scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Ulrich Meyer

Other affiliations: Max Planck Society
Bio: Ulrich Meyer is an academic researcher from Goethe University Frankfurt. The author has contributed to research in topics: Shortest path problem & Time complexity. The author has an hindex of 27, co-authored 137 publications receiving 3036 citations. Previous affiliations of Ulrich Meyer include Max Planck Society.


Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: In this article, external memory graph algorithms for a few representative problems are reviewed, and a comparison is made between external-memory (EM) graph algorithms and graph-based methods.
Abstract: Solving real-world optimization problems frequently boils down to processing graphs. The graphs themselves are used to represent and structure relationships of the problem’s components. In this chapter we review external-memory (EM) graph algorithms for a few representative problems:

34 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
19 Oct 2015-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: This work describes the algorithm and presents a reference implementation in MATLAB to test the algorithm’s performance on simulated networks as well as networks derived from magnetoencephalographic data, a tractable and data-efficient way of reconstructing approximative networks of multivariate interactions.
Abstract: Network graphs have become a popular tool to represent complex systems composed of many interacting subunits; especially in neuroscience, network graphs are increasingly used to represent and analyze functional interactions between multiple neural sources. Interactions are often reconstructed using pairwise bivariate analyses, overlooking the multivariate nature of interactions: it is neglected that investigating the effect of one source on a target necessitates to take all other sources as potential nuisance variables into account; also combinations of sources may act jointly on a given target. Bivariate analyses produce networks that may contain spurious interactions, which reduce the interpretability of the network and its graph metrics. A truly multivariate reconstruction, however, is computationally intractable because of the combinatorial explosion in the number of potential interactions. Thus, we have to resort to approximative methods to handle the intractability of multivariate interaction reconstruction, and thereby enable the use of networks in neuroscience. Here, we suggest such an approximative approach in the form of an algorithm that extends fast bivariate interaction reconstruction by identifying potentially spurious interactions post-hoc: the algorithm uses interaction delays reconstructed for directed bivariate interactions to tag potentially spurious edges on the basis of their timing signatures in the context of the surrounding network. Such tagged interactions may then be pruned, which produces a statistically conservative network approximation that is guaranteed to contain non-spurious interactions only. We describe the algorithm and present a reference implementation in MATLAB to test the algorithm’s performance on simulated networks as well as networks derived from magnetoencephalographic data. We discuss the algorithm in relation to other approximative multivariate methods and highlight suitable application scenarios. Our approach is a tractable and data-efficient way of reconstructing approximative networks of multivariate interactions. It is preferable if available data are limited or if fully multivariate approaches are computationally infeasible.

30 citations

01 Jan 2001
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented two new results on I/O-efficient depth-first search in an important class of sparse graphs, namely undirected embedded planar graphs.
Abstract: Even though a large number of I/O-efficient graph algorithms have been developed, a number of fundamental problems still remain open. For example, no space- and I/O-efficient algorithms are known for depth-first search or breadth-first search in sparse graphs. In this paper we present two new results on I/O-efficient depth-first search in an important class of sparse graphs, namely undirected embedded planar graphs. We develop a new efficient depth-first search algorithm and show how planar depth-first search in general can be reduced to planar breadth-first search. As part of the first result we develop the first I/O-efficient algorithm for finding a simple cycle separator of a biconnected planar graph. Together with other recent reducibility results, the second result provides further evidence that external memory breadth-first search is among the hardest problems on planar graphs.

27 citations

01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: This work shows how to compute single-source shortest paths in undirected graphs with non-negative edge lengths in O(√nm/Blogn+MST(n,m)I/Os, where n is the number of vertices, m is theNumber of edges, B is the disk block size, and MST(m) is the I/O-cost of computing a minimum spanning tree.
Abstract: We show how to compute single-source shortest paths in undirected graphs with non-negative edge lengths in O(√nm/Blogn+MST(n,m)I/Os, where n is the number of vertices, m is the number of edges, B is the disk block size, and MST(n,m) is the I/O-cost of computing a minimum spanning tree. For sparse graphs, the new algorithm performs O((n/√B)logn) I/Os. This result removes our previous algorithm's dependence on the edge lengths in the graph.

27 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The variegate spectrum of experimental results gives a good picture of the features of these priority queues, thus being helpful to anyone interested in the use of such data structures on very large data sets.
Abstract: In this paper we compare the performance of eight different priority queue implementations: four of them are explicitly designed to work in an external-memory setting, the others are standard internal-memory queues available in the LEDA library [Mehlhorn and Naher 1999]. Two of the external-memory priority queues are obtained by engineering known internal-memory priority queues with the aim of achieving effective performance on external storage devices (i.e., Radix heaps [Ahuja et al. 1990] and array heaps [Thorup 1996]). Our experimental framework includes some simple tests, like random sequences of insert or delete-minimum operations, as well as more advanced tests consisting of intermixed sequences of update operations and "application driven" update sequences originated by simulations of Dijkstra's algorithm on large graph instances. Our variegate spectrum of experimental results gives a good picture of the features of these priority queues, thus being helpful to anyone interested in the use of such data structures on very large data sets.

26 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis.
Abstract: Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

13,246 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
22 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Some of the major results in random graphs and some of the more challenging open problems are reviewed, including those related to the WWW.
Abstract: We will review some of the major results in random graphs and some of the more challenging open problems. We will cover algorithmic and structural questions. We will touch on newer models, including those related to the WWW.

7,116 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
06 Jun 2010
TL;DR: A model for processing large graphs that has been designed for efficient, scalable and fault-tolerant implementation on clusters of thousands of commodity computers, and its implied synchronicity makes reasoning about programs easier.
Abstract: Many practical computing problems concern large graphs. Standard examples include the Web graph and various social networks. The scale of these graphs - in some cases billions of vertices, trillions of edges - poses challenges to their efficient processing. In this paper we present a computational model suitable for this task. Programs are expressed as a sequence of iterations, in each of which a vertex can receive messages sent in the previous iteration, send messages to other vertices, and modify its own state and that of its outgoing edges or mutate graph topology. This vertex-centric approach is flexible enough to express a broad set of algorithms. The model has been designed for efficient, scalable and fault-tolerant implementation on clusters of thousands of commodity computers, and its implied synchronicity makes reasoning about programs easier. Distribution-related details are hidden behind an abstract API. The result is a framework for processing large graphs that is expressive and easy to program.

3,840 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that the full set of hydromagnetic equations admit five more integrals, besides the energy integral, if dissipative processes are absent, which made it possible to formulate a variational principle for the force-free magnetic fields.
Abstract: where A represents the magnetic vector potential, is an integral of the hydromagnetic equations. This -integral made it possible to formulate a variational principle for the force-free magnetic fields. The integral expresses the fact that motions cannot transform a given field in an entirely arbitrary different field, if the conductivity of the medium isconsidered infinite. In this paper we shall show that the full set of hydromagnetic equations admit five more integrals, besides the energy integral, if dissipative processes are absent. These integrals, as we shall presently verify, are I2 =fbHvdV, (2)

1,858 citations

Book
02 Jan 1991

1,377 citations