scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Tianzhu Zhang

Bio: Tianzhu Zhang is an academic researcher from University of Science and Technology of China. The author has contributed to research in topics: Video tracking & Discriminative model. The author has an hindex of 41, co-authored 135 publications receiving 7561 citations. Previous affiliations of Tianzhu Zhang include University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign & Agency for Science, Technology and Research.


Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
Matej Kristan1, Ales Leonardis2, Jiří Matas3, Michael Felsberg4, Roman Pflugfelder5, Luka Cehovin1, Tomas Vojir3, Gustav Häger4, Alan Lukežič1, Gustavo Fernandez5, Abhinav Gupta6, Alfredo Petrosino7, Alireza Memarmoghadam8, Alvaro Garcia-Martin9, Andres Solis Montero10, Andrea Vedaldi11, Andreas Robinson4, Andy J. Ma12, Anton Varfolomieiev13, A. Aydin Alatan14, Aykut Erdem15, Bernard Ghanem16, Bin Liu, Bohyung Han17, Brais Martinez18, Chang-Ming Chang19, Changsheng Xu20, Chong Sun21, Daijin Kim17, Dapeng Chen22, Dawei Du20, Deepak Mishra23, Dit-Yan Yeung24, Erhan Gundogdu25, Erkut Erdem15, Fahad Shahbaz Khan4, Fatih Porikli26, Fatih Porikli27, Fei Zhao20, Filiz Bunyak28, Francesco Battistone7, Gao Zhu27, Giorgio Roffo29, Gorthi R. K. Sai Subrahmanyam23, Guilherme Sousa Bastos30, Guna Seetharaman31, Henry Medeiros32, Hongdong Li27, Honggang Qi20, Horst Bischof33, Horst Possegger33, Huchuan Lu21, Hyemin Lee17, Hyeonseob Nam34, Hyung Jin Chang35, Isabela Drummond30, Jack Valmadre11, Jae-chan Jeong36, Jaeil Cho36, Jae-Yeong Lee36, Jianke Zhu37, Jiayi Feng20, Jin Gao20, Jin-Young Choi, Jingjing Xiao2, Ji-Wan Kim36, Jiyeoup Jeong, João F. Henriques11, Jochen Lang10, Jongwon Choi, José M. Martínez9, Junliang Xing20, Junyu Gao20, Kannappan Palaniappan28, Karel Lebeda38, Ke Gao28, Krystian Mikolajczyk35, Lei Qin20, Lijun Wang21, Longyin Wen19, Luca Bertinetto11, Madan Kumar Rapuru23, Mahdieh Poostchi28, Mario Edoardo Maresca7, Martin Danelljan4, Matthias Mueller16, Mengdan Zhang20, Michael Arens, Michel Valstar18, Ming Tang20, Mooyeol Baek17, Muhammad Haris Khan18, Naiyan Wang24, Nana Fan39, Noor M. Al-Shakarji28, Ondrej Miksik11, Osman Akin15, Payman Moallem8, Pedro Senna30, Philip H. S. Torr11, Pong C. Yuen12, Qingming Huang20, Qingming Huang39, Rafael Martin-Nieto9, Rengarajan Pelapur28, Richard Bowden38, Robert Laganiere10, Rustam Stolkin2, Ryan Walsh32, Sebastian B. Krah, Shengkun Li19, Shengping Zhang39, Shizeng Yao28, Simon Hadfield38, Simone Melzi29, Siwei Lyu19, Siyi Li24, Stefan Becker, Stuart Golodetz11, Sumithra Kakanuru23, Sunglok Choi36, Tao Hu20, Thomas Mauthner33, Tianzhu Zhang20, Tony P. Pridmore18, Vincenzo Santopietro7, Weiming Hu20, Wenbo Li40, Wolfgang Hübner, Xiangyuan Lan12, Xiaomeng Wang18, Xin Li39, Yang Li37, Yiannis Demiris35, Yifan Wang21, Yuankai Qi39, Zejian Yuan22, Zexiong Cai12, Zhan Xu37, Zhenyu He39, Zhizhen Chi21 
08 Oct 2016
TL;DR: The Visual Object Tracking challenge VOT2016 goes beyond its predecessors by introducing a new semi-automatic ground truth bounding box annotation methodology and extending the evaluation system with the no-reset experiment.
Abstract: The Visual Object Tracking challenge VOT2016 aims at comparing short-term single-object visual trackers that do not apply pre-learned models of object appearance. Results of 70 trackers are presented, with a large number of trackers being published at major computer vision conferences and journals in the recent years. The number of tested state-of-the-art trackers makes the VOT 2016 the largest and most challenging benchmark on short-term tracking to date. For each participating tracker, a short description is provided in the Appendix. The VOT2016 goes beyond its predecessors by (i) introducing a new semi-automatic ground truth bounding box annotation methodology and (ii) extending the evaluation system with the no-reset experiment. The dataset, the evaluation kit as well as the results are publicly available at the challenge website (http://votchallenge.net).

