The ability of platinum and gold catalysts to effect powerful atom-economic transformations has led to a marked increase in their utilization. The quite remarkable correlation of their catalytic behavior with the available structural data, coordination chemistry, and organometallic reactivity patterns, including relativistic effects, allows the underlying principles of catalytic carbophilic activation by π acids to be formulated. The spectrum of reactivity extends beyond their utility as catalytic and benign alternatives to conventional stoichiometric π acids. The resulting reactivity profile allows this entire field of catalysis to be rationalized, and brings together the apparently disparate electrophilic metal carbene and nonclassical carbocation explanations. The advances in coupling, cycloisomerization, and structural reorganization—from the design of new transformations to the improvement to known reactions—are highlighted in this Review. The application of platinum- and gold-catalyzed transformations in natural product synthesis is also discussed.

Catalytic Carbophilic Activation: Catalysis by Platinum and Gold π Acids

1.1. Context and Meta-Review
Despite the ubiquity of metallic gold (Au) in popular culture, its deployment in homogeneous catalysis has only recently undergone widespread investigation. In the past decade, and especially since 2004, great progress has been made in developing efficient and selective Au-catalyzed transformations, as evidenced by the prodigious number of reviews available on various aspects of this growing field. Hashmi has written a series of comprehensive reviews outlining the progression of Au-catalyzed reaction development,1 and a number of more focused reviews provide further insight into particular aspects of Au catalysis. A brief meta-review of the available range of perspectives published on Au catalysis helps to put this Chemical Reviews article in context.

The vast majority of reactions developed with homogeneous Au catalysts have exploited the propensity of Au to activate carbon-carbon π-bonds as electrophiles. Gold has come to be regarded as an exceedingly mild, relatively carbophilic Lewis acid, and the broad array of newly developed reactions proceeding by activation of unsaturated carbon-carbon bonds has been expertly reviewed.2

Further reviews and highlights on Au catalysis focus on particular classes of synthetic reactions. An excellent comprehensive review of Au-catalyzed enyne cycloisomerizations is available.3 Even more focused highlights on hydroarylation of alkynes,4 hydroamination of C-C multiple bonds,5 and reactions of oxo-alkynes6 and propargylic esters7 provide valuable perspectives on progress and future directions in the development of homogeneous Au catalysis.

Most of the reviews on Au catalysis emphasize broad or specific advances in synthetic utility. Recently, we have invoked relativistic effects to provide a framework for understanding the observed reactivity of Au catalysts, in order to complement empirical advancements.8 In this Chemical Reviews article, we attempt to enumerate the ways in which selectivity can be controlled in homogeneous Au catalysis. It is our hope that lessons to guide catalyst selection and the design of new catalysts may be distilled from a thorough evaluation of ligand, counterion, and oxidation state effects as they influence chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivity in homogeneous Au catalysis.

http://www.cchem.berkeley.edu/toste/publications/cr068430g.pdf

Ligand effects in homogeneous Au catalysis.

