scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Waasila Jassat

Other affiliations: University of the Western Cape
Bio: Waasila Jassat is an academic researcher from National Health Laboratory Service. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 17 publications receiving 120 citations. Previous affiliations of Waasila Jassat include University of the Western Cape.

Papers published on a yearly basis

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Widespread underlying SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity was observed in Gauteng before the omicron-dominant wave of Covid-19, and Epidemiologic data showed a decoupling of hospitalizations and deaths from infections while Omicron was circulating.
Abstract: BACKGROUND The B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified on November 25, 2021, in Gauteng province, South Africa. Data regarding the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG in Gauteng before the fourth wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), in which the omicron variant was dominant, are needed. METHODS We conducted a seroepidemiologic survey from October 22 to December 9, 2021, in Gauteng to determine the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Households included in a previous seroepidemiologic survey (conducted from November 2020 to January 2021) were contacted; to account for changes in the survey population, there was a 10% increase in the households contacted, with the use of the same sampling framework. Dried-blood-spot samples were tested for IgG against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleocapsid protein with the use of quantitative assays. We also evaluated Covid-19 epidemiologic trends in Gauteng, including cases, hospitalizations, recorded deaths, and excess deaths from the start of the pandemic through January 12, 2022. RESULTS Samples were obtained from 7010 participants, of whom 1319 (18.8%) had received a Covid-19 vaccine. The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG ranged from 56.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.6 to 59.7) among children younger than 12 years of age to 79.7% (95% CI, 77.6 to 81.5) among adults older than 50 years of age. Vaccinated participants were more likely to be seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 than unvaccinated participants (93.1% vs. 68.4%). Epidemiologic data showed that the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection increased and subsequently declined more rapidly during the fourth wave than it had during the three previous waves. The incidence of infection was decoupled from the incidences of hospitalization, recorded death, and excess death during the fourth wave, as compared with the proportions seen during previous waves. CONCLUSIONS Widespread underlying SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity was observed in Gauteng before the omicron-dominant wave of Covid-19. Epidemiologic data showed a decoupling of hospitalizations and deaths from infections while omicron was circulating. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.).

