Author
William Small
Other affiliations: University of Hong Kong, University of Chicago, Northwestern University ...read more
Bio: William Small is an academic researcher from Loyola University Chicago. The author has contributed to research in topics: Radiation therapy & Brachytherapy. The author has an hindex of 56, co-authored 396 publications receiving 12744 citations. Previous affiliations of William Small include University of Hong Kong & University of Chicago.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Maastricht University Medical Centre1, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart2, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center3, Taipei Medical University Hospital4, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón5, City of Hope National Medical Center6, Mount Vernon Hospital7, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven8, University of Padua9, Northwestern University10, University of Barcelona11, Bellvitge University Hospital12
TL;DR: Patients with pCR after chemoradiation have better long-term outcome than do those without pCR, and pCR might be indicative of a prognostically favourable biological tumour profile with less propensity for local or distant recurrence and improved survival.
Abstract: Summary Background Locally advanced rectal cancer is usually treated with preoperative chemoradiation. After chemoradiation and surgery, 15–27% of the patients have no residual viable tumour at pathological examination, a pathological complete response (pCR). This study established whether patients with pCR have better long-term outcome than do those without pCR. Methods In PubMed, Medline, and Embase we identified 27 articles, based on 17 different datasets, for long-term outcome of patients with and without pCR. 14 investigators agreed to provide individual patient data. All patients underwent chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. Primary outcome was 5-year disease-free survival. Kaplan-Meier survival functions were computed and hazard ratios (HRs) calculated, with the Cox proportional hazards model. Subgroup analyses were done to test for effect modification by other predicting factors. Interstudy heterogeneity was assessed for disease-free survival and overall survival with forest plots and the Q test. Findings 484 of 3105 included patients had a pCR. Median follow-up for all patients was 48 months (range 0–277). 5-year crude disease-free survival was 83·3% (95% CI 78·8–87·0) for patients with pCR (61/419 patients had disease recurrence) and 65·6% (63·6–68·0) for those without pCR (747/2263; HR 0·44, 95% CI 0·34–0·57; p Q test and forest plots did not suggest significant interstudy variation. The adjusted HR for pCR for failure was 0·54 (95% CI 0·40–0·73), indicating that patients with pCR had a significantly increased probability of disease-free survival. The adjusted HR for disease-free survival for administration of adjuvant chemotherapy was 0·91 (95% CI 0·73–1·12). The effect of pCR on disease-free survival was not modified by other prognostic factors. Interpretation Patients with pCR after chemoradiation have better long-term outcome than do those without pCR. pCR might be indicative of a prognostically favourable biological tumour profile with less propensity for local or distant recurrence and improved survival. Funding None.
1,459 citations
••
Medical University of South Carolina1, Wake Forest University2, Emory University3, Indiana University4, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis5, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center6, Virginia Commonwealth University7, Imperial College Healthcare8, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center9, Case Western Reserve University10
TL;DR: The accuracy of CTC varied considerably between centers and did not improve as the study progressed, suggesting that this method is not yet ready for widespread clinical application.
Abstract: ContextConventional colonoscopy is the best available method for detection
of colorectal cancer; however, it is invasive and not without risk. Computed
tomographic colonography (CTC), also known as virtual colonoscopy, has been
reported to be reasonably accurate in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia
in studies performed at expert centers.ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy of CTC in a large number of participants across
multiple centers.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA nonrandomized, evaluator-blinded, noninferiority study design of 615
participants aged 50 years or older who were referred for routine, clinically
indicated colonoscopy in 9 major hospital centers between April 17, 2000,
and October 3, 2001. The CTC was performed by using multislice scanners immediately
before standard colonoscopy; findings at colonoscopy were reported before
and after segmental unblinding to the CTC results.Main Outcome MeasuresThe sensitivity and specificity of CTC and conventional colonoscopy
in detecting participants with lesions sized at least 6 mm. Secondary outcomes
included detection of all lesions, detection of advanced lesions, possible
technical confounders, participant preferences, and evidence for increasing
accuracy with experience.ResultsA total of 827 lesions were detected in 308 of 600 participants who
underwent both procedures; 104 participants had lesions sized at least 6 mm.
The sensitivity of CTC for detecting participants with 1 or more lesions sized
at least 6 mm was 39.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.6%-48.4%) and for
lesions sized at least 10 mm, it was 55.0% (95% CI, 39.9%-70.0%). These results
were significantly lower than those for conventional colonoscopy, with sensitivities
of 99.0% (95% CI, 97.1%->99.9%) and 100%, respectively. A total of 496 participants
were without any lesion sized at least 6 mm. The specificity of CTC and conventional
colonoscopy for detecting participants without any lesion sized at least 6
mm was 90.5% (95% CI, 87.9%-93.1%) and 100%, respectively, and without lesions
sized at least 10 mm, 96.0% (95% CI, 94.3%-97.6%) and 100%, respectively.
Computed tomographic colonography missed 2 of 8 cancers. The accuracy of CTC
varied considerably between centers and did not improve as the study progressed.
Participants expressed no clear preference for either technique.ConclusionsComputed tomographic colonography by these methods is not yet ready
for widespread clinical application. Techniques and training need to be improved.
697 citations
••
TL;DR: The global cervical cancer crisis is discussed and efforts to improve the prevention and treatment of the disease in underdeveloped countries are discussed.
