scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

V. E. Schrock

Bio: V. E. Schrock is an academic researcher from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The author has contributed to research in topics: FLiBe & Cost of electricity by source. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 264 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the liquid-wall HYLIFE-II conceptual design has been presented, which has been shown to reduce the electricity cost by using a neutronically thick array of flowing molten-salt jets, which will not burn, has a low tritium solubility and inventory, and protects the chamber walls.
Abstract: Enhanced safety and performance improvements have been made to the liquid-wall HYLIFE reactor, yielding the current HYLIFE-II conceptual design. Liquid lithium has been replaced with a neutronically thick array of flowing molten-salt jets (Li[sub 2]BeF[sub 4] or Flibe), which will not burn, has a low tritium solubility and inventory, and protects the chamber walls, giving a robust design with a 30-yr lifetime. The tritium inventory is 0.5 g in the molten salt and 140 g in the metal of the tube walls, where it is less easily released. The 5-MJ driver is a recirculating induction accelerator estimated to cost $570 million (direct costs). Heavy-ion targets yield 350 MJ, six times per second, to produce 940 MW of electrical power for a cost of 6.5 cents/kW[center dot]h. Both larger and smaller yields are possible with correspondingly lower and higher pulse rates. When scaled up to 1934 MW (electric), the plant design has a calculated cost of electricity of 4.5 cents/kW[center dot]h. The design did not take into account potential improved plant availability and lower operations and maintenance costs compared with conventional power plant experience, resulting from the liquid wall protection. Such improvements would directly lower the electricity cost figures. For example,more » if the availability can be raised from the conservatively assumed 75% to 85% and the annual cost of component replacement, operations, and maintenance can be reduced from 6% to 3% of direct cost, the cost of electricity would drop to 5.0 and 3.9 cents/kW[center dot]h for 1- and 2-GW (electric) cases. 50 refs., 15 figs., 3 tabs.« less

273 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the potential of achieving tritium self-sufficiency depends on many system physics and technology parameters, and Interactive Physics and Technology R&D programs should be implemented to determine the potential to realize those physics and technologies options and parameters that have large effects on attaining a realistic window for tritiam self-sufficiency.

115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
S. Nakai1, K Mima1
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of recent progress in laser driven implosion is reviewed, showing that improvements in the uniformity of irradiation by laser beams on fuel pellets have achieved quantitative progress in implosion performance.
Abstract: Recent progress in laser driven implosion is reviewed. Improvements in the uniformity of irradiation by laser beams on fuel pellets have achieved quantitative progress in implosion performance. The recent results of the direct drive–central ignition experiments give us confidence in achieving fusion ignition, burning and energy gain using a multi-beam megajoule laser with full implementation of beam smoothing techniques. Fast ignition research is also reviewed, which could give us a higher energy gain with lower laser energy. The science and technology of laser fusion power plants are beginning to attract wider attention, as forming the road map to achieve commercial power plants for cleaner, safer and abundant fusion energy.Corrections were made to this article on 28 April 2004

102 citations

18 Dec 1998
TL;DR: In this article, the authors review work on flashlamp-pumped solid state lasers and discuss diode-pump solid state laser, the Mercury laser in particular, and discuss ICF lasers beyond Mercury.
Abstract: This paper reviews work on flashlamp-pumped solid state lasers and discusses diode-pumped solid state lasers, the Mercury laser in particular. It also discusses ICF lasers beyond Mercury.

99 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a diode pumped solid state laser (DPSSL) was used as a driver for an inertial fusion energy (IFE) power plant to minimize the calculated cost of electricity (COE).
Abstract: A comprehensive conceptual design for a diode pumped solid state laser (DPSSL) as a driver for an inertial fusion energy (IFE) power plant is presented. This design is based on recent technical advances that offer potential solutions to difficulties previously associated with the use of a laser for IFE applications. The design was selected by using a systems analysis code that optimizes a DPSSL configuration by minimizing the calculated cost of electricity (COE). The code contains the significant physics relevant to the DPSSL driver, but treats the target chamber and balance of plant costs generically using scaling relations published for the Sombrero KrF laser concept. The authors describe the physics incorporated in the code, predict DPSSL performance and its variations with changes in the major parameters, discuss IFE economics and technical risk, and identify the high leverage development efforts that can make DPSSL driven IFE plants more economically competitive. It is believed that this study is a significant advance over previous conceptual studies of DPSSLs for IFE because it incorporates a new cost effective gain medium, applies a potential solution to the `final optics` problem, and considers the laser physics in substantially greater detail. The result is the introduction of an option for an IFE driver that has relatively low development costs and that builds upon the mature laser technology base already developed for Nova and being developed for the proposed National Ignition Facility. The baseline design of the paper has a product of laser efficiency and target gain of ηG~6.6 and a COE of 8.6 cents/kW.h for a 1 GW(e) plant with a target gain of 76 at 3.7 MJ. Higher ηG(11) and lower COEs (6.6 cents/kW.h) can be achieved with target gains twice as high

92 citations