Example of American Political Science Review format
Recent searches

Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format Example of American Political Science Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

American Political Science Review — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Political Science and International Relations #5 of 556 up up by 1 rank
Sociology and Political Science #27 of 1269 -
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 266 Published Papers | 1942 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 11/04/2023
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.9
SJR: 0.688
SNIP: 0.981
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.545
SNIP: 1.328
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.7
SJR: 0.483
SNIP: 1.338
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.8
SJR: 0.451
SNIP: 1.301

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

4.183

7% from 2018

Impact factor for American Political Science Review from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 4.183
2018 3.895
2017 3.252
2016 3.316
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

7.3

18% from 2019

CiteRatio for American Political Science Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 7.3
2019 6.2
2018 6.2
2017 6.3
2016 7.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 7% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 18% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

5.878

0% from 2019

SJR for American Political Science Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.878
2019 5.872
2018 6.531
2017 5.587
2016 7.869
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.119

12% from 2019

SNIP for American Political Science Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.119
2019 4.676
2018 3.667
2017 3.563
2016 4.487
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 0% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 12% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

American Political Science Review

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Cambridge University Press

American Political Science Review

American Political Science Review is political science's premier scholarly research journal, providing peer-reviewed articles and review essays from subfields throughout the discipline. Areas covered include political theory, American politics, public policy, public administra...... Read More

Sociology and Political Science

Political Science and International Relations

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
11 Apr 2023
i
ISSN
0003-0554
i
Impact Factor
Very High - 4.793
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
G E Blonder, M Tinkham, and T M Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515–4532, 1982. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.2307/1961794
The truly disadvantaged : the inner city, the underclass, and public policy

Abstract:

""The Truly Disadvantaged" should spur critical thinking in many quarters about the causes and possible remedies for inner city poverty. As policy makers grapple with the problems of an enlarged underclass they--as well as community leaders and all concerned Americans of all races--would be advised to examine Mr. Wilson's inc... ""The Truly Disadvantaged" should spur critical thinking in many quarters about the causes and possible remedies for inner city poverty. As policy makers grapple with the problems of an enlarged underclass they--as well as community leaders and all concerned Americans of all races--would be advised to examine Mr. Wilson's incisive analysis."--Robert Greenstein, "New York Times Book Review" "'Must reading' for civil-rights leaders, leaders of advocacy organizations for the poor, and for elected officials in our major urban centers."--Bernard C. Watson, "Journal of Negro Education" "Required reading for anyone, presidential candidate or private citizen, who really wants to address the growing plight of the black urban underclass."--David J. Garrow, "Washington Post Book World" Selected by the editors of the "New York Times Book Review" as one of the sixteen best books of 1987. Winner of the 1988 C. Wright Mills Award of the Society for the Study of Social Problems. read more read less

Topics:

Concentrated poverty (65%)65% related to the paper, Political sociology (63%)63% related to the paper, Disadvantaged (56%)56% related to the paper, Underclass (53%)53% related to the paper
7,278 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0003055403000534
Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War
James D. Fearon1, David D. Laitin1

Abstract:

An influential conventional wisdom holds that civil wars proliferated rapidly with the end of the Cold War and that the root cause of many or most of these has been ethnic and religious antagonisms. We show that the current prevalence of internal war is mainly the result of a steady accumulation of protracted conflicts since ... An influential conventional wisdom holds that civil wars proliferated rapidly with the end of the Cold War and that the root cause of many or most of these has been ethnic and religious antagonisms. We show that the current prevalence of internal war is mainly the result of a steady accumulation of protracted conflicts since the 1950s and 1960s rather than a sudden change associated with a new, post-Cold War international system. We also find that after controlling for per capita income, more ethnically or religiously diverse countries have been no more likely to experience significant civil violence in this period. We argue for understanding civil war in this period in terms of insurgency or rural guerrilla warfare, a particular form of military practice that can be harnessed to diverse political agendas. The factors that explain which countries have been at risk for civil war are not their ethnic or religious characteristics but rather the conditions that favor insurgency. These include poverty—which marks financially and bureaucratically weak states and also favors rebel recruitment—political instability, rough terrain, and large populations.We wish to thank the many people who provided comments on earlier versions of this paper in a series of seminar presentations. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation (Grants SES-9876477 and SES-9876530); support from the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences with funds from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; valuable research assistance from Ebru Erdem, Nikolay Marinov, Quinn Mecham, David Patel, and TQ Shang; sharing of data by Paul Collier. read more read less

