scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Zoie Shui-Yee Wong

Bio: Zoie Shui-Yee Wong is an academic researcher from International University, Cambodia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health informatics & Incident report. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 29 publications receiving 390 citations. Previous affiliations of Zoie Shui-Yee Wong include University of New South Wales & City University of Hong Kong.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is foreseeable that together with reliable data management platforms AI methods will enable analysis of massive infectious disease and surveillance data effectively to support government agencies, healthcare service providers, and medical professionals to response to disease in the future.
Abstract: Background Since the beginning of the 21st century, the amount of data obtained from public health surveillance has increased dramatically due to the advancement of information and communications technology and the data collection systems now in place. Methods This paper aims to highlight the opportunities gained through the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods to enable reliable disease-oriented monitoring and projection in this information age. Results and Conclusion It is foreseeable that together with reliable data management platforms AI methods will enable analysis of massive infectious disease and surveillance data effectively to support government agencies, healthcare service providers, and medical professionals to response to disease in the future.

136 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A historical perspective about the evaluation of AI in healthcare is provided and key challenges of evaluating AI-enabled clinical decision support during design, development, selection, use, and ongoing surveillance are examined.
Abstract: Objectives: This paper draws attention to: i) key considerations for evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) enabled clinical decision support; and ii) challenges and practical implications of AI design, development, selection, use, and ongoing surveillance. Method: A narrative review of existing research and evaluation approaches along with expert perspectives drawn from the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Working Group on Technology Assessment and Quality Development in Health Informatics and the European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems. Results: There is a rich history and tradition of evaluating AI in healthcare. While evaluators can learn from past efforts, and build on best practice evaluation frameworks and methodologies, questions remain about how to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of AI that dynamically harness vast amounts of genomic, biomarker, phenotype, electronic record, and care delivery data from across health systems. This paper first provides a historical perspective about the evaluation of AI in healthcare. It then examines key challenges of evaluating AI-enabled clinical decision support during design, development, selection, use, and ongoing surveillance. Practical aspects of evaluating AI in healthcare, including approaches to evaluation and indicators to monitor AI are also discussed. Conclusion: Commitment to rigorous initial and ongoing evaluation will be critical to ensuring the safe and effective integration of AI in complex sociotechnical settings. Specific enhancements that are required for the new generation of AI-enabled clinical decision support will emerge through practical application.

99 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A novel method to generate belief rule base for risk analysis in new product development is developed and a new way to quantify the influence of antecedent attributes on the consequence is proposed.
Abstract: Research highlights? A novel method to generate belief rule base for risk analysis in new product development is developed. ? A new way to quantify the influence of antecedent attributes on the consequence is proposed. ? Biases and inconsistencies can be reduced by the method during the belief rule base generation process. ? A case regarding customer perception risk analysis is then studied using the method proposed in the paper. New product development (NPD) is crucial for a company's success in a competitive market. Meanwhile, NPD is a process associated with great complexity and high risk. To ensure its smooth operation, risks involved in an NPD process need to be analyzed in a proper way. In this paper, a novel method is proposed to generate a belief rule base (BRB), which is the basis of the Belief Rule-Base Inference Methodology using the Evidential Reasoning (RIMER). Due to its capability in dealing with complex reasoning problems under uncertainty, RIMER is then applied to assess customer perception risk (CPR) in an NPD process. To test and validate the method proposed in this paper, a case study of an "Interactive Doll" is conducted at the end of the paper.

50 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A framework for learning healthcare data with imbalanced distribution via incorporating different rebalancing strategies is developed and showed that the developed framework can significantly improve the detection accuracy of medical incidents due to look-alikes sound-alike (LASA) mix-ups.
Abstract: Identifying rare but significant healthcare events in massive unstructured datasets has become a common task in healthcare data analytics. However, imbalanced class distribution in many practical datasets greatly hampers the detection of rare events, as most classification methods implicitly assume an equal occurrence of classes and are designed to maximize the overall classification accuracy. In this study, we develop a framework for learning healthcare data with imbalanced distribution via incorporating different rebalancing strategies. The evaluation results showed that the developed framework can significantly improve the detection accuracy of medical incidents due to look-alike sound-alike (LASA) mix-ups. Specifically, logistic regression combined with the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) produces the best detection results, with a significant 45.3% increase in recall (recall = 75.7%) compared with pure logistic regression (recall = 52.1%).