Gold salts and complexes have emerged in the past few years as the most powerful catalysts for electrophilic activation of alkynes toward a variety of nucleophiles under homogeneous conditions. In a simplified form, nucleophilic attack on the [AuL]-activated alkyne proceeds via π complexes 1 to give trans-alkenyl gold complexes of type 2 as intermediates (Scheme 1). This type of coordination is also a common theme in gold-catalyzed cycloisomerizations of enynes, in which the alkene function acts as the nucleophile. In the reaction of enynes with complexes of other transition metals, an Alder-ene cycloisomerization can take place by simultaneous coordination of the alkyne and the alkene to the metal followed by an oxidative cyclometalation. In contrast, this process does not occur for gold(I) since oxidative addition processes are not facile for this metal. 6 In addition, the [AuL] fragment, which is isolobal to H and HgL, adopts a linear coordination and binds to either the alkene or the alkyne. Thus, cycloisomerizations of enynes catalyzed by gold proceed by an initial coordination of the metal to the alkyne, and as illustrated in Scheme 2, the resulting complex 3 reacts with the alkene by either the 5-exo-dig or 6-endo-dig pathway to form the exoor endocyclopropyl gold carbene 4 or 5, respectively, as has been established with other electrophilic transition-metal complexes or halides MXn as catalysts. The proposed involvement of cyclopropyl metal carbenes of type 4 in the electrophilic activation of enynes by transition metals was first substantiated in reactions catalyzed by Pd(II), in which the initially formed cyclopropyl palladium carbenes undergo [4 + 2] cycloaddition with the double bond of the conjugate enyne. Strong evidence for the existence of cyclopropyl metal carbenes as intermediates was also obtained in the reaction of enynes bearing additional double bonds at the alkenyl chain with Ru(II) and Pt(II) catalysts. In these reactions, the cyclopropyl metal carbenes are trapped intramolecularly by the terminal alkene to give tetracycles containing two cyclopropanes. Gold(I) complexes usually surpass the reactivity shown by Pt(II) and other electrophilic metal salts and complexes for the activation of enynes. They are highly reactive yet uniquely selective Lewis acids that have a high affinity for π bonds. This high π-acidity is linked to relativistic effects, which reach a maximum in the periodic table with gold. However, on occasion, the stronger Lewis acidity of gold complexes can be detrimental in terms of selectivity and because of their low tolerance to certain functional groups. In these instances, the less-strongly Lewis acidic Pt(II) complexes could be the catalysts of choice. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: aechavarren@ iciq.es. † Additional affiliation: Departamento de Quı́mica Orgánica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain. Scheme 1 Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3326–3350 3326

Gold-catalyzed cycloisomerizations of enynes: a mechanistic perspective.

Transition-metal catalysts containing gold present new opportunities for chemical synthesis, and it is therefore not surprising that these complexes are beginning to capture the attention of the chemical community. Cationic phosphine-gold(i) complexes are especially versatile and selective catalysts for a growing number of synthetic transformations. The reactivity of these species can be understood in the context of theoretical studies on gold; relativistic effects are especially helpful in rationalizing the reaction manifolds available to gold catalysts. This Review draws on experimental and computational data to present our current understanding of homogeneous gold catalysis, focusing on previously unexplored reactivity and its application to the development of new methodology.

Relativistic effects in homogeneous gold catalysis

1.1. General Reactivity of Alkyne-Gold(I) Complexes
For centuries, gold had been considered a precious, purely decorative inert metal. It was not until 1986 that Ito and Hayashi described the first application of gold(I) in homogeneous catalysis.1 More than one decade later, the first examples of gold(I) activation of alkynes were reported by Teles2 and Tanaka,3 revealing the potential of gold(I) in organic synthesis. Now, gold(I) complexes are the most effective catalysts for the electrophilic activation of alkynes under homogeneous conditions, and a broad range of versatile synthetic tools have been developed for the construction of carbon–carbon or carbon–heteroatom bonds.

Gold(I) complexes selectively activate π-bonds of alkynes in complex molecular settings,4−10 which has been attributed to relativistic effects.11−13 In general, no other electrophilic late transition metal shows the breadth of synthetic applications of homogeneous gold(I) catalysts, although in occasions less Lewis acidic Pt(II) or Ag(I) complexes can be used as an alternative,9,10,14,15 particularly in the context of the activation of alkenes.16,17 Highly electrophilic Ga(III)18−22 and In(III)23,24 salts can also be used as catalysts, although often higher catalyst loadings are required.

In general, the nucleophilic Markovnikov attack to η2-[AuL]+-activated alkynes 1 forms trans-alkenyl-gold complexes 2 as intermediates (Scheme 1).4,5a,9,10,12,25−29 This activation mode also occurs in gold-catalyzed cycloisomerizations of 1,n-enynes and in hydroarylation reactions, in which the alkene or the arene act as the nucleophile.



Scheme 1

Anti-Nucleophilic Attack to η2-[AuL]+-Activated Alkynes

/pdf/gold-i-catalyzed-activation-of-alkynes-for-the-construction-50i37g5kgj.pdf

Gold(I)-Catalyzed Activation of Alkynes for the Construction of Molecular Complexity

La cyclisation des acetates d'ethynyl-1 propene-2ols-1, catalysee par PdCl 2 (MeCN) 2 conduit aux acetates de cyclo pentadiene-1,4ols qui se transforment en cyclopentene-2ones

Valentin Rautenstrauch

Papers

2-Cyclopentenones from 1-ethynyl-2-propenyl acetates