scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Zack Sullivan

Bio: Zack Sullivan is an academic researcher from Illinois Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Top quark & Large Hadron Collider. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 85 publications receiving 3488 citations. Previous affiliations of Zack Sullivan include Fermilab & Argonne National Laboratory.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Georg Weiglein1, Sami Lehti2, Geneviève Bélanger, Tao Han3, David L. Rainwater4, Massimiliano Chiorboli5, Michael Ratz, M. Schumacher6, P. Niezurawski7, Stefano Moretti8, Filip Moortgat9, S. J. Asztalos10, Rohini M. Godbole11, Abdelhak Djouadi12, G. Polesello9, Werner Porod13, Werner Porod14, A.A. Giolo-Nicollerat15, Alessia Tricomi5, J.L. Hewett16, M. Szleper17, L. Zivkovic18, Stephen Godfrey19, Maria Krawczyk7, Klaus Desch20, Alexander Sherstnev21, Dimitri Bourilkov22, A. G. Akeroyd, Dirk Zerwas, M. Muhlleitner23, T. Binoth24, Maria Spiropulu9, Alexander Nikitenko25, A. Krokhotine, V. Bunichev21, Tadas Krupovnickas26, Peter Wienemann, T. Hurth9, T. Hurth16, A. De Roeck9, S. De Curtis27, Ritva Kinnunen2, D. Grellscheid28, U. Baur29, J. Kalinowski7, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick9, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick1, H. U. Martyn30, Alexander Pukhov21, C. Hugonie14, U. Ellwanger, Daniel Tovey31, Aleksander Filip Zarnecki7, Thomas G. Rizzo16, S. Slabospitsky, Jonathan L. Feng32, Remi Lafaye33, Sally Dawson34, Diaz23, Philip Bechtle20, I.F. Ginzburg, Hooman Davoudiasl, Andreas Redelbach24, J. Jiang35, W. J. Stirling1, Reinhold Rückl24, Per Osland36, S. Weinzierl37, Fernando Quevedo38, Laura Reina26, Timothy Barklow16, H. J. Schreiber, Andre Sopczak39, Wilfried Buchmuller, Howard E. Haber40, H. Pas24, E. Lytken41, Xerxes Tata, Howard Baer26, Tsutomu T. Yanagida42, Sabine Kraml43, Sabine Kraml9, Mayda Velasco17, Francois Richard, E. K. U. Gross6, A.F. Osorio44, J. Guasch23, Fawzi Boudjema, Stewart Boogert45, Sven Heinemeyer9, Sabine Riemann, D. Asner18, Daniele Dominici27, Victoria Jane Martin46, J.F. Gunion47, Marco Battaglia48, Michael Spira23, Doreen Wackeroth29, David J. Miller46, David J. Miller49, Joan Sola50, J. Gronberg10, Zack Sullivan, A. Juste, Lynne H. Orr4, Wolfgang Hollik51, Heather E. Logan3, Benjamin C. Allanach38, Junji Hisano42, Carlos E. M. Wagner35, Carlos E. M. Wagner52, Frank F. Deppisch24, Tilman Plehn9, F. Gianotti9, Gianluca Cerminara53, G.A. Blair54, Wolfgang Kilian, Michael Dittmar15, E. E. Boos21, Kiyotomo Kawagoe55, Alexander Belyaev26, Koichi Hamaguchi, Børge Kile Gjelsten56, Tim M. P. Tait, Klaus Mönig, Edmond L. Berger35, P.M. Zerwas, Mihoko M. Nojiri57 
Durham University1, University of Helsinki2, University of Wisconsin-Madison3, University of Rochester4, University of Catania5, Weizmann Institute of Science6, University of Warsaw7, University of Southampton8, CERN9, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory10, Indian Institute of Science11, University of Montpellier12, University of Zurich13, Spanish National Research Council14, ETH Zurich15, Stanford University16, Northwestern University17, University of Pittsburgh18, Carleton University19, University of Hamburg20, Moscow State University21, University of Florida22, Paul Scherrer Institute23, University of Würzburg24, Imperial College London25, Florida State University26, University of Florence27, University of Bonn28, University at Buffalo29, RWTH Aachen University30, University of Sheffield31, University of California, Irvine32, Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de physique des particules33, Brookhaven National Laboratory34, Argonne National Laboratory35, University of Bergen36, University of Mainz37, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services38, Lancaster University39, University of California, Santa Cruz40, University of Copenhagen41, University of Tokyo42, Austrian Academy of Sciences43, University of Manchester44, University College London45, University of Edinburgh46, University of California, Davis47, University of California, Berkeley48, University of Glasgow49, University of Barcelona50, Max Planck Society51, University of Chicago52, University of Turin53, Royal Holloway, University of London54, Kobe University55, University of Oslo56, Kyoto University57
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the possible interplay between the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the International e(+)e(-) Linear Collider (ILC) in testing the Standard Model and in discovering and determining the origin of new physics.

