to these guidelines, deleting some recommendations, was published online by the AHA. The writing group was asked review the original document and revise if appropriate. In June 2018, the writing group submitted a document with minor changes and with inclusion of important newly published randomized controlled trials with >100 participants and clinical outcomes at least 90 days after AIS. The document was sent to 14 peer reviewers. The writing group evaluated the peer reviewers' comments and revised when appropriate. The current final document was approved by all members of the writing group except when relationships with industry precluded members from voting and by the governing bodies of the AHA. These guidelines use the American College of Cardiology/AHA 2015 Class of Recommendations and Level of Evidence and the new AHA guidelines format. Results- These guidelines detail prehospital care, urgent and emergency evaluation and treatment with intravenous and intra-arterial therapies, and in-hospital management, including secondary prevention measures that are appropriately instituted within the first 2 weeks. The guidelines support the overarching concept of stroke systems of care in both the prehospital and hospital settings. Conclusions- These guidelines provide general recommendations based on the currently available evidence to guide clinicians caring for adult patients with acute arterial ischemic stroke. In many instances, however, only limited data exist demonstrating the urgent need for continued research on treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

3,819 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 2001-Spine
TL;DR: Disc degeneration can be graded reliably on routine T2-weighted magnetic resonance images using the grading system and algorithm presented in this investigation.
Abstract: Study design A reliability study was conducted Objectives To develop a classification system for lumbar disc degeneration based on routine magnetic resonance imaging, to investigate the applicability of a simple algorithm, and to assess the reliability of this classification system Summary of background data A standardized nomenclature in the assessment of disc abnormalities is a prerequisite for a comparison of data from different investigations The reliability of the assessment has a crucial influence on the validity of the data Grading systems of disc degeneration based on state of the art magnetic resonance imaging and corresponding reproducibility studies currently are sparse Methods A grading system for lumbar disc degeneration was developed on the basis of the literature An algorithm to assess the grading was developed and optimized by reviewing lumbar magnetic resonance examinations The reliability of the algorithm in depicting intervertebral disc alterations was tested on the magnetic resonance images of 300 lumbar intervertebral discs in 60 patients (33 men and 27 women) with a mean age of 40 years (range, 10-83 years) All scans were analyzed independently by three observers Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were assessed by calculating kappa statistics Results There were 14 Grade I, 82 Grade II, 72 Grade III, 68 Grade IV, and 64 Grade V discs The kappa coefficients for intra- and interobserver agreement were substantial to excellent: intraobserver (kappa range, 084-090) and interobserver (kappa range, 069-081) Complete agreement was obtained, on the average, in 838% of all the discs A difference of one grade occurred in 159% and a difference of two or more grades in 13% of all the cases Conclusion Disc degeneration can be graded reliably on routine T2-weighted magnetic resonance images using the grading system and algorithm presented in this investigation

3,048 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Clinicians should be prepared to offer patients a choice between a screening test that is effective at both early cancer detection and cancer prevention through the detection and removal of polyps and those that can detect cancer early and also can detect adenomatous polyps.

2,876 citations