Tina C. Wan

Bio: Tina C. Wan is an academic researcher from Medical College of Wisconsin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Adenosine & Adenosine receptor. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 31 publications receiving 1226 citations. Previous affiliations of Tina C. Wan include University of California, San Francisco.

Canine Mast Cell Adenosine Receptors: Cloning and Expression of the A3 Receptor and Evidence that Degranulation Is Mediated by the A2B Receptor

Abstract: We cloned and characterized the canine A3 adenosine receptor (AR) and examined AR-induced degranulation of the BR line of canine mastocytoma cells. Canine A3AR transcript is found predominantly in spleen, lung, liver, and testes and encodes a 314-amino acid heptahelical receptor.125I-N6-Aminobenzyladenosine binds to two affinity states of canine A3AR withKD values of 0.7 ± 0.1 and 16 ± 0.8 nm, reflecting G protein-coupled and -uncoupled receptors, respectively. Xanthine antagonists bind with similar affinities to human, canine, and rabbit receptors but with 80–400-fold lower affinities to rat A3AR. Although canine BR mastocytoma cells contain A1AR, A2BAR, and A3AR, degranulation seems to be mediated primarily by A2BARs stimulated by the nonselective agonist 5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) but not by the A3-selective agonistN6-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5′-N-methylcarboxamide. NECA-stimulated degranulation is not prevented by pertussis toxin and is blocked by enprofylline (Ki = 7 μm), an antiasthmatic xanthine with low affinity (Ki > 100 μm) for A1AR, A2AAR, and A3AR. NECA increases canine mastocytoma cell cAMP, Ca2+, and inositol trisphosphate levels; these responses are antagonized half-maximally by 7–15 μm enprofylline. The results suggest that (i) the cloned canine A3AR is structurally and pharmacologically more similar to human than to rat A3AR; (ii) the A2BAR, and not the A1AR or A3AR, is principally responsible for adenosine-mediated degranulation of canine BR mastocytoma cells; and (iii) the BR cell A2BAR couples to both Ca2+ mobilization and cAMP accumulation. Although A2B receptors play a major role in the regulation of BR mast cell degranulation, multiple AR subtypes and G proteins may influence mast cell functions.

Adenosine inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha release from mouse peritoneal macrophages via A2A and A2B but not the A3 adenosine receptor.

Abstract: Adenosine is elaborated in injured tissues where it suppresses inflammatory responses of essentially all immune cells, including production of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Most of the anti-inflammatory actions of adenosine have been attributed to signaling through the A(2A) adenosine receptor (A(2A)AR). Previously, however, it has been shown that the A(3)AR agonist N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methylcarboxamide (IB-MECA) potently inhibited TNF-alpha release from macrophages obtained from A(2A)AR "knockout" (A(2A)KO) mice, suggesting that the A(3)AR may also regulate cytokine expression. Here, we confirmed that the A(2A)AR is the primary AR subtype that suppresses TNF-alpha release from thioglycollate-elicited mouse peritoneal macrophages induced by both Toll-like receptor-dependent (TLR) and TLR-independent stimuli, but we determined that the A(2B)AR rather than the A(3)AR mediates the non-A(2A)AR actions of adenosine since 1) the ability of IB-MECA to inhibit TNF-alpha release was not altered in macrophages isolated from A(3)KO mice, and 2) the A(2B)AR antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-[4-[((4-cyanophenyl)carbamoylmethyl)oxy]phenyl]xanthine (MRS 1754) blocked the ability of the nonselective AR agonist adenosine-5'-N-ethylcarboxamide (NECA) to inhibit TNF-alpha release from macrophages isolated from A(2A)KO mice. Although A(2B)ARs seem capable of inhibiting TNF-alpha release, the A(2A)AR plays a dominant suppressive role since MRS 1754 did not block the ability of NECA to inhibit TNF-alpha release from macrophages isolated from wild-type (WT) mice. Furthermore, the potency and efficacy of adenosine to inhibit TNF-alpha release from WT macrophages were not influenced by blocking A(2B)ARs with MRS 1754. The data indicate that adenosine suppresses TNF-alpha release from macrophages primarily via A(2A)ARs, although the A(2B)AR seems to play an underlying inhibitory role that may contribute to the anti-inflammatory actions of adenosine under select circumstances.