422 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Georg Weiglein, Timothy Barklow, E. E. Boos, A. De Roeck, Klaus Kurt Desch, F. Gianotti, Rohini M. Godbole, J.F. Gunion, Howard E. Haber, S. Heinemeyer, J.L. Hewett, Kiyotomo Kawagoe, Klaus Mönig, Mihoko M. Nojiri, G. Polesello, Francois Richard, Sabine Riemann, W. J. Stirling, A. G. Akeroyd, Benjamin C. Allanach, D. M. Asner, S. J. Asztalos, Howard Baer, M. Battaglia, U. Baur, Philip Bechtle, Geneviève Bélanger, Alexander Belyaev, Edmond L. Berger, T. Binoth, G.A. Blair, Stewart Boogert, Fawzi Boudjema, Dimitri Bourilkov, Wilfried Buchmuller, V. Bunichev, Gianluca Cerminara, Massimiliano Chiorboli, Hooman Davoudiasl, Sally Dawson, S. De Curtis, Frank F. Deppisch, Marco Aurelio Diaz, Michael Dittmar, Abdelhak Djouadi, Daniele Dominici, U. Ellwanger, Jonathan L. Feng, I.F. Ginzburg, A. S. Giolo-Nicollerat, Børge Kile Gjelsten, Stephen Godfrey, David Grellscheid, J. Gronberg, Eugene P. Gross, J. Guasch, Koichi Hamaguchi, Tao Han, Junji Hisano, Wolfgang Hollik, Cyril Hugonie, Tobias Hurth, J. Jiang, A. Juste, J. Kalinowski, Wolfgang Kilian, Ritva Kinnunen, Sabine Kraml, Maria Krawczyk, A. Krokhotine, T. Krupovnickas, Remi Lafaye, Sami Lehti, Heather E. Logan, Else Lytken, Victoria Jane Martin, H.U. Martyn, David J. Miller, Stefano Moretti, F. Moortgat, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick, M. Muhlleitner, P. Niezurawski, Alexander Nikitenko, Lynne H. Orr, Per Osland, A.F. Osorio, H. Pas, Tilman Plehn, Werner Porod, Alexander Pukhov, Fernando Quevedo, D. Rainwater, Michael Ratz, Andreas Redelbach, Laura Reina, Tom Rizzo, Reinhold Rückl, H. J. Schreiber, Markus Schumacher, Alexander Sherstnev, S. Slabospitsky, Joan Sola, Andre Sopczak, Michael Spira, Maria Spiropulu, Zack Sullivan, Michal Szleper, Tim M. P. Tait, Xerxes Tata, Daniel Tovey, Alessia Tricomi, Mayda Velasco, Doreen Wackeroth, Carlos E. M. Wagner, S. Weinzierl, Peter Wienemann, Tsutomu T. Yanagida, Aleksander Filip Zarnecki, Dirk Zerwas, P.M. Zerwas, L. Zivkovic 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors address the possible interplay between the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the International e+e- Linear Collider (ILC) in testing the Standard Model and in discovering and determining the origin of new physics.
Abstract: Physics at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the International e+e- Linear Collider (ILC) will be complementary in many respects, as has been demonstrated at previous generations of hadron and lepton colliders. This report addresses the possible interplay between the LHC and ILC in testing the Standard Model and in discovering and determining the origin of new physics. Mutual benefits for the physics programme at both machines can occur both at the level of a combined interpretation of Hadron Collider and Linear Collider data and at the level of combined analyses of the data, where results obtained at one machine can directly influence the way analyses are carried out at the other machine. Topics under study comprise the physics of weak and strong electroweak symmetry breaking, supersymmetric models, new gauge theories, models with extra dimensions, and electroweak and QCD precision physics. The status of the work that has been carried out within the LHC / LC Study Group so far is summarised in this report. Possible topics for future studies are outlined.

