Author
Thomas P. Davis
Other affiliations: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Cooperative Research Centre ...read more
Bio: Thomas P. Davis is an academic researcher from University of Queensland. The author has contributed to research in topics: Polymerization & Chain transfer. The author has an hindex of 107, co-authored 724 publications receiving 41495 citations. Previous affiliations of Thomas P. Davis include Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation & Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
26 Jul 2002
TL;DR: Krzysztof Matyjaszewski and Thomas P. Davis as discussed by the authors discussed the fundamental concepts and history of living radical polymers and their application in industrial applications and processes.
Abstract: Introduction (Krzysztof Matyjaszewski and Thomas P. Davis). Contributors. 1. Theory of Radical Reactions (Johan P. A. Heuts). 2. Small Radical Chemistry (Martin Newcomb). 3. General Chemistry of Radical Polymerization (Bunichiro Yamada and Per B. Zetterlund). 4. The Kinetics of Free Radical Polymerization (Christopher Barner-Kowollik, Philipp Vana, and Thomas P. Davis). 5. Copolymerization Kinetics (Michelle L. Coote and Thomas P. Davis). 6. Heterogeneous Systems (Alex M. van Herk and Michael Monteiro). 7. Industrial Applications and Processes (Michael Cunningham and Robin Hutchinson). 8. General Concepts and History of Living Radical Polymerization (Krzysztof Matyjaszewski). 9. Kinetics of Living Radical Polymerization (Takeshi Fukuda, Atsushi Goto, and Yoshinobu Tsujii). 10. Nitroxide Mediated Living Radical Polymerization (Craig J. Hawker). 11. Fundamentals of Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (Krzysztof Matyjaszewski and Jianhui Xia). 12. Control of Free Radical Polymerization by Chain Transfer Methods (John Chiefari and Ezio Rizzardo). 13. Control of Stereochemistry of Polymers in Radical Polymerization (Akikazu Matsumoto). 14. Macromolecular Engineering by Controlled Radical Polymerization (Yves Gnanou and Daniel Taton). 15. Experimental Procedures and Techniques for Radical Polymerization (Stefan A. F. Bon and David M. Haddleton). 16. Future Outlook and Perspectives (Krzysztof Matyjaszewski and Thomas P. Davis). Index.
1,407 citations
TL;DR: The control of molecular weight and molecular weight distribution has enabled access to complex architectures and site specific functionality that were previously impossible to achieve via traditional free radical polymerizations.
Abstract: A living radical polymerization (LRP) is a free radical polymerization that aims at displaying living character, (i.e., does not terminate or transfer and is able to continue polymerization once the initial feed is exhausted by addition of more monomer). However, termination reactions are inherent to a radical process, and modern LRP techniques seek to minimize such reactions, therefore providing control over the molecular weight and the molecular weight distribution of a polymeric material. In addition, the better LRP techniques incorporate many of the desirable features of traditional free radical polymerization, such as compatibility with a wide range of monomers, tolerance of many functionalities, and facile reaction conditions. The control of molecular weight and molecular weight distribution has enabled access to complex architectures and site specific functionality that were previously impossible to achieve via traditional free radical polymerizations. These LRPs are classified in three different subgroups: (1) stable free-radical polymerization such as nitroxide mediated polymerization (NMP),1,2 (2) degenerative transfer polymerization, such as iodine transfer polymerization (ITP and RITP),3,4 single electron transfer-degenerative transfer living radical polymerization(SET-DTLRP),5,6reversibleaddition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT),7,8 and macromolecular design via the interchange of xanthates (MADIX)9,10 polymerization, and (3) metal mediated catalyzed polymerization, such as atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP),11-14 single electron transfer-living radical polymerization (SET-LRP),15 and organotellurium mediated living radical polymrization16-19 Among the existing LRP techniques, RAFT and MADIX are probably the most versatile processes, as they are tolerant * E-mail: T.P.D., T.Davis@UNSW.edu.au; S.P., S.Perrier@ chem.usyd.edu.au. † Centre for Advanced Macromolecular Design (CAMD), School of Chemical Sciences & Engineering, UNSW. ‡ Centre for Advanced Macromolecular Design (CAMD), School of Biotechnology & Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW. § The University of Sydney. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 5402–5436 5402
858 citations
TL;DR: There has been considerable interest in the application of photochromism to photo-responsive systems which has led to the development of new tailored smart materials for photonics and biomedical fields as discussed by the authors, and the underlying principles behind photoresponsive behavior, subsequent applications and relevant examples.
475 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used the pulsed-laser polymerization (PLP) and subsequent polymer analysis by size exclusion (SEC) chromatography for free-radical polymerization of butyl acrylate.
