Author
Ulf Müller-Ladner
Other affiliations: University of Regensburg, University of Genoa, University of Paris ...read more
Bio: Ulf Müller-Ladner is an academic researcher from University of Giessen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Arthritis & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 77, co-authored 590 publications receiving 27658 citations. Previous affiliations of Ulf Müller-Ladner include University of Regensburg & University of Genoa.
Topics: Arthritis, Medicine, Synovial membrane, Rheumatoid arthritis, Adipokine
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre1, University of Michigan2, Radboud University Nijmegen3, University of Toronto4, McGill University5, University of Basel6, University of Florence7, Auckland City Hospital8, University of Pittsburgh9, Charité10, University of California, Los Angeles11, University College London12, University of Zurich13, University of Paris14, Marche Polytechnic University15, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston16, Newcastle University17, University of Pécs18, Georgetown University19, Istanbul University20, Medical University of Białystok21, University of Giessen22, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli23, University College Dublin24, Stanford University25, National Health Service26, University of Colorado Denver27, Medical College of Wisconsin28, University of Alabama at Birmingham29, University of Manchester30, Rutgers University31, Thomas Jefferson University32, University of Toledo33, Amgen34, Boston University35, Medical University of South Carolina36, University of Pennsylvania37, Northwestern University38
TL;DR: The ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc performed better than the 1980 ACR criteria and should allow for more patients to be classified correctly as having the disease.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The 1980 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) lack sensitivity for early SSc and limited cutaneous SSc. The present work, by a joint committee of the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), was undertaken for the purpose of developing new classification criteria for SSc. METHODS: Using consensus methods, 23 candidate items were arranged in a multicriteria additive point system with a threshold to classify cases as SSc. The classification system was reduced by clustering items and simplifying weights. The system was tested by 1) determining specificity and sensitivity in SSc cases and controls with scleroderma-like disorders, and 2) validating against the combined view of a group of experts on a set of cases with or without SSc. RESULTS: It was determined that skin thickening of the fingers extending proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints is sufficient for the patient to be classified as having SSc; if that is not present, 7 additive items apply, with varying weights for each: skin thickening of the fingers, fingertip lesions, telangiectasia, abnormal nailfold capillaries, interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension, Raynaud's phenomenon, and SSc-related autoantibodies. Sensitivity and specificity in the validation sample were, respectively, 0.91 and 0.92 for the new classification criteria and 0.75 and 0.72 for the 1980 ACR classification criteria. All selected cases were classified in accordance with consensus-based expert opinion. All cases classified as SSc according to the 1980 ACR criteria were classified as SSc with the new criteria, and several additional cases were now considered to be SSc. CONCLUSION: The ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc performed better than the 1980 ACR criteria for SSc and should allow for more patients to be classified correctly as having the disease.
2,743 citations
Radboud University Nijmegen1, University of Michigan2, University of Toronto3, McGill University4, University of Basel5, University of Florence6, Auckland City Hospital7, University of Pittsburgh8, Complutense University of Madrid9, Charité10, University of California, Los Angeles11, University College London12, University of Zurich13, University of Paris14, Marche Polytechnic University15, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston16, Newcastle University17, University of Pécs18, Georgetown University19, Istanbul University20, Medical University of Białystok21, University of Giessen22, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli23, University College Dublin24, Stanford University25, Amgen26, University of Colorado Denver27, Medical College of Wisconsin28, University of Alabama at Birmingham29, National Health Service30, University of Manchester31, Rutgers University32, Thomas Jefferson University33, University of Toledo34, Boston University35, University of Pennsylvania36, Medical University of South Carolina37, Northwestern University38, University of Western Ontario39
TL;DR: The ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc performed better than the 1980 ACR criteria and should allow for more patients to be classified correctly as having the disease.
Abstract: Objective The 1980 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) lack sensitivity for early SSc and limited cutaneous SSc. The present work, by a joint committee of the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), was undertaken for the purpose of developing new classification criteria for SSc. Methods Using consensus methods, 23 candidate items were arranged in a multicriteria additive point system with a threshold to classify cases as SSc. The classification system was reduced by clustering items and simplifying weights. The system was tested by (1) determining specificity and sensitivity in SSc cases and controls with scleroderma-like disorders, and (2) validating against the combined view of a group of experts on a set of cases with or without SSc. Results It was determined that skin thickening of the fingers extending proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints is sufficient for the patient to be classified as having SSc; if that is not present, seven additive items apply, with varying weights for each: skin thickening of the fingers, fingertip lesions, telangiectasia, abnormal nailfold capillaries, interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension, Raynaud9s phenomenon, and SSc-related autoantibodies. Sensitivity and specificity in the validation sample were, respectively, 0.91 and 0.92 for the new classification criteria and 0.75 and 0.72 for the 1980 ACR classification criteria. All selected cases were classified in accordance with consensus-based expert opinion. All cases classified as SSc according to the 1980 ACR criteria were classified as SSc with the new criteria, and several additional cases were now considered to be SSc. Conclusions The ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc performed better than the 1980 ACR criteria for SSc and should allow for more patients to be classified correctly as having the disease.