Cl-IB-MECA [2-Chloro-N6-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5′-N-methylcarboxamide] Reduces Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Mice by Activating the A Adenosine Receptor

Abstract: We used pharmacological agents and genetic methods to determine whether the potent A(3) adenosine receptor (AR) agonist 2-chloro-N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methylcarboxamide (Cl-IB-MECA) protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice via the A(3)AR or via interactions with other AR subtypes. Pretreating wild-type (WT) mice with Cl-IB-MECA reduced myocardial infarct size induced by 30 min of coronary occlusion and 24 h of reperfusion at doses (30 and 100 mug/kg) that concomitantly reduced blood pressure and stimulated systemic histamine release. The A(3)AR-selective antagonist MRS 1523 [3-propyl-6-ethyl-5[(ethylthio)carbonyl]-2-phenyl-4-propyl-3-pyridine-carboxylate], but not the A(2A)AR antagonist ZM 241385 [4-{2-7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo-[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl}phenol], blocked the reduction in infarct size provided by Cl-IB-MECA, suggesting a mechanism involving the A(3)AR. To further examine the selectivity of Cl-IB-MECA, we assessed its cardioprotective effectiveness in A(3)AR gene "knock-out" (A(3)KO) mice. Cl-IB-MECA did not reduce myocardial infarct size in A(3)KO mice in vivo and did not protect isolated perfused hearts obtained from A(3)KO mice from injury induced by global ischemia and reperfusion. Additional studies using WT mice treated with compound 48/80 [condensation product of p-methoxyphenethyl methylamine with formaldehyde] to deplete mast cell contents excluded the possibility that Cl-IB-MECA was cardioprotective by releasing mediators from mast cells. These data demonstrate that Cl-IB-MECA protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice principally by activating the A(3)AR.

The A3 adenosine receptor agonist CP-532,903 [N6-(2,5-dichlorobenzyl)-3'-aminoadenosine-5'-N-methylcarboxamide] protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury via the sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive potassium channel.

Abstract: We examined the cardioprotective profile of the new A3 adenosine receptor (AR) agonist CP-532,903 [ N 6-(2,5-dichlorobenzyl)-3′-aminoadenosine-5′- N -methylcarboxamide] in an in vivo mouse model of infarction and an isolated heart model of global ischemia/reperfusion injury. In radioligand binding and cAMP accumulation assays using human embryonic kidney 293 cells expressing recombinant mouse ARs, CP-532,903 was found to bind with high affinity to mouse A3ARs ( K i = 9.0 ± 2.5 nM) and with high selectivity versus mouse A1AR (100-fold) and A2AARs (1000-fold). In in vivo ischemia/reperfusion experiments, pretreating mice with 30 or 100 μg/kg CP-532,903 reduced infarct size from 59.2 ± 2.1% of the risk region in vehicle-treated mice to 42.5 ± 2.3 and 39.0 ± 2.9%, respectively. Likewise, treating isolated mouse hearts with CP-532,903 (10, 30, or 100 nM) concentration dependently improved recovery of contractile function after 20 min of global ischemia and 45 min of reperfusion, including developed pressure and maximal rate of contraction/relaxation. In both models of ischemia/reperfusion injury, CP-532,903 provided no benefit in studies using mice with genetic disruption of the A3AR gene, A3 knockout (KO) mice. In isolated heart studies, protection provided by CP-532,903 and ischemic preconditioning induced by three brief ischemia/reperfusion cycles were lost in Kir6.2 KO mice lacking expression of the pore-forming subunit of the sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channel. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings provided evidence that the A3AR is functionally coupled to the sarcolemmal KATP channel in murine cardiomyocytes. We conclude that CP-532,903 is a highly selective agonist of the mouse A3AR that protects against ischemia/reperfusion injury by activating sarcolemmal KATP channels.

