scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Ulrich Beyer

Bio: Ulrich Beyer is an academic researcher from Hoffmann-La Roche. The author has contributed to research in topics: Continuous erythropoietin receptor activator & Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 27 publications receiving 1273 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Evaluation of PFS and patterns of response and progression revealed that allowance for TL reversion from PD per imRECIST may better identify patients with OS benefit, and may inform additional modifications to radiographic criteria to better reflect efficacy with CIT agents.
Abstract: PurposeTreating solid tumors with cancer immunotherapy (CIT) can result in unconventional responses and overall survival (OS) benefits that are not adequately captured by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. We describe immune-modified RECIST (imRECIST) criteria, designed to better capture CIT responses.Patients and MethodsAtezolizumab data from clinical trials in non–small-cell lung cancer, metastatic urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma were evaluated. Modifications to imRECIST versus RECIST v1.1 included allowance for best overall response after progressive disease (PD) and changes in PD definitions per new lesions (NLs) and nontarget lesions. imRECIST progression-free survival (PFS) did not count initial PD as an event if the subsequent scan showed disease control. OS was evaluated using conditional landmarks in patients whose PFS differed by imRECIST versus RECIST v1.1.ResultsThe best overall response was 1% to 2% greater, the disease control rate was 8% to ...

261 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agent is as safe as conventional epoetin treatment, and can maintain anaemia management in haemodialysis patients when given intravenously at 4-week dosing intervals.

152 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Subcutaneous C.E.R.A.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, was as effective as epoetin in maintaining Hb and was well tolerated when administered up to once monthly in patients who have CKD and are on dialysis and randomly convert directly from epoETin alpha or beta one to three times weekly.
Abstract: Background: C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, is in development to provide anemia correction and stable maintenance of hemoglobin (Hb) levels at extended administration intervals in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study examined its efficacy and safety when administered up to once monthly in patients who have CKD and are on dialysis and randomly convert directly from epoetin α or β one to three times weekly. Design, setting, participants, and measurements: In this three-arm, comparator-controlled, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, Phase III study, 572 dialysis patients (≥18 yr) who were receiving stable subcutaneous epoetin one to three times weekly were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to continue epoetin or to receive subcutaneous C.E.R.A. once monthly or twice monthly for 52 wk. Dosage was adjusted to maintain Hb ±1.0 g/dl of baseline level. Primary end point was mean change in Hb level between baseline and the evaluation period (weeks 29 to 36). Results: Mean Hb levels during the evaluation period were similar between groups (once-monthly C.E.R.A. 11.5 g/dl; twice-monthly C.E.R.A. 11.7 g/dl; epoetin 11.5 g/dl). The difference between C.E.R.A. and epoetin in mean change (97.5% confidence interval) in Hb concentration between baseline and evaluation was −0.022 g/dl (−0.262 to 0.217) for once monthly and 0.141 g/dl (−0.098 to 0.380) for twice monthly. Analysis demonstrated that C.E.R.A. was as effective as epoetin in maintaining Hb and was well tolerated. Conclusions: Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. once or twice monthly successfully maintained tight and stable Hb levels in patients who were on dialysis and randomly converted directly from epoetin one to three times weekly.

147 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: No difference was observed on the study's primary outcome measure, the clinician-rated MADRS change from baseline to end of treatment, between adjunctive basimglurant MR vs placebo, and good tolerability warrant further investigation with this compound in depressive disorders.
Abstract: Importance Antagonism of the postsynaptic metabotropic glutamate subtype 5 receptor is a novel approach to modulate glutamatergic function and has proven efficacy in a number of preclinical behavioral models of depression. Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of basimglurant modified-release (MR) vs placebo as adjunctive therapy to ongoing antidepressant medication therapy in patients with MDD who had inadequate response within the current episode. Design, Setting, and Participants In this phase 2b, double blind, randomized clinical trial of 333 adult patients with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of MDD across 59 research clinics globally, patients were assigned to 1 of 2 doses of basimglurant MR (0.5 or 1.5 mg) or placebo once daily, adjunctive to ongoing antidepressant medication therapy (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor). Patients were enrolled from October 5, 2011, through July 26, 2013. Interventions Six-week treatment with 0.5 mg of basimglurant MR, 1.5-mg basimglurant MR, or placebo once daily, adjunctive to ongoing antidepressant medication therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the mean change from baseline score on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), as rated by the clinician at week 6. Other measures included patient-rated MADRS, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology–Self-Report, Clinical Global Impression–Improvement, Patient Global Impression–Improvement, and Clinical Global Impression–Severity Scales and adverse events. Results A total of 596 patients were screened, and 333 were randomized into the study (mean [SD] age, 47 [11.2] years; 216 female [65.1%]). The primary end point (mean change in clinician-rated MADRS score from baseline to end of treatment) was not met (effect size [ES] = 0.16, P = .42; intent-to-treat [ITT] mixed-effects model for repeated measures [MMRM] analysis for comparing 1.5-mg basimglurant MR and placebo). Across secondary and exploratory end points, 1.5-mg basimglurant MR revealed larger improvements vs placebo on the patient-rated MADRS (−16.2 vs −13.3, ES = 0.28, nominal P = .04), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology–Self-Report (−7.5 vs −5.8; ES = 0.37, nominal P = .009), Clinical Global Impression–Improvement mean score, and Patient Global Impression–Improvement mean score. Improvements were also seen in the patient-rated MADRS remission rate (36.0% vs 22.0%; nominal P = .03) and response rate (50.5% vs 40.4%; nominal P = .13), A 0.5-mg dose of basimglurant MR had no benefit over placebo in any of these measures. The most common adverse event was dizziness, which was mostly transient and of mild intensity. Conclusions and Relevance No difference was observed on the study’s primary outcome measure, the clinician-rated MADRS change from baseline to end of treatment, between adjunctive basimglurant MR vs placebo. Adjunctive 1.5-mg basimglurant MR daily revealed, however, an antidepressant effect across secondary end points, particularly in patient-rated measures. These findings combined with good tolerability warrant further investigation with this compound in depressive disorders. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01437657

