There is considerable pressure to define the key requirements of 5G, develop 5G standards, and perform technology trials as quickly as possible. Normally, these activities are best done in series but there is a desire to complete these tasks in parallel so that commercial deployments of 5G can begin by 2020. 5G will not be an incremental improvement over its predecessors; it aims to be a revolutionary leap forward in terms of data rates, latency, massive connectivity, network reliability, and energy efficiency. These capabilities are targeted at realizing high-speed connectivity, the Internet of Things, augmented virtual reality, the tactile internet, and so on. The requirements of 5G are expected to be met by new spectrum in the microwave bands (3.3-4.2 GHz), and utilizing large bandwidths available in mm-wave bands, increasing spatial degrees of freedom via large antenna arrays and 3-D MIMO, network densification, and new waveforms that provide scalability and flexibility to meet the varying demands of 5G services. Unlike the one size fits all 4G core networks, the 5G core network must be flexible and adaptable and is expected to simultaneously provide optimized support for the diverse 5G use case categories. In this paper, we provide an overview of 5G research, standardization trials, and deployment challenges. Due to the enormous scope of 5G systems, it is necessary to provide some direction in a tutorial article, and in this overview, the focus is largely user centric, rather than device centric. In addition to surveying the state of play in the area, we identify leading technologies, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses, and outline the key challenges ahead, with research test beds delivering promising performance but pre-commercial trials lagging behind the desired 5G targets.

5G : A tutorial overview of standards, trials, challenges, deployment, and practice

The IoT paradigm holds the promise to revolutionize the way we live and work by means of a wealth of new services, based on seamless interactions between a large amount of heterogeneous devices. After decades of conceptual inception of the IoT, in recent years a large variety of communication technologies has gradually emerged, reflecting a large diversity of application domains and of communication requirements. Such heterogeneity and fragmentation of the connectivity landscape is currently hampering the full realization of the IoT vision, by posing several complex integration challenges. In this context, the advent of 5G cellular systems, with the availability of a connectivity technology, which is at once truly ubiquitous, reliable, scalable, and cost-efficient, is considered as a potentially key driver for the yet-to emerge global IoT. In the present paper, we analyze in detail the potential of 5G technologies for the IoT, by considering both the technological and standardization aspects. We review the present-day IoT connectivity landscape, as well as the main 5G enablers for the IoT. Last but not least, we illustrate the massive business shifts that a tight link between IoT and 5G may cause in the operator and vendors ecosystem.

/pdf/internet-of-things-in-the-5g-era-enablers-architecture-and-4vjccjwnie.pdf

Internet of Things in the 5G Era: Enablers, Architecture, and Business Models

Traditional ultra-dense wireless networks are recommended as a complement for cellular networks and are deployed in partial areas, such as hotspot and indoor scenarios. Based on the massive multiple-input multi-output antennas and the millimeter wave communication technologies, the 5G ultra-dense cellular network is proposed to deploy in overall cellular scenarios. Moreover, a distribution network architecture is presented for 5G ultra-dense cellular networks. Furthermore, the backhaul network capacity and the backhaul energy efficiency of ultra-dense cellular networks are investigated to answer an important question, that is, how much densification can be deployed for 5G ultra-dense cellular networks. Simulation results reveal that there exist densification limits for 5G ultra-dense cellular networks with backhaul network capacity and backhaul energy efficiency constraints.

5G Ultra-Dense Cellular Networks

The exponential growth and availability of data in all forms is the main booster to the continuing evolution in the communications industry. The popularization of traffic-intensive applications including high definition video, 3-D visualization, augmented reality, wearable devices, and cloud computing defines a new era of mobile communications. The immense amount of traffic generated by today’s customers requires a paradigm shift in all aspects of mobile networks. Ultradense network (UDN) is one of the leading ideas in this racetrack. In UDNs, the access nodes and/or the number of communication links per unit area are densified. In this paper, we provide a survey-style introduction to dense small cell networks. Moreover, we summarize and compare some of the recent achievements and research findings. We discuss the modeling techniques and the performance metrics widely used to model problems in UDN. Also, we present the enabling technologies for network densification in order to understand the state-of-the-art. We consider many research directions in this survey, namely, user association, interference management, energy efficiency, spectrum sharing, resource management, scheduling, backhauling, propagation modeling, and the economics of UDN deployment. Finally, we discuss the challenges and open problems to the researchers in the field or newcomers who aim to conduct research in this interesting and active area of research.

