scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Tim J. Evans

Other affiliations: University of Missouri
Bio: Tim J. Evans is an academic researcher from Public Health England. The author has contributed to research in topics: Ergovaline & Tremetone. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 64 publications receiving 1099 citations. Previous affiliations of Tim J. Evans include University of Missouri.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To estimate the healthcare costs of diabetic foot disease in England, the number of patients diagnosed with diabetes and the severity of the disease is estimated to be between £20,000 and £30,000 a year.
Abstract: Aim To estimate the healthcare costs of diabetic foot disease in England. Methods Patient-level data sets at a national and local level, and evidence from clinical studies, were used to estimate the annual cost of health care for foot ulceration and amputation in people with diabetes in England in 2014-2015. Results The cost of health care for ulceration and amputation in diabetes in 2014-2015 is estimated at between £837 million and £962 million; 0.8% to 0.9% of the National Health Service (NHS) budget for England. More than 90% of expenditure was related to ulceration, and 60% was for care in community, outpatient and primary settings. For inpatients, multiple regression analysis suggested that ulceration was associated with a length of stay 8.04 days longer (95% confidence interval 7.65 to 8.42) than that for diabetes admissions without ulceration. Conclusions Diabetic foot care accounts for a substantial proportion of healthcare expenditure in England, more than the combined cost of breast, prostate and lung cancers. Much of this expenditure arises through prolonged and severe ulceration. If the NHS were to reduce the prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers in England by one-third, the gross annual saving would be more than £250 million. Diabetic foot ulceration is a large and growing problem globally, and it is likely that there is potential to improve outcomes and reduce expenditure in many countries.

201 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The effect of the dosing vehicle (e.g., dough) on the ability of an in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) method to predict relative bioavailable Pb associated with soil ingestion was evaluated and expensive in vitro methods may be useful in providing an estimate of the variability in relative bio available Pb at a single study site.
Abstract: The effect of the dosing vehicle (e.g., dough) on the ability of an in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) method to predict relative bioavailable Pb associated with soil ingestion was evaluated. Bioaccessible Pb determined by the IVG method was compared with relative bioavailable Pb measured from dosing trials using juvenile swine for 18 contaminated soils ranging from 1270 to 14200 mg Pb kg(-1). Bioaccessible Pb was measured in the IVG gastric extraction (GE) and intestinal extraction (IE) solutions. Mean bioaccessible Pb values were 32.2% for GE without dough, 23.0% for GE with dough, 1.06% for IE without dough, and 0.56% for IE with dough. It is possible that phytic acid associated with the dough addition decreased bioaccessible Pb. In vivo relative bioavailable Pb ranges for different swine tissues were 1 to 87% for blood, 0 to 110% for liver, 1 to 124% for kidney, and 0.04 to 94% for bone. Strong linear relationships between IVG GE Pb with dough (r > 0.76, P 0.56, P 0.81, P < 0.0001) and in vivo bioavailable Pb as estimated with blood, kidney, liver, and bone were found. Inexpensive in vitro methods may be useful in providing an estimate of the variability in relative bioavailable Pb at a single study site. The IVG method can be used to estimate relative bioavailable Pb, As, and Cd in contaminated soil.

