scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Thomas N. Habinek

Bio: Thomas N. Habinek is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cicero. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 56 citations.
Topics: Cicero

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 1990-Apeiron
TL;DR: In recent years, the focus on Qcero's philosophical and rhetorical writings of the 40s BC has focused less on Cicero's use of sources and more on his immediate political motivations as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: In recent years scholarship on Qcero's philosophical and rhetorical writings of the 40s BC has focused less on Cicero's use of sources and more on his immediate political motivations. Reasons for this shift in focus from sources to context are not far to seek. The political events of the period, including Pompey's loss at Pharsalus, the dictatorship and assassination of Julius Caesar, and the rising tension between Antony and the Senate were virtually unprecedented, and their significance was as obvious to participants as it has been to subsequent history. In addition, Cicero's own assessment of these events and the corresponding fluctuation in his emotional and psychological condition are well-documented in the surviving correspondence. As a result, scholars who seek to identify political aims in Cicero's ostensibly nonpolitical writing of the period have no difficulty in establishing either motive or opportunity. Yet it is perhaps precisely because of the topical or occasional significance of the late treatises of Cicero that readers have tended to overlook their significance (indeed the significance of

57 citations


Cited by
More filters
Book
14 Nov 2002
TL;DR: Pangle argues that the difficulties surrounding this discussion are soon dispelled once one understands the purpose of the Nicomachean Ethics as both a source of practical guidance for life and a profound, theoretical investigation into human nature as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: This book offers a comprehensive account of the major philosophical works on friendship and its relationship to self-love. The book gives central place to Aristotle's searching examination of friendship in the Nicomachean Ethics. Lorraine Pangle argues that the difficulties surrounding this discussion are soon dispelled once one understands the purpose of the Ethics as both a source of practical guidance for life and a profound, theoretical investigation into human nature. The book also provides fresh interpretations of works on friendship by Plato, Cicero, Epicurus, Seneca, Montaigne and Bacon. The author shows how each of these thinkers sheds light on central questions of moral philosophy: is human sociability rooted in neediness or strength? is the best life chiefly solitary, or dedicated to a community with others? Clearly structured and engagingly written, this book will appeal to a broad swathe of readers across philosophy, classics and political science.

139 citations

MonographDOI
TL;DR: Statius' Silvae, written late in the reign of Domitian (AD 81-96), are a new kind of poetry that confronts the challenge of imperial majesty or private wealth by new poetic strategies and forms as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Statius' Silvae, written late in the reign of Domitian (AD 81–96), are a new kind of poetry that confronts the challenge of imperial majesty or private wealth by new poetic strategies and forms. As poems of praise, they delight in poetic excess whether they honour the emperor or the poet's friends. Yet extravagant speech is also capacious speech. It functions as a strategy for conveying the wealth and grandeur of villas, statues and precious works of art as well as the complex emotions aroused by the material and political culture of empire. The Silvae are the product of a divided, self-fashioning voice. Statius was born in Naples of non-aristocratic parents. His position as outsider to the culture he celebrates gives him a unique perspective on it. The Silvae are poems of anxiety as well as praise, expressive of the tensions within the later period of Domitian's reign.

127 citations

MonographDOI
01 Nov 2011
TL;DR: Burton et al. as discussed by the authors argue that language and ideals contributed just as much to Roman empire-building as military muscle, using a constructivist theoretical framework drawn from international relations.
Abstract: In this bold new interpretation of the origins of ancient Rome's overseas empire, Dr Burton charts the impact of the psychology, language and gestures associated with the Roman concept of amicitia, or 'friendship'. The book challenges the prevailing orthodox Cold War-era realist interpretation of Roman imperialism and argues that language and ideals contributed just as much to Roman empire-building as military muscle. Using a constructivist theoretical framework drawn from international relations, Dr Burton replaces the modern scholarly fiction of a Roman empire built on networks of foreign clients and client-states with an interpretation grounded firmly in the discursive habits of the ancient texts themselves. The results better account for the peculiar rhythms of Rome's earliest period of overseas expansion - brief periods of vigorous military and diplomatic activity, such as the rolling back of Seleucid power in Asia Minor and Greece in 192–188 BC, followed by long periods of inactivity.

77 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The life of Seneca achieved exemplary status in Roman culture because it enabled Romans to think through issues critical to the preservation of social order as mentioned in this paper, which was a cultural phenomenon on its own terms.
Abstract: The attention Seneca attracted in his lifetime and succeeding generations not only preserves information about his biography: it also merits interpretation as a cultural phenomenon on its own terms. This paper argues that the life of Seneca achieved exemplary status because it enabled Romans to think through issues critical to the preservation of social order. As a new man who rose to power as the republican noble families were dying out, Seneca posed the question of imperial succession in an acute form. As a member of an imperial elite that was increasingly inclusive in its recruitment strategies, Seneca validated reliance on education and key cultural competencies as markers of elite status and legitimacy. His renown articulates a shift in emphasis within Roman culture from gloria-the old republican ideal based on zero-sum competition for honor-to claritas, or claritudo-distinction for special achievement or characteristics that grants entree to a collective elite. The specific cultural competencies demonstrated by Seneca and noted by those who spread his renown alert us to practices the Romans especially valued, namely theatricality, the use of writing to display a persona, the mastery of general discourse, and the interpretation of politics in ethical terms. As an exemplum Seneca could be-and was-the target of both praise and blame. The story of his close relationship with Nero and subsequent tragic death placed him among the sacrificial victims Romans seemed to regard as legitimizing a social order based on domination by a well-defined elite. In addition to various of Seneca9s writings, this essay considers in particular the Tacitean narrative of his relationship with Nero, Quintilian9s analysis of his achievement and influence, and his depiction in Octavia.

70 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 1994
TL;DR: To extract a set of political principles or mystificatory arguments from a text and call them "ideology" is to overlook the fact that a text is ideological only insofar as it seeks to affect an audience as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Ideology is a process as well as a product. To extract a set of political principles or mystificatory arguments from a text and call them ‘ideology’ is to overlook the fact that a text is ideological only insofar as it seeks to affect an audience. As J.B. Thompson has written, in a passage cited with approval by Terry Eagleton, ‘to study ideology…is to study the ways in which meaning (or signification) serves to sustain relations of domination.’ The ideology of a text, such as a dialogue of Cicero, cannot therefore be understood except in strategic relationship to a particular context. And the question that allows us to explore that relationship and thereby to begin to reconstruct the ‘relations of domination’ underwritten by the text is cui bono: to whose advantage is this text constructed and situated as it is?

37 citations