scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Conference

International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis 

About: International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis is an academic conference. The conference publishes majorly in the area(s): Computer science & Test case. Over the lifetime, 1031 publications have been published by the conference receiving 48410 citations.


Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
21 Jul 2014
TL;DR: Defects4J, a database and extensible framework providing real bugs to enable reproducible studies in software testing research, and provides a high-level interface to common tasks in softwareTesting research, making it easy to con- duct and reproduce empirical studies.
Abstract: Empirical studies in software testing research may not be comparable, reproducible, or characteristic of practice. One reason is that real bugs are too infrequently used in software testing research. Extracting and reproducing real bugs is challenging and as a result hand-seeded faults or mutants are commonly used as a substitute. This paper presents Defects4J, a database and extensible framework providing real bugs to enable reproducible studies in software testing research. The initial version of Defects4J contains 357 real bugs from 5 real-world open source pro- grams. Each real bug is accompanied by a comprehensive test suite that can expose (demonstrate) that bug. Defects4J is extensible and builds on top of each program’s version con- trol system. Once a program is configured in Defects4J, new bugs can be added to the database with little or no effort. Defects4J features a framework to easily access faulty and fixed program versions and corresponding test suites. This framework also provides a high-level interface to common tasks in software testing research, making it easy to con- duct and reproduce empirical studies. Defects4J is publicly available at http://defects4j.org.

977 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Aug 2000
TL;DR: Can prioritization techniques be effective when aimed at specific modified versions; what tradeoffs exist between fine granularity and coarse granularity prioritized techniques; and can the incorporation of measures of fault proneness into prioritization technique improve their effectiveness?
Abstract: Test case prioritization techniques schedule test cases in an order that increases their effectiveness in meeting some performance goal. One performance goal, rate of fault detection, is a measure of how quickly faults are detected within the testing process; an improved rate of fault detection can provide faster feedback on the system under test, and let software engineers begin locating and correcting faults earlier than might otherwise be possible. In previous work, we reported the results of studies that showed that prioritization techniques can significantly improve rate of fault detection. Those studies, however, raised several additional questions: (1) can prioritization techniques be effective when aimed at specific modified versions; (2) what tradeoffs exist between fine granularity and coarse granularity prioritization techniques; (3) can the incorporation of measures of fault proneness into prioritization techniques improve their effectiveness? This paper reports the results of new experiments addressing these questions.

783 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2002
TL;DR: Korat is a novel framework for automated testing of Java programs that uses the method precondition to automatically generate all (nonisomorphic) test cases up to a given small size and generates test cases much faster than the declarative framework.
Abstract: This paper presents Korat, a novel framework for automated testing of Java programs. Given a formal specification for a method, Korat uses the method precondition to automatically generate all (nonisomorphic) test cases up to a given small size. Korat then executes the method on each test case, and uses the method postcondition as a test oracle to check the correctness of each output.To generate test cases for a method, Korat constructs a Java predicate (i.e., a method that returns a boolean) from the method's pre-condition. The heart of Korat is a technique for automatic test case generation: given a predicate and a bound on the size of its inputs, Korat generates all (nonisomorphic) inputs for which the predicate returns true. Korat exhaustively explores the bounded input space of the predicate but does so efficiently by monitoring the predicate's executions and pruning large portions of the search space.This paper illustrates the use of Korat for testing several data structures, including some from the Java Collections Framework. The experimental results show that it is feasible to generate test cases from Java predicates, even when the search space for inputs is very large. This paper also compares Korat with a testing framework based on declarative specifications. Contrary to our initial expectation, the experiments show that Korat generates test cases much faster than the declarative framework.

714 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2004
TL;DR: The main contribution of this work is to show how efficient white-box test input generation can be done for code manipulating complex data, taking into account complex method preconditions.
Abstract: We show how model checking and symbolic execution can be used to generate test inputs to achieve structural coverage of code that manipulates complex data structures. We focus on obtaining branch-coverage during unit testing of some of the core methods of the red-black tree implementation in the Java TreeMap library, using the Java PathFinder model checker. Three different test generation techniques will be introduced and compared, namely, straight model checking of the code, model checking used in a black-box fashion to generate all inputs up to a fixed size, and lastly, model checking used during white-box test input generation. The main contribution of this work is to show how efficient white-box test input generation can be done for code manipulating complex data, taking into account complex method preconditions.

558 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
09 Jul 2007
TL;DR: A general framework for dynamic tainting is defined and developed that is highly flexible and customizable, allows for performing both data-flow and control-flow based taints conservatively, and does not rely on any customized run-time system.
Abstract: Dynamic taint analysis is gaining momentum. Techniques based on dynamic tainting have been successfully used in the context of application security, and now their use is also being explored in different areas, such as program understanding, software testing, and debugging. Unfortunately, most existing approaches for dynamic tainting are defined in an ad-hoc manner, which makes it difficult to extend them, experiment with them, and adapt them to new contexts. Moreover, most existing approaches are focused on data-flow based tainting only and do not consider tainting due to control flow, which limits their applicability outside the security domain. To address these limitations and foster experimentation with dynamic tainting techniques, we defined and developed a general framework for dynamic tainting that (1) is highly flexible and customizable, (2) allows for performing both data-flow and control-flow based tainting conservatively, and (3) does not rely on any customized run-time system. We also present DYTAN, an implementation of our framework that works on x86 executables, and a set of preliminary studies that show how DYTAN can be used to implement different tainting-based approaches with limited effort. In the studies, we also show that DYTAN can be used on real software, by using FIREFOX as one of our subjects, and illustrate how the specific characteristics of the tainting approach used can affect efficiency and accuracy of the taint analysis, which further justifies the use of our framework to experiment with different variants of an approach.

552 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Conference in previous years
YearPapers
2023105
202266
202158
202055
201953
201840