Author

# Wyatt Milgrim

Bio: Wyatt Milgrim is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mathematics & Similarity (geometry). The author has co-authored 4 publications.

##### Papers
More filters
Justin Cheigh
20 Oct 2022
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors studied the probabilistic aspects of random Zeckendorf games and showed that for any input N , the range of possible game lengths constitutes an interval of natural numbers: every game length between the shortest and longest game lengths can be achieved.
Abstract: . Zeckendorf proved that any positive integer has a unique decomposition as a sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers, indexed by F 1 = 1 , F 2 = 2 , F n +1 = F n + F n − 1 . Motivated by this result, Baird, Epstein, Flint, and Miller [3] deﬁned the two-player Zeckendorf game, where two players take turns acting on a multiset of Fibonacci numbers that always sums to N . The game terminates when no possible moves remain, and the ﬁnal player to perform a move wins. Notably, [3] studied the setting of random games: the game proceeds by choosing an available move uniformly at random, and they conjecture that as the input N → ∞ , the distribution of random game lengths converges to a Gaussian. We prove that certain sums of move counts is constant, and ﬁnd a lower bound on the number of shortest games on input N involving the Catalan numbers. The works [3] and Cuzensa et al. [5] determined how to achieve a shortest and longest possible Zeckendorf game on a given input N , respectively: we establish that for any input N , the range of possible game lengths constitutes an interval of natural numbers: every game length between the shortest and longest game lengths can be achieved. We further the study of probabilistic aspects of random Zeckendorf games. We study two probability measures on the space of all Zeckendorf games on input N : the uniform measure, and the measure induced by choosing moves uniformly at random at any given position. Under both measures that in the limit N → ∞ , both players win with probability 1 / 2. We also ﬁnd natural partitions of the collection of all Zeckendorf games of a ﬁxed input N , on which we observe weak convergence to a Gaussian in the limit N → ∞ . We conclude the work with many open problems.
06 Oct 2022
TL;DR: In particular, the authors showed that a hypothesis class with finite VC-dimension is PAC-learnable under the assumption that the VC dimension of the hypothesis class is as large as possible.
Abstract: Given a domain $X$ and a collection $\mathcal{H}$ of functions $h:X\to \{0,1\}$, the Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension of $\mathcal{H}$ measures its complexity in an appropriate sense. In particular, the fundamental theorem of statistical learning says that a hypothesis class with finite VC-dimension is PAC learnable. Recent work by Fitzpatrick, Wyman, the fourth and seventh named authors studied the VC-dimension of a natural family of functions $\mathcal{H}_t^{'2}(E): \mathbb{F}_q^2\to \{0,1\}$, corresponding to indicator functions of circles centered at points in a subset $E\subseteq \mathbb{F}_q^2$. They showed that when $|E|$ is large enough, the VC-dimension of $\mathcal{H}_t^{'2}(E)$ is the same as in the case that $E = \mathbb F_q^2$. We study a related hypothesis class, $\mathcal{H}_t^d(E)$, corresponding to intersections of spheres in $\mathbb{F}_q^d$, and ask how large $E\subseteq \mathbb{F}_q^d$ needs to be to ensure the maximum possible VC-dimension. We resolve this problem in all dimensions, proving that whenever $|E|\geq C_dq^{d-1/(d-1)}$ for $d\geq 3$, the VC-dimension of $\mathcal{H}_t^d(E)$ is as large as possible. We get a slightly stronger result if $d=3$: this result holds as long as $|E|\geq C_3 q^{7/3}$. Furthermore, when $d=2$ the result holds when $|E|\geq C_2 q^{7/4}$.
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , Fleischmann, Konyagin, Miller, Palsson, Pesikoff, and Wolf provide bounds on the minimum number of distinct angles in general position in three dimensions.
Abstract: In 1946, Erd\H{o}s posed the distinct distance problem, which seeks to find the minimum number of distinct distances between pairs of points selected from any configuration of $n$ points in the plane. The problem has since been explored along with many variants, including ones that extend it into higher dimensions. Less studied but no less intriguing is Erd\H{o}s' distinct angle problem, which seeks to find point configurations in the plane that minimize the number of distinct angles. In their recent paper "Distinct Angles in General Position," Fleischmann, Konyagin, Miller, Palsson, Pesikoff, and Wolf use a logarithmic spiral to establish an upper bound of $O(n^2)$ on the minimum number of distinct angles in the plane in general position, which prohibits three points on any line or four on any circle. We consider the question of distinct angles in three dimensions and provide bounds on the minimum number of distinct angles in general position in this setting. We focus on pinned variants of the question, and we examine explicit constructions of point configurations in $\mathbb{R}^3$ which use self-similarity to minimize the number of distinct angles. Furthermore, we study a variant of the distinct angles question regarding distinct angle chains and provide bounds on the minimum number of distinct chains in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and $\mathbb{R}^3$.
R G Ascoli
19 Jul 2023
TL;DR: In this article , the authors generalize Sun's result to arbitrary dimension and improve the exponent in the case $d=3, where the VC-dimension of the vector space is 3. Abstract: Let$\mathbb{F}_q^d$be the$d$-dimensional vector space over the finite field with$q$elements. For a subset$E\subseteq \mathbb{F}_q^d$and a fixed nonzero$t\in \mathbb{F}_q$, let$\mathcal{H}_t(E)=\{h_y: y\in E\}$, where$h_y$is the indicator function of the set$\{x\in E: x\cdot y=t\}$. Two of the authors, with Maxwell Sun, showed in the case$d=3$that if$|E|\geq Cq^{\frac{11}{4}}$and$q$is sufficiently large, then the VC-dimension of$\mathcal{H}_t(E)$is 3. In this paper, we generalize the result to arbitrary dimension and improve the exponent in the case$d=3\$.