190 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Sarah Wulf Hanson, Cristiana Abbafati, Joachim G.J.V. Aerts, Ziyad Al-Aly, Charlie Ashbaugh, Tala Ballouz, O. Blyuss, Polina Bobkova, G.A. Bonsel, Svetlana Borzakova, Danilo Buonsenso, Denis Butnaru, Austin Carter, Helen Y. Chu, Cristina De Rose, Mohamed Mustafa Diab, Emil Ekbom, Maha El Tantawi, Victor Fomin, Robert Frithiof, Aysylu Gamirova, Petr Glybochko, Juanita A. Haagsma, Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard, Erin B. Hamilton, Gabrielle Harris, Majanka H. Heijenbrok-Kal, Raimund Helbok, Merel E. Hellemons, David Hillus, Susanne M. Huijts, Michael Hultström, Waasila Jassat, Florian Kurth, Ing-Marie Larsson, Miklos Lipcsey, Chelsea Liu, Callan Loflin, Andrei Malinovschi, Wenhui Mao, L. Mazankova, Denise J. McCulloch, Dominik Menges, Noushin Mohammadifard, Daniel Munblit, Nikita A Nekliudov, Osondu Ogbuoji, I.M. Osmanov, José L. Peñalvo, Maria Skaalum Petersen, Milo A. Puhan, Mujibur Rahman, Verena Rass, Nickolas Reinig, Gerard M. Ribbers, A Ricchiuto, Sten Rubertsson, E. R. Samitova, Nizal Sarrafzadegan, Anastasia Shikhaleva, Kyle E. Simpson, Dario Sinatti, Joan B. Soriano, Ekaterina Spiridonova, Fridolin Steinbeis, Andrey A. Svistunov, Piero Valentini, Brittney J. van de Water, R. J. G. Van Den Berg-Emons, Ewa Wallin, Martin Witzenrath, Yifan Wu, Hanzhang Xu, T. Zoller, Christopher Adolph, James Albright, Joanne O. Amlag, Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, Bree Bang-Jensen, Catherine Bisignano, Rachel Castellano, Emma Castro, Suman Chakrabarti, James R. Collins, Xiaochen Dai, Farah Daoud, Carolyn Dapper, Amanda Deen, Bruce Bartholow Duncan, Megan Erickson, Samuel B. Ewald, Alize J. Ferrari, Abraham D. Flaxman, Nancy Fullman, Amiran Gamkrelidze, John R. Giles, Gaorui Guo, Simon I. Hay, Jiawei He, Monika Helak, Erin Hulland, Maia Kereselidze, Kristopher J Krohn, Alice Lazzar-Atwood, Akiaja R. Lindstrom, Rafael Lozano, Deborah Carvalho Malta, Johan H. Mansson, Ana Maria Mantilla Herrera, Ali H. Mokdad, Lorenzo Monasta, Shuhei Nomura, Maja Pasovic, David M. Pigott, Robert C. Reiner, Grace Reinke, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Damian Santomauro, Aleksei Sholokhov, Emma Elizabeth Spurlock, Rebecca L. Walcott, Ally Walker, Charles Shey Wiysonge, Peng Zheng, Janet Prvu Bettger, Christopher J L Murray, Theo Vos 
10 Oct 2022-JAMA
TL;DR: This study presents estimates of the proportion of individuals with at least 1 of the 3 self-reported Long COVID symptom clusters in 2020 and 2021, which were more common in women aged 20 years or older by sex and for both sexes of nonhospitalized individuals younger than 20 years of age.
Abstract: Importance Some individuals experience persistent symptoms after initial symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (often referred to as Long COVID). Objective To estimate the proportion of males and females with COVID-19, younger or older than 20 years of age, who had Long COVID symptoms in 2020 and 2021 and their Long COVID symptom duration. Design, Setting, and Participants Bayesian meta-regression and pooling of 54 studies and 2 medical record databases with data for 1.2 million individuals (from 22 countries) who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of the 54 studies, 44 were published and 10 were collaborating cohorts (conducted in Austria, the Faroe Islands, Germany, Iran, Italy, the Netherlands, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, and the US). The participant data were derived from the 44 published studies (10 501 hospitalized individuals and 42 891 nonhospitalized individuals), the 10 collaborating cohort studies (10 526 and 1906), and the 2 US electronic medical record databases (250 928 and 846 046). Data collection spanned March 2020 to January 2022. Exposures Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Main Outcomes and Measures Proportion of individuals with at least 1 of the 3 self-reported Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings; cognitive problems; or ongoing respiratory problems) 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 and 2021, estimated separately for hospitalized and nonhospitalized individuals aged 20 years or older by sex and for both sexes of nonhospitalized individuals younger than 20 years of age. Results A total of 1.2 million individuals who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection were included (mean age, 4-66 years; males, 26%-88%). In the modeled estimates, 6.2% (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 2.4%-13.3%) of individuals who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection experienced at least 1 of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters in 2020 and 2021, including 3.2% (95% UI, 0.6%-10.0%) for persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings, 3.7% (95% UI, 0.9%-9.6%) for ongoing respiratory problems, and 2.2% (95% UI, 0.3%-7.6%) for cognitive problems after adjusting for health status before COVID-19, comprising an estimated 51.0% (95% UI, 16.9%-92.4%), 60.4% (95% UI, 18.9%-89.1%), and 35.4% (95% UI, 9.4%-75.1%), respectively, of Long COVID cases. The Long COVID symptom clusters were more common in women aged 20 years or older (10.6% [95% UI, 4.3%-22.2%]) 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection than in men aged 20 years or older (5.4% [95% UI, 2.2%-11.7%]). Both sexes younger than 20 years of age were estimated to be affected in 2.8% (95% UI, 0.9%-7.0%) of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. The estimated mean Long COVID symptom cluster duration was 9.0 months (95% UI, 7.0-12.0 months) among hospitalized individuals and 4.0 months (95% UI, 3.6-4.6 months) among nonhospitalized individuals. Among individuals with Long COVID symptoms 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, an estimated 15.1% (95% UI, 10.3%-21.1%) continued to experience symptoms at 12 months. Conclusions and Relevance This study presents modeled estimates of the proportion of individuals with at least 1 of 3 self-reported Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings; cognitive problems; or ongoing respiratory problems) 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

165 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Waasila Jassat1, Caroline Mudara1, Lovelyn Ozougwu1, Stefano Tempia1  +1543 moreInstitutions (2)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed data from the DATCOV national active surveillance system for COVID-19 admissions to hospital from March 5, 2020, to March 27, 2021.