1,899 citations
University of Basel1, Radboud University Nijmegen2, University of Padua3, Complutense University of Madrid4, University of Paris5, University of Zurich6, University of Bari7, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences8, University of Florence9, Russian Academy10, Rambam Health Care Campus11, University of Regensburg12, Charité13, University of the Witwatersrand14, Johns Hopkins University15, University of Coimbra16, University of Verona17, Lund University18, University of Ljubljana19, Utrecht University20, University of Pécs21, Medical University of Vienna22, University of Debrecen23, Sapienza University of Rome24, University of Geneva25, University of Silesia in Katowice26, University College London27, University of Tübingen28, Military Medical Academy29, Lille University of Science and Technology30, University of Michigan31, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy32, Charles University in Prague33, University of Zagreb34
TL;DR: Disease-related causes, in particular pulmonary fibrosis, PAH and cardiac causes, accounted for the majority of deaths in SSc.
Abstract: Objectives To determine the causes and predictors of mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods Patients with SSc (n=5860) fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology criteria and prospectively followed in the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) cohort were analysed. EUSTAR centres completed a structured questionnaire on cause of death and comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse survival in SSc subgroups and to identify predictors of mortality. Results Questionnaires were obtained on 234 of 284 fatalities. 55% of deaths were attributed directly to SSc and 41% to non-SSc causes; in 4% the cause of death was not assigned. Of the SSc-related deaths, 35% were attributed to pulmonary fibrosis, 26% to pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and 26% to cardiac causes (mainly heart failure and arrhythmias). Among the non-SSc-related causes, infections (33%) and malignancies (31%) were followed by cardiovascular causes (29%). Of the non-SSc-related fatalities, 25% died of causes in which SSc-related complications may have participated (pneumonia, sepsis and gastrointestinal haemorrhage). Independent risk factors for mortality and their HR were: proteinuria (HR 3.34), the presence of PAH based on echocardiography (HR 2.02), pulmonary restriction (forced vital capacity below 80% of normal, HR 1.64), dyspnoea above New York Heart Association class II (HR 1.61), diffusing capacity of the lung (HR 1.20 per 10% decrease), patient age at onset of Raynaud's phenomenon (HR 1.30 per 10 years) and the modified Rodnan skin score (HR 1.20 per 10 score points). Conclusion Disease-related causes, in particular pulmonary fibrosis, PAH and cardiac causes, accounted for the majority of deaths in SSc.
1,010 citations
TL;DR: The clinical distinction seemed to be superseded by an antibody-based classification in predicting some scleroderma complications, and the EUSTAR MEDS database facilitates the analysis of clinical patterns in SSc, and contributes to the standardised assessment and monitoring of SSc internationally.
Abstract: Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a
multisystem autoimmune disease which is classified into
a diffuse cutaneous (dcSSc) and a limited cutaneous
(lcSSc) subset according to the skin involvement. In
order to better understand the vascular, immunological
and fibrotic processes of SSc and to guide its treatment
the EULAR Scleroderma Trials And Research (EUSTAR) group
was formed in June 2004.
Aims and Methods: EUSTAR collects prospectively
the Minimal Essential Data Set (MEDS) on all sequential
patients fulfilling the ACR diagnostic criteria in
participating centres. We aimed to characterize
demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of
disease presentation in SSc and analysed EUSTAR baseline
visits.
Results: In April 2006, a total of 3656 patients
(1349 with dcSSc and 2101 with lcSSc) were enrolled in
102 centres and 30 countries. 1330 individuals had
autoantibodies against Scl70 and 1106 against
anticentromere antibodies. 87% of patients were female.
On multivariate analysis, scleroderma subsets (dcSSc vs.
lcSSc), antibody status and age at onset of Raynaud’s
phenomenon, but not gender were independently associated
with the prevalence of organ manifestations.
Autoantibody status in this analysis appeared more
closely associated with clinical manifestations than
were SSc subsets.
Conclusion: dcSSc and lcSSc subsets are
associated with particular organ manifestations, but in
this analysis the clinical distinction appeared
superseded by an antibody based classification in
predicting some scleroderma complications. The EUSTAR
MEDS data base facilitates the analysis of clinical
patterns in SSc and contributes to the standardised
assessment and monitoring of SSc internationally.