744 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
16 Jun 2012
TL;DR: Experimental results show that MTT methods consistently outperform state-of-the-art trackers and mining the interdependencies between particles improves tracking performance and overall computational complexity.
Abstract: In this paper, we formulate object tracking in a particle filter framework as a multi-task sparse learning problem, which we denote as Multi-Task Tracking (MTT). Since we model particles as linear combinations of dictionary templates that are updated dynamically, learning the representation of each particle is considered a single task in MTT. By employing popular sparsity-inducing l p, q mixed norms (p Є {2, ∞} and q = 1), we regularize the representation problem to enforce joint sparsity and learn the particle representations together. As compared to previous methods that handle particles independently, our results demonstrate that mining the interdependencies between particles improves tracking performance and overall computational complexity. Interestingly, we show that the popular L 1 tracker [15] is a special case of our MTT formulation (denoted as the L 11 tracker) when p = q = 1. The learning problem can be efficiently solved using an Accelerated Proximal Gradient (APG) method that yields a sequence of closed form updates. As such, MTT is computationally attractive. We test our proposed approach on challenging sequences involving heavy occlusion, drastic illumination changes, and large pose variations. Experimental results show that MTT methods consistently outperform state-of-the-art trackers.

709 citations

Book ChapterDOI
Matej Kristan1, Ales Leonardis2, Jiří Matas3, Michael Felsberg4  +155 moreInstitutions (47)
23 Jan 2019
TL;DR: The Visual Object Tracking challenge VOT2018 is the sixth annual tracker benchmarking activity organized by the VOT initiative; results of over eighty trackers are presented; many are state-of-the-art trackers published at major computer vision conferences or in journals in the recent years.
Abstract: The Visual Object Tracking challenge VOT2018 is the sixth annual tracker benchmarking activity organized by the VOT initiative. Results of over eighty trackers are presented; many are state-of-the-art trackers published at major computer vision conferences or in journals in the recent years. The evaluation included the standard VOT and other popular methodologies for short-term tracking analysis and a “real-time” experiment simulating a situation where a tracker processes images as if provided by a continuously running sensor. A long-term tracking subchallenge has been introduced to the set of standard VOT sub-challenges. The new subchallenge focuses on long-term tracking properties, namely coping with target disappearance and reappearance. A new dataset has been compiled and a performance evaluation methodology that focuses on long-term tracking capabilities has been adopted. The VOT toolkit has been updated to support both standard short-term and the new long-term tracking subchallenges. Performance of the tested trackers typically by far exceeds standard baselines. The source code for most of the trackers is publicly available from the VOT page. The dataset, the evaluation kit and the results are publicly available at the challenge website (http://votchallenge.net).

