Author
Thomas V. Colby
Other affiliations: LDS Hospital, National Jewish Health, University of Iowa ...read more
Bio: Thomas V. Colby is an academic researcher from Mayo Clinic. The author has contributed to research in topics: Usual interstitial pneumonia & Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The author has an hindex of 126, co-authored 501 publications receiving 60130 citations. Previous affiliations of Thomas V. Colby include LDS Hospital & National Jewish Health.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: This document represents the current state of knowledge regarding idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and contains sections on definition and epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, natural history, staging and prognosis, treatment, and monitoring disease course.
Abstract: This document is an international evidence-based guideline on the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and is a collaborative effort of the American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society, the Japanese Respiratory Society, and the Latin American Thoracic Association. It represents the current state of knowledge regarding idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and contains sections on definition and epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, natural history, staging and prognosis, treatment, and monitoring disease course. For the diagnosis and treatment sections, pragmatic GRADE evidence-based methodology was applied in a question-based format. For each diagnosis and treatment question, the committee graded the quality of the evidence available (high, moderate, low, or very low), and made a recommendation (yes or no, strong or weak). Recommendations were based on majority vote. It is emphasized that clinicians must spend adequate time with patients to discuss patients' values and preferences and decide on the appropriate course of action.
5,834 citations
TL;DR: The Diagnostic Process Is Dynamic Clinical Evaluation Radiological Evaluation Role of Surgical Lung Biopsy Unclassifiable Interstitial Pneumonia Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Evaluation Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Abstract: Executive Summary Objectives Participants Evidence Validation Key Messages Introduction Rationale for a Change in the Approach to Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias Development of a New Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia Current Classification of IIP New ATS/ERS Classification Principles Guiding the Assessment of Patients with Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias The Diagnostic Process Is Dynamic Clinical Evaluation Radiological Evaluation Role of Surgical Lung Biopsy Unclassifiable Interstitial Pneumonia Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Evaluation Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features IPF: Areas of Uncertainty Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features NSIP: Areas of Uncertainty Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features COP: Areas of Uncertainty Acute Interstitial Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features AIP: Areas of Uncertainty Respiratory Bronchiolitis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features RB-ILD: Areas of Uncertainty Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features DIP: Areas of Uncertainty Lymphoid Interstitial Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features LIP: Areas of Uncertainty References Appendix
3,591 citations
Woolcock Institute of Medical Research1, University of Otago2, University of Cape Town3, Boston University4, University of California, San Francisco5, University of Wisconsin-Madison6, Creighton University7, University of Arizona8, University of Newcastle9, Erasmus University Rotterdam10, University of Groningen11, University of Edinburgh12, McMaster University13, Imperial College London14, University of Leicester15, University of Amsterdam16, University of Nevada, Reno17, University of Washington18, University of Aberdeen19, University of Pittsburgh20
TL;DR: This update is a supplement to the previous 2002 IIP classification document and outlines advances in the past decade and potential areas for future investigation.
Abstract: Background: In 2002 the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) defined seven specific entities, and provided standardized terminology and diagnostic criteria. In addition, the historical “gold standard” of histologic diagnosis was replaced by a multidisciplinary approach. Since 2002 many publications have provided new information about IIPs.Purpose: The objective of this statement is to update the 2002 ATS/ERS classification of IIPs.Methods: An international multidisciplinary panel was formed and developed key questions that were addressed through a review of the literature published between 2000 and 2011.Results: Substantial progress has been made in IIPs since the previous classification. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia is now better defined. Respiratory bronchiolitis–interstitial lung disease is now commonly diagnosed without surgical biopsy. The clinical course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and nonspecific inte...
2,931 citations
Book•
23 Apr 1999
TL;DR: The TNM Classification of Malignant Mesothelioma of the Pleura is applied to lung and Pleural Tumours because of the high unclassifiedness of these tumours.
Abstract: Histological Classification of Lung and Pleural Tumours- Definitions and Explanatory Notes- Epithelial Tumours- Soft Tissue Tumours- Mesothelial Tumours- Miscellaneous Tumours- Lymphoproliferative Diseases- Secondary Tumours- Unclassified Tumours- Tumour-Like Lesions- TNM Classification of Lung Carcinoma- TNM Classification of Malignant Mesothelioma of the Pleura- Illustrations
1,371 citations
TL;DR: The intention was to render the classification simple and practical to every surgical laboratory, so that most lung tumours could be classified by light microscopic criteria.
Abstract: Tumour classification systems provide the foundation for tumour diagnosis and patient therapy and a critical basis for epidemiological and clinical studies. This updated classification was developed with the aim to adhere to the principles of reproducibility, clinical significance, and simplicity in order to minimize the number of unclassifiable lesions. Major changes in the revised classification as compared to the previous one (WHO 1981 1) include the addition of two pre-invasive lesions to squamous dysplasia and carcinoma in situ ; atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia. Another change is the subclassification of adenocarcinoma: the definition of bronchioalveolar carcinoma has been restricted to noninvasive tumours. There has been substantial evolution of concepts in neuroendocrine lung tumour classification. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is now recognized as a histologically high grade non small cell carcinoma showing histopathological features of neuroendocrine differentiation as well as immunohistochemical neuroendocrine markers. The large cell carcinoma class has been enriched with several variants, including the LCNEC and the basaloid carcinoma, both with a dismal prognosis. Finally, a new class was defined called carcinoma with pleomorphic, sarcomatoid, or sarcomatous elements, which brings together a number of proliferations characterized by a spectrum of epithelial to mesenchymal differentiation. Immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy are invaluable techniques for diagnosis and subclassification, but our intention was to render the classification simple and practical to every surgical laboratory, so that most lung tumours could be classified by light microscopic criteria.
