Ya. L. Gol'dfarb

Bio: Ya. L. Gol'dfarb is an academic researcher from Russian Academy of Sciences. The author has contributed to research in topics: Thiophene & Ring (chemistry). The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 267 publications receiving 486 citations.

Studies of selenides of thiophene and furan series—V: Mass spectra of some thiophene, furan and selenophene derivatives

Abstract: Mass spectra of some selenides, sulphides and ethers of furan, thiophene and selenophene series are described. A new fragmentation reaction, consisting in splitting off alkyl, insertion of heteroatom in the cycle and loss of one of heteroatoms as CX, is discussed in detail.

Beckmann Rearrangement of Oximes under Very Mild Conditions

Abstract: A variety of ketoximes, easily prepared from the corresponding ketones, undergo the Beckmann rearrangement upon treatment with 2,4,6-trichloro[1,3,5]triazine in N,N-dimethylformamide at room temperature in excellent yields. This procedure can be applied to aldoximes for obtaining the corresponding nitriles.

Isomerization of allylbenzenes.

Abstract: ed from in the transition state. This answers the question of both the retention and the inversion of stereochemistry for the simple exchange reaction giving back I (which it should be noted is highly disfavored because k2 ≫ k−1). Retention of configuration would occur by first noting that the potassium ion would also be coordinated to the same face as the abstracted hydrogen atom because it was originally coordinated to the oxygen of the base. A molecule of deuterated alcohol can then approach this same face through coordination to the potassium. Rotation of these ligands around potassium would result in the deuterated alcohol now hydrogen bonded to the allylic anion (IV-top), which following collapse would return the chiral alkene I-d with the same configuration. On the other hand, inversion of stereochemistry would occur via the deuterated solvent approaching from the face of the allylic anion opposite to that hydrogen bonded, and exchange with the alcohol giving (IV-bottom). This could collapse and give chiral alkene I-d with inversion of configuration. The E/Z ratio of 60 for product III-h is also important because this value is extremely high as compared to the equilibrium value of 4.2 for the diastereoisomers, and compares to other systems as well. For example, the isomerization of allylbenzene into 1-propenylbenzene has an E/Z ratio of 44 when using potassium t-butoxide in DMSO. The reason for this higher-than-equilibrium ratio is explained in Scheme 3. Two “conformations” of the chiral alkene I are suitable for deprotonation and will lead to either the E or the Z allylic anions as shown. The rate of “conformational rotation” must be many orders of magnitude greater than the rates for Scheme 2. Proposed Base-Mediated Reaction Mechanism Scheme 3. Interactions Leading to Observed E/Z Ratios Chemical Reviews Review DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00052 Chem. Rev. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX E deprotonation (kE and kZ), and thus the E/Z ratio in the product must be related to the kE/kZ ratio. The transition state leading to the Z-allylic anion must thus be higher in energy than the one leading to the E-allylic anion, presumably due to the disfavored 1,3-allylic interactions, which would make charge stabilization through conjugation more difficult. Cram has reported this in more detail, including an analysis of collapse ratios (i.e., ratio of protonation of either carbon on the allylic anion), the stereochemical stability of allylic and vinyl anions, and the kinetic and thermodynamic stabilities of olefinic products formed by protonation of allylic anions. 2.2. Transition Metal-Mediated Mechanisms The mechanisms for the transition metal-mediated isomerizations have in some cases been very carefully determined, while in many they are assumed from one of two generally accepted pathways (Schemes 4 and 5). The first involves a discrete transition metal−hydride active catalyst and the formation of a transition metal−alkyl intermediate, while the second involves the formation and collapse of a η-allyl hydride complex. Each of the mechanisms described below bases its premise on the fact that each step is reversible, and thus the reactions are under thermodynamic control at equilibrium. 2.2.1. Alkyl Mechanism. For this mechanism to occur, the transition metal catalyst must have both an empty 2e− coordination site (e.g., via dissociation of a ligand) and a metal hydride bond that is typically generated in situ under the reaction conditions (see Scheme 4). The catalyst first coordinates to the π-electrons of the alkene followed by an insertion reaction to give either a primary or a secondary metal−alkyl intermediate. The primary metal−alkyl is generally formed faster for many catalysts, but is a mechanistic dead-end returning the starting material through β-hydride elimination and is thus a nonproductive pathway. The secondary metal− alkyl intermediate can however produce either the Eor the Z1-propenylbenzene on β-hydride elimination, which is clearly thermodynamically favored because of the conjugation to the benzene ring. 2.2.2. Allyl Mechanism. The allyl mechanism, however, requires a transition metal capable of having two vacant coordination sites, and, more specifically, no metal−hydride should be present or the alkyl mechanism will take place (see Scheme 5). The first step involves coordination of the πelectrons of the allylbenzene to one of the transition metal’s vacant sites. This