scispace - formally typeset
U

Ursula Bellugi

Researcher at Salk Institute for Biological Studies

Publications -  239
Citations -  20723

Ursula Bellugi is an academic researcher from Salk Institute for Biological Studies. The author has contributed to research in topics: Williams syndrome & Sign language. The author has an hindex of 79, co-authored 238 publications receiving 20132 citations. Previous affiliations of Ursula Bellugi include Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior & University of Washington.

Papers
More filters
Book

The signs of language

TL;DR: The two faces of sign and sign language have been studied in this paper, where the authors compare Chinese and American signs and feature analysis of handshapes and the rate of speaking and signing.
Journal ArticleDOI

I. The Neurocognitive Profile of Williams Syndrome: A Complex Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses

TL;DR: The rare, genetically based disorder, Williams syndrome, produces a constellation of distinctive cognitive, neuroanatomical, and electrophysiological features which are explored through the series of studies reported here.
Book

What the hands reveal about the brain

TL;DR: This paper showed that there are primary linguistic systems passed down from one generation of deaf people to the next, which have been forged into antonomous languages and are not derived from front spoken languages.
Journal ArticleDOI

Three Processes in the Child's Acquisition of Syntax

TL;DR: For instance, at about eighteen months children are likely to begin constructing two-word utterances; such a one, for instance, as Push car as mentioned in this paper, and some children go about the house all day long naming things (table, doggie, ball, etc.).
Journal ArticleDOI

Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production

TL;DR: The familiar assertion that, in language development, understanding precedes production was tested for 10 grammatical contrasts with 12 3-year-old children and it was found that production in the sense of imitation proves to be more advanced than understanding in 3- year-olds.