334 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a survey of the state-of-the-art work in the field of computer vision and artificial intelligence, which includes the following authors: M. Beneke, I.E.Boos, M.Brock, R.Brandenburg, A.Berger, W.Bernreuther, E.Bergers, E.Efthymiopoulos, N.M. Mangano, J.Womersley, and W. Womersley.
Abstract: Conveners: M. Beneke, I. Efthymiopoulos, M.L. Mangano,J. Womersley Contributing authors: A. Ahmadov, G. Azuelos,U. Baur, A. Belyaev, E.L.Berger, W. Bernreuther , E.E.Boos,M. Bosman,A. Brandenburg, R.Brock, M. Buice, N. Cartiglia, F. Cerutti,A. Cheplakov, L. Chikovani,M. Cobal-Grassmann, G. Corcella,F. del Aguila,T. Djobava,J. Dodd,V. Drollinger, A. Dubak,S.Frixione, D. Froidevaux,B. GonźalezPiñeiro, Y.P. Gouz,D. Green,P. Grenier, S.Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, V. Ilyin, C. Kao,A. Kharchilava,R.Kinnunen,V.V. Kukhtin,S.Kunori, L. La Rotonda,A. Lagatta,M. Lefebvre, K. Maeshima,G. Mahlon,S.Mc Grath,G. Medin, R.Mehdiyev, B. Mele, Z. Metreveli, D. O’Neil, L.H. Orr, D. Pallin, S.Parke, J. Parsons,D. Popovic, L. Reina,E. Richter-Was,T.G. Rizzo,D. Salihagic, M. Sapinski,M.H. Seymour , V. Simak,L. Simic, G. Skoro, S.R.Slabospitsk y, J. Smolik,L. Sonnensc hein,T. Stelzer , N. Stepanov, Z. Sullivan,T. Tait, I. Vichou,R.Vidal, D. Wackeroth,G. Weiglein,S.Willenbrock, W. Wu

266 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a new next-to-leading order calculation for fully dieren tial single-topquark nal states is presented using phase space slicing and dipole subtraction methods.
Abstract: We present a new next-to-leading order calculation for fully dieren tial single-topquark nal states. The calculation is performed using phase space slicing and dipole subtraction methods. The results of the methods are found to be in agreement. The dipole subtraction method calculation retains the full spin dependence of the nal state particles. We show a few numerical results to illustrate the utility and consistency of the resulting computer implementations.

258 citations

14 Nov 2000
TL;DR: In this paper, the Higgs sector of the Minimal supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model (MSSM) is of particular interest because it predicts the existence of a light CP-even neutral Higgs boson with a mass below about 130 GeV.
Abstract: Despite the success of the Standard Model (SM), which provides a superb description of a wide range of experimental particle physics data, the dynamics responsible for electroweak symmetry breaking is still unknown. Its elucidation remains one of the primary goals of future high energy physics experimentation. Present day global fits to precision electroweak data based on the Standard Model favor the existence of a weakly-interacting scalar Higgs boson, which is a remnant of elementary scalar dynamics that drives electroweak symmetry breaking. The only known viable theoretical framework incorporating light elementary scalar fields employs low-energy supersymmetry, where the scale of supersymmetry breaking is {Omicron} (1 TeV). The Higgs sector of the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model (MSSM) is of particular interest because it predicts the existence of a light CP-even neutral Higgs boson with a mass below about 130 GeV. Moreover, over a significant portion of the MSSM parameter space, the properties of this scalar are indistinguishable from those of the SM Higgs boson.