Activation of the A3 Adenosine Receptor Suppresses Superoxide Production and Chemotaxis of Mouse Bone Marrow Neutrophils

Abstract: Adenosine is formed in injured/ischemic tissues, where it suppresses the actions of essentially all cells of the immune system. Most of the anti-inflammatory actions of adenosine have been attributed to signaling through the Gs protein-coupled A2A adenosine receptor (AR). Here, we report that the A3AR is highly expressed in murine neutrophils isolated from bone marrow. Selective activation of the A3AR with (2 S ,3 S ,4 R ,5 R )-3-amino-5-[6-(2,5-dichlorobenzylamino)purin-9-yl]-4-hydroxytetrahydrofuran-2-carboxylic acid methylamide (CP-532,903) potently inhibited mouse bone marrow neutrophil superoxide generation and chemotaxis induced by various activating agents. The selectivity of CP-532,903 was confirmed in assays using neutrophils obtained from A2AAR and A3AR gene “knockout” mice. In a model of thioglycollate-induced inflammation, treating mice with CP-532,903 inhibited recruitment of leukocytes into the peritoneum by specifically activating the A3AR. Collectively, our findings support the theory that the A3AR contributes to the anti-inflammatory actions of adenosine on neutrophils and provide a potential mechanistic explanation for the efficacy of A3AR agonists in animal models of inflammation (i.e., inhibition of neutrophil-mediated tissue injury).

Receptors for Purines and Pyrimidines

Abstract: ### A. Overview Extracellular purines (adenosine, ADP, and ATP) and pyrimidines (UDP and UTP) are important signaling molecules that mediate diverse biological effects via cell-surface receptors termed purine receptors. In this review particular emphasis is placed on the discrepancy between the

International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors

Abstract: Four adenosine receptors have been cloned and characterized from several mammalian species. The receptors are named adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3). The A(2A) and A(2B) receptors preferably interact with members of the G(s) family of G proteins and the A(1) and A(3) receptors with G(i/o) proteins. However, other G protein interactions have also been described. Adenosine is the preferred endogenous agonist at all these receptors, but inosine can also activate the A(3) receptor. The levels of adenosine seen under basal conditions are sufficient to cause some activation of all the receptors, at least where they are abundantly expressed. Adenosine levels during, e.g., ischemia can activate all receptors even when expressed in low abundance. Accordingly, experiments with receptor antagonists and mice with targeted disruption of adenosine A(1), A(2A), and A(3) expression reveal roles for these receptors under physiological and particularly pathophysiological conditions. There are pharmacological tools that can be used to classify A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors but few drugs that interact selectively with A(2B) receptors. Testable models of the interaction of these drugs with their receptors have been generated by site-directed mutagenesis and homology-based modelling. Both agonists and antagonists are being developed as potential drugs.

Adenosine receptors as therapeutic targets

Abstract: Adenosine receptors are major targets of caffeine, the most commonly consumed drug in the world There is growing evidence that they could also be promising therapeutic targets in a wide range of conditions, including cerebral and cardiac ischaemic diseases, sleep disorders, immune and inflammatory disorders and cancer After more than three decades of medicinal chemistry research, a considerable number of selective agonists and antagonists of adenosine receptors have been discovered, and some have been clinically evaluated, although none has yet received regulatory approval However, recent advances in the understanding of the roles of the various adenosine receptor subtypes, and in the development of selective and potent ligands, as discussed in this review, have brought the goal of therapeutic application of adenosine receptor modulators considerably closer

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXI. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors—An Update

Abstract: In the 10 years since our previous International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology report on the nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors, no developments have led to major changes in the recommendations. However, there have been so many other developments that an update is needed. The fact that the structure of one of the adenosine receptors has recently been solved has already led to new ways of in silico screening of ligands. The evidence that adenosine receptors can form homo- and heteromultimers has accumulated, but the functional significance of such complexes remains unclear. The availability of mice with genetic modification of all the adenosine receptors has led to a clarification of the functional roles of adenosine, and to excellent means to study the specificity of drugs. There are also interesting associations between disease and structural variants in one or more of the adenosine receptors. Several new selective agonists and antagonists have become available. They provide improved possibilities for receptor classification. There are also developments hinting at the usefulness of allosteric modulators. Many drugs targeting adenosine receptors are in clinical trials, but the established therapeutic use is still very limited.