Author
Toshihiko Kawano
Other affiliations: University of California, Berkeley
Bio: Toshihiko Kawano is an academic researcher from Los Alamos National Laboratory. The author has contributed to research in topics: Neutron & Fission. The author has an hindex of 32, co-authored 220 publications receiving 7483 citations. Previous affiliations of Toshihiko Kawano include University of California, Berkeley.
Topics: Neutron, Fission, Nuclear data, Nuclear reaction, Neutron emission
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Los Alamos National Laboratory1, Brookhaven National Laboratory2, Oak Ridge National Laboratory3, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute4, Argonne National Laboratory5, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory6, International Atomic Energy Agency7, National Institute of Standards and Technology8, Japan Atomic Energy Agency9, Idaho National Laboratory10, Jožef Stefan Institute11, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group12, University of Vienna13
TL;DR: The ENDF/B-VII.1 library as mentioned in this paper is the most widely used data set for nuclear data analysis and has been updated several times over the last five years. But the most recent version of the ENDF-B-VI.0 library is based on the JENDL-4.0 standard.
2,171 citations
••
Los Alamos National Laboratory1, National Nuclear Data Center2, Oak Ridge National Laboratory3, Argonne National Laboratory4, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory5, National Institute of Standards and Technology6, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute7, Idaho National Laboratory8, Westinghouse Electric9, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited10, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group11
TL;DR: The ENDF/B-VII.0 as discussed by the authors file contains data primarily for reactions with incident neutrons, protons, and photons on almost 400 isotopes, based on experimental data and theory predictions.
1,913 citations
••
Brookhaven National Laboratory1, Los Alamos National Laboratory2, International Atomic Energy Agency3, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute4, National Institute of Standards and Technology5, Oak Ridge National Laboratory6, Argonne National Laboratory7, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory8, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory9, North Carolina State University10, University of Michigan11, Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire12, TRIUMF13, Rosatom14, Chalk River Laboratories15, Paul Scherrer Institute16, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology17, University of Bucharest18, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research19
TL;DR: The new ENDF/B-VIII.0 evaluated nuclear reaction data library as mentioned in this paper includes improved thermal neutron scattering data and uses new evaluated data from the CIELO project for neutron reactions on 1 H, 16 O, 56 Fe, 235 U, 238 U and 239 Pu described in companion papers.
1,249 citations
••
TL;DR: The need to re-evaluate the cross section standards is based on the appearance of a significant amount of precise experimental data and improved developments in the methodology of analysis and evaluation.
257 citations
••
Los Alamos National Laboratory1, Nuclear Energy Agency2, Brookhaven National Laboratory3, International Atomic Energy Agency4, National Institute of Standards and Technology5, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute6, Oak Ridge National Laboratory7, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology8, Japan Atomic Energy Agency9, Ohio University10, Jožef Stefan Institute11, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group12, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory13, Argonne National Laboratory14, Idaho National Laboratory15, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements16, Chalk River Laboratories17, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research18, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy19
TL;DR: The paper summarizes a program of nuclear science and computational work needed to create the new CIELO nuclear data evaluations and identifies discrepancies between various evaluations of the highest priority isotopes.
103 citations
Cited by
More filters
01 May 1993
TL;DR: Comparing the results to the fastest reported vectorized Cray Y-MP and C90 algorithm shows that the current generation of parallel machines is competitive with conventional vector supercomputers even for small problems.
Abstract: Three parallel algorithms for classical molecular dynamics are presented. The first assigns each processor a fixed subset of atoms; the second assigns each a fixed subset of inter-atomic forces to compute; the third assigns each a fixed spatial region. The algorithms are suitable for molecular dynamics models which can be difficult to parallelize efficiently—those with short-range forces where the neighbors of each atom change rapidly. They can be implemented on any distributed-memory parallel machine which allows for message-passing of data between independently executing processors. The algorithms are tested on a standard Lennard-Jones benchmark problem for system sizes ranging from 500 to 100,000,000 atoms on several parallel supercomputers--the nCUBE 2, Intel iPSC/860 and Paragon, and Cray T3D. Comparing the results to the fastest reported vectorized Cray Y-MP and C90 algorithm shows that the current generation of parallel machines is competitive with conventional vector supercomputers even for small problems. For large problems, the spatial algorithm achieves parallel efficiencies of 90% and a 1840-node Intel Paragon performs up to 165 faster than a single Cray C9O processor. Trade-offs between the three algorithms and guidelines for adapting them to more complex molecular dynamics simulations are also discussed.
29,323 citations
•
28,685 citations
••
University of Manchester1, KEK2, CERN3, Complutense University of Madrid4, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory5, Toyama College6, Lebedev Physical Institute7, Fermilab8, University of Paris-Sud9, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory10, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI11, Queen's University Belfast12, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information13, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare14, Northeastern University15, University of Seville16, National University of Cordoba17, Saint Joseph University18, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research19, Illawarra Health & Medical Research Institute20, University of Wollongong21, Hampton University22, TRIUMF23, ETH Zurich24, Centre national de la recherche scientifique25, University of Bordeaux26, University of Helsinki27, National Technical University of Athens28, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine29, University of Notre Dame30, Ashikaga Institute of Technology31, Kobe University32, Intelligence and National Security Alliance33, University of Trieste34, University of Warwick35, University of Belgrade36, Instituto Superior Técnico37, European Space Agency38, Varian Medical Systems39, George Washington University40, Ritsumeikan University41, Ton Duc Thang University42, Université Paris-Saclay43, Idaho State University44, Naruto University of Education45
01 Nov 2016-Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment
TL;DR: Geant4 as discussed by the authors is a software toolkit for the simulation of the passage of particles through matter, which is used by a large number of experiments and projects in a variety of application domains, including high energy physics, astrophysics and space science, medical physics and radiation protection.
Abstract: Geant4 is a software toolkit for the simulation of the passage of particles through matter. It is used by a large number of experiments and projects in a variety of application domains, including high energy physics, astrophysics and space science, medical physics and radiation protection. Over the past several years, major changes have been made to the toolkit in order to accommodate the needs of these user communities, and to efficiently exploit the growth of computing power made available by advances in technology. The adaptation of Geant4 to multithreading, advances in physics, detector modeling and visualization, extensions to the toolkit, including biasing and reverse Monte Carlo, and tools for physics and release validation are discussed here.
2,260 citations
••
Los Alamos National Laboratory1, Brookhaven National Laboratory2, Oak Ridge National Laboratory3, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute4, Argonne National Laboratory5, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory6, International Atomic Energy Agency7, National Institute of Standards and Technology8, Japan Atomic Energy Agency9, Idaho National Laboratory10, Jožef Stefan Institute11, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group12, University of Vienna13
TL;DR: The ENDF/B-VII.1 library as mentioned in this paper is the most widely used data set for nuclear data analysis and has been updated several times over the last five years. But the most recent version of the ENDF-B-VI.0 library is based on the JENDL-4.0 standard.
2,171 citations
01 Jan 2005
TL;DR: The Monthly Notices as mentioned in this paper is one of the three largest general primary astronomical research publications in the world, published by the Royal Astronomical Society (RAE), and it is the most widely cited journal in astronomy.
Abstract: Monthly Notices is one of the three largest general primary astronomical research publications. It is an international journal, published by the Royal Astronomical Society. This article 1 describes its publication policy and practice.
2,091 citations