scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Zdzisław Pawlak

Bio: Zdzisław Pawlak is an academic researcher from Polish Academy of Sciences. The author has contributed to research in topics: Rough set & Dominance-based rough set approach. The author has an hindex of 49, co-authored 214 publications receiving 28434 citations. Previous affiliations of Zdzisław Pawlak include Warsaw University of Technology & University of Warsaw.


Papers
More filters
01 Jan 2002
TL;DR: A new mathematical model of a flow network different to that introduced by Ford and Fulkerson is proposed and it is shown that flow in such networks is governed by Bayes’ formula, which leads to a new look on Bayes' formula and many new applications.
Abstract: This paper, which is a continuation of series of authors papers on the relationship between decision algorithms and Bayes' theorem, is related to Łukasiewicz's ideas concerning the relationship between multivalued logic, probability and Bayes' theorem. We proposed in this paper a new mathematical model of a flow network different to that introduced by Ford and Fulkerson. Basically, the model is intended to be used rather as a mathematical model of decision processes than as flow analysis and it concerns rather flow of information than material media. Branches of the network are interpreted as decision rules, whereas the whole network represents a decision algorithm. It is shown that flow in such networks is governed by Bayes’ formula. In this case the formula describes deterministic information flow distribution among branches of the network, without referring to its probabilistic character. This leads to a new look on Bayes’ formula and many new applications.
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors dotyczy wieloletniej pracy naukowo-dydaktycznej i organizacyjnej ks. Idziego Radzisewskiego jako profesora i rektora Seminarium Duchownego we Włocławku.
Abstract: Artykuł dotyczy wieloletniej pracy naukowo-dydaktycznej i organizacyjnej ks. Idziego Radziszewskiego jako profesora i rektora Seminarium Duchownego we Włocławku. Włocławski okres działalności ks. Radziszewskiego, jego niezwykłe dokonania i osiągnięcia w zakresie reorganizacji i modernizacji włocławskiego seminarium, zwłaszcza poziomu nauczania i wychowania jest mało znany a jednocześnie bardzo ważny w dalszej jego naukowej drodze. Opracowanie składa się z trzech części. Pierwsza przedstawia jego pracę naukowo-dydaktyczną i organizacyjną jako profesora i wicerektora w seminarium włocławskim. Druga ukazuje jego działalność naukowo-organizacyjną jako rektora. Trzecia dotyczy powstania i pracy w „Ateneum Kapłańskim”.

Cited by
More filters
Book
08 Sep 2000
TL;DR: This book presents dozens of algorithms and implementation examples, all in pseudo-code and suitable for use in real-world, large-scale data mining projects, and provides a comprehensive, practical look at the concepts and techniques you need to get the most out of real business data.
Abstract: The increasing volume of data in modern business and science calls for more complex and sophisticated tools. Although advances in data mining technology have made extensive data collection much easier, it's still always evolving and there is a constant need for new techniques and tools that can help us transform this data into useful information and knowledge. Since the previous edition's publication, great advances have been made in the field of data mining. Not only does the third of edition of Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques continue the tradition of equipping you with an understanding and application of the theory and practice of discovering patterns hidden in large data sets, it also focuses on new, important topics in the field: data warehouses and data cube technology, mining stream, mining social networks, and mining spatial, multimedia and other complex data. Each chapter is a stand-alone guide to a critical topic, presenting proven algorithms and sound implementations ready to be used directly or with strategic modification against live data. This is the resource you need if you want to apply today's most powerful data mining techniques to meet real business challenges. * Presents dozens of algorithms and implementation examples, all in pseudo-code and suitable for use in real-world, large-scale data mining projects. * Addresses advanced topics such as mining object-relational databases, spatial databases, multimedia databases, time-series databases, text databases, the World Wide Web, and applications in several fields. *Provides a comprehensive, practical look at the concepts and techniques you need to get the most out of real business data

23,600 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis.
Abstract: Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

13,246 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The wrapper method searches for an optimal feature subset tailored to a particular algorithm and a domain and compares the wrapper approach to induction without feature subset selection and to Relief, a filter approach tofeature subset selection.

8,610 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This approach seems to be of fundamental importance to artificial intelligence (AI) and cognitive sciences, especially in the areas of machine learning, knowledge acquisition, decision analysis, knowledge discovery from databases, expert systems, decision support systems, inductive reasoning, and pattern recognition.
Abstract: Rough set theory, introduced by Zdzislaw Pawlak in the early 1980s [11, 12], is a new mathematical tool to deal with vagueness and uncertainty. This approach seems to be of fundamental importance to artificial intelligence (AI) and cognitive sciences, especially in the areas of machine learning, knowledge acquisition, decision analysis, knowledge discovery from databases, expert systems, decision support systems, inductive reasoning, and pattern recognition.

7,185 citations

01 Jan 1998
TL;DR: This thesis addresses the problem of feature selection for machine learning through a correlation based approach with CFS (Correlation based Feature Selection), an algorithm that couples this evaluation formula with an appropriate correlation measure and a heuristic search strategy.
Abstract: A central problem in machine learning is identifying a representative set of features from which to construct a classification model for a particular task. This thesis addresses the problem of feature selection for machine learning through a correlation based approach. The central hypothesis is that good feature sets contain features that are highly correlated with the class, yet uncorrelated with each other. A feature evaluation formula, based on ideas from test theory, provides an operational definition of this hypothesis. CFS (Correlation based Feature Selection) is an algorithm that couples this evaluation formula with an appropriate correlation measure and a heuristic search strategy. CFS was evaluated by experiments on artificial and natural datasets. Three machine learning algorithms were used: C4.5 (a decision tree learner), IB1 (an instance based learner), and naive Bayes. Experiments on artificial datasets showed that CFS quickly identifies and screens irrelevant, redundant, and noisy features, and identifies relevant features as long as their relevance does not strongly depend on other features. On natural domains, CFS typically eliminated well over half the features. In most cases, classification accuracy using the reduced feature set equaled or bettered accuracy using the complete feature set. Feature selection degraded machine learning performance in cases where some features were eliminated which were highly predictive of very small areas of the instance space. Further experiments compared CFS with a wrapper—a well known approach to feature selection that employs the target learning algorithm to evaluate feature sets. In many cases CFS gave comparable results to the wrapper, and in general, outperformed the wrapper on small datasets. CFS executes many times faster than the wrapper, which allows it to scale to larger datasets. Two methods of extending CFS to handle feature interaction are presented and experimentally evaluated. The first considers pairs of features and the second incorporates iii feature weights calculated by the RELIEF algorithm. Experiments on artificial domains showed that both methods were able to identify interacting features. On natural domains, the pairwise method gave more reliable results than using weights provided by RELIEF.

3,533 citations