Background

In the UK, women aged 50–73 years are invited for screening by mammography every 3 years. In 2009–10, more than 2.24 million women in this age group in England were invited to take part in the programme, of whom 73% attended a screening clinic. Of these, 64,104 women were recalled for assessment. Of those recalled, 81% did not have breast cancer; these women are described as having a false-positive mammogram.

 Objective

The aim of this systematic review was to identify the psychological impact on women of false-positive screening mammograms and any evidence for the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce this impact. We were also looking for evidence of effects in subgroups of women.

 Data sources

MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Health Management Information Consortium, Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, CRD Health Technology Assessment (HTA), Cochrane Methodology, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, Conference Proceeding Citation Index-Social Science and Humanities, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Sociological Abstracts, the International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, the British Library's Electronic Table of Contents and others. Initial searches were carried out between 8 October 2010 and 25 January 2011. Update searches were carried out on 26 October 2011 and 23 March 2012.

 Review methods

Based on the inclusion criteria, titles and abstracts were screened independently by two reviewers. Retrieved papers were reviewed and selected using the same independent process. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by another. Each included study was assessed for risk of bias.

 Results

Eleven studies were found from 4423 titles and abstracts. Studies that used disease-specific measures found a negative psychological impact lasting up to 3 years. Distress increased with the level of invasiveness of the assessment procedure. Studies using instruments designed to detect clinical levels of morbidity did not find this effect. Women with false-positive mammograms were less likely to return for the next round of screening [relative risk (RR) 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 0.98] than those with normal mammograms, were more likely to have interval cancer [odds ratio (OR) 3.19 (95% CI 2.34 to 4.35)] and were more likely to have cancer detected at the next screening round [OR 2.15 (95% CI 1.55 to 2.98)].

 Limitations

This study was limited to UK research and by the robustness of the included studies, which frequently failed to report quality indicators, for example failure to consider the risk of bias or confounding, or failure to report participants' demographic characteristics.

 Conclusions

We conclude that the experience of having a false-positive screening mammogram can cause breast cancer-specific psychological distress that may endure for up to 3 years, and reduce the likelihood that women will return for their next round of mammography screening. These results should be treated cautiously owing to inherent weakness of observational designs and weaknesses in reporting. Future research should include a qualitative interview study and observational studies that compare generic and disease-specific measures, collect demographic data and include women from different social and ethnic groups.

Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms

68Ga-FAPI (fibroblast activation protein inhibitor) is a novel and highly promising radiotracer for PET/CT imaging. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to explore the potential of FAPI-PET/CT in gynecological malignancies. We assessed biodistribution, tumor uptake, and the influence of pre- or postmenopausal status on tracer accumulation in hormone-sensitive organs. Furthermore, a comparison with the current standard oncological tracer 18F-FDG was performed in selected cases. A total of 31 patients (median age 59.5) from two centers with several gynecological tumors (breast cancer; ovarian cancer; cervical cancer; endometrial cancer; leiomyosarcoma of the uterus; tubal cancer) underwent 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT. Out of 31 patients, 10 received an additional 18F-FDG scan within a median time interval of 12.5 days (range 1–76). Tracer uptake was quantified by standardized uptake values (SUV)max and (SUV)mean, and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) was calculated (SUVmax tumor/ SUVmean organ). Moreover, a second cohort of 167 female patients with different malignancies was analyzed regarding their FAPI uptake in normal hormone-responsive organs: endometrium (n = 128), ovary (n = 64), and breast (n = 147). These patients were categorized by age as premenopausal ( 65 years; n = 68), and unknown menstrual status (35–65 years; n = 87), followed by an analysis of FAPI uptake of the pre- and postmenopausal group. In 8 out of 31 patients, the primary tumor was present, and all 31 patients showed lesions suspicious for metastasis (n = 81) demonstrating a high mean SUVmax in both the primary (SUVmax 11.6) and metastatic lesions (SUVmax 9.7). TBR was significantly higher in 68Ga-FAPI compared to 18F-FDG for distant metastases (13.0 vs. 5.7; p = 0.047) and by trend for regional lymph node metastases (31.9 vs 27.3; p = 0.6). Biodistribution of 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT presented significantly lower uptake or no significant differences in 15 out of 16 organs, compared to 18F-FDG-PET/CT. The highest uptake of all primary lesions was obtained in endometrial carcinomas (mean SUVmax 18.4), followed by cervical carcinomas (mean SUVmax 15.22). In the second cohort, uptake in premenopausal patients differed significantly from postmenopausal patients in endometrium (11.7 vs 3.9; p < 0.0001) and breast (1.8 vs 1.0; p = 0.004), whereas no significant difference concerning ovaries (2.8 vs 1.6; p = 0.141) was observed. Due to high tracer uptake resulting in sharp contrasts in primary and metastatic lesions and higher TBRs than 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT presents a promising imaging method for staging and follow-up of gynecological tumors. The presence or absence of the menstrual cycle seems to correlate with FAPI accumulation in the normal endometrium and breast. This first investigation of FAP ligands in gynecological tumor entities supports clinical application and further research in this field.