is followed by an oxidative addition reaction giving an η-allyl metal−hydride complex, which can collapse to either the starting material or the rearranged and thus more stable alkene. The η-complex may also rearrange to the ηcomplex as part of the reaction pathway. The difference between these two mechanisms can be determined through deuterium labeling with 32 and crossover experiments (Scheme 6). The allyl mechanism is entirely intramolecular and involves an effective 1,3-hydride shift as the only mechanistic pathway. Thus, in a crossover experiment, such as that in Scheme 6, the deuterium should (a) only be found at the 1and 3-positions of the allylic system, that is, 34, and (b) not be incorporated into the second nondeuterated substrate. In the case of the alkyl mechanism, products similar to those of the allyl mechanism may be detected in addition to (a) the nondeuterated substrate showing some deuterium incorporation and (b) the loss of deuterium and incorporation of hydrogen on the deuterated substrate. Furthermore, deuterium incorporation at the 2-position of the allylic system, 35, is also expected because the initial metal−hydride insertion reaction may have poor regioselectivity as already explained in Scheme 2. Of course it should be noted that these two general mechanisms are just that, and the specific reaction pathway for different transition metal catalysts will depend heavily on the transition metal, ligand, solvent, and substrate combinations. More detailed mechanistic data can be obtained from kinetic studies supplemented by state-of-the-art measurements, for example, nanosecond time-resolved IR, NMR, and DFT calculations. These studies have invariably revealed Scheme 4. Alkyl Mechanism M = transition metal; [L]n = bound ligand(s); [L]0 = dissociating ligand or vacant 2e− site. Scheme 5. Allyl Mechanism M = transition metal; [L]n = bound ligand(s); [L]0 = dissociating ligand or vacant 2e− site. Chemical Reviews Review DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00052 Chem. Rev. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX F mechanisms more complicated than those presented above, but at the same time generally holding true to them. One major mechanistic departure has been that proposed by Harvey and Lloyd-Jones in which they suggest a binuclear palladium complex being involved in the E/Z isomerization of alkenes. However, it should be noted that this is only applicable in some cases. More important is that the specific mechanisms themselves answer questions related to E/Z selectivity in these transition metal-mediated isomerizations. Simplistically, the reactions can be considered to be under thermodynamic control, and therefore the E/Z ratios will favor the E-isomer. The π-allyl mechanism has been linked, in a general sense, with higher E/Z ratios, but can by no means be used as proof for a particular mechanism. This is because the E/Z selectivity in the reaction is strongly governed not only by the thermodynamic stability of the E isomer (and intermediates leading to the E-isomer), but can be shifted through ligand and or kinetic control to high ratios of either the E or the Z isomers. The sections below detailing the specific examples in the literature will highlight these selectivities. 3. ISOMERIZATION METHODS − GENERAL Perusal of the literature quickly confirms that 2-propenylaryl isomerization reactions have been promoted by mainly two classes of methods, viz., the application of bases (section 4) or transition metal complexes (section 5). In this Review, these sections will thus be discussed separately, in addition to a final section describing miscellaneous allylaryl isomerizations (section 6). In each section, substrates of particular interest will be highlighted, with particular care being taken to convey important experimental data such as yields, the cis/trans ratios obtained, and any other relevant information. 4. BASE-MEDIATED ISOMERIZATIONS In general, base-initiated reactions require at least a stoichiometric amount of base to accomplish the isomerization of an allylbenzene. This method has seen much application in the past literature, and some general information has been collated in book chapters. 4.1. Hydroxide/Alkoxide Ion-Mediated Isomerizations This particular method involves the use of fairly harsh reaction conditions in that it generally comprises heating the substrate in a protic solution (ethanol, methanol, or n-butanol) of sodium or potassium hydroxide (giving rise to a mixture of the hydroxide and corresponding alkoxide under equilibrium conditions). Other examples include the use of hydroxide in DMSO. Of interest is that the KOH/ethylene glycolmediated isomerization of eugenol 5 has actually been incorporated into the curriculum of a teaching laboratory to demonstrate how the kinetics of a reaction can be studied using NMR spectroscopic, GC, and HPLC laboratory techniques. It should also be mentioned here that the importance of the potassium t-butoxide system means that a separate subsection will be dedicated to this method (see section 4.2). In the first section, examples of where hydroxide-mediated isomerization has been applied will be highlighted. This will be followed by methods in which the isomerization approach has been modified, albeit with additives (phase transfer), microwave heating, or different solvent systems. 4.1.1. Hydroxide/Alkoxide Ions in Alcohol (Methanol, Ethanol, n-Butanol) or without Solvent. It should be noted that the use of sodium ethoxide has been rigorously studied, showing that the isomerization of para-substi