Abstract: Propagation rate coefficients, k(P), for free-radical polymerization of butyl acrylate (BA) previously reported by several groups are critically evaluated. All data were determined by the combination of pulsed-laser polymerization (PLP) and subsequent polymer analysis by size exclusion (SEC) chromatography. The PLP-SEC technique has been recommended as the method of choice for the determination of k(P) by the IUPAC Working Party on Modeling of Polymerization Kinetics and Processes. Application of the technique to acrylates has proven to be very difficult and, along with other experimental evidence, has led to the conclusion that acrylate chain-growth kinetics are complicated by intramolecular transfer (backbiting) events to form a mid-chain radical structure of lower reactivity. These mechanisms have a significant effect on acrylate polymerization rate even at low temperatures, and have limited the PLP-SEC determination of k(P) of chain-end radicals to low temperatures (<20 degreesC) using high pulse repetition rates. Nonetheless, the values for BA from six different laboratories, determined at ambient pressure in the temperature range of -65 to 20 degreesC mostly for bulk monomer with few data in solution, fulfill consistency criteria and show excellent agreement, and are therefore combined together into a benchmark data set. The data are fitted well by an Arrhenius relation resulting in a pre-exponential factor of 2.21 x 10(7) L (.) mol(-1) (.) s(-1) and an activation energy of 17.9 kJ (.) mol(-1). It must be emphasized that these PLP-determined k(P) values are for monomer addition to a chain-end radical and that, even at low temperatures, it is necessary to consider the presence of two radical structures that have very different reactivity. Studies for other alkyl acrylates do not provide sufficient results to construct benchmark data sets, but indicate that the family behavior previously documented for alkyl methacrylates also holds true within the alkyl acrylate family of monomers. [GRAPHICS] Arrhenius plot of propagation rate coefficients, k(P), for BA as measured by PLP-SEC.
464 citations
TL;DR: This succinct review of the recent literature is collated to assess the current state of understanding of the influence of nanoparticle shape on the effectiveness of drug delivery with a special emphasis on cancer therapy.
Abstract: Introduction: Nanoparticles have been successfully used for cancer drug delivery since 1995. In the design of commercial nanoparticles, size and surface characteristics have been exploited to achieve efficacious delivery. However, the design of optimized drug delivery platforms for efficient delivery to disease sites with minimal off-target effects remains a major research goal. One crucial element of nanoparticle design influencing both pharmacokinetics and cell uptake is nanoparticle morphology (both size and shape). In this succinct review, the authors collate the recent literature to assess the current state of understanding of the influence of nanoparticle shape on the effectiveness of drug delivery with a special emphasis on cancer therapy.Areas covered: This review draws on studies that have focused on the role of nonspherical nanoparticles used for cancer drug delivery. In particular, the authors summarize the influence of nanoparticle shape on biocirculation, biodistribution, cellular uptake and ...
433 citations
Cited by
More filters
[...]
TL;DR: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one, which seems an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.
Abstract: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.
Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …
33,785 citations
6,927 citations
TL;DR: The basis for the unique properties and rate enhancement for triazole formation under Cu(1) catalysis should be found in the high ∆G of the reaction in combination with the low character of polarity of the dipole of the noncatalyzed thermal reaction, which leads to a considerable activation barrier.
Abstract: The Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction of organic azides and alkynes has gained considerable attention in recent years due to the introduction in 2001 of Cu(1) catalysis by Tornoe and Meldal, leading to a major improvement in both rate and regioselectivity of the reaction, as realized independently by the Meldal and the Sharpless laboratories. The great success of the Cu(1) catalyzed reaction is rooted in the fact that it is a virtually quantitative, very robust, insensitive, general, and orthogonal ligation reaction, suitable for even biomolecular ligation and in vivo tagging or as a polymerization reaction for synthesis of long linear polymers. The triazole formed is essentially chemically inert to reactive conditions, e.g. oxidation, reduction, and hydrolysis, and has an intermediate polarity with a dipolar moment of ∼5 D. The basis for the unique properties and rate enhancement for triazole formation under Cu(1) catalysis should be found in the high ∆G of the reaction in combination with the low character of polarity of the dipole of the noncatalyzed thermal reaction, which leads to a considerable activation barrier. In order to understand the reaction in detail, it therefore seems important to spend a moment to consider the structural and mechanistic aspects of the catalysis. The reaction is quite insensitive to reaction conditions as long as Cu(1) is present and may be performed in an aqueous or organic environment both in solution and on solid support.
3,855 citations
TL;DR: The authors found that approximately 5% of patients with malignant gliomas have a family history of glioma and most of these familial cases are associated with rare genetic syndromes, such as neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2, the Li−Fraumeni syndrome (germ-line p53 mutations associated with an increased risk of several cancers), and Turcot's syndrome (intestinal polyposis and brain tumors).
Abstract: Approximately 5% of patients with malignant gliomas have a family history of gliomas. Some of these familial cases are associated with rare genetic syndromes, such as neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2, the Li−Fraumeni syndrome (germ-line p53 mutations associated with an increased risk of several cancers), and Turcot’s syndrome (intestinal polyposis and brain tumors). 10 However, most familial cases have
3,823 citations
TL;DR: Approaches, Derivatives and Applications Vasilios Georgakilas,† Michal Otyepka,‡ Athanasios B. Bourlinos,† Vimlesh Chandra, Namdong Kim, K. Kim,§,⊥ Radek Zboril,*,‡ and Kwang S. Kim.
Abstract: Approaches, Derivatives and Applications Vasilios Georgakilas,† Michal Otyepka,‡ Athanasios B. Bourlinos,‡ Vimlesh Chandra, Namdong Kim, K. Christian Kemp, Pavel Hobza,‡,§,⊥ Radek Zboril,*,‡ and Kwang S. Kim* †Institute of Materials Science, NCSR “Demokritos”, Ag. Paraskevi Attikis, 15310 Athens, Greece ‡Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic Center for Superfunctional Materials, Department of Chemistry, Pohang University of Science and Technology, San 31, Hyojadong, Namgu, Pohang 790-784, Korea Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Flemingovo naḿ. 2, 166 10 Prague 6, Czech Republic
3,460 citations