William V. Holt

Bio: William V. Holt is an academic researcher from University of Sheffield. The author has contributed to research in topics: Sperm & Sperm motility. The author has an hindex of 53, co-authored 212 publications receiving 9113 citations. Previous affiliations of William V. Holt include Hammersmith Hospital & Zoological Society of London.

Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials.

Abstract: Two fertility trials were undertaken to evaluate the relationship between boar semen quality and fertility (conception rate and litter size) after on-farm artificial insemination (AI). Trial 1 included 98 ejaculates from 27 boars, and trial 2 included 72 ejaculates from 26 boars. The semen quality was measured by computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) using the Hobson Sperm Tracker. Boar semen was diluted in a standard extender (Beltsville Thawing Solution, BTS), dispensed into 75 ml allquots each containing 1.5 x 10(9) spermatozoa and dispatched to farms by overnight mail for use by their normal AI procedures. Randomly selected 75 ml aliquots of semen from each boar were also sent to the institute of Zoology for CASA measurement. Prior to CASA analysis, the spermatozoa were recovered from the BTS using Percoll gradients, resuspended in trisbuffered saline media containing 40 mM Ca++, and incubated at 39 degrees C. Parameters of sperm motion were measured after 0, 2, 4, and 6 hours of incubation. Various multiple regression models based on measured motion parameters could account for up to 24% of the variation in litter size. Using logistic regression, highly significant (P < 0.0001) models explaining conception rate in terms of sperm motion were derived for trial 2 only. The change in sperm velocity during the first 2 hours of incubation and the magnitude of the velocity parameters after 2 hours were identified as the most consistent indicators of fertility. Other attributes of sperm quality, i.e., frequency of spontaneous acrosome reactions (AR) and ARs induced by ionophore A23187 or solubilized pig zona pellucida, were also examined. When the "within-trial" median litter size was used as a way of allocating ejaculates to "high" or "low" litter-size groups, higher litter size was associated with lower frequency of both spontaneous and induced AR. These results demonstrate that fertility information can be derived from the CASA analysis of boar semen provided it is combined with a period of incubation in capacitating conditions.

Sperm Subpopulations in Boar (Sus scrofa) and Gazelle (Gazella dama mhorr) Semen as Revealed by Pattern Analysis of Computer-Assisted Motility Assessments

Abstract: The aim of this study was to test the suitability of "pattern analysis" for the exploration of data provided by computer-assisted semen analysis methods. Data sets derived from the examination of boar sperm responses to bicarbonate and caffeine (measurements on 3208 spermatozoa) and from studies of semen cryopreservation in Mohor gazelles (7278 spermatozoa) were reanalyzed. A nonhierarchical classification method was used to generate initial subgroups of spermatozoa (9 for boar, 13 for gazelle). The subgroup centroids were fused, yielding three boar sperm subpopulations and four gazelle sperm subpopulations distinguished by sperm behaviors. Bicarbonate and caffeine both induced major transitions (p < 0.0001) of boar sperm behavior, detected as shifts in group membership (from group 2, i.e., active but nonlinear movement, into group 1, i.e., linear, rapid movement). Some spermatozoa (approximately 3%) were refractory to both caffeine and bicarbonate. The gazelle sperm subpopulation structure was affected by the inclusion of equex (sodium triethanolamine lauryl sulfate) in the cryoprotective diluents. Equex suppressed the appearance of spermatozoa with erratic behavior (p < 0.0001; high curvilinear velocity, low linearity, low straight-line velocity) after cryopreservation. The proportion of these erratic spermatozoa was positively correlated with animal age (r = 0.68, p = 0.029). Pattern analysis revealed novel aspects of the data not seen in the original investigations and usefully supplemented the more standard data analysis approaches.

Sperm-Oviduct Interaction: Induction of Capacitation and Preferential Binding of Uncapacitated Spermatozoa to Oviductal Epithelial Cells in Porcine Species

Abstract: After mating, inseminated spermatozoa are transported to the oviduct They attach to and interact with oviductal epithelial cells (OEC) To investigate sperm-OEC interactions, we used chlortetracycline to study the capacitation status of boar spermatozoa in coculture with homologous OEC and cells of nonreproductive origin (LLC-PK1, porcine kidney epithelial cell line) Boar spermatozoa were cocultured with OEC and LLC-PK1 cells for 15, 60, 120, or 240 min The proportion of capacitated spermatozoa in coculture with the isthmic and ampullar cells increased significantly (p < 005) during incubation However, most spermatozoa in coculture with LLC-PK1 cells or blank (medium only) remained uncapacitated In addition, preferential binding of uncapacitated, capacitated, or acrosome-reacted boar spermatozoa to OEC and the other cell type was investigated Our approach was to vary the proportions of uncapacitated, capacitated, or acrosome-reacted boar spermatozoa in suspension using long preincubation and lysophosphatidylcholine treatment of semen prior to a very short incubation with OEC or LLC-PK1 cells The results showed that the majority of spermatozoa that were bound to OEC or LLC-PK1 cells were uncapacitated and that a significant relationship existed between the relative proportion of uncapacitated spermatozoa in the control samples and those bound to LLC-PK1 cells (r2 = 043, p < 0005) However, there was no correlation between the proportion of uncapacitated spermatozoa in the control samples and the proportion of those bound to isthmic or ampullar cells In conclusion, the results clearly demonstrated the specific nature of the sperm-OEC interaction in the porcine species This interaction is initiated by uncapacitated spermatozoa binding to OEC and is continued by the induction of capacitation in cocultured spermatozoa

The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma

Abstract: We describe the landscape of somatic genomic alterations based on multidimensional and comprehensive characterization of more than 500 glioblastoma tumors (GBMs). We identify several novel mutated genes as well as complex rearrangements of signature receptors, including EGFR and PDGFRA. TERT promoter mutations are shown to correlate with elevated mRNA expression, supporting a role in telomerase reactivation. Correlative analyses confirm that the survival advantage of the proneural subtype is conferred by the G-CIMP phenotype, and MGMT DNA methylation may be a predictive biomarker for treatment response only in classical subtype GBM. Integrative analysis of genomic and proteomic profiles challenges the notion of therapeutic inhibition of a pathway as an alternative to inhibition of the target itself. These data will facilitate the discovery of therapeutic and diagnostic target candidates, the validation of research and clinical observations and the generation of unanticipated hypotheses that can advance our molecular understanding of this lethal cancer.

Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract

Abstract: At coitus, human sperm are deposited into the anterior vagina, where, to avoid vaginal acid and immune responses, they quickly contact cervical mucus and enter the cervix. Cervical mucus filters out sperm with poor morphology and motility and as such only a minority of ejaculated sperm actually enter the cervix. In the uterus, muscular contractions may enhance passage of sperm through the uterine cavity. A few thousand sperm swim through the uterotubal junctions to reach the Fallopian tubes (uterine tubes, oviducts) where sperm are stored in a reservoir, or at least maintained in a fertile state, by interacting with endosalpingeal (oviductal) epithelium. As the time of ovulation approaches, sperm become capacitated and hyperactivated, which enables them to proceed towards the tubal ampulla. Sperm may be guided to the oocyte by a combination of thermotaxis and chemotaxis. Motility hyperactivation assists sperm in penetrating mucus in the tubes and the cumulus oophorus and zona pellucida of the oocyte, so that they may finally fuse with the oocyte plasma membrane. Knowledge of the biology of sperm transport can inspire improvements in artificial insemination, IVF, the diagnosis of infertility and the development of contraceptives.

Mechanisms of Fertilization in Mammals

Abstract: The spermatozoa of most invertebrates (e.g., sea urchins) and nonmammalian vertebrates (e.g., fishes and amphibians) have full capacity to fertilize eggs upon leaving the testis. Testicular spermatozoa of mammals, on the other hand, do not possess the ability to do so. Their fertilizing capacity develops as they pass through the epididymis (Young, 1931; Nishikawa and Waide, 1952; Blandau and Rumery, 1964; Bedford, 1966; Orgebin-Crist, 1967). This process, apparently “unique” to mammals, is referred to as the epididymal maturation of spermatozoa. Even after their maturation, however, spermatozoa require an additional phase of maturation or capacitation within the female genital tract before they are able to fertilize eggs (Austin, 1951, 1952; Chang, 1951a). Thus, epididymal maturation and capacitation are two extra steps that mammaliam spermatozoa must take before they can effect fertilization. In this chapter, I will discuss how mammalian spermatozoa prepare themselves for fertilization and how the spermatozoa and eggs interact during fertilization. The process and mechanisms of sperm transport in the female genital tract will not be dealt with extensively here. Readers are referred to Bishop (1961, 1969), Blandau (1969), Bedford (1970b, 1972b), Thibault (1972, 1973a), Zamboni (1972), Blandau and Gaddum-Rosse (1974), Hafez and Thibault (1975), Overstreet and Katz (1977), Overstreet and Cooper (1978, 1979b), Overstreet et al. (1978), Shalgi and Kraicer(1978), Cooper et al. (1979) and Hunter (1975, 1980). The rejection or elimination of extra spermatozoa by the fertilized egg, one of the most fascinating events in fertilization, will not be discussed here. Instead, readers are referred to the chapter by Dr. Wolf in this volume. The physiology of egg activation has been described and discussed to some extent by Gwatkin (1977) and Yanagimachi (1978a). There are numerous reviews dealing with general aspects of mammalian fertilization. The following are recommended to aid in grasping the outline of mammalian fertilization: Austin and Bishop (1957), Austin and Walton (1960), Austin (1961, 1968), Blandau (1961), Piko (1969), Thibault (1969), Bedford (1970a,b, 1972b), Gwatkin (1976, 1977), Yanagimachi (1977, 1978a), Bedford and Cooper (1978) and Hunter (1980).

A critical analysis of the biological impacts of plasticizers on wildlife.

Abstract: This review provides a critical analysis of the biological effects of the most widely used plasticizers, including dibutyl phthalate, diethylhexyl phthalate, dimethyl phthalate, butyl benzyl phthalate and bisphenol A (BPA), on wildlife, with a focus on annelids (both aquatic and terrestrial), molluscs, crustaceans, insects, fish and amphibians. Moreover, the paper provides novel data on the biological effects of some of these plasticizers in invertebrates, fish and amphibians. Phthalates and BPA have been shown to affect reproduction in all studied animal groups, to impair development in crustaceans and amphibians and to induce genetic aberrations. Molluscs, crustaceans and amphibians appear to be especially sensitive to these compounds, and biological effects are observed at environmentally relevant exposures in the low ng l−1 to µg l−1 range. In contrast, most effects in fish (except for disturbance in spermatogenesis) occur at higher concentrations. Most plasticizers appear to act by interfering with the functioning of various hormone systems, but some phthalates have wider pathways of disruption. Effect concentrations of plasticizers in laboratory experiments coincide with measured environmental concentrations, and thus there is a very real potential for effects of these chemicals on some wildlife populations. The most striking gaps in our current knowledge on the impacts of plasticizers on wildlife are the lack of data for long-term exposures to environmentally relevant concentrations and their ecotoxicity when part of complex mixtures. Furthermore, the hazard of plasticizers has been investigated in annelids, molluscs and arthropods only, and given the sensitivity of some invertebrates, effects assessments are warranted in other invertebrate phyla.