Abstract: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common malignancy diagnosed in women worldwide. Nearly all cases of cervical cancer result from infection with the human papillomavirus, and the prevention of cervical cancer includes screening and vaccination. Primary treatment options for patients with cervical cancer may include surgery or a concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimen consisting of cisplatin-based chemotherapy with external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Cervical cancer causes more than one quarter of a million deaths per year as a result of grossly deficient treatments in many developing countries. This warrants a concerted global effort to counter the shocking loss of life and suffering that largely goes unreported. This article provides a review of the biology, prevention, and treatment of cervical cancer, and discusses the global cervical cancer crisis and efforts to improve the prevention and treatment of the disease in underdeveloped countries. Cancer 2017;123:2404-12. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
679 citations
••
Harvard University1, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group2, Washington University in St. Louis3, McGill University4, Medical College of Wisconsin5, Duke University6, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center7, University of Toronto8, Boston University9, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center10, University of Miami11, Northwestern University12, University of Utah13
TL;DR: Consensus guidelines for pelvic normal tissue contouring were reached and are available as a CT image atlas on the RTOG Web site, which will allow uniformity in defining normal tissues for clinical trials delivering pelvic radiation and will facilitate future normal tissue complication research.
Abstract: Purpose To define a male and female pelvic normal tissue contouring atlas for Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials. Methods and Materials One male pelvis computed tomography (CT) data set and one female pelvis CT data set were shared via the Image-Guided Therapy QA Center. A total of 16 radiation oncologists participated. The following organs at risk were contoured in both CT sets: anus, anorectum, rectum (gastrointestinal and genitourinary definitions), bowel NOS (not otherwise specified), small bowel, large bowel, and proximal femurs. The following were contoured in the male set only: bladder, prostate, seminal vesicles, and penile bulb. The following were contoured in the female set only: uterus, cervix, and ovaries. A computer program used the binomial distribution to generate 95% group consensus contours. These contours and definitions were then reviewed by the group and modified. Results The panel achieved consensus definitions for pelvic normal tissue contouring in RTOG trials with these standardized names: Rectum, AnoRectum, SmallBowel, Colon, BowelBag, Bladder, UteroCervix, Adnexa_R, Adnexa_L, Prostate, SeminalVesc, PenileBulb, Femur_R, and Femur_L. Two additional normal structures whose purpose is to serve as targets in anal and rectal cancer were defined: AnoRectumSig and Mesorectum. Detailed target volume contouring guidelines and images are discussed. Conclusions Consensus guidelines for pelvic normal tissue contouring were reached and are available as a CT image atlas on the RTOG Web site. This will allow uniformity in defining normal tissues for clinical trials delivering pelvic radiation and will facilitate future normal tissue complication research.
393 citations
••
TL;DR: Three-dimensional treatment planning tools provide dosimetric predictors for the risk of symptomatic RT-induced lung injury and allow for beams to be selected to minimize these risks.
364 citations
Cited by
More filters
01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: For example, Standardi pružaju okvir koje ukazuju na ucinkovitost kvalitetnih instrumenata u onim situacijama u kojima je njihovo koristenje potkrijepljeno validacijskim podacima.
Abstract: Pedagosko i psiholosko testiranje i procjenjivanje spadaju među najvažnije doprinose znanosti o ponasanju nasem drustvu i pružaju temeljna i znacajna poboljsanja u odnosu na ranije postupke. Iako se ne može ustvrditi da su svi testovi dovoljno usavrseni niti da su sva testiranja razborita i korisna, postoji velika kolicina informacija koje ukazuju na ucinkovitost kvalitetnih instrumenata u onim situacijama u kojima je njihovo koristenje potkrijepljeno validacijskim podacima. Pravilna upotreba testova može dovesti do boljih odluka o pojedincima i programima nego sto bi to bio slucaj bez njihovog koristenja, a također i ukazati na put za siri i pravedniji pristup obrazovanju i zaposljavanju. Međutim, losa upotreba testova može dovesti do zamjetne stete nanesene ispitanicima i drugim sudionicima u procesu donosenja odluka na temelju testovnih podataka. Cilj Standarda je promoviranje kvalitetne i eticne upotrebe testova te uspostavljanje osnovice za ocjenu kvalitete postupaka testiranja. Svrha objavljivanja Standarda je uspostavljanje kriterija za evaluaciju testova, provedbe testiranja i posljedica upotrebe testova. Iako bi evaluacija prikladnosti testa ili njegove primjene trebala ovisiti prvenstveno o strucnim misljenjima, Standardi pružaju okvir koji osigurava obuhvacanje svih relevantnih pitanja. Bilo bi poželjno da svi autori, sponzori, nakladnici i korisnici profesionalnih testova usvoje Standarde te da poticu druge da ih također prihvate.
3,905 citations
••
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center1, Oregon Health & Science University2, Mount Sinai St. Luke's and Mount Sinai Roosevelt3, American Cancer Society4, Veterans Health Administration5, Emory University6, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine7, University of Pennsylvania8, Eastern Virginia Medical School9, Mayo Clinic10, Kaiser Permanente11, University of Wisconsin-Madison12, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis13, Creighton University14, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center15
TL;DR: Clinicians should be prepared to offer patients a choice between a screening test that is effective at both early cancer detection and cancer prevention through the detection and removal of polyps and those that can detect cancer early and also can detect adenomatous polyps.
2,876 citations
••
TL;DR: The physical principles underlying some current biomedical applications of magnetic nanoparticles are reviewed and the relevant physics of magnetic materials and their responses to applied magnetic fields are surveyed.
Abstract: The physical principles underlying some current biomedical applications of magnetic nanoparticles are reviewed. Starting from well-known basic concepts, and drawing on examples from biology and biomedicine, the relevant physics of magnetic materials and their responses to applied magnetic fields are surveyed. The way these properties are controlled and used is illustrated with reference to (i) magnetic separation of labelled cells and other biological entities; (ii) therapeutic drug, gene and radionuclide delivery; (iii) radio frequency methods for the catabolism of tumours via hyperthermia; and (iv) contrast enhancement agents for magnetic resonance imaging applications. Future prospects are also discussed.
2,815 citations