770 citations
Medical University of Białystok1, Radboud University Nijmegen2, Paris Descartes University3, Charité4, University of Zurich5, University of California, Los Angeles6, University of Pécs7, University of Belgrade8, University of Leeds9, University College London10, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg11, University of Giessen12, University of Florence13, University of Cologne14, University of Michigan15, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre16, Utrecht University17, University of Lübeck18, Medical University of South Carolina19, Ghent University Hospital20, Ghent University21, University of Basel22, Johns Hopkins University23, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli24, University of Padua25
TL;DR: In this article, the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) developed a set of recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc) with attention to new therapeutic questions.
Abstract: The aim was to update the 2009 European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc), with attention to new therapeutic questions. Update of the previous treatment recommendations was performed according to EULAR standard operating procedures. The task force consisted of 32 SSc clinical experts from Europe and the USA, 2 patients nominated by the pan-European patient association for SSc (Federation of European Scleroderma Associations (FESCA)), a clinical epidemiologist and 2 research fellows. All centres from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group were invited to submit and select clinical questions concerning SSc treatment using a Delphi approach. Accordingly, 46 clinical questions addressing 26 different interventions were selected for systematic literature review. The new recommendations were based on the available evidence and developed in a consensus meeting with clinical experts and patients. The procedure resulted in 16 recommendations being developed (instead of 14 in 2009) that address treatment of several SSc-related organ complications: Raynaud's phenomenon (RP), digital ulcers (DUs), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), skin and lung disease, scleroderma renal crisis and gastrointestinal involvement. Compared with the 2009 recommendations, the 2016 recommendations include phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors for the treatment of SSc-related RP and DUs, riociguat, new aspects for endothelin receptor antagonists, prostacyclin analogues and PDE-5 inhibitors for SSc-related PAH. New recommendations regarding the use of fluoxetine for SSc-related RP and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for selected patients with rapidly progressive SSc were also added. In addition, several comments regarding other treatments addressed in clinical questions and suggestions for the SSc research agenda were formulated. These updated data-derived and consensus-derived recommendations will help rheumatologists to manage patients with SSc in an evidence-based way. These recommendations also give directions for future clinical research in SSc.
708 citations
Cited by
More filters
[...]
TL;DR: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one, which seems an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.
Abstract: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.
Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …
33,785 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors defined the following terms: ALAT, alanine aminotransferase, ASAT, aspartate AMINOTE, and APAH, associated pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Abstract: ALAT
: alanine aminotransferase
ASAT
: aspartate aminotransferase
APAH
: associated pulmonary arterial hypertension
BAS
: balloon atrial septostomy
BMPR2
: bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2
BNP
: brain natriuretic peptide
BPA
: balloon pulmonary angioplasty
BREATHE
: Bosentan
5,224 citations
Medical University of Vienna1, University of Amsterdam2, Leiden University Medical Center3, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust4, Chapel Allerton Hospital5, Humboldt State University6, Oregon Health & Science University7, Utrecht University8, VU University Medical Center9, University of Montpellier10, University of Belgrade11, Erasmus University Rotterdam12, University of Paris-Sud13, Charles University in Prague14, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre15, University of Cologne16, Weston Education Centre17, Tufts University18
TL;DR: These recommendations intend informing rheumatologists, patients, national rheumology societies, hospital officials, social security agencies and regulators about EULAR's most recent consensus on the management of RA, aimed at attaining best outcomes with current therapies.
Abstract: In this article, the 2010 European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs and bDMARDs, respectively) have been updated. The 2013 update has been developed by an international task force, which based its decisions mostly on evidence from three systematic literature reviews (one each on sDMARDs, including glucocorticoids, bDMARDs and safety aspects of DMARD therapy); treatment strategies were also covered by the searches. The evidence presented was discussed and summarised by the experts in the course of a consensus finding and voting process. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were derived and levels of agreement (strengths of recommendations) were determined. Fourteen recommendations were developed (instead of 15 in 2010). Some of the 2010 recommendations were deleted, and others were amended or split. The recommendations cover general aspects, such as attainment of remission or low disease activity using a treat-to-target approach, and the need for shared decision-making between rheumatologists and patients. The more specific items relate to starting DMARD therapy using a conventional sDMARD (csDMARD) strategy in combination with glucocorticoids, followed by the addition of a bDMARD or another csDMARD strategy (after stratification by presence or absence of adverse risk factors) if the treatment target is not reached within 6 months (or improvement not seen at
4,730 citations
Imperial College London1, National Institutes of Health2, University of Alberta3, Boston Children's Hospital4, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital5, University of Sydney6, University of Giessen7, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre8, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign9, Medical University of Graz10, Vanderbilt University Medical Center11, University of São Paulo12
TL;DR: In this paper, a clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension (PH) was established, categorizing PH into groups which share similar pathological and hemodynamic characteristics and therapeutic approaches, and the main change was to withdraw persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) from Group 1 because this entity carries more differences than similarities with other PAH subgroups.
4,135 citations