Topics:

Insurgency (62%)62% related to the paper, Guerrilla warfare (57%)57% related to the paper, Politics (53%)53% related to the paper, Spanish Civil War (52%)52% related to the paper, Civil Conflict (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
5,994 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.2307/2082979
What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data
Nathaniel Beck1, Jonathan N. Katz2

Abstract:

We examine some issues in the estimation of time-series cross-section models, calling into question the conclusions of many published studies, particularly in the field of comparative political economy. We show that the generalized least squares approach of Parks produces standard errors that lead to extreme overconfidence, o... We examine some issues in the estimation of time-series cross-section models, calling into question the conclusions of many published studies, particularly in the field of comparative political economy. We show that the generalized least squares approach of Parks produces standard errors that lead to extreme overconfidence, often underestimating variability by 50% or more. We also provide an alternative estimator of the standard errors that is correct when the error structures show complications found in this type of model. Monte Carlo analysis shows that these “panel-corrected standard errors” perform well. The utility of our approach is demonstrated via a reanalysis of one “social democratic corporatist” model. read more read less

Topics:

Generalized least squares (54%)54% related to the paper, Standard error (52%)52% related to the paper, Estimator (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
5,670 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.2307/2586011
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Paul Pierson1

Abstract:

It is increasingly common for social scientists to describe political processes as “path dependent.” The concept, however, is often employed without careful elaboration. This article conceptualizes path dependence as a social process grounded in a dynamic of “increasing returns.” Reviewing recent literature in economics and s... It is increasingly common for social scientists to describe political processes as “path dependent.” The concept, however, is often employed without careful elaboration. This article conceptualizes path dependence as a social process grounded in a dynamic of “increasing returns.” Reviewing recent literature in economics and suggesting extensions to the world of politics, the article demonstrates that increasing returns processes are likely to be prevalent, and that good analytical foundations exist for exploring their causes and consequences. The investigation of increasing returns can provide a more rigorous framework for developing some of the key claims of recent scholarship in historical institutionalism: Specific patterns of timing and sequence matter; a wide range of social outcomes may be possible; large consequences may result from relatively small or contingent events; particular courses of action, once introduced, can be almost impossible to reverse; and consequently, political development is punctuated by critical moments or junctures that shape the basic contours of social life. read more read less

Topics:

Path dependence (55%)55% related to the paper, Historical institutionalism (53%)53% related to the paper, Returns to scale (52%)52% related to the paper, Rational choice institutionalism (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
5,652 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.2307/1952653
The American Voter
5,137 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for American Political Science Review.

It automatically formats your research paper to Cambridge University Press formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

American Political Science Review format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write American Political Science Review in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the American Political Science Review guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the American Political Science Review guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the American Political Science Review guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in American Political Science Review?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the American Political Science Review citation style.

4. Can I use the American Political Science Review templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for American Political Science Review.

5. Can I use a manuscript in American Political Science Review that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper American Political Science Review that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in American Political Science Review?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in American Political Science Review.

7. Where can I find the template for the American Political Science Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per American Political Science Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the American Political Science Review's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. American Political Science Review an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's American Political Science Review is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like American Political Science Review?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like American Political Science Review?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using American Political Science Review?

After writing your paper autoformatting in American Political Science Review, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is American Political Science Review's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for American Political Science Review?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for American Political Science Review. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In American Political Science Review?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for American Political Science Review are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the American Political Science Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per American Political Science Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download American Political Science Review in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in American Political Science Review Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to American Political Science Review formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template