scispace - formally typeset
V

Veena Kumari

Researcher at Brunel University London

Publications -  370
Citations -  16361

Veena Kumari is an academic researcher from Brunel University London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Schizophrenia & Prepulse inhibition. The author has an hindex of 69, co-authored 352 publications receiving 14982 citations. Previous affiliations of Veena Kumari include King's College London & University of East London.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Brain anatomy and sensorimotor gating in Asperger’s syndrome

TL;DR: It is hypothesized that Asperger's syndrome is associated with abnormalities in fronto-striatal pathways resulting in defective sensorimotor gating, and consequently characteristic difficulties inhibiting repetitive thoughts, speech and actions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nicotine use in schizophrenia: the self medication hypotheses.

TL;DR: An overview of the explanations for elevated rates of smoking in schizophrenia is presented, with particular emphasis on the theories relating this behaviour to sensory gating and cognitive deficits in this disorder that have been viewed as major support for the self-medication hypotheses.
Journal ArticleDOI

The relationship between brain structure and neurocognition in schizophrenia: a selective review

TL;DR: A review of studies attempting to determine the relationship between brain structure and neurocognition in schizophrenia revealed that whole brain volume tends to correlate with the measures of general intelligence as well as with a range of specific cognitive functions in normal controls and female schizophrenia patients, but this relationship is disrupted in male patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Normalization of Information Processing Deficits in Schizophrenia With Clozapine

TL;DR: Clozapine is superior to typical antipsychotics in normalizing prepulse inhibition, presumably because of its pharmacological effects on prefrontal regions of the brain or its effects on a broader range of neuroreceptors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Identical, but not the same: Intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0 T scanners

TL;DR: The results are encouraging for multi-centre DTI studies in larger populations, but also illustrate the importance of the image processing pipeline for reproducibility.