639 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
Matej Kristan1, Ales Leonardis2, Jiri Matas3, Michael Felsberg4, Roman Pflugfelder5, Luka Čehovin Zajc1, Tomas Vojir3, Gustav Häger4, Alan Lukezic1, Abdelrahman Eldesokey4, Gustavo Fernandez5, Alvaro Garcia-Martin6, Andrej Muhič1, Alfredo Petrosino7, Alireza Memarmoghadam8, Andrea Vedaldi9, Antoine Manzanera10, Antoine Tran10, A. Aydin Alatan11, Bogdan Mocanu, Boyu Chen12, Chang Huang, Changsheng Xu13, Chong Sun12, Dalong Du, David Zhang, Dawei Du13, Deepak Mishra, Erhan Gundogdu14, Erhan Gundogdu11, Erik Velasco-Salido, Fahad Shahbaz Khan4, Francesco Battistone, Gorthi R. K. Sai Subrahmanyam, Goutam Bhat4, Guan Huang, Guilherme Sousa Bastos, Guna Seetharaman15, Hongliang Zhang16, Houqiang Li17, Huchuan Lu12, Isabela Drummond, Jack Valmadre9, Jae-chan Jeong18, Jaeil Cho18, Jae-Yeong Lee18, Jana Noskova, Jianke Zhu19, Jin Gao13, Jingyu Liu13, Ji-Wan Kim18, João F. Henriques9, José M. Martínez, Junfei Zhuang20, Junliang Xing13, Junyu Gao13, Kai Chen21, Kannappan Palaniappan22, Karel Lebeda, Ke Gao22, Kris M. Kitani23, Lei Zhang, Lijun Wang12, Lingxiao Yang, Longyin Wen24, Luca Bertinetto9, Mahdieh Poostchi22, Martin Danelljan4, Matthias Mueller25, Mengdan Zhang13, Ming-Hsuan Yang26, Nianhao Xie16, Ning Wang17, Ondrej Miksik9, Payman Moallem8, Pallavi Venugopal M, Pedro Senna, Philip H. S. Torr9, Qiang Wang13, Qifeng Yu16, Qingming Huang13, Rafael Martin-Nieto, Richard Bowden27, Risheng Liu12, Ruxandra Tapu, Simon Hadfield27, Siwei Lyu28, Stuart Golodetz9, Sunglok Choi18, Tianzhu Zhang13, Titus Zaharia, Vincenzo Santopietro, Wei Zou13, Weiming Hu13, Wenbing Tao21, Wenbo Li28, Wengang Zhou17, Xianguo Yu16, Xiao Bian24, Yang Li19, Yifan Xing23, Yingruo Fan20, Zheng Zhu13, Zhipeng Zhang13, Zhiqun He20 
01 Jul 2017
TL;DR: The Visual Object Tracking challenge VOT2017 is the fifth annual tracker benchmarking activity organized by the VOT initiative; results of 51 trackers are presented; many are state-of-the-art published at major computer vision conferences or journals in recent years.
Abstract: The Visual Object Tracking challenge VOT2017 is the fifth annual tracker benchmarking activity organized by the VOT initiative. Results of 51 trackers are presented; many are state-of-the-art published at major computer vision conferences or journals in recent years. The evaluation included the standard VOT and other popular methodologies and a new "real-time" experiment simulating a situation where a tracker processes images as if provided by a continuously running sensor. Performance of the tested trackers typically by far exceeds standard baselines. The source code for most of the trackers is publicly available from the VOT page. The VOT2017 goes beyond its predecessors by (i) improving the VOT public dataset and introducing a separate VOT2017 sequestered dataset, (ii) introducing a realtime tracking experiment and (iii) releasing a redesigned toolkit that supports complex experiments. The dataset, the evaluation kit and the results are publicly available at the challenge website1.

