scispace - formally typeset
V

Vivian Sobchack

Researcher at University of California, Los Angeles

Publications -  28
Citations -  2252

Vivian Sobchack is an academic researcher from University of California, Los Angeles. The author has contributed to research in topics: Film genre & Film studies. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 28 publications receiving 2062 citations. Previous affiliations of Vivian Sobchack include University of California, Santa Cruz.

Papers
More filters
MonographDOI

The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience

Vivian Sobchack
- 01 Jan 1992 - 
TL;DR: Sobchack as discussed by the authors argued that the movie experience depends on two "viewers" viewing: the spectator and the film, each existing as both subject and object of vision.
Book

Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture

TL;DR: Sobchack as discussed by the authors considers the key role our bodies play in making sense of today's image-saturated culture, emphasizing our corporeal rather than our intellectual engagements with film and other media.
Book

Screening Space: The American Science Fiction Film

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors attempt to shape definitions of the American science fiction film, studying the connection between the films and social preconceptions, and discuss their import, seeking to rescue the genre from the neglect of film theorists.
BookDOI

The Persistence of history : cinema, television, and the modern event

TL;DR: The Persistence of History as discussed by the authors examines how the moving image has completely altered traditional modes of historical thought and representation and explores a range of film and video texts, from The Ten Commandments to the Rodney King video, from the projected work of documentarian Errol Morris to Oliver Stone's JFK and Spielberg's Schindler's List.
Journal ArticleDOI

Living a ‘Phantom Limb’: On the Phenomenology of Bodily Integrity

TL;DR: Throughout, the reversible aspects of my two legs as ‘phantom’ and ‘real’, present and absent, and visible and invisible are explored — paying attention, as well, to the lived and linguistic sense the authors make of their bodies in ‘parts” and their bodies as “whole’.