50 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The data suggest that MRSA transmission was more serious in LTCFs than in hospitals, and infection control should be focused on LTCF in order to reduce the burden of MRSA carriers in healthcare settings.
Abstract: The relative contribution of long term care facilities (LTCFs) and hospitals in the transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is unknown. Concurrent MRSA screening and spa type analysis was performed in LTCFs and their network hospitals to estimate the rate of MRSA acquisition among residents during their stay in LTCFs and hospitals, by colonization pressure and MRSA transmission calculations. In 40 LTCFs, 436 (21.6%) of 2020 residents were identified as ‘MRSA-positive’. The incidence of MRSA transmission per 1000-colonization-days among the residents during their stay in LTCFs and hospitals were 309 and 113 respectively, while the colonization pressure in LTCFs and hospitals were 210 and 185 per 1000-patient-days respectively. MRSA spa type t1081 was the most commonly isolated linage in both LTCF residents (76/121, 62.8%) and hospitalized patients (51/87, 58.6%), while type t4677 was significantly associated with LTCF residents (24/121, 19.8%) compared with hospitalized patients (3/87, 3.4%) (p < 0.001). This suggested continuous transmission of MRSA t4677 among LTCF residents. Also, an inverse linear relationship between MRSA prevalence in LTCFs and the average living area per LTCF resident was observed (Pearson correlation −0.443, p = 0.004), with the odds of patients acquiring MRSA reduced by a factor of 0.90 for each 10 square feet increase in living area. Our data suggest that MRSA transmission was more serious in LTCFs than in hospitals. Infection control should be focused on LTCFs in order to reduce the burden of MRSA carriers in healthcare settings.

44 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Policy makers need to be aware of the equivocal evidence when considering school closures for COVID-19, and that combinations of social distancing measures should be considered.

1,559 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The present review is aimed at overviewing the potential applications of AI and Big Data in the global effort to manage the pandemic.
Abstract: SARS-CoV2 is a novel coronavirus, responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic declared by the World Health Organization. Thanks to the latest advancements in the field of molecular and computational techniques and information and communication technologies (ICTs), artificial intelligence (AI) and Big Data can help in handling the huge, unprecedented amount of data derived from public health surveillance, real-time epidemic outbreaks monitoring, trend now-casting/forecasting, regular situation briefing and updating from governmental institutions and organisms, and health facility utilization information. The present review is aimed at overviewing the potential applications of AI and Big Data in the global effort to manage the pandemic.

228 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
18 Oct 1986-BMJ
TL;DR: Improved results during the study period are due not to the use of a computer but to accurate collection of information and feedback of results to the doctors concerned, emphasise the point made by the authors.
Abstract: a correct decision in 84% and a combined bad diagnostic and management error rate of 3-2%.' We used a different approach, which requires the surgeon to categorise patients into management pathways at the time ofadmission (definitely needs operation, definitely does not require operation, uncertain). Laparoscopy was done in the uncertain group. We consider that this management approach to acute abdominal pain is more appropriate than a system based on diagnostic accuracy. We emphasise the point made by the authors that improved results during the study period are due not to the use of a computer but to accurate collection ofinformation and feedback of results to the doctors concerned. Improvement in this important area stems from interest, analysis, and feedback. Computers are one way of achieving this, rigorous analysis of decision making is another. We prefer the latter.

206 citations

01 Jan 2019

151 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This dataset, intended to be a time-series dataset, is transformed into a regression dataset and used in training a multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network (ANN) to achieve a worldwide model of the maximal number of patients across all locations in each time unit.
Abstract: Coronavirus (COVID-19) is a highly infectious disease that has captured the attention of the worldwide public. Modeling of such diseases can be extremely important in the prediction of their impact. While classic, statistical, modeling can provide satisfactory models, it can also fail to comprehend the intricacies contained within the data. In this paper, authors use a publicly available dataset, containing information on infected, recovered, and deceased patients in 406 locations over 51 days (22nd January 2020 to 12th March 2020). This dataset, intended to be a time-series dataset, is transformed into a regression dataset and used in training a multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network (ANN). The aim of training is to achieve a worldwide model of the maximal number of patients across all locations in each time unit. Hyperparameters of the MLP are varied using a grid search algorithm, with a total of 5376 hyperparameter combinations. Using those combinations, a total of 48384 ANNs are trained (16128 for each patient group-deceased, recovered, and infected), and each model is evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2). Cross-validation is performed using K-fold algorithm with 5-folds. Best models achieved consists of 4 hidden layers with 4 neurons in each of those layers, and use a ReLU activation function, with R2 scores of 0.98599 for confirmed, 0.99429 for deceased, and 0.97941 for recovered patient models. When cross-validation is performed, these scores drop to 0.94 for confirmed, 0.781 for recovered, and 0.986 for deceased patient models, showing high robustness of the deceased patient model, good robustness for confirmed, and low robustness for recovered patient model.

141 citations