Author
Yoshito Iesaka
Bio: Yoshito Iesaka is an academic researcher from Tokyo Medical and Dental University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Catheter ablation & Atrial fibrillation. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 227 publications receiving 14263 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Johns Hopkins University1, University of Barcelona2, St George's, University of London3, Taipei Veterans General Hospital4, Maastricht University5, Washington University in St. Louis6, Imperial College London7, University of Virginia8, Virginia Commonwealth University9, Thomas Jefferson University10, Beaumont Hospital11, University of Bordeaux12, Leipzig University13, University of Oklahoma14, University of Michigan15, Royal Melbourne Hospital16, University College Dublin17, Korea University18, University of Münster19, University of Birmingham20, University of Western Ontario21, Cleveland Clinic22, Harvard University23, University of Pennsylvania24, Northwestern University25, Université de Montréal26, Mayo Clinic27, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai28, University of California, Los Angeles29, National Yang-Ming University30, Loyola University Chicago31
TL;DR: This 2012 Consensus Statement is to provide a state-of-the-art review of the field of catheter and surgical ablation of AF and to report the findings of a Task Force, convened by the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society and charged with defining the indications, techniques, and outcomes of this procedure.
Abstract: During the past decade, catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has evolved rapidly from an investigational procedure to its current status as a commonly performed ablation procedure in many major hospitals throughout the world. Surgical ablation of AF, using either standard or minimally invasive techniques, is also performed in many major hospitals throughout the world.
In 2007, an initial Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical AF Ablation was developed as a joint effort of the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society.1 The 2007 document was also developed in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the American College of Cardiology. Since the publication of the 2007 document, there has been much learned about AF ablation, and the indications for these procedures have changed. Therefore the purpose of this 2012 Consensus Statement is to provide a state-of-the-art review of the field of catheter and surgical ablation of AF and to report the findings of a Task Force, convened by the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society and charged with defining the indications, techniques, and outcomes of this procedure. Included within this document are recommendations pertinent to the design of clinical trials in the field of AF ablation, including definitions relevant to this topic.
This statement summarizes the opinion of the Task Force members based on an extensive literature review as well as their own experience. It is directed to all health care professionals who are involved in the care of patients with AF, particularly those who are undergoing, or are being considered for, catheter or surgical ablation procedures for AF. This statement is not intended to recommend or promote catheter ablation of AF. Rather the ultimate judgment regarding care of a particular patient …
2,754 citations
TL;DR: When analyzed in a large number of electrophysiology laboratories worldwide, catheter ablation of AF shows to be effective in ≈80% of patients after 1.3 procedures per patient, with ≈70% of them not requiring further antiarrhythmic drugs during intermediate follow-up.
Abstract: Background— The purpose of this study was to provide an updated worldwide report on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and Results— A questi...
2,626 citations
1,614 citations
University of Pennsylvania1, Johns Hopkins University2, Mayo Clinic3, University of Barcelona4, St George's, University of London5, Maastricht University6, Cleveland Clinic7, University of Virginia8, Baylor University9, Virginia Commonwealth University10, Thomas Jefferson University11, Beaumont Hospital12, University of Bordeaux13, Leipzig University14, University of Oklahoma15, University of Michigan16, Royal Melbourne Hospital17, University College Dublin18, Korea University19, University of Münster20, University of Birmingham21, University of Western Ontario22, Imperial College London23, Harvard University24, Northwestern University25, National Yang-Ming University26, Washington University in St. Louis27, Université de Montréal28, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai29, University of California, Los Angeles30, Loyola University Chicago31
TL;DR: A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS), was published in this paper.
1,271 citations
Johns Hopkins University1, University of Barcelona2, Mayo Clinic3, Maastricht University4, Washington University in St. Louis5, St Mary's Hospital6, Beaumont Hospital7, University of Bordeaux8, University of Oklahoma9, University of Pennsylvania10, Northwestern University11, University of Michigan12, Cleveland Clinic13, Harvard University14, University of California, Los Angeles15
1,257 citations
Cited by
More filters
TL;DR: This document summarizes current research, plans, and recommendations for future research, as well as providing a history of the field and some of the techniques used, currently in use, at the National Institutes of Health.
Abstract: Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair
Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect
Nancy M. Albert, PhD, RN, FAHA
Biykem Bozkurt, MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA
Ralph G. Brindis, MD, MPH, MACC
Mark A. Creager, MD, FACC, FAHA[#][1]
Lesley H. Curtis, PhD, FAHA
David DeMets, PhD[#][1]
Robert A
6,967 citations
TL;DR: Estimates of expected health outcomes for larger societies are included, where data exist, and the level of evidence and the strength of recommendation of particular treatment options are weighed and graded according to pre-defined scales.
Abstract: Guidelines summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an individual patient suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk–benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes for textbooks. The legal implications of medical guidelines have been discussed previously.
A large number of Guidelines have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as well as by other societies and organizations. Because of the impact on clinical practice, quality criteria for development of guidelines have been established in order to make all decisions transparent to the user. The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC Guidelines can be found on the ESC Web Site (http://www.escardio.org/guidelines-surveys/esc-guidelines/about/Pages/rules-writing.aspx).
In brief, experts in the field are selected and undertake a comprehensive review of the published evidence for management and/or prevention of a given condition. A critical evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is performed, including assessment of the risk–benefit ratio. Estimates of expected health outcomes for larger societies are included, where data exist. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendation of particular treatment options are weighed and graded according to pre-defined scales, as outlined in Tables 1 and 2 .
View this table:
Table 1
Classes of recommendations
View this table:
Table 2
Levels of evidence
The experts of the writing panels have provided disclosure statements of all relationships they may have that might be perceived as real or potential sources of conflicts of interest. These disclosure forms are kept on file at the European Heart House, headquarters of the ESC. Any changes in conflict of interest that arise during the writing period must be notified to the ESC. The Task Force report received its entire financial support from …
5,329 citations
TL;DR: The Task Force for the management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology has been endorsed by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO).
Abstract: The Task Force for the management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC
Endorsed by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO)
5,255 citations
4,960 citations
Leipzig University1, University of Belgrade2, Leiden University3, Uppsala University4, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia5, University of Barcelona6, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy7, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens8, François Rabelais University9, Royal Melbourne Hospital10, University of Melbourne11, University of Lisbon12, University of Birmingham13, University of Groningen14, University Medical Center Groningen15, University of Central Lancashire16
TL;DR: The content of these European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines has been published for personal and educational use only and no commercial use is authorized.
Abstract: Supplementary Table 9, column 'Edoxaban', row 'eGFR category', '95 mL/min' (page 15). The cell should be coloured green instead of yellow. It should also read "60 mg"instead of "60 mg (use with caution in 'supranormal' renal function)."In the above-indicated cell, a footnote has also been added to state: "Edoxaban should be used in patients with high creatinine clearance only after a careful evaluation of the individual thromboembolic and bleeding risk."Supplementary Table 9, column 'Edoxaban', row 'Dose reduction in selected patients' (page 16). The cell should read "Edoxaban 60 mg reduced to 30 mg once daily if any of the following: creatinine clearance 15-50 mL/min, body weight <60 kg, concomitant use of dronedarone, erythromycin, ciclosporine or ketokonazole"instead of "Edoxaban 60 mg reduced to 30 mg once daily, and edoxaban 30 mg reduced to 15mg once daily, if any of the following: creatinine clearance of 30-50 mL/min, body weight <60 kg, concomitant us of verapamil or quinidine or dronedarone."
4,285 citations