X
Xiao-yuan Dong
Researcher at University of Winnipeg
Publications - 82
Citations - 2906
Xiao-yuan Dong is an academic researcher from University of Winnipeg. The author has contributed to research in topics: Wage & China. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 80 publications receiving 2561 citations. Previous affiliations of Xiao-yuan Dong include China Center for Economic Research & Southwestern University of Finance and Economics.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Labor Migration and Time Use Patterns of the Left-behind Children and Elderly in Rural China
TL;DR: In this article, an analysis of the impact of internal migration on the time allocation patterns of the left-behind elderly and children in rural China, 1997-2006, contributes to the literature on changes in the well-being of the Left-behind population.
Journal ArticleDOI
Harsh choices: Chinese women's paid work and unpaid care responsibilities under economic reform.
Sarah Cook,Xiao-yuan Dong +1 more
TL;DR: The authors call for a gendered approach to both social and labour market policies, with investments in support of social reproduction services so as to ease the pressures on women.
Journal ArticleDOI
Soft budget constraints, social burdens, and labor redundancy in China's state industry
Xiao-yuan Dong,Louis Putterman +1 more
TL;DR: This paper found that hardening budget constraints, without at the same time relieving SOEs from their social burdens, was a major proximate cause of rising redundant labor in the early 1990s in China.
Journal ArticleDOI
Segmentation and discrimination in China's emerging industrial labor market
Xiao-yuan Dong,Paul Bowles +1 more
TL;DR: This article analyzed wage-setting behavior in four types of enterprise: state-owned enterprises (SOEs), township and village enterprises (TVEs), joint ventures (JVs), and foreign-invested firms (FIFs) in China's light consumer goods industry in 1998.
Journal ArticleDOI
Two-tier land tenure system and sustained economic growth in post-1978 rural China
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that in the presence of multiple market distortions, land privatization is unlikely to provide a solution to the agricultural problems and instead, an approach which refines the existing framework of the two-tier ownership system offers more promise.