Author
Willem H. Meeuwisse
Other affiliations: Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Alberta Children's Hospital
Bio: Willem H. Meeuwisse is an academic researcher from University of Calgary. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poison control & Ice hockey. The author has an hindex of 76, co-authored 235 publications receiving 30295 citations. Previous affiliations of Willem H. Meeuwisse include Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health & Allen Institute for Brain Science.
Topics: Poison control, Ice hockey, Concussion, Injury prevention, Athletes
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health1, University of Calgary2, NorthShore University HealthSystem3, University of Michigan4, Boston University5, University of Missouri–Kansas City6, University of Maryland, Baltimore7, University of Washington8, Oslo University Hospital9, University of Zurich10, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill11, Harvard University12, University of Toronto13, University at Buffalo14, University of Melbourne15, University of California, San Francisco16, Medical College of Wisconsin17, Boston Children's Hospital18, Princeton University19, Vanderbilt University Medical Center20, Vanderbilt University21, Toronto Western Hospital22
TL;DR: This document is developed for physicians and healthcare providers who are involved in athlete care, whether at a recreational, elite or professional level, and provides an overview of issues that may be of importance to healthcare providers involved in the management of SRC.
Abstract: The 2017 Concussion in Sport Group (CISG) consensus statement is designed to build on the principles outlined in the previous statements1–4 and to develop further conceptual understanding of sport-related concussion (SRC) using an expert consensus-based approach. This document is developed for physicians and healthcare providers who are involved in athlete care, whether at a recreational, elite or professional level. While agreement exists on the principal messages conveyed by this document, the authors acknowledge that the science of SRC is evolving and therefore individual management and return-to-play decisions remain in the realm of clinical judgement.
This consensus document reflects the current state of knowledge and will need to be modified as new knowledge develops. It provides an overview of issues that may be of importance to healthcare providers involved in the management of SRC. This paper should be read in conjunction with the systematic reviews and methodology paper that accompany it. First and foremost, this document is intended to guide clinical practice; however, the authors feel that it can also help form the agenda for future research relevant to SRC by identifying knowledge gaps.
A series of specific clinical questions were developed as part of the consensus process for the Berlin 2016 meeting. Each consensus question was the subject of a specific formal systematic review, which is published concurrently with this summary statement. Readers are directed to these background papers in conjunction with this summary statement as they provide the context for the issues and include the scope of published research, search strategy and citations reviewed for each question. This 2017 consensus statement also summarises each topic and recommendations in the context of all five CISG meetings (that is, 2001, 2004, 2008, 2012 as well as 2016). Approximately 60 000 published articles were screened by the expert panels for the Berlin …
2,388 citations
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health1, University of Calgary2, Boston Medical Center3, University of Zurich4, University of Missouri–Kansas City5, International Olympic Committee6, University of Oslo7, University of Toronto8, University of Michigan9, Vanderbilt University Medical Center10, University of Washington11, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill12, University of British Columbia13, Burke Rehabilitation Hospital14, Cornell University15, University of Ottawa16, Medical College of Wisconsin17, Monash University18, University of New South Wales19, University of Melbourne20, McMaster University21, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey22, Princeton University23
TL;DR: The 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012 was attended by Paul McCrory, Willem H Meeuwisse, Mark Aubry, Jiří Dvořák, Ruben J Echemendia, Lars Engebretsen, Karen Johnston, Jeffrey S Kutcher, Martin Raftery, Allen Sills and Kathryn Schneider.
2,293 citations
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health1, University of Calgary2, Boston University3, University of Missouri–Kansas City4, International Olympic Committee5, University of Michigan6, Veterans Health Administration7, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill8, University of British Columbia9, Medical College of Wisconsin10, University of Melbourne11, McMaster University12, Rutgers University13
TL;DR: This paper is a revision and update of the recommendations developed following the 1st (Vienna 2001), 2nd (Prague 2004) and 3rd (Zurich 2008) International Consensus Conferences on Concussions in Sport and is based on the deliberations at the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012.
Abstract: The new 2012 Zurich Consensus statement is designed to build on the principles outlined in the previous documents and to develop further conceptual understanding of this problem using a formal consensus-based approach. A detailed description of the consensus process is outlined at the end of this document under the Background section. This document is developed primarily for use by physicians and healthcare professionals who are involved in the care of injured athletes, whether at the recreational, elite or professional level.
2,269 citations
TL;DR: The 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012 was attended by Paul McCrory, Willem H Meeuwisse, Mark Aubry, Jiří Dvořák, Ruben J Echemendia, Lars Engebretsen, Karen Johnston, Jeffrey S Kutcher, Martin Raftery, Allen Sills and Kathryn Schneider.
Abstract: PreambleThis paper is a revision and update of the recommendations developed following the 1st (Vienna) and 2nd (Prague) International Symposia on Concussion in Sport.1,2 The Zurich Consensus statement is designed to build on the principles outlined in the original Vienna and Prague documents and to
1,421 citations
TL;DR: Recommendations are made on how the incidence of match and training injuries should be reported and a checklist of issues and information that should be included in published reports of studies of football injuries is presented.
