scispace - formally typeset
Z

Zachary A. Caddick

Researcher at San Jose State University

Publications -  10
Citations -  105

Zachary A. Caddick is an academic researcher from San Jose State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Motivated reasoning & Daylight. The author has an hindex of 3, co-authored 10 publications receiving 61 citations. Previous affiliations of Zachary A. Caddick include University of Pittsburgh.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of the environmental parameters necessary for an optimal sleep environment

TL;DR: In this article, the authors conduct a review of the evidence surrounding the optimal characteristics for the sleep environment in the categories of noise, temperature, lighting, and air quality in order to provide specific recommendations for each of these components.
Book ChapterDOI

Sleep Environment Recommendations for Future Spaceflight Vehicles

TL;DR: There are wide individual differences in the preferred sleep environment; therefore modifiable sleeping compartments are necessary to ensure all crewmembers are able to select personalized configurations for optimal sleep.

Evaluating contradicting and confirming evidence: A study on beliefs and motivated reasoning

TL;DR: Caddick et al. as discussed by the authors examined ideological, psychological, and demographic predictors of motivated reasoning and found higher levels of dogmatism and lower levels of neuroticism in those engaging in motivated reasoning.
Journal ArticleDOI

Motivated Reasoning in an Explore-Exploit Task

TL;DR: The authors investigated the role of prior preferences in causal learning and found evidence of motivated reasoning despite financial incentives for accuracy, and showed that having neutral preferences (e.g., preferring neither increased nor decreased spending on border security) would lead to more accurate assessments overall compared to having a strong initial preference; however, they did not find evidence for such an effect.
Journal ArticleDOI

When beliefs and evidence collide: psychological and ideological predictors of motivated reasoning about climate change

TL;DR: Motivated reasoning occurs when we reason differently about evidence that supports our prior beliefs than when it contradicts those beliefs as mentioned in this paper, i.e., when it is contrary to our beliefs.