Heteroatom‐Facilitated Lithiations

Abstract: Some 25 years have elapsed since the topic of metalation reactions was reviewed by Gilman and Morton. The intervening years have been notable for intensive explorations in this area, in part because many organolithium reagents are now commercially available. Specifically, research efforts have been characterized by the discovery of new functional groups that promote metalation, elaboration of novel heterocyclic and olefinic substrates as metalatable species, recognition of new types of lithiating agents, and the continuation of efforts to define accurately the mechanism of metalation. Accordingly, heteroatom-facilitated lithiation has become recognized as an increasingly important tool, not only in the elaboration of carbocyclic aromatic and heteroaromatic systems, but also in synthetic aliphatic chemistry. A few recent reviews have covered the topic in a more limited or less specific sense. It is the purpose of this chapter to survey and classify the vast accumulation of heteroatom-facilitated lithiations recorded since the first coverage in Organic Reactions. As outlined by Gilman and Morton, the terms “metalation” in general and “lithiation” in particular denote any replacement of a hydrogen atom by metal or lithium. In this review, however, lithiation is defined as the exchange of a hydrogen atom attached to an sp2-hybridized carbon atom by lithium to form a covalent lithium-carbon bond. More specifically, discussion is limited to those metalations that, through the influence of a heteroatom, are characterized by rate enhancement and regioselectivity. In fact, lithiation reactions of this type are noted for an extraordinarily high degree of regioselectivity, metalation generally occurring on the sp2-carbon atom closest to the heteroatom. Based on the relative position of the heteroatom, such lithiations are conveniently classified into two principal categories: alpha and beta (ortho) lithiations. In alpha lithiations the metalating agent deprotonates the sp2-carbon atom alpha to the heteroatom to form a carbonlithium bond. This sp2-carbon atom may be part of an olefinic or heteroaromatic π system. In beta lithiations the metalating agent is directed to deprotonate the sp2-carbon atom beta to the heteroatom-containing substituent. The sp2-carbon atom can be part of an aromatic or an olefinic π system. It should be noted that the designation “ortho metalation” is used specifically for the beta metalation of carbocyclic aromatic systems. This chapter surveys all systems in which alpha and beta lithiations have been observed, with the exception of ferrocenes. Keywords: lithiations; alpha lithiations; beta lithiations; scope; limitations; alpha activating atom; oxygen; sulfur; nitrogen; selenium; tellurium; halogens; beta-directing atom; substrates; enamines; vinyl isocyanides; formamides; pyrroles; indoles; pyrazoles; imidazoles; triazoles; tetrazoles; alkyl vinyl ethers; pyrazoles; pyridines; pyrimidines; furans; oxazolines; oxazoles; sulfides; sulfoxides; thiophenes; electron-withdrawing groups; vinyl halogens; amines; ethers; sulfones; amides; alcohols; ketones; experimental procedures