/pdf/68ga-fapi-pet-ct-in-patients-with-various-gynecological-4wrivpw5qv.pdf

68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT in patients with various gynecological malignancies.

The recommendations cover indications for MRI examination including acquisition planes, patient preparation, imaging protocol including multi-parametric approaches such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI-MR),  dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE-MR) and standardised reporting. The document also underscores the value of whole-body 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and highlights potential future methods. In 2019, the ESUR female pelvic imaging working group reviewed the revised 2018 FIGO staging system, the up-to-date clinical management guidelines, and the recent imaging literature. The RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) was followed to develop the current ESUR consensus guidelines following methodological steps: literature research, questionnaire developments, panel selection, survey, data extraction and analysis. The updated ESUR guidelines are recommendations based on ≥ 80% consensus among experts. If ≥ 80% agreement was not reached, the action was indicated as optional. The present ESUR guidelines focus on the main role of MRI in the initial staging, response monitoring and evaluation of disease recurrence. Whole-body FDG-PET plays an important role in the detection of lymph nodes (LNs) and distant metastases. • T2WI and DWI-MR are now recommended for initial staging, monitoring of response and evaluation of recurrence.
 • DCE-MR is optional; its primary role remains in the research setting.
 • T2WI, DWI-MRI and whole-body FDG-PET/CT enable comprehensive assessment of treatment response and recurrence

/pdf/staging-recurrence-and-follow-up-of-uterine-cervical-cancer-4xgrr0hfl3.pdf

Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018

Pelvic Radiation and Normal Tissue Toxicity

Limitations and Pitfalls of FDG-PET/CT in Infection and Inflammation.

The role of whole-body positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with fluorodeoxyglucose ( FDG fluorodeoxyglucose ) is now established in the assessment of many gynecologic and genitourinary malignant tumors. FDG fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT has been widely adopted for staging assessments in patients with suspected advanced disease, in cases of suspected disease recurrence, and for determining prognosis in a number of malignancies. A number of pitfalls are commonly encountered when reviewing FDG fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scans in gynecologic and genitourinary cases; these pitfalls can be classified into those that yield potential false-positive or false-negative results. Potential false positives include physiologic uptake of FDG fluorodeoxyglucose by the endometrium and ovaries in premenopausal patients, physiologic renal excretion of FDG fluorodeoxyglucose into the ureters and the urinary bladder, and increased FDG fluorodeoxyglucose activity in benign conditions such as uterine fibroids, pelvic inflammatory disease, and benign endometriotic cysts. Potential false negatives include low-level FDG fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by necrotic, mucinous, cystic, or low-grade tumors and the masking of serosal and peritoneal disease by adjacent physiologic bowel or bladder activity. In addition, there are inherent technical limitations-such as motion artifact (from respiratory motion and bowel peristalsis) and the limited spatial resolution of PET-that may limit the assessment of small-volume malignant disease. Knowledge of the key imaging features of physiologic and nonphysiologic FDG fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, in addition to understanding the principles of adequate patient preparation and PET scanning protocols, is important for accurate interpretation of gynecologic and genitourinary oncologic FDG fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT studies. ©RSNA, 2017.