103 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Analysis showed that subcutaneous C.E.R.A.R., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, once every 2 wk corrects anemia in ESA-naïve patients who are not on dialysis.
Abstract: Background and objectives: This study examined the efficacy of C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, for correcting anemia in patients who had chronic kidney disease (CKD) and were not on dialysis. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: In this open-label, randomized, parallel-group, Phase III study, 324 adult patients with CKD not on dialysis nor receiving treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous C.E.R.A. once every 2 wk or darbepoetin alfa once weekly during an 18-wk correction period and a 10-wk evaluation period. Thereafter, patients receiving C.E.R.A. were randomly assigned to C.E.R.A. once every 2 wk or once monthly, and patients receiving darbepoetin alfa could receive darbepoetin alfa once weekly or once every 2 wk for a 24-wk extension period. Dosage was adjusted to achieve a hemoglobin (Hb) response and to maintain Hb ±1 g/dl of the response level and 11 to 13 g/dl. Primary end points were Hb response rate during correction and evaluation and change in Hb concentration between baseline and evaluation. Results: Hb response rates were 97.5% for C.E.R.A. and 96.3% for darbepoetin alfa. Adjusted mean changes in Hb from baseline to evaluation were 2.15 g/dl (C.E.R.A.) and 2.00 g/dl (darbepoetin alfa). Analysis showed that C.E.R.A. once every 2 wk was as effective as darbepoetin alfa once weekly for correcting anemia. Hb levels remained stable in all groups during the extension period. C.E.R.A. and darbepoetin alfa were well tolerated. Conclusions: Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. once every 2 wk corrects anemia in ESA–naive patients who are not on dialysis.

101 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
14 Jan 2020-Immunity
TL;DR: Ten key challenges facing cancer immunotherapy are defined, which range from lack of confidence in translating pre-clinical findings to identifying optimal combinations of immune-based therapies for any given patient.

954 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is hypothesized that under conditions of mild, persistent hyperketonemia, such as those that prevail during treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors, β-hydroxybutyrate is freely taken up by the heart and oxidized in preference to fatty acids, which improves the transduction of oxygen consumption into work efficiency at the mitochondrial level.
Abstract: The striking and unexpected relative risk reductions in cardiovascular (CV) mortality (38%), hospitalization for heart failure (35%), and death from any cause (32%) observed in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial using an inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) in patients with type 2 diabetes and high CV risk have raised the possibility that mechanisms other than those observed in the trial-modest improvement in glycemic control, small decrease in body weight, and persistent reductions in blood pressure and uric acid level-may be at play. We hypothesize that under conditions of mild, persistent hyperketonemia, such as those that prevail during treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors, β-hydroxybutyrate is freely taken up by the heart (among other organs) and oxidized in preference to fatty acids. This fuel selection improves the transduction of oxygen consumption into work efficiency at the mitochondrial level. In addition, the hemoconcentration that typically follows SGLT2 inhibition enhances oxygen release to the tissues, thereby establishing a powerful synergy with the metabolic substrate shift. These mechanisms would cooperate with other SGLT2 inhibition-induced changes (chiefly, enhanced diuresis and reduced blood pressure) to achieve the degree of cardioprotection revealed in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. This hypothesis opens up new lines of investigation into the pathogenesis and treatment of diabetic and nondiabetic heart disease.

727 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: The use of ESAs and other agents to treat anemia in CKD and methods for Guideline Development suggest that red cell transfusion is a viable treatment option.
Abstract: 282 Summary of Recommendation Statements 283 Chapter 1: Diagnosis and evaluation of anemia in CKD 288 Chapter 2: Use of iron to treat anemia in CKD 292 Chapter 3: Use of ESAs and other agents to treat anemia in CKD 299 Chapter 4: Red cell transfusion to treat anemia in CKD 311 Methods for Guideline Development 317 Biographic and Disclosure Information 324

712 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Evidence-based pharmacological treatments are available for first-line treatment of major depressive disorder and for management of inadequate response, however, given the limitations of the evidence base, pharmacological management of MDD still depends on tailoring treatments to the patient.
Abstract: Background:The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) conducted a revision of the 2009 guidelines by updating the evidence and recommendations. The scope of the 2016 guidelines r...

689 citations