485 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2017
TL;DR: The proposed MCPF is designed to exploit and complement the strength of a MCF and a particle filter, and can effectively maintain multiple modes in the posterior density using fewer particles than conventional particle filters, thereby lowering the computational cost.
Abstract: In this paper, we propose a multi-task correlation particle filter (MCPF) for robust visual tracking. We first present the multi-task correlation filter (MCF) that takes the interdependencies among different features into account to learn correlation filters jointly. The proposed MCPF is designed to exploit and complement the strength of a MCF and a particle filter. Compared with existing tracking methods based on correlation filters and particle filters, the proposed tracker has several advantages. First, it can shepherd the sampled particles toward the modes of the target state distribution via the MCF, thereby resulting in robust tracking performance. Second, it can effectively handle large-scale variation via a particle sampling strategy. Third, it can effectively maintain multiple modes in the posterior density using fewer particles than conventional particle filters, thereby lowering the computational cost. Extensive experimental results on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed MCPF performs favorably against the state-of-the-art methods.

440 citations


Cited by
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
23 Jun 2013
TL;DR: Large scale experiments are carried out with various evaluation criteria to identify effective approaches for robust tracking and provide potential future research directions in this field.
Abstract: Object tracking is one of the most important components in numerous applications of computer vision. While much progress has been made in recent years with efforts on sharing code and datasets, it is of great importance to develop a library and benchmark to gauge the state of the art. After briefly reviewing recent advances of online object tracking, we carry out large scale experiments with various evaluation criteria to understand how these algorithms perform. The test image sequences are annotated with different attributes for performance evaluation and analysis. By analyzing quantitative results, we identify effective approaches for robust tracking and provide potential future research directions in this field.

3,828 citations

01 Jan 2006

3,012 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An extensive evaluation of the state-of-the-art online object-tracking algorithms with various evaluation criteria is carried out to identify effective approaches for robust tracking and provide potential future research directions in this field.
Abstract: Object tracking has been one of the most important and active research areas in the field of computer vision. A large number of tracking algorithms have been proposed in recent years with demonstrated success. However, the set of sequences used for evaluation is often not sufficient or is sometimes biased for certain types of algorithms. Many datasets do not have common ground-truth object positions or extents, and this makes comparisons among the reported quantitative results difficult. In addition, the initial conditions or parameters of the evaluated tracking algorithms are not the same, and thus, the quantitative results reported in literature are incomparable or sometimes contradictory. To address these issues, we carry out an extensive evaluation of the state-of-the-art online object-tracking algorithms with various evaluation criteria to understand how these methods perform within the same framework. In this work, we first construct a large dataset with ground-truth object positions and extents for tracking and introduce the sequence attributes for the performance analysis. Second, we integrate most of the publicly available trackers into one code library with uniform input and output formats to facilitate large-scale performance evaluation. Third, we extensively evaluate the performance of 31 algorithms on 100 sequences with different initialization settings. By analyzing the quantitative results, we identify effective approaches for robust tracking and provide potential future research directions in this field.

2,974 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss human emotion perception from a psychological perspective, examine available approaches to solving the problem of machine understanding of human affective behavior, and discuss important issues like the collection and availability of training and test data.
Abstract: Automated analysis of human affective behavior has attracted increasing attention from researchers in psychology, computer science, linguistics, neuroscience, and related disciplines. However, the existing methods typically handle only deliberately displayed and exaggerated expressions of prototypical emotions despite the fact that deliberate behaviour differs in visual appearance, audio profile, and timing from spontaneously occurring behaviour. To address this problem, efforts to develop algorithms that can process naturally occurring human affective behaviour have recently emerged. Moreover, an increasing number of efforts are reported toward multimodal fusion for human affect analysis including audiovisual fusion, linguistic and paralinguistic fusion, and multi-cue visual fusion based on facial expressions, head movements, and body gestures. This paper introduces and surveys these recent advances. We first discuss human emotion perception from a psychological perspective. Next we examine available approaches to solving the problem of machine understanding of human affective behavior, and discuss important issues like the collection and availability of training and test data. We finally outline some of the scientific and engineering challenges to advancing human affect sensing technology.

2,503 citations