Ultra-Dense Networks: A Survey

Internet of Things (IoT): A review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues

The promise of ubiquitous and super-fast connectivity for the upcoming years will be in large part fulfilled by the addition of base stations and spectral aggregation. The resulting very dense networks (DenseNets) will face a number of technical challenges. Among others, the interference emerges as an old acquaintance with new significance. As a matter of fact, the interference conditions and the role of aggressor and victim depend to a large extent on the density and the scenario. To illustrate this, downlink interference statistics for different 3GPP simulation scenarios and a more irregular and dense deployment in Tokyo are compared. Evolution to DenseNets offers new opportunities for further development of downlink interference cooperation techniques. Various mechanisms in LTE and LTE-Advanced are revisited. Some techniques try to anticipate the future in a proactive way, whereas others simply react to an identified interference problem. As an example, we propose two algorithms to apply time domain and frequency domain small cell interference coordination in a DenseNet.

/pdf/interference-coordination-for-dense-wireless-networks-45xg9v5zpj.pdf

Interference coordination for dense wireless networks

Dense network deployments comprising small cells pose a series of important challenges when it comes to achieving an efficient resource use and curbing intercell interference in the downlink. This paper examines different techniques to treat these problems in a dynamic way, from the network and the receiver sides. As a network coordination scheme, we apply a centralized joint cell association and scheduling mechanism based on dynamic cell switching by which users are not always served by the strongest perceived cell. The method simultaneously results in more balanced loads and increased performance. Interference management at the receiver is achieved through the use of a network-assisted interference cancellation and suppression (NAICS) receiver. In order to further boost the fifth percentile user data rates, the transmission rank at the interferers is selectively reduced by a centralized rank coordination functionality. These mechanisms are evaluated in an LTE-Advanced dense small cell scenario with dynamic traffic. Simulation results illustrate that a combination of the centralized cell association and scheduling scheme and interference cancellation at the receiver can provide fifth percentile data rate gains of up to 80% without a detrimental effect on the median user rates, under the applied assumptions and simulation settings. The gains reach 110% when rank coordination is applied.

Improving Dense Network Performance Through Centralized Scheduling and Interference Coordination

This article presents a characterization of different LTE-Advanced network deployments with regard to downlink interference and resource usage. The investigation focuses on heterogeneous networks (HetNets) with dedicated spectrum for each layer and, in particular, on cases where small cells are densely deployed. Thus, the main interference characteristics of the macro layer and the dense small cell layer are studied separately. Moreover, the potential benefit of mitigating the dominant interferer in such scenarios is quantified as an upper bound gain and its time variability is discussed and evaluated. A dynamic FTP traffic model is applied, with varying amounts of traffic in the network. The results present an uneven use of resources in all feasible load regions. The interference under the dynamic traffic model shows a strong variability, and the impact of the dominant interferer is such that 30% of the users could achieve at least a 50% throughput gain if said interferer were mitigated, with some users reaching a 300% improvement during certain time intervals. All the mentioned metrics are remarkably similar in the macro and small cell deployments, which suggests that densification does not necessarily imply stricter interference mitigation requirements. Therefore, the conclusion is that the same techniques could be applied in both scenarios to deal with the dominant interferer.

/pdf/interference-characterization-and-mitigation-benefit-166mma5aa8.pdf

Interference characterization and mitigation benefit analysis for LTE-A macro and small cell deployments

This article compares the potential performance gains from downlink scheduling and interference mitigation in an LTE-Advanced dense small cell network. The study combines theoretical considerations and system-level simulations with a dynamic traffic model and different offered loads. It is shown that intra-cell scheduling can provide a 22% throughput gain in a narrow traffic load region, while the plausible gains from an ideal inter-cell resource management mechanism can be greater than 50% for a wider range of traffic loads, reaching 300% for some of the cases. The results from this research provide valuable insight for the design of resource management algorithms targeted to small cell scenarios on dedicated carriers.

Effects of Interference Mitigation and Scheduling on Dense Small Cell Networks

Network-Assisted Interference Cancellation and Suppression (NAICS) receivers have appeared as a promising way to curb inter-cell interference in future dense network deployments. This investigation compares the performance of a NAICS receiver with successive interference cancellation capabilities, known as Symbol-Level Interference Cancellation (SLIC), with respect to a baseline Minimum Mean Square Error-Interference Rejection Combining (MMSE-IRC) receiver. The study is carried out on a dense, clusterized small cell network, illustrating to which extent NAICS can overcome the additional interference associated with such deployments. Moreover, we analyse how much the data rates could be potentially improved by estimating the throughput with ideal cancellation of the dominant interferer. The results point to limited gains of up to 12% in the coverage data rates when NAICS is used, and that the instantaneous throughput might increase up to 100% in the most favourable case, falling significantly below the estimated 200% maximum gain with ideal cancellation.

Victor Fernandez-Lopez

Papers

Interference coordination for dense wireless networks

Improving Dense Network Performance Through Centralized Scheduling and Interference Coordination

Interference characterization and mitigation benefit analysis for LTE-A macro and small cell deployments

Effects of Interference Mitigation and Scheduling on Dense Small Cell Networks

Interference Management with Successive Cancellation for Dense Small Cell Networks