U
Ulrika Ekseth
Publications - 4
Citations - 1526
Ulrika Ekseth is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Tomosynthesis & Mammography. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 4 publications receiving 1398 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program
Per Skaane,Andriy I. Bandos,Randi Gullien,Ellen B. Eben,Ulrika Ekseth,Unni Haakenaasen,Mina Izadi,Ingvild N. Jebsen,Gunnar Jahr,Mona Krager,Loren Niklason,Solveig Hofvind,David Gur +12 more
TL;DR: The use of mammography plus tomosynthesis in a screening environment resulted in a significantly higher cancer detection rate and enabled the detection of more invasive cancers.
Journal ArticleDOI
Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images
Per Skaane,Andriy I. Bandos,Ellen B. Eben,Ingvild N. Jebsen,Mona Krager,Unni Haakenaasen,Ulrika Ekseth,Mina Izadi,Solveig Hofvind,Randi Gullien +9 more
TL;DR: The combination of current reconstructed 2D images and DBT performed comparably to FFDM plus DBT and is adequate for routine clinical use when interpreting screening mammograms.
Journal ArticleDOI
Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration
Per Skaane,Andriy I. Bandos,Randi Gullien,Ellen B. Eben,Ulrika Ekseth,Unni Haakenaasen,Mina Izadi,Ingvild N. Jebsen,Gunnar Jahr,Mona Krager,Solveig Hofvind +10 more
TL;DR: Double reading of 2D + 3D significantly improves the cancer detection rate in mammography screening and significantly reduced false-positive interpretations in tomosynthesis-based examinations.
Journal ArticleDOI
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
Per Skaane,Randi Gullien,Hilde Bjørndal,Ellen B. Eben,Ulrika Ekseth,Unni Haakenaasen,Gunnar Jahr,Ingvild N. Jebsen,Mona Krager +8 more
TL;DR: Comparing digital mammography and DBT in a side-by-side feature analysis for cancer conspicuity shows that there is a potential for increasing the sensitivity using this new technique, especially for cancers manifesting as spiculated masses and distortions.