210 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 1988-Nature
TL;DR: In this paper, a sedimentological core and petrographic characterisation of samples from eleven boreholes from the Lower Carboniferous of Bowland Basin (Northwest England) is presented.
Abstract: Deposits of clastic carbonate-dominated (calciclastic) sedimentary slope systems in the rock record have been identified mostly as linearly-consistent carbonate apron deposits, even though most ancient clastic carbonate slope deposits fit the submarine fan systems better. Calciclastic submarine fans are consequently rarely described and are poorly understood. Subsequently, very little is known especially in mud-dominated calciclastic submarine fan systems. Presented in this study are a sedimentological core and petrographic characterisation of samples from eleven boreholes from the Lower Carboniferous of Bowland Basin (Northwest England) that reveals a >250 m thick calciturbidite complex deposited in a calciclastic submarine fan setting. Seven facies are recognised from core and thin section characterisation and are grouped into three carbonate turbidite sequences. They include: 1) Calciturbidites, comprising mostly of highto low-density, wavy-laminated bioclast-rich facies; 2) low-density densite mudstones which are characterised by planar laminated and unlaminated muddominated facies; and 3) Calcidebrites which are muddy or hyper-concentrated debrisflow deposits occurring as poorly-sorted, chaotic, mud-supported floatstones. These

9,929 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: MadGraph5 aMC@NLO as discussed by the authors is a computer program capable of handling all these computations, including parton-level fixed order, shower-matched, merged, in a unified framework whose defining features are flexibility, high level of parallelisation and human intervention limited to input physics quantities.
Abstract: We discuss the theoretical bases that underpin the automation of the computations of tree-level and next-to-leading order cross sections, of their matching to parton shower simulations, and of the merging of matched samples that differ by light-parton multiplicities. We present a computer program, MadGraph5 aMC@NLO, capable of handling all these computations — parton-level fixed order, shower-matched, merged — in a unified framework whose defining features are flexibility, high level of parallelisation, and human intervention limited to input physics quantities. We demonstrate the potential of the program by presenting selected phenomenological applications relevant to the LHC and to a 1-TeV e + e − collider. While next-to-leading order results are restricted to QCD corrections to SM processes in the first public version, we show that from the user viewpoint no changes have to be expected in the case of corrections due to any given renormalisable Lagrangian, and that the implementation of these are well under way.

6,509 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Pythia program as mentioned in this paper can be used to generate high-energy-physics ''events'' (i.e. sets of outgoing particles produced in the interactions between two incoming particles).
Abstract: The Pythia program can be used to generate high-energy-physics ''events'', i.e. sets of outgoing particles produced in the interactions between two incoming particles. The objective is to provide as accurate as possible a representation of event properties in a wide range of reactions, within and beyond the Standard Model, with emphasis on those where strong interactions play a role, directly or indirectly, and therefore multihadronic final states are produced. The physics is then not understood well enough to give an exact description; instead the program has to be based on a combination of analytical results and various QCD-based models. This physics input is summarized here, for areas such as hard subprocesses, initial- and final-state parton showers, underlying events and beam remnants, fragmentation and decays, and much more. Furthermore, extensive information is provided on all program elements: subroutines and functions, switches and parameters, and particle and process data. This should allow the user to tailor the generation task to the topics of interest.

6,300 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current status of particle dark matter, including experimental evidence and theoretical motivations, including direct and indirect detection techniques, is discussed in this paper. But the authors focus on neutralinos in models of supersymmetry and Kaluza-Klein dark matter in universal extra dimensions.

4,614 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a new generation of parton distribution functions with increased precision and quantitative estimates of uncertainties is presented, using a recently developed eigenvector-basis approach to the hessian method, which provides the means to quickly estimate the uncertainties of a wide range of physical processes at these high-energy hadron colliders, based on current knowledge of the parton distributions.
Abstract: A new generation of parton distribution functions with increased precision and quantitative estimates of uncertainties is presented. This work signiflcantly extends previous CTEQ and other global analyses on two fronts: (i) a full treatment of available experimental correlated systematic errorsforbothnewandolddata sets; (ii) asystematic and pragmatic treatment of uncertainties of the parton distributions and their physical predictions, using a recently developed eigenvector-basis approach to the hessian method. The new gluon distribution is considerably harder than that of previous standard flts. A numberofphysicsissues,particularlyrelatingtothebehaviorofthegluondistribution,are addressedinmorequantitativetermsthanbefore. Extensiveresultsontheuncertaintiesof parton distributions at various scales, and on parton luminosity functions at the Tevatron RunII and the LHC, are presented. The latter provide the means to quickly estimate the uncertainties of a wide range of physical processes at these high-energy hadron colliders, basedoncurrentknowledgeofthepartondistributions. Inparticular, theuncertaintieson the production cross sections of the W, Z at the Tevatron and the LHC are estimated to be§4% and§5%, respectively, and that of a light Higgs at the LHC to be§5%.

4,427 citations