1,090 citations
Cited by
More filters
TL;DR: This document represents the current state of knowledge regarding idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and contains sections on definition and epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, natural history, staging and prognosis, treatment, and monitoring disease course.
Abstract: This document is an international evidence-based guideline on the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and is a collaborative effort of the American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society, the Japanese Respiratory Society, and the Latin American Thoracic Association. It represents the current state of knowledge regarding idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and contains sections on definition and epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, natural history, staging and prognosis, treatment, and monitoring disease course. For the diagnosis and treatment sections, pragmatic GRADE evidence-based methodology was applied in a question-based format. For each diagnosis and treatment question, the committee graded the quality of the evidence available (high, moderate, low, or very low), and made a recommendation (yes or no, strong or weak). Recommendations were based on majority vote. It is emphasized that clinicians must spend adequate time with patients to discuss patients' values and preferences and decide on the appropriate course of action.
5,834 citations
TL;DR: This section is written to provide guidance in interpreting pulmonary function tests (PFTs) to medical directors of hospital-based laboratories that perform PFTs, and physicians who are responsible for interpreting the results of PFTS most commonly ordered for clinical purposes.
Abstract: SERIES “ATS/ERS TASK FORCE: STANDARDISATION OF LUNG FUNCTION TESTING”
Edited by V. Brusasco, R. Crapo and G. Viegi
Number 5 in this Series
This section is written to provide guidance in interpreting pulmonary function tests (PFTs) to medical directors of hospital-based laboratories that perform PFTs, and physicians who are responsible for interpreting the results of PFTs most commonly ordered for clinical purposes. Specifically, this section addresses the interpretation of spirometry, bronchodilator response, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity ( D L,CO) and lung volumes.
The sources of variation in lung function testing and technical aspects of spirometry, lung volume measurements and D L,CO measurement have been considered in other documents published in this series of Task Force reports 1–4 and in the American Thoracic Society (ATS) interpretative strategies document 5.
An interpretation begins with a review and comment on test quality. Tests that are less than optimal may still contain useful information, but interpreters should identify the problems and the direction and magnitude of the potential errors. Omitting the quality review and relying only on numerical results for clinical decision making is a common mistake, which is more easily made by those who are dependent upon computer interpretations.
Once quality has been assured, the next steps involve a series of comparisons 6 that include comparisons of test results with reference values based on healthy subjects 5, comparisons with known disease or abnormal physiological patterns ( i.e. obstruction and restriction), and comparisons with self, a rather formal term for evaluating change in an individual patient. A final step in the lung function report is to answer the clinical question that prompted the test.
Poor choices made during these preparatory steps increase the risk of misclassification, i.e. a falsely negative or falsely positive interpretation for a lung function abnormality or a change …
5,078 citations
TL;DR: Diagnostic Criteria of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease Key Laboratory Features of N TM Health Careand Hygiene-associated Disease Prevention Prophylaxis and Treatment of NTM Disease Introduction Methods.
Abstract: Diagnostic Criteria of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease Key Laboratory Features of NTM Health Careand Hygiene-associated Disease Prevention Prophylaxis and Treatment of NTM Disease Introduction Methods Taxonomy Epidemiology Pathogenesis Host Defense and Immune Defects Pulmonary Disease Body Morphotype Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibition Laboratory Procedures Collection, Digestion, Decontamination, and Staining of Specimens Respiratory Specimens Body Fluids, Abscesses, and Tissues Blood Specimen Processing Smear Microscopy Culture Techniques Incubation of NTM Cultures NTM Identification Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for NTM Molecular Typing Methods of NTM Clinical Presentations and Diagnostic Criteria Pulmonary Disease Cystic Fibrosis Hypersensitivity-like Disease Transplant Recipients Disseminated Disease Lymphatic Disease Skin, Soft Tissue, and Bone Disease
4,969 citations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill1, University of Birmingham2, University of Aberdeen3, University of Barcelona4, Cleveland Clinic5, University of Cambridge6, University of Groningen7, University of Lübeck8, University of Oxford9, University of Paris10, Mayo Clinic11, University of Pennsylvania12, Boston University13, Hacettepe University14, Imperial College London15, Statens Serum Institut16, Medical University of Vienna17, Norwich University18, Harvard University19, Toho University20, University of East Anglia21
TL;DR: 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides J. Watts; Arthritis & Rheumatism
Abstract: 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides J. Jennette;R. Falk;P. Bacon;N. Basu;M. Cid;F. Ferrario;L. Flores-Suarez;W. Gross;L. Guillevin;E. Hagen;G. Hoffman;D. Jayne;C. Kallenberg;P. Lamprecht;C. Langford;R. Luqmani;A. Mahr;E. Matteson;P. Merkel;S. Ozen;C. Pusey;N. Rasmussen;A. Rees;D. Scott;U. Specks;J. Stone;K. Takahashi;R. Watts; Arthritis & Rheumatism
4,249 citations
01 Jan 2002
TL;DR: This list includes tumours of undefined neoplastic nature, which are of uncertain differentiation Bone Tumours, Ewing sarcoma/Primitive neuroedtodermal tumour, Myogenic, lipogenic, neural and epithelial tumours, and others.
4,185 citations