123 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
12 Jan 2022-medRxiv
TL;DR: The objective was to compare COVID‐19 outcomes in the Omicron‐driven fourth wave with prior waves in the Western Cape, assess the contribution of undiagnosed prior infection to differences in outcomes and determine whether protection against severe disease conferred by prior infection and/or vaccination was maintained.
Abstract: The objective was to compare COVID‐19 outcomes in the Omicron‐driven fourth wave with prior waves in the Western Cape, assess the contribution of undiagnosed prior infection to differences in outcomes in a context of high seroprevalence due to prior infection and determine whether protection against severe disease conferred by prior infection and/or vaccination was maintained.

110 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 has been reported to cause milder disease in adults but lead to increased hospital admissions in children, and how should differences be interpreted.

106 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the clinical severity of COVID-19 omicron variant using S gene target failure (SGTF) on the Thermo Fisher Scientific TaqPath COVID19 PCR test as a proxy was assessed using multivariable logistic regression models.

684 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors identified two new lineages, BA.4 and BA.5, responsible for a fifth wave of infections in South Africa, by using a multinomial logistic regression model.
Abstract: Abstract Three lineages (BA.1, BA.2 and BA.3) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant of concern predominantly drove South Africa’s fourth Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave. We have now identified two new lineages, BA.4 and BA.5, responsible for a fifth wave of infections. The spike proteins of BA.4 and BA.5 are identical, and similar to BA.2 except for the addition of 69–70 deletion (present in the Alpha variant and the BA.1 lineage), L452R (present in the Delta variant), F486V and the wild-type amino acid at Q493. The two lineages differ only outside of the spike region. The 69–70 deletion in spike allows these lineages to be identified by the proxy marker of S-gene target failure, on the background of variants not possessing this feature. BA.4 and BA.5 have rapidly replaced BA.2, reaching more than 50% of sequenced cases in South Africa by the first week of April 2022. Using a multinomial logistic regression model, we estimated growth advantages for BA.4 and BA.5 of 0.08 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08–0.09) and 0.10 (95% CI: 0.09–0.11) per day, respectively, over BA.2 in South Africa. The continued discovery of genetically diverse Omicron lineages points to the hypothesis that a discrete reservoir, such as human chronic infections and/or animal hosts, is potentially contributing to further evolution and dispersal of the virus.

359 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors collected data from participants who were self-reporting test results and symptoms in the ZOE COVID app (previously known as the COVID Symptoms Study App) to quantify the differences in symptom prevalence, risk of hospital admission, and symptom duration among the vaccinated population.

341 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This study finds post CO VID-19 condition prevalence is substantial; the health effects of COVID-19 appear to be prolonged and can exert stress on the healthcare system.
Abstract: Abstract Introduction This study aims to examine the worldwide prevalence of post COVID-19 condition, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods PubMed, Embase, and iSearch were searched on July 5, 2021 with verification extending to March 13, 2022. Using a random effects framework with DerSimonian-Laird estimator, we meta-analyzed post COVID-19 condition prevalence at 28+ days from infection. Results 50 studies were included, and 41 were meta-analyzed. Global estimated pooled prevalence of post COVID-19 condition was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.39,0.46). Hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients have estimates of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.44,0.63) and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.25,0.46), respectively. Regional prevalence estimates were Asia— 0.51 (95% CI: 0.37,0.65), Europe— 0.44 (95% CI: 0.32,0.56), and North America— 0.31 (95% CI: 0.21,0.43). Global prevalence for 30, 60, 90, and 120 days after infection were estimated to be 0.37 (95% CI: 0.26,0.49), 0.25 (95% CI: 0.15,0.38), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.14,0.57) and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.40,0.59), respectively. Fatigue was the most common symptom reported with a prevalence of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.17,0.30), followed by memory problems (0.14 [95% CI: 0.10,0.19]). Discussion This study finds post COVID-19 condition prevalence is substantial; the health effects of COVID-19 appear to be prolonged and can exert stress on the healthcare system.

328 citations