Abstract: Variations in definitions and methodologies have created differences in the results and conclusions obtained from studies of football (soccer) injuries, making interstudy comparisons difficult. Therefore an Injury Consensus Group was established under the auspices of Federation Internationale de Football Association Medical Assessment and Research Centre. A nominal group consensus model approach was used. A working document on definitions, methodology, and implementation was discussed by the group. Iterative draft statements were prepared and circulated to members of the group for comment before the final consensus statement was produced. Definitions of injury, recurrent injury, severity, and training and match exposures in football together with criteria for classifying injuries in terms of location, type, diagnosis, and causation are proposed. Proforma for recording players' baseline information, injuries, and training and match exposures are presented. Recommendations are made on how the incidence of match and training injuries should be reported and a checklist of issues and information that should be included in published reports of studies of football injuries is presented.
1,309 citations
Cited by
More filters
31 Oct 2001
TL;DR: The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) as mentioned in this paper is an independent organization devoted to the development of standards for testing and materials, and is a member of IEEE 802.11.
Abstract: The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) is an independent organization devoted to the development of standards.
3,792 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed AMIOdarone versus implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD-DV) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.
Abstract: ACC
: American College of Cardiology
ACE
: angiotensin-converting enzyme
ACS
: acute coronary syndrome
AF
: atrial fibrillation
AGNES
: Arrhythmia Genetics in the Netherlands
AHA
: American Heart Association
AMIOVIRT
: AMIOdarone Versus Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator:
2,830 citations
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health1, University of Calgary2, NorthShore University HealthSystem3, University of Michigan4, Boston University5, University of Missouri–Kansas City6, University of Maryland, Baltimore7, University of Washington8, Oslo University Hospital9, University of Zurich10, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill11, Harvard University12, University of Toronto13, University at Buffalo14, University of Melbourne15, University of California, San Francisco16, Medical College of Wisconsin17, Boston Children's Hospital18, Princeton University19, Vanderbilt University Medical Center20, Vanderbilt University21, Toronto Western Hospital22
TL;DR: This document is developed for physicians and healthcare providers who are involved in athlete care, whether at a recreational, elite or professional level, and provides an overview of issues that may be of importance to healthcare providers involved in the management of SRC.
Abstract: The 2017 Concussion in Sport Group (CISG) consensus statement is designed to build on the principles outlined in the previous statements1–4 and to develop further conceptual understanding of sport-related concussion (SRC) using an expert consensus-based approach. This document is developed for physicians and healthcare providers who are involved in athlete care, whether at a recreational, elite or professional level. While agreement exists on the principal messages conveyed by this document, the authors acknowledge that the science of SRC is evolving and therefore individual management and return-to-play decisions remain in the realm of clinical judgement.
This consensus document reflects the current state of knowledge and will need to be modified as new knowledge develops. It provides an overview of issues that may be of importance to healthcare providers involved in the management of SRC. This paper should be read in conjunction with the systematic reviews and methodology paper that accompany it. First and foremost, this document is intended to guide clinical practice; however, the authors feel that it can also help form the agenda for future research relevant to SRC by identifying knowledge gaps.
A series of specific clinical questions were developed as part of the consensus process for the Berlin 2016 meeting. Each consensus question was the subject of a specific formal systematic review, which is published concurrently with this summary statement. Readers are directed to these background papers in conjunction with this summary statement as they provide the context for the issues and include the scope of published research, search strategy and citations reviewed for each question. This 2017 consensus statement also summarises each topic and recommendations in the context of all five CISG meetings (that is, 2001, 2004, 2008, 2012 as well as 2016). Approximately 60 000 published articles were screened by the expert panels for the Berlin …
2,388 citations
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health1, University of Calgary2, Boston Medical Center3, University of Zurich4, University of Missouri–Kansas City5, University of Oslo6, International Olympic Committee7, University of Toronto8, University of Michigan9, Vanderbilt University Medical Center10, University of Washington11, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill12, University of British Columbia13, Cornell University14, Burke Rehabilitation Hospital15, University of Ottawa16, Medical College of Wisconsin17, Monash University18, University of New South Wales19, University of Melbourne20, McMaster University21, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey22, Princeton University23
TL;DR: The 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012 was attended by Paul McCrory, Willem H Meeuwisse, Mark Aubry, Jiří Dvořák, Ruben J Echemendia, Lars Engebretsen, Karen Johnston, Jeffrey S Kutcher, Martin Raftery, Allen Sills and Kathryn Schneider.
2,293 citations
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health1, University of Calgary2, Boston University3, University of Missouri–Kansas City4, International Olympic Committee5, University of Michigan6, Veterans Health Administration7, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill8, University of British Columbia9, Medical College of Wisconsin10, University of Melbourne11, McMaster University12, Rutgers University13
TL;DR: This paper is a revision and update of the recommendations developed following the 1st (Vienna 2001), 2nd (Prague 2004) and 3rd (Zurich 2008) International Consensus Conferences on Concussions in Sport and is based on the deliberations at the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012.
Abstract: The new 2012 Zurich Consensus statement is designed to build on the principles outlined in the previous documents and to develop further conceptual understanding of this problem using a formal consensus-based approach. A detailed description of the consensus process is outlined at the end of this document under the Background section. This document is developed primarily for use by physicians and healthcare professionals who are involved in the care of injured athletes, whether at the recreational, elite or professional level.
2,269 citations