FDG PET/CT Pitfalls in Gynecologic and Genitourinary Oncologic Imaging.

Locally advanced and node-positive cervical cancers are usually treated with external beam radiation therapy and intracavitary brachytherapy with concomitant chemotherapy. In patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, imaging plays a vital role in pretreatment planning, assessment of primary tumor response to treatment, follow-up, and evaluation of treatment-related complications. Radiation therapy planning is crucial to successful local and regional control of disease. Patient selection criteria for radiation therapy with concomitant chemotherapy are described, as is assessment of treatment response of the primary cervical tumor at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Image interpretation can be challenging because of radiation therapy-related changes in the pelvic organs. Expected changes in the bladder, bowel, and bone marrow after radiation therapy are described, and multimodality imaging findings at computed tomography, MR imaging, and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography are illustrated. Complications after radiation therapy have declined over recent years because of targeted radiation therapy. These complications can be divided into acute and chronic effects, where acute toxic effects occur within weeks of treatment. Chronic complications include cervical stenosis, small bowel stricture, fistula formation, and insufficiency fractures. Imaging is an essential tool in the care of patients with cervical cancer treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The reporting radiologist should be familiar with the expected imaging appearances of the pelvic organs after radiation therapy, as well as potential complications, to avoid pitfalls in image interpretation.

https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/pdf/10.1148/rg.2016150117

Post–Radiation Therapy Imaging Appearances in Cervical Carcinoma

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women of all ages worldwide. The disease is staged using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) system, which was updated in 2018. The authors explain the key changes from the 2009 version and the rationale behind them. The changes have been made to reflect common clinical practice, differentiate prognostic outcomes, and guide treatment stratification. Treatment options are dependent on the stage of disease and include fertility-sparing and non-fertility-sparing surgical options as well as chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease. The updated FIGO staging gives added importance to MRI as a method of accurately measuring tumor size and depicting the presence of parametrial involvement. With the inclusion of lymph node involvement in the updated 2018 FIGO staging, cross-sectional imaging-and in particular, fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT-has an increasing role in the depiction of nodal disease. Understanding the radiologic techniques used, the literature supporting them, and common imaging pitfalls ensures accurate staging of disease and optimization of treatment. ©RSNA, 2020 See discussion on this article by Javitt (pp 1823-1824).

2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the optimal modality for local staging of gynecological tumors. Advances in functional MRI with diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences provide more detailed information regarding tumor cellularity, vascularity, and viability. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) now has an established role in imaging for gynecological cancers, particularly staging of locally advanced cervical cancers and pre-salvage exenterative therapy in relapsed gynecologic tumors. Novel PET tracers, targeting other aspects of tumor biology, are being evaluated although none are currently in routine clinical use. New PET/MR scanners have the potential to combine the strengths of both modalities in one sitting. This review covers advances in gynecologic imaging concentrating on cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers.

What's New in Imaging for Gynecologic Cancer?

This article summarizes current imaging practice with regard to investigation of female subfertility and explores newer applications for restoring fertility in the benign and oncologic settings.

/pdf/subfertility-what-the-radiologist-needs-to-know-3n3nnfs33e.pdf

Victoria Stewart

Papers

FDG PET/CT Pitfalls in Gynecologic and Genitourinary Oncologic Imaging.

Post–Radiation Therapy Imaging Appearances in Cervical Carcinoma

2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging.

What's New in Imaging for Gynecologic Cancer?

Subfertility: What the Radiologist Needs to Know