139 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: DTC is rare but frequently results in graft loss and death, and Explantation/excision is likely to benefit recipients with localized cancer, but in transplants other than kidney/pancreas, the benefits should be balanced against the risks of retransplantation.
Abstract: Background Donor origin cancer (DOC) in transplant recipients may be transmitted with the graft (donor-transmitted cancer [DTC]) or develop subsequently from the graft (donor-derived cancer [DDC]). Methods Recipients with DOC between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2010, were identified from the United Kingdom Transplant Registry and database search at transplantation centers. Results Of 30,765 transplants from 14,986 donors, 18 recipients developed DOC from 16 donors (0.06%): 3 were DDC (0.01%) and 15 were DTC (0.05%). Of the 15 DTCs, 6 were renal cell cancer; 5, lung cancer; 2, lymphoma; 1, neuroendocrine cancer; and 1, colon cancer. Recipients with DTC underwent explant/excision (11), chemotherapy (4), and radiotherapy (1). Of 15 recipients, 3 (20%) recipients with DTC died as a direct consequence of cancer. Early DTC (diagnosed ≤6 weeks of transplantation) showed a better outcome (no DTC-related deaths in 11 cases) as opposed to late DTC (DTC-related deaths in 3 of 4 cases). Five-year survival was 83% for kidney recipients with DTC compared with 93% for recipients without DTC (P=0.077). None of the donors resulting in cancer transmission was known to have cancer at donation. Conclusions DTC is rare but frequently results in graft loss and death. The risk of cancer transmission cannot be eliminated because, in every case, the presence of cancer was not known at donation. This information will allow informed consent for prospective recipients. Explantation/excision is likely to benefit recipients with localized cancer, but in transplants other than kidney/pancreas, the benefits should be balanced against the risks of retransplantation.

102 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the capacity of an in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) method to predict relative bioavailable Cd from soil ingestion was evaluated, which was compared with rela-...
Abstract: The capacity of an in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) method to predict relative bioavailable Cd from soil ingestion was evaluated. Bioaccessible Cd determined by the IVG method was compared with rela...

97 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Transplanted organs carry the risk of inadvertent donor cancer transmission, and some cancers in organ donors have been classified as being associated with a high or unacceptable risk, but the evidence for such recommendations is scanty.
Abstract: Background Transplanted organs carry the risk of inadvertent donor cancer transmission Some cancers in organ donors have been classified as being associated with a high or unacceptable risk, but the evidence for such recommendations is scanty Methods The risk of cancer transmission from donors characterized as high or unacceptable risk was studied by analysing transplant and cancer registry data Donors and recipients from England (1990–2008) were identified from the UK Transplant Registry Cancer details were obtained from cancer registries and classified using guidelines from the Council of Europe and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Results Of 17 639 donors, 202 (1·1 per cent) had a history of cancer, including 61 donors with cancers classed as having an unacceptable/high risk of transmission No cancer transmission was noted in 133 recipients of organs from these 61 donors At 10 years after transplantation, the additional survival benefit gained by transplanting organs from donors with unacceptable/high-risk cancer was 944 (95 per cent confidence interval (ci) 851 to 1037) life-years, with a mean survival of 7·1 (95 per cent ci 6·4 to 7·8) years per recipient Conclusion Strict implementation of present guidelines is likely to result in overestimation of cancer transmission risk in some donors Organs from some donors with cancers defined as unacceptable/high risk can be used safely

63 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Frank L.J. Visseren, François Mach, Yvo M. Smulders, David Carballo, Konstantinos C. Koskinas, Maria Bäck, Athanase Benetos, Alessandro Biffi, José-Manuel Boavida1, Davide Capodanno, Bernard Cosyns, Carolyn Crawford, Constantinos H. Davos, Ileana Desormais, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Oscar H. Franco, Sigrun Halvorsen, FD Richard Hobbs, Monika Hollander, Ewa A. Jankowska, Matthias Michal, Simona Sacco, Naveed Sattar, Lale Tokgozoglu, Serena Tonstad, Konstantinos P Tsioufis2, Ineke van Dis, Isabelle C. Van Gelder, Christoph Wanner3, Bryan Williams, Guy De Backer, Vera Regitz-Zagrosek, Anne Hege Aamodt, Magdy Abdelhamid, Victor Aboyans, Christian Albus, Riccardo Asteggiano, Magnus Bäck, Michael A. Borger, Carlos Brotons, Jelena Čelutkienė, Renata Cifkova, Maja Čikeš, Francesco Cosentino, Nikolaos Dagres, Tine De Backer, Dirk De Bacquer, Victoria Delgado, Hester Den Ruijter, Paul Dendale, Heinz Drexel, Volkmar Falk, Laurent Fauchier, Brian A. Ference, Jean Ferrières, Marc Ferrini4, Miles Fisher4, Danilo Fliser3, Zlatko Fras, Dan Gaita, Simona Giampaoli, Stephan Gielen, Ian D. Graham, Catriona Jennings, Torben Jørgensen, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Maryam Kavousi, Wolfgang Koenig, Aleksandra Konradi, Dipak Kotecha, Ulf Landmesser, Madalena Lettino, Basil S. Lewis, Aleš Linhart, Maja-Lisa Løchen1, Konstantinos Makrilakis1, Giuseppe Mancia2, Pedro Marques-Vidal, John W. McEvoy, Paul McGreavy, Béla Merkely, Lis Neubeck, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Joep Perk, Steffen E. Petersen, Anna Sonia Petronio, Massimo F Piepoli, Nana Pogosova, Eva Prescott, Kausik K. Ray, Zeljko Reiner, Dimitrios J. Richter, Lars Rydén, Evgeny Shlyakhto, Marta Sitges, Miguel Sousa-Uva, Isabella Sudano, Monica Tiberi, Rhian M. Touyz, Andrea Ungar, W. M. Monique Verschuren, Olov Wiklund, David A. Wood, José Luis Zamorano, Carolyn A Crawford, Oscar H Franco Duran 

1,650 citations

10 May 1965

507 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Haramaya University1, Université de Montréal2, Université de Moncton3, University of Ibadan4, National Heart Foundation of Australia5, University of La Frontera6, University of Cuenca7, University of Waterloo8, University of the Republic9, Ghent University10, National Taiwan University11, University of Ottawa12, Karolinska Institutet13, Technische Universität München14, University of Cape Town15, University of the Witwatersrand16, Swansea University17, Lithuanian Sports University18, Emory University19, University of Los Andes20, Central University of Venezuela21, Hong Kong Baptist University22, Qatar Airways23, University of Tartu24, University of Regina25, The Chinese University of Hong Kong26, Mahidol University27, Pennington Biomedical Research Center28, University of Queensland29, Seoul National University30, Queen's University31, Linköping University32, University of Medicine and Health Sciences33, University of Guadalajara34, Shanghai University of Sport35, National University of Science and Technology36, University of Primorska37, University of Porto38, University of Ghana39, University of Strathclyde40, University of Girona41, Carlos III Health Institute42, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina43, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven44, University of South Australia45, University of Southern Denmark46, University of Auckland47, Bath Spa University48, University of Ljubljana49, Tribhuvan University50, Utrecht University51, J. F. Oberlin University52, University of Botswana53, Stamford University Bangladesh54, National Chung Hsing University55, University of Warsaw56
TL;DR: The present study provides rich new evidence showing that the situation regarding the physical activity of children and youth is a concern worldwide and strategic public investments to implement effective interventions to increase physical activity opportunities are needed.
Abstract: Background: Accumulating sufficient moderate to vigorous physical activity is recognized as a key determinant of physical, physiological, developmental, mental, cognitive, and social health among children and youth (aged 5–17 y). The Global Matrix 3.0ofReportCardgradesonphysicalactivitywasdevelopedtoachieveabetterunderstandingoftheglobalvariationinchildand youth physical activity and associated supports. Methods: Work groups from 49 countries followed harmonized procedures to develop their Report Cards by grading 10 common indicators using the best available data. The participating countries were divided into 3 categories using the United Nations’ human development index (HDI) classification (low or medium, high, and very high HDI). Results: A total of 490 grades, including 369 letter grades and 121 incomplete grades, were assigned by the 49 work groups. Overall, an average grade of “C−,”“D+,” and “C−” was obtained for the low and medium HDI countries, high HDI countries, and very high HDI countries, respectively. Conclusions: The present study provides rich new evidence showing that the situation regarding the physical activity of children and youth is a concern worldwide. Strategic public investments to implement effective interventions to increase